Posts Tagged ‘religion’

“Unmasking Disappointment: Series XV”

September 7, 2026

*

“Geometric Allegory” digital painting 2023 by Ricardo Morin (American visual artist born in Venezuela–1954)

*

Scope and Use

This entry forms part of the constitutional corpus presented in the Appendix, which comprises the twenty-five constitutions of Venezuela and is arranged for consultation rather than continuous reading.  Comparison proceeds through permanent rubric codes whose identity remains constant throughout the corpus; an absent rubric denotes constitutional silence, while a retired rubric is never reassigned.  Citations begin with the article number and follow the CIDEP recension linked at the end of the entry.  The complete definition of the corpus, its method, and its citation convention appear in the Scope and Use note that introduces the nineteenth-century constitutions, beginning with “Unmasking Disillusion: Series XI”: https://observationsonthenatureofperception.com/2026/06/15/unmasking-disillusion-series-xi/

Recensional note:  The quotations and article numbers have been collated against the electronic transcriptions published by CIDEP.  Only manifest transcription errors whose retention would misrepresent the antecedent have been normalized, including “Estada de Los Andes” and “no venta” in Articles 1 and 30 of the 1881 text; “Estado Caraboba,” normalized as “Estado Carabobo,” in Article 1 of the 1891 text; and the reference to “paragraph 23” of Article 13, restored as “paragraph 20,” in Article 81 of the 1891 text.  None of these normalizations alters the constitutional substance.  The marker cont. denotes substantive continuity notwithstanding orthographic, punctuation, or inflectional variation; cf. is reserved for changes that modify, remove, add, or redistribute constitutional content; and new identifies a provision without an antecedent in the immediately preceding Constitution.  At each point marked cf., the language producing the distinction is preserved according to the respective constitutional text.

Translation convention

Institutional names and constitutional terms are retained in italicized Castilian and followed by their contemporary English equivalents in brackets.  Constitutional quotations, including the Preámbulo [Preamble] and every antecedent introduced by cf., are rendered in contemporary Latinate English.  Comparative citations introduced by cf. are italicized as complete units.

Ricardo F. Morín

September 7, 2026

Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania


9). La Constitución de 1891

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891], formally the Constitución de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Constitution of the United States of Venezuela], was adopted by the Congreso de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Congress of the United States of Venezuela] at Caracas on 9 April 1891 and promulgated by Presidente [President] Raimundo Andueza Palacio on 16 April 1891.

DOC-PRE—Preámbulo [Preamble]:

“The Congress of the United States of Venezuela, having considered and examined the petitions addressed by the nine States of the Venezuelan Federation through their respective Legislatures, requesting the reform of Article 118 of the Constitution of 1881; and considering: That not only does the majority required for that reform exist, but the vote of the autonomous Entities upon the matter is unanimous; and, That in this case reform is obligatory, and the National Legislature must undertake it in accordance with Articles 46 and 50 of the Compact of Union. Decrees:”

Although the Preámbulo [Preamble] identified Article 118 as the subject of the reform requested by the Estados [States], the enacted Constitución [Constitution] also altered the territorial organization established by Article 1 and extended the ordinary legislative session from sixty to seventy days in Article 30.

FND-TER—Territorio [Territory]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] provided that the Estados [States] declared independent and united by the Constitución de 28 de marzo de 1864 [Constitution of 28 March 1864], and known on 27 April 1881 as Apure, Bolívar, Barquisimeto, Barcelona, Carabobo, Cojedes, Cumaná, Falcón, Guzmán Blanco, Guárico, Guayana, Guzmán, Maturín, Nueva Esparta, Portuguesa, Táchira, Trujillo, Yaracuy, Zamora, and Zulia, were constituted as nine major political entities (Art. 1; cf. 1881, Art. 1: “The States that the Constitution of 28 March 1864 declared independent and united to form the Venezuelan Federation, and which are now denominated Apure, Bolívar, Barquisimeto, Barcelona, Carabobo, Cojedes, Cumaná, Falcón, Guzmán Blanco, Guárico, Guayana, Guzmán, Maturín, Nueva Esparta, Portuguesa, Táchira, Trujillo, Yaracuy, Zamora, and Zulia, are constituted as nine major political entities, namely:”).

Those nine political entities were Estado Bermúdez [State of Bermúdez], composed of Barcelona, Cumaná, and Maturín; Estado Miranda [State of Miranda], composed of Bolívar, Guzmán Blanco, Guárico, and Nueva Esparta; Estado Carabobo [State of Carabobo], composed of Carabobo and Nirgua; Estado Zamora [State of Zamora], composed of Cojedes, Portuguesa, and Zamora; Estado Lara [State of Lara], composed of Barquisimeto and Yaracuy, except the Departamento Nirgua [Department of Nirgua]; Estado de Los Andes [State of the Andes], composed of Guzmán, Trujillo, and Táchira; Estado Bolívar [State of Bolívar], composed of Guayana and Apure; Estado Zulia [State of Zulia]; and Estado Falcón [State of Falcón] (Art. 1; cf. 1881, Art. 1: “State of Oriente, composed of Barcelona, Cumaná, and Maturín; State of Guzmán Blanco, composed of Bolívar, Guzmán Blanco, Guárico, and Nueva Esparta; State of Carabobo, composed of Carabobo and Nirgua; South-Western State, composed of Cojedes, Portuguesa, and Zamora; North-Western State, composed of Barquisimeto and Yaracuy, except the Department of Nirgua; State of the Andes, composed of Guzmán, Trujillo, and Táchira; State of Bolívar, composed of Guayana and Apure; State of Zulia, by itself; and State of Falcón, also by itself.”).

Those entities were constituted in order to continue forming a single free, sovereign, and independent Nación [Nation] under the name Estados Unidos de Venezuela [United States of Venezuela] (Art. 1; cont. 1881, Art. 1).

The limits of the major Estados [States] remained those assigned to the former provinces by the Ley de 28 de abril de 1856 [Law of 28 April 1856], which had established the last territorial division, until that division should be reformed (Art. 2; cont. 1881, Art. 2).

The exterior limits of the Estados Unidos de la Federación Venezolana [United States of the Venezuelan Federation] remained those corresponding in 1810 to the former Capitanía General de Venezuela [Captaincy General of Venezuela] (Art. 3; cont. 1881, Art. 3).

The Estados [States] grouped into major political entities were denominated Secciones [Sections]. The Secciones [Sections] were equal among themselves; the constitutions governing their internal organization had to accord with the federal principles established by the Constitución [Constitution]; and undelegated soberanía [sovereignty] resided in the Estado [State], subject only to the limitations arising from the compact of association (Art. 4; cont. 1881, Art. 4).

POW-LEG—Congreso [Congress]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] vested the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] in two Cámaras [Chambers], one of Senadores [Senators] and the other of Diputados [Deputies] (Art. 18; cont. 1881, Art. 18). The Estados [States] determined the manner of electing the Diputados [Deputies] (Art. 19; cont. 1881, Art. 19). Each Estado [State] elected one Diputado [Deputy] for every thirty-five thousand inhabitants and another for any remainder of at least fifteen thousand, together with an equal number of suplentes [substitutes] (Art. 20; cont. 1881, Art. 20). The Diputados [Deputies] served four-year terms and were renewed in their entirety (Art. 21; cont. 1881, Art. 21). The Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] examined the annual account presented by the Presidente [President], could adopt a vote of censure against the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State], and heard charges against the officer exercising the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive], the Ministros [Ministers], other national officers, and senior public officers of the Estados [States] in the cases prescribed by the Constitución [Constitution] (Arts. 22–24; cont. 1881, Arts. 22–24).

Each Legislatura estatal [State Legislature] elected three principal Senadores [Senators] and an equal number of suplentes [substitutes]. The Senadores [Senators] had to be Venezuelan by birth and at least thirty years of age, served four-year terms, and were renewed in their entirety (Arts. 25–27; cont. 1881, Arts. 25–27). The Senado [Senate] tried and determined the proceedings initiated in the Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] and remained assembled for that purpose when a proceeding had not concluded during the legislative session (Arts. 28–29; cont. 1881, Arts. 28–29).

The Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] assembled annually in the capital on 20 February, or on the earliest possible day thereafter, without prior convocation. Its sessions lasted seventy days and could be extended to ninety by decision of the majority (Art. 30; cf. 1881, Art. 30: “The National Legislature shall assemble each year in the capital of the United States on 20 February, or on the earliest possible day thereafter, without need of prior convocation. Sessions shall last sixty days and may be extended to ninety at the judgment of the majority.”). The Cámaras [Chambers] opened their sessions with at least two thirds of their members; after opening, they could continue with two thirds of those who had installed them, provided that number did not fall below half of all appointed members (Arts. 31–32; cont. 1881, Arts. 31–32). The Cámaras [Chambers] acted separately but assembled as Congreso [Congress] when the Constitución [Constitution] or the laws so required, or when either Cámara [Chamber] considered a joint session necessary; sessions were public or secret as each Cámara [Chamber] resolved (Arts. 33–34; cont. 1881, Arts. 33–34).

Each Cámara [Chamber] adopted its rules, corrected infractions, maintained order in the house of its sessions, disciplined spectators, removed impediments to the free exercise of its functions, executed its exclusive resolutions, determined the qualifications of its members, and heard their resignations (Art. 35; cont. 1881, Art. 35). Neither Cámara [Chamber] could suspend its sessions or change its place of meeting without the consent of the other; upon disagreement, the Cámaras [Chambers] assembled jointly and the decision of the majority prevailed (Art. 36; cont. 1881, Art. 36). The exercise of any public function was incompatible during the sessions with the office of Senador [Senator] or Diputado [Deputy]; the law fixed their indemnities, and an increase could not take effect before the period following the complete renewal of the Cámaras [Chambers] that enacted it (Art. 37; cont. 1881, Art. 37). Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] enjoyed immunity from 20 January until thirty days after the sessions ended, consisting in the suspension of all civil or criminal proceedings, although a criminal investigation concerning an act punishable by corporal penalty could continue through the summary stage (Art. 38; cont. 1881, Art. 38). The Congreso [Congress] was presided over by the Presidente del Senado [President of the Senate], while the Presidente de la Cámara de Diputados [President of the Chamber of Deputies] served as Vicepresidente [Vice-President] (Art. 39; cont. 1881, Art. 39). miembros de las Cámaras [members of the Chambers] incurred no responsibility for opinions or speeches delivered therein (Art. 40; cont. 1881, Art. 40). A Senador [Senator] or Diputado [Deputy] who accepted an office or commission from the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] thereby vacated his legislative seat (Art. 41; cont. 1881, Art. 41). Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] could neither contract with the Gobierno Nacional [National Government] nor prosecute the claims of others before it (Art. 42; cont. 1881, Art. 42).

The Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] exercised authority over disputes among Estados [States], the Distrito Federal [Federal District], customs, seaports and maritime coasts, national postal services, national codes, currency, national symbols, national offices, the national debt, public borrowing, the census and national statistics, the armed force, war and peace, treaties, public-works contracts, budgets, national prosperity and the advancement of the sciences and arts, weights and measures, amnesties, the Territorios [Territories], the procedure and penalties governing trials before the Senado [Senate], the population basis for the Diputados [Deputies], admission of foreigners to public service, military retirement and montepíos [survivors’ pensions], the responsibility of national and Estado [State] officers, military ranks and promotions, and election of the Consejo Federal [Federal Council] (Art. 43; cont. 1881, Art. 43). It could also enact the necessary general laws, while no law in conflict with the Constitución [Constitution] could be promulgated or executed (Art. 44; cont. 1881, Art. 44).

Bills and decrees could be introduced by members of either Cámara [Chamber], were subject to admission and three debates separated by at least one day, passed from one Cámara [Chamber] to the other, and followed the procedures governing amendments, insistence, rejection, pending bills, repeal, publication, nondelegation, and retroactivity (Arts. 45–60; cont. 1881, Arts. 45–60).

ECO-HAC—Hacienda [Public Finance]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] empowered the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] to organize all matters concerning the aduanas [customs houses], whose revenues formed the Tesoro de la Unión [Treasury of the Union] until replaced by other revenues; to determine all matters concerning the national debt; to borrow upon the credit of the Nación [Nation]; and to establish the annual budgets of public expenditure (Art. 43, nos. 3, 10, 11, and 18; cont. 1881, Art. 43, nos. 3, 10, 11, and 18). No expenditure could be made from the Tesoro Nacional [National Treasury] unless Congreso [Congress] had expressly appropriated a sum for it in the annual budget. Those who violated that rule were civilly liable to the Tesoro Nacional [National Treasury] for the sums paid, and ordinary expenses took precedence over extraordinary expenses in every disbursement of public funds (Art. 105; cont. 1881, Art. 105). Offices collecting national contributions and offices making payments had to remain separate, and the former could make no payments other than the salaries of their respective employees (Art. 106; cont. 1881, Art. 106). If no budget was enacted for a fiscal period, the budget for the immediately preceding period remained in force (Art. 107; cont. 1881, Art. 107). Exports from Venezuela were free of duty (Art. 101; cont. 1881, Art. 101).

POW-EXE—Ejecutivo [Executive]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] established a Consejo Federal [Federal Council] composed of one Senador [Senator] and one Diputado [Deputy] from each political entity, together with one additional Diputado [Deputy] for the Distrito Federal [Federal District], elected by Congreso [Congress] every two years from the respective representations of the Estados [States] and Distrito Federal [Federal District] (Art. 61 and §; cont. 1881, Art. 61 and §). The Consejo Federal [Federal Council] elected from among its members the Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] and the person who would replace him upon a temporary or absolute vacancy. An election of a person who was not a member of the Consejo [Council] was void and without effect (Art. 62; cont. 1881, Art. 62). The miembros del Consejo [members of the Council] and the Presidente [President] served two-year terms and could not be reelected for the immediately succeeding period, although they resumed their legislative seats upon completing their service (Art. 63; cont. 1881, Art. 63). The Consejo Federal [Federal Council] resided in the Distrito Federal [Federal District], exercised the functions assigned by the Constitución [Constitution], required an absolute majority of its members to act, adopted its internal rules, and annually appointed the member who would preside over its sessions (Art. 64; cont. 1881, Art. 64).

The Presidente [President] appointed and removed the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State]; presided over the Gabinete [Cabinet]; received diplomatic representatives; signed official letters addressed to foreign sovereigns and presidents; executed the laws and decrees of the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature]; promulgated resolutions and decrees approved by the Consejo Federal [Federal Council]; organized the Distrito Federal [Federal District]; issued navigation patents to national vessels; reported annually to Congreso [Congress] on the exercise of the powers conferred by Article 66; and performed the other functions assigned by national law (Art. 65; cont. 1881, Art. 65).

With the deliberative vote of the Consejo Federal [Federal Council], the Presidente [President] defended the Nación [Nation] against external attack; administered terrenos baldíos [public lands], mines, and saltworks by delegation from the Estados [States]; convened the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] in ordinary and extraordinary sessions; appointed diplomatic representatives and consuls; directed negotiations and concluded treaties subject to legislative approval; concluded contracts of national interest subject to legislative approval; appointed, removed, and suspended finance officers; declared war with prior authorization from Congreso [Congress]; exercised the powers conferred in the event of foreign war; employed the public force to restore constitutional order when an armed uprising threatened the institutions of the Nación [Nation]; employed the public force to end armed collision among Estados [States] and compel submission of their disputes to arbitration; directed the war and appointed the commander of the Ejército [Army]; organized the national force in time of peace; granted general or individual pardons; and defended the territory designated for the Distrito Federal [Federal District] when invasion was feared (Art. 66; cont. 1881, Art. 66).

The Presidente [President] was assisted in the conduct of business by the number of Ministros [Ministers] established by law, which determined their functions and duties and organized their departments (Art. 67; cont. 1881, Art. 67). A Ministro [Minister] had to be at least twenty-five years of age and either Venezuelan by birth or a national of five years’ standing (Art. 68; cont. 1881, Art. 68). The Ministros [Ministers] were the necessary organs of the Presidente [President], and every presidential act required their countersignature before it could be executed by authorities, officers, or private persons (Art. 69; cont. 1881, Art. 69). Ministros [Ministers] had to conform their acts to the Constitución [Constitution] and the laws; even a written presidential order did not absolve them of personal responsibility (Art. 70; cont. 1881, Art. 70). Matters other than the internal administration of the departments were determined by the Consejo de Ministros [Council of Ministers], whose responsibility was collective and joint (Art. 71; cont. 1881, Art. 71). Within the first five sessions of each year, the Ministros [Ministers] reported upon their departments, presented the annual budget and the general account for the preceding year, appeared before the Cámaras [Chambers] when summoned, and supplied the written or oral reports demanded of them, except for matters reserved in diplomatic negotiations (Arts. 72–74; cont. 1881, Arts. 72–74). Ministros [Ministers] were responsible for treason against the Nación [Nation], violation of the Constitución [Constitution] or laws, misappropriation of public funds, expenditures exceeding appropriations, bribery in matters within their office or in appointments, and failure to comply with decisions of the Consejo Federal [Federal Council] (Art. 75; cont. 1881, Art. 75).

The Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] was exercised by the Consejo Federal [Federal Council], the Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] or the person acting in his stead, together with the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State], who were its organs. The Presidente [President] had to be Venezuelan by birth (Art. 86 and §; cont. 1881, Art. 86). The functions of the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] could not be exercised outside the Distrito Federal [Federal District], except in the circumstance prescribed by Article 66, no. 10, attribution 5. When the Presidente [President], with the approval of the Consejo Federal [Federal Council], assumed command of the Ejército [Army] or left the Distrito [District] on business of public interest, he could exercise no other functions and was replaced by the Consejo Federal [Federal Council] pursuant to Article 62 (Art. 87; cont. 1881, Art. 87).

The Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] was directed to negotiate with the Gobiernos de América [Governments of the Americas] concerning compacts of alliance or confederation (Art. 116; cont. 1881, Art. 116).

POW-JUD—Poder Judicial [Judicial Power]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] established an Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] composed of one Vocal [Member] for each Estado de la Federación [State of the Federation]. Its Vocales [Members] had to be Venezuelan by birth and at least thirty years of age (Art. 76; cont. 1881, Art. 76). Congreso [Congress] elected one principal Vocal [Member] and one substitute for each Estado [State] from lists of candidates prepared by the respective Estado [State] delegations in Congreso [Congress] (Art. 77; cont. 1881, Art. 77). The law determined the functions of the Vocales [Members] and other officers of the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] (Art. 78; cont. 1881, Art. 78). Principal Vocales [Members] and their suplentes [substitutes] served four-year terms and, while in office, could not accept an appointment from the Ejecutivo [Executive] without first resigning and obtaining lawful acceptance of the resignation; violation entailed four years’ disqualification from public office in Venezuela (Art. 79; cont. 1881, Art. 79).

The Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] had jurisdiction over civil and criminal proceedings involving diplomatic officers in the cases permitted by the Derecho de Gentes [Law of Nations]; proceedings that the Presidente [President] ordered to be brought against his Ministros [Ministers]; proceedings concerning ministerial responsibility; proceedings against diplomatic agents accredited abroad; civil proceedings against the Nación [Nation] when the law so provided; jurisdictional disputes among officers of different Estados [States]; political matters voluntarily submitted by the Estados [States]; determination of the governing law when national laws conflicted with one another or with Estado [State] laws; disputes arising from contracts or negotiations concluded by the Presidente de la Federación [President of the Federation]; prize causes; and other matters assigned by law (Art. 80; cont. 1881, Art. 80).

The Constitución [Constitution] also established a Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] as a tribunal of the Estados [States], composed of one Vocal [Member] for each Estado [State], with four-year terms (Art. 81; cont. 1881, Art. 81). Vocales [Members] of the Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] had to be practicing attorneys with at least six years of professional practice, Venezuelan, and over thirty years of age (Art. 82; cont. 1881, Art. 82). Every four years, each Legislatura estatal [State Legislature] prepared a list of attorneys equal in number to the Estados de la Federación [States of the Federation], from which the Consejo Federal [Federal Council] elected the Vocal [Member] corresponding to each Estado [State] (Art. 83; cont. 1881, Art. 83). After those elections, the Consejo Federal [Federal Council] compiled and published a general list of the remaining attorneys, from which absolute vacancies were filled by lot; temporary vacancies were filled as prescribed by law (Art. 84; cont. 1881, Art. 84).

The Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] heard criminal and responsibility proceedings against senior officers of the Estados [States], applying the laws of the respective Estado [State] and, in the absence of a law of responsibility, the general legislation of the República [Republic]; determined the recurso de casación [appeal in cassation] in the manner prescribed by law; reported annually to the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] on impediments to uniform civil and criminal legislation; and resolved jurisdictional conflicts among judicial officers of different Estados [States] and, within a single Estado [State], when no authority existed to resolve them (Art. 85; cont. 1881, Art. 85).

The tribunals of justice of the Estados [States] were independent, and proceedings initiated before them terminated within the respective Estado [State], subject only to review by the Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] in the cases permitted by law (Art. 89; cont. 1881, Art. 89). The law could also create such other national tribunals as were necessary (Art. 111; cont. 1881, Art. 111).

POW-SUB—Gobierno subnacional [Subnational Government]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] constituted the former Estados [States] as nine larger political entities, styled the Estados [States] of Bermúdez, Miranda, Carabobo, Zamora, Lara, Los Andes, Bolívar, Zulia, and Falcón, which continued to form one nation under the denomination Estados Unidos de Venezuela [United States of Venezuela] (Art. 1; cf. 1881, Art. 1: “The States that the Constitution of 28 March 1864 declared independent and united to form the Venezuelan Federation … are constituted as nine great political entities, namely:”). The territorial division established by the Ley de 28 de abril de 1856 [Law of 28 April 1856] determined the boundaries of those entities until amended by law (Art. 2; cont. 1881, Art. 2). The entities formed by the aggregation of former Estados [States] were denominated Secciones [Sections], declared equal among themselves, required to enact constitutions consonant with the federal principles established by the Constitución [Constitution], and retained the soberanía [sovereignty] not delegated, subject only to the limitations arising from the compact of association (Art. 4; cont. 1881, Art. 4).

The Estados [States] composing the Federación Venezolana [Venezuelan Federation] reciprocally recognized their respective autonomías [autonomies], declared themselves equal as political entities, and retained in full the sovereignty not expressly delegated by the Constitución [Constitution] (Art. 12; cont. 1881, Art. 12). The Constitución [Constitution] enumerated the obligations of the Estados [States], including organization according to the principles of popular, elective, federal, representative, alternative, and responsible government; enactment of constitutions consonant with the federal compact; preservation of sectional independence and the integrity of the Federación [Federation]; abstention from foreign political or diplomatic relations; cession of territory required for the Distrito Federal [Federal District] and other national purposes; recognition of specified federal powers and administrations; compliance with, and enforcement of, the Constitución [Constitution], federal laws, and federal judicial acts; organization of their tribunals; establishment of direct and public suffrage; provision of primary education and instruction in arts and trades; contribution of the contingent to the national public force; neutrality in disputes among Estados [States]; submission of interstate controversies to Congreso [Congress] or the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court]; recognition of federal jurisdiction over specified proceedings against the executive authorities of the Estados [States]; participation in the distribution of specified revenues; and the other duties enumerated in Article 13 (Art. 13; cont. 1881, Art. 13).

All matters not expressly attributed to the Administración General de la Nación [General Administration of the Nation] fell within the competence of the Estados [States] (Art. 88; cont. 1881, Art. 88). The tribunals of justice of the Estados [States] were declared independent, and proceedings initiated within an Estado [State] terminated there, subject only to review by the Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] in the cases permitted by law (Art. 89; cont. 1881, Art. 89). Every act of Congreso [Congress] or the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] that violated the rights guaranteed to the Estados [States] or assailed their independence had to be declared void by the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] upon petition of a majority of the Legislaturas estatales [State Legislatures] (Art. 90; cont. 1881, Art. 90).

The Gobierno de la Federación [Government of the Federation] could maintain no resident officers exercising jurisdiction or authority within the Estados [States] other than the Estados [States]’ own officers. Officers of the Hacienda [Public Finance] and personnel assigned to forces garrisoning national fortresses, parks created by law, naval stations, and authorized ports were excepted; their jurisdiction was confined to their respective offices and precincts, without exempting them from the general laws of the Estado [State] in which they resided (Art. 97; cont. 1881, Art. 97).

The Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could station neither forces nor military commanders exercising command within an Estado [State] without the consent of its government (Art. 98; cont. 1881, Art. 98). Neither the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] nor the Ejecutivos de los Estados [Executives of the States] could intervene by armed force in the domestic contests of an Estado [State], although they could tender their good offices toward a peaceful settlement (Art. 99; cont. 1881, Art. 99).

CON-AMD—Reforma de la Constitución [Constitutional Amendment]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] authorized its amendment by the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] upon application by the Legislaturas estatales [State Legislatures], but only upon the points on which a majority of the Estados [States] concurred (Art. 118; cf. 1881, Art. 118: “This Constitution may be amended in whole or in part by the National Legislature if a majority of the Legislatures of the States should so request. The decision of the majority renders the amendment obligatory; but the amendment shall never extend beyond the points upon which the applications concur.”). It further provided that one or more points could be amended when two thirds of the members of the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature], acting separately and according to the procedure established for the enactment of laws, so resolved. An amendment adopted by that method had to be submitted to the Legislaturas de los Estados [State Legislatures] and was enacted only as to the point or points ratified by a majority of them (Art. 118; new).

CIV-SUF—Sufragio [Suffrage]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] made male Venezuelans over twenty-one years of age eligible for office, subject only to the exceptions established by the Constitución [Constitution] (Art. 7; cont. 1881, Art. 7). It guaranteed freedom of suffrage in popular elections, restricted only by minority under eighteen years of age (Art. 14, no. 11; cont. 1881, Art. 14, no. 11). It required the Estados [States] to establish direct and public suffrage in popular elections, render it obligatory, and secure it through the electoral census. Each vote had to be cast in full and public session of the respective electoral board, entered in the register prescribed by law, and signed by the elector or, if impeded or unable to write, by another at his request; without that formality, the vote was not deemed cast (Art. 13, no. 22; cont. 1881, Art. 13, no. 22).

The Diputados [Deputies] were elected by popular vote in the proportion established by the Constitución [Constitution], with an equal number of suplentes [substitutes] (Art. 20; cont. 1881, Art. 20). Each Legislatura estatal [State Legislature] elected three principal Senadores [Senators] and an equal number of suplentes [substitutes] (Art. 25; cont. 1881, Art. 25). The Consejo Federal [Federal Council] elected from among its members the Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] and the person who would replace him upon temporary or absolute vacancy (Art. 62; cont. 1881, Art. 62). During periods of popular elections, the fuerza pública nacional y la de los Estados [national and State public forces] remained strictly confined to barracks throughout the electoral period (Art. 108; cont. 1881, Art. 108).

CIV-CIT—Ciudadanía [Citizenship]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] recognized as Venezuelans all persons born within the territory of Venezuela, irrespective of their parents’ nationality; children of a Venezuelan mother or father born in another territory who established domicile in the country and manifested their will to become Venezuelan; foreigners who had obtained a carta de nacionalidad [letter of naturalization]; and persons born in any of the Repúblicas hispanoamericanas [Spanish-American Republics] or the Antillas españolas [Spanish Antilles] who established residence in the República [Republic] and manifested their will to become its citizens (Art. 5; cont. 1881, Art. 5). Venezuelans who established domicile and acquired nationality in a foreign country did not thereby lose their Venezuelan status (Art. 6; cont. 1881, Art. 6). Male Venezuelans over twenty-one years of age were eligible for public office, subject only to the exceptions established by the Constitución [Constitution] (Art. 7; cont. 1881, Art. 7). Venezuelans were bound to serve the Nación [Nation] according to law, sacrificing their property and lives if necessary for its defense (Art. 8; cont. 1881, Art. 8). In every Estado [State] of the Unión [Union], they enjoyed the rights and immunities inherent in their status as citizens of the Federación [Federation] and were subject there to the same duties as native-born and domiciled inhabitants (Art. 9; cont. 1881, Art. 9).

Foreigners enjoyed the same civil rights as Venezuelans and the same security of person and property as nationals. They could resort to diplomatic channels only in accordance with public treaties and in cases permitted by law (Art. 10; cont. 1881, Art. 10). The law determined the rights incident to condición de extranjero [alien status], according as foreigners were domiciled or transient (Art. 11; cont. 1881, Art. 11).

RTS-GAR—Derechos [Rights]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] guaranteed Venezuelans the inviolability of life, abolishing capital punishment irrespective of the law prescribing it; property, subject only to legislatively imposed contributions, judicial decision, and expropriation for public works after indemnification and adversarial proceedings; the inviolability and secrecy of correspondence and other private papers; the inviolability of the domestic home, except to prevent the commission of a crime in accordance with law; personal liberty, including abolition of forced recruitment, perpetual proscription of slavery, freedom for slaves who entered Venezuelan territory, and the principle that no person is bound to do what the law does not command or prevented from doing what it does not prohibit; freedom of thought expressed orally or through the press without prior censorship, subject to judicial actions for calumny, insult, or injury to a third party; freedom of transit, change of domicile, departure from and return to the República [Republic] with one’s property; freedom of industry, with protection for discoveries and productions; freedom of peaceful, unarmed assembly and association; the right of petition and of obtaining a determination; freedom of suffrage in popular elections, restricted only by minority under eighteen years of age; freedom of instruction, with an obligation upon the public power to establish primary education and instruction in arts and trades without charge; religious freedom; individual security, with the guarantees enumerated in Article 14, no. 14; and equality before the law, including the prohibition of titles of nobility and hereditary honors and the official forms of address ciudadano [citizen] and usted [you] (Art. 14; cont. 1881, Art. 14).

The enumeration of guarantees did not restrict the power of the Estados [States] to accord their inhabitants additional guarantees (Art. 15; cont. 1881, Art. 15). Estado [State] laws prescribed penalties for violations of those guarantees and established procedures for making them effective (Art. 16; cont. 1881, Art. 16). Persons who issued, signed, executed, or ordered the execution of decrees, orders, or resolutions violating any guarantee accorded to Venezuelans were declared culpable and punished according to law, and every ciudadano [citizen] was competent to accuse them (Art. 17; cont. 1881, Art. 17).

All usurped authority was without effect, and its acts were void. Any decision procured by the direct or indirect requisition of the armed force or by an assembly of the people in a subversive posture was likewise void by operation of law and without effect (Art. 102; cont. 1881, Art. 102).

The Derecho de Gentes [Law of Nations] formed part of national legislation and governed especially in cases of civil war. Civil war could be concluded by treaties among the belligerents, who were required to observe the humanitarian usages of Christian and civilized nations; the guarantee of life remained inviolable in every case (Art. 117; cont. 1881, Art. 117).

REG-MIL—La fuerza armada [Armed Force]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] empowered the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] annually to fix the size of the naval and land forces, enact the ordinances of the Ejército [Army], prescribe rules for forming and replacing those forces, enact laws governing military retirement and montepíos [survivors’ pensions], and determine the manner of conferring military ranks and promotions (Art. 43, nos. 13, 14, 26, and 28; cont. 1881, Art. 43, nos. 13, 14, 26, and 28).

With the deliberative vote of the Consejo Federal [Federal Council], the Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] organized the national force in time of peace, directed the war, appointed the commander of the Ejército [Army], declared war with prior authorization from Congreso [Congress], exercised the powers conferred in case of foreign war, employed the public force to restore constitutional order upon an armed uprising against the institutions of the Nación [Nation], employed the public force to terminate armed collision among Estados [States] and compel submission of their disputes to arbitration, and defended the territory designated for the Distrito Federal [Federal District] when invasion was feared (Art. 66, nos. 9–16; cont. 1881, Art. 66, nos. 9–16).

The national public force was divided into naval and land forces and consisted of the milicia ciudadana [citizen militia] organized by the Estados [States] pursuant to their laws (Art. 91; cont. 1881, Art. 91). The force placed at the charge of the Federación [Federation] consisted of a contingent, proportioned to population, supplied by each Estado [State] through the call to service of citizens required to render it under their internal laws (Art. 92; cont. 1881, Art. 92). In time of war, that contingent could be augmented by bodies of the milicia ciudadana [citizen militia] up to the number of men necessary to satisfy “the national requisition” (Art. 93; cf. 1881, Art. 93: “In case of war, the contingent may be augmented by bodies of the citizen militia up to the number of men necessary to satisfy the requisition of the National Government.”). The Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could replace the commanders of the public force supplied by the Estados [States] in the cases and with the formalities prescribed by national military law, whereupon it requested replacements from the respective Estados [States] (Art. 94; cont. 1881, Art. 94). Military and civil authority could never be exercised by the same person or corporation (Art. 95; cont. 1881, Art. 95).

All existing instruments of war belonged to the Gobierno Nacional [National Government], without prohibiting the Estados [States] from acquiring those required for their internal defense (Art. 97; cont. 1881, Art. 97).

The Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could station neither forces nor military commanders exercising command within an Estado [State] without the consent of its government (Art. 98; cont. 1881, Art. 98). Neither the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] nor the Ejecutivos de los Estados [Executives of the States] could intervene by armed force in the domestic contests of an Estado [State], although they could tender their good offices toward a peaceful settlement (Art. 99; cont. 1881, Art. 99). During periods of popular elections, the fuerza pública nacional y la de los Estados [national and State public forces] remained strictly confined to barracks throughout the electoral period (Art. 108; cont. 1881, Art. 108). The armed force could not deliberate; it was “passive and obedient,” and no armed body could make requisitions or demand aid except through the civil authorities and in the manner prescribed by law (Art. 113; cont. 1881, Art. 113).

In cases of civil war, the provisions of the Derecho de Gentes [Law of Nations] incorporated into national legislation governed; belligerents could conclude treaties to terminate the war, were required to observe humanitarian usages, and could not violate the guarantee of life (Art. 117; cont. 1881, Art. 117).

REG-REL—Religión [Religion]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] guaranteed religious freedom (Art. 14, no. 13; cont. 1881, Art. 14, no. 13). It further provided that, the Nación [Nation] being in possession of the derecho de patronato eclesiástico [right of ecclesiastical patronage], that right would be exercised as prescribed by the governing law (Art. 96; cont. 1881, Art. 96).

CON-FIN—Disposiciones finales [Final Provisions]:

The Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] entered into force on the date of its official promulgation in each Estado [State]. It further directed that, in all public acts and official documents, the date of the Federación [Federation] be reckoned from 20 February 1859 and that of the Ley [Law] from 28 March 1864 (Art. 119; cont. 1881, Art. 119). The constitutional period for offices within the Administración General de la República [General Administration of the Republic] continued to be reckoned from 20 February 1882, the date upon which the amended Constitución [Constitution] was put into operation (Art. 120; cf. 1881, Art. 122: “The new constitutional period shall begin to be reckoned, for offices within the General Administration of the Republic, on 20 February 1882, when the present period terminates.”). For all civil and political acts of the Estados de la Federación [States of the Federation], the population basis was that determined by the latest census approved by the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] (Art. 121; cf. 1881, Art. 123: “For all acts in the civil and political life of the States of the Federation, their population basis is that determined by the census approved on 6 June 1874, until amended.”). The Constitución de 27 de abril de 1881 [Constitution of 27 April 1881] was repealed (Art. 122; cf. 1881, Art. 124: “The Federal Constitution enacted in 1874 is repealed.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] was adopted at Caracas, in the Palacio del Cuerpo Legislativo Federal [Palace of the Federal Legislative Body], on 9 April 1891, signed by the members of Congreso [Congress] there recorded, and ordered executed and observed at the Palacio Federal [Federal Palace] in Caracas on 16 April 1891 by Presidente [President] Raimundo Andueza Palacio and his Ministros [Ministers].

Note: the original text of the Constitución de 1891 [Constitution of 1891] may be consulted through CIDEP (Recopilación de Leyes y Decretos de Venezuela [Compilation of the Laws and Decrees of Venezuela]): https://cidep.online/files/constituciones/1891.pdf


10). La Constitución de 1893

La Constitución de 1893 [The Constitution of 1893] (Constitución de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Constitution of the United States of Venezuela]) was adopted by the Asamblea Nacional Constituyente [National Constituent Assembly] at Caracas on 12 June 1893 and promulgated by Presidente [President] Joaquín Crespo on 21 June 1893.

DOC-PRE—Preámbulo [Preamble]:

“We, the representatives of the people of Venezuela, assembled as a Constituent Assembly pursuant to the convocation contained in the Executive Decree of 1 January of the present year, invoking the favor and inspiration of the Supreme Legislator of the Universe, decree the following: CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF VENEZUELA”

FND-TER—Territorio [Territory]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] declared that the Estados [States] of Los Andes, Bermúdez, Bolívar, Carabobo, Falcón, Lara, Miranda, Zamora, and Zulia continued united as the Nación [Nation] under the denomination Estados Unidos de Venezuela [United States of Venezuela] (Art. 1; cf. 1891, Art. 1: “The States that the Constitution of 28 March 1864 declared independent and united … are constituted as nine great political entities, namely: the State of Bermúdez … the State of Miranda … the State of Carabobo … the State of Zamora … the State of Lara … the State of Los Andes … the State of Bolívar … the State of Zulia, by itself, and the State of Falcón, likewise by itself.”).

The boundaries of those Estados [States] were to be determined by those assigned to the former provinces by the Ley de 28 de abril de 1856 [Law of 28 April 1856], except that the former Departamento Nirgua [Department of Nirgua] formed part of the Estado Carabobo [State of Carabobo] (Art. 2; cf. 1891, Art. 2: “The boundaries of these great States are determined by those assigned to the former provinces by the Law of 28 April 1856, which fixed the last territorial division, until that division is amended.”).

The territory of the Estados Unidos de Venezuela [United States of Venezuela] was the same as that belonging in 1810 to the Capitanía General de Venezuela [Captaincy General of Venezuela] (Art. 3; cont. 1891, Art. 3).

Two or more Estados [States] could unite to form a single Estado [State] if their respective Asambleas Legislativas [Legislative Assemblies] so resolved. The former Estados [States] that the Constitución de 28 de marzo de 1864 [Constitution of 28 March 1864] had declared independent and that the Constitución de 27 de abril de 1881 [Constitution of 27 April 1881] had converted into Secciones [Sections] could recover the status of Estados [States] if two thirds of their Distritos [Districts], acting through their representatives in the Asamblea Legislativa [Legislative Assembly], so petitioned and their population exceeded one hundred thousand inhabitants. In the absence of that population, they could petition to separate from one Estado [State] and be annexed to another, provided that the Estado [State] from which they separated retained the requisite base of one hundred thousand inhabitants. In either case, notice was given to Congreso [Congress], the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive], and the other Estados [States] of the Federación [Federation], and the law regulated the procedure (Art. 4; new).

POW-LEG—Congreso [Congress]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] vested the legislative authority of the Nación [Nation] in the Congreso de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Congress of the United States of Venezuela], composed of a Cámara del Senado [Chamber of the Senate] and a Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] (Arts. 18–19; cf. 1891, Art. 18: “The National Legislature shall be composed of two Chambers, one of Senators and the other of Deputies.”; cf. 1891, Art. 19: “The States shall determine the manner of conducting the election of Deputies.”).

Each Estado [State] elected one Diputado [Deputy] for every thirty-five thousand inhabitants and one additional Diputado [Deputy] for every excess of not less than fifteen thousand, with an equal number of suplentes [substitutes]; the Distrito Federal [Federal District] likewise elected its Diputados [Deputies] under the same rules (Arts. 20 and 23; cf. 1891, Art. 20: “To constitute the Chamber of Deputies, each State shall appoint by popular election, in conformity with paragraph 22 of Article 13 of this Constitution, one Deputy for every thirty-five thousand inhabitants and one additional Deputy for an excess of not less than fifteen thousand.”).

Diputados [Deputies] had to be Venezuelan by birth; their election was popular and conducted under paragraph 24 of Article 13; they served four-year terms, were renewed in their entirety, and their vacancies were filled according to law for the remainder of the term (Arts. 21–24 and sole paragraph to Art. 24; cf. 1891, Art. 21: “The Deputies shall serve four years in their offices and shall be renewed in their entirety.”).

The Asamblea Legislativa [Legislative Assembly] of each Estado [State] elected three principal Senadores [Senators] and three suplentes [substitutes]; Senadores [Senators] had to be Venezuelan by birth and at least thirty years of age, served four-year terms, and were renewed in their entirety (Arts. 26–29; cf. 1891, Art. 25: “To constitute this Chamber, each State, through its respective Legislature, shall elect three principal Senators and, to fill vacancies that may occur, an equal number of substitutes.”; cf. 1891, Art. 26: “To be a Senator, a person must: 1. Be Venezuelan by birth; and 2. Be thirty years of age.”; cf. 1891, Art. 27: “The Senators shall serve four years in their offices and shall be renewed in their entirety.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] prescribed the annual meeting of the Cámaras Legislativas [Legislative Chambers] in the capital of the Unión [Union] on 20 February, or on the nearest possible day, without prior convocation; sessions of seventy days, extendable to ninety; quorum requirements; public and secret sessions; the internal powers of each Cámara [Chamber]; the rule that neither Cámara [Chamber] could suspend its sessions or change its place of meeting without the consent of the other; incompatibility between legislative office and other public functions during the sessions; legislative indemnities; immunity; the presidency of Congreso [Congress]; nonliability for opinions or speeches; and the prohibition against Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] contracting with the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] or prosecuting the claims of others before it (Arts. 30–43; cf. 1891, Art. 30: “The National Legislature shall meet each year in the capital of the United States on 20 February, or on the nearest possible day, without need of prior convocation.”; cf. 1891, Art. 34: “The sessions shall be public, and secret when the Chamber so resolves.”; cf. 1891, Art. 38: “Senators and Deputies, from 20 January of each year until thirty days after the termination of the sessions, shall enjoy immunity.”; cf. 1891, Art. 40: “The members of the Chambers are not responsible for the opinions they express or the speeches they deliver therein.”; cf. 1891, Art. 42: “Nor may Senators and Deputies contract with the National Government or prosecute the claims of others before it.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] enumerated the powers of Congreso [Congress] over national taxes, aduanas [customs houses], ports, postal and telegraph offices, national codes, currency, national symbols, national offices, the national debt, public borrowing, statistics and the census, the armed force, war, treaties, contracts of national interest, the budget, amnesties, the Territorios [Territories], elections, official responsibility, military retirement and montepíos [survivors’ pensions], military ranks and promotions, and laws of a general character (Arts. 44–46; cf. 1891, Art. 43: “The National Legislature has the following powers:”; cf. 1891, Art. 44: “In addition to the preceding enumeration, the National Legislature may enact such laws of a general character as may be necessary …”).

The Constitución [Constitution] prescribed the introduction, debate, amendment, approval, promulgation, repeal, and publication of laws; required that a law amending another be drafted in full; provided that bills rejected during the sessions of one year could not be introduced anew except during those of another; declared the power of Congreso [Congress] to enact law nondelegable; and provided that no legislative provision would have retroactive effect, except in matters of judicial procedure and when imposing a lesser penalty (Arts. 47–59; cf. 1891, Art. 45: “The laws and decrees of the National Legislature may be introduced by members of either Chamber …”; cf. 1891, Art. 46: “… it shall receive three debates, with an interval of at least one day between each …”; cf. 1891, Art. 50: “A law amending another shall be drafted in full, and the prior law shall be repealed in all its parts.”; cf. 1891, Art. 52: “Bills rejected in one Legislature may not be introduced anew except in another.”; cf. 1891, Art. 58: “Laws shall not be in force until published with the prescribed solemnity.”; cf. 1891, Art. 59: “The power conferred to enact law is not delegable.”; cf. 1891, Art. 60: “No legislative provision shall have retroactive effect, except in matters of judicial procedure and when imposing a lesser penalty.”).

ECO-HAC—Hacienda [Public Finance]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] empowered the Congreso de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Congress of the United States of Venezuela] to decree national taxes and organize all matters concerning the aduanas [customs houses], determine all matters concerning the national debt and its interest, authorize borrowing upon the credit of the Nación [Nation], and frame the general budget of public revenues and expenditures, which in no case could fail to receive an annual vote (Art. 44, nos. 2, 9, 10, and 17; cf. 1891, Art. 43, nos. 3, 10, 11, and 18: “To organize all matters concerning the Customs Houses, whose revenues shall constitute the treasury of the Union until replaced by other revenues”; “To determine all matters concerning the National Debt”; “To borrow upon the credit of the Nation”; “To frame annually the budgets of public expenditure.”).

The Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] was charged with administering terrenos baldíos [public lands], mines, and saltworks pursuant to law; negotiating the loans authorized by Congreso [Congress] in strict conformity with its provisions; and supervising and safeguarding the collection of national revenues (Art. 76, nos. 5, 15, and 16; cf. 1891, Art. 66, nos. 2, 10, and 7: “To administer the public lands, mines, and saltworks of the States by their delegation”; “To exact contributions in advance and negotiate the loans authorized by the National Legislature”; “To appoint officers of the Public Finance whose appointment is not attributed to another authority.”).

The Consejo de Gobierno [Council of Government] was required to supervise the lawful administration and application of national revenues, submitting annually to Congreso [Congress] such reports and observations as were warranted; to ensure the proper delivery of the sums assigned to the Estados [States] under Article 13, no. 32; and to ensure the detailed fortnightly publication of the movements of the Treasury (Art. 85, no. 4; new).

Within the first ten days of the second month of the Cámaras [Chambers]’ sessions, the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State] were required to present the general budget of revenues and expenditures and the general account for the preceding year (Art. 97; cf. 1891, Art. 73: “Within the same period, they shall present to the National Legislature the budget of public expenditures and the general account for the preceding year.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] declared exports from Venezuela free and prohibited every duty upon them; prohibited any expenditure from the Tesoro Nacional [National Treasury] for which Congreso [Congress] had not expressly appropriated a sum in the general budget of public expenditures; rendered violators civilly liable to the Tesoro Nacional [National Treasury] for the sums paid; required ordinary expenses to take precedence over extraordinary expenses; and required offices collecting national contributions and offices making payments to remain separate, the former making no payment other than the salaries of their respective employees (Arts. 136, 138, and 139; cf. 1891, Art. 101: “Exports from Venezuela are free, and no duty burdening them may be imposed.”; cf. 1891, Art. 105: “No expenditure shall be made from the National Treasury for which Congress has not expressly appropriated a sum in the annual budget …”; cf. 1891, Art. 106: “Offices collecting national contributions and offices making payments shall always remain separate …”).

POW-EXE—Ejecutivo [Executive]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] assigned the Administración general de la Nación [General Administration of the Nation], insofar as it was not conferred upon another authority, to the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive], exercised by the Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] in union with the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State] and the Consejo de Gobierno [Council of Government] in the powers conferred upon it by the Constitución [Constitution] (Art. 60; cf. 1891, Art. 86: “The National Executive is exercised by the Federal Council, the President of the United States of Venezuela or the person acting in his stead, in union with the Ministers of State, who are its organs.”). funciones ejecutivas [executive functions] could not be exercised outside the Distrito Federal [Federal District], except in the constitutional circumstance of the temporary transfer of the Poder General [General Power]; when the Presidente [President] assumed command of the Ejército [Army] or left the Distrito Federal [Federal District] in exercise of the constitutional power, he was replaced by the presiding member of the Consejo de Gobierno [Council of Government] (Arts. 61–62; cf. 1891, Art. 87: “The functions of the National Executive may not be exercised outside the Federal District, except in the case provided in number 5, attribution 10, Article 66 of the Constitution. When the President, with the approval of the Council, assumes command of the Army or leaves the District because matters of public interest so require, he may exercise no other functions and shall be replaced by the Federal Council pursuant to Article 62 of this Constitution.”).

The Presidente [President] was elected by the citizens of the Estados [States] and the Distrito Federal [Federal District] through direct and secret voting; he had to be Venezuelan by birth and at least thirty years of age (Art. 63; cf. 1891, Art. 62: “The Federal Council elects from among its members the President of the United States of Venezuela and, in the same manner, the person who shall replace him upon temporary or absolute vacancies occurring during his term.”; cf. 1891, paragraph to Art. 86: “To be President of the United States of Venezuela, a person must be Venezuelan by birth.”). The Cámaras [Chambers] assembled as Congreso [Congress] conducted the scrutiny; the Constitución [Constitution] regulated missing returns, the absence of an absolute majority, the failure of Congreso [Congress] to organize, and the subsidiary intervention of the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] (Arts. 64–69; new).

Temporary or absolute vacancies in the Presidencia [Presidency] were filled by the presiding member of the Consejo de Gobierno [Council of Government]; if an absolute vacancy occurred during the first two years of the term, elections were to be called to complete the remainder. The presidential term ran for four years from 20 February; the Presidente [President] was ineligible for the immediately succeeding term, a restriction also applicable to any person who had exercised the Presidencia [Presidency] during the last year of the prior term and to relatives specified by the Constitución [Constitution]. His salary could not be altered during the term, and the Presidente [President] was answerable for treason against the Nación [Nation], violation of the Constitución [Constitution] or laws, and common crimes (Arts. 70–75; cf. 1891, Arts. 62–63: “The members of the Federal Council serve two years, as does the President of the United States of Venezuela.”).

The Presidente [President] directly exercised the powers enumerated in Article 76; with the consultative vote of the Consejo de Gobierno [Council of Government], those in Article 77; and, after a deliberative vote of that Consejo [Council], those in Article 78. They included execution of the laws and decrees of Congreso [Congress]; appointment and removal of Ministros [Ministers] and officers; administration of the Distrito Federal [Federal District], terrenos baldíos [public lands], mines, and saltworks; negotiation of loans; supervision of revenues; executive regulation of the laws; external defense; extraordinary convocation of Congreso [Congress]; diplomatic relations; war; organization and direction of the national force; pardons; restoration of constitutional order; termination of armed collisions among Estados [States]; contracts of national interest; and exclusion of foreigners prejudicial to public order (Arts. 76–78; cf. 1891, Arts. 65–66: “The following are powers of the President of the United States of Venezuela:”; “Apart from the preceding powers, which belong exclusively to the President of the United States of Venezuela, he shall exercise the following with the deliberative vote of the Federal Council:”).

The Consejo de Gobierno [Council of Government] consisted of nine principal Vocales [Members] and their suplentes [substitutes], elected by Congreso [Congress] for the same four-year term as the Presidencia [Presidency]. Its members had to possess the qualifications required of the Presidente [President]; the Consejo [Council] elected its own officers, deliberated with the attendance of at least two thirds of its members, and exercised the consultative, deliberative, administrative, and fiscal functions established by the Constitución [Constitution]. The Consejeros [Councillors] were answerable for treason against the Nación [Nation], bribery, violation of the Constitución [Constitution] or laws, and common crimes (Arts. 79–89; cf. 1891, Arts. 61–64: “There shall be a Federal Council composed of one Senator and one Deputy from each of the political entities, and one additional Deputy for the Federal District.”).

The Presidente [President] had for the conduct of business the Ministros [Ministers] prescribed by law. Ministros [Ministers] had to be at least twenty-five years of age and Venezuelan by birth; they constituted the Consejo de Ministros [Council of Ministers] for matters within its competence and were the legal, sole, and necessary organs of the Presidente [President], whose acts were without effect absent the corresponding ministerial countersignature. They were required to conform their acts to the Constitución [Constitution] and laws, render accounts and reports to the Cámaras [Chambers], present the budget and general account, and answer in the cases enumerated by the Constitución [Constitution] (Arts. 90–99; cf. 1891, Arts. 67–75: “The President of the United States of Venezuela shall have for the conduct of business the Ministers prescribed by law.”).

POW-JUD—Poder Judicial [Judicial Power]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] vested the Poder Judicial de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Judicial Power of the United States of Venezuela] in the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court], the Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation], and the other Tribunales y Juzgados [Tribunals and Courts] established by law. Judicial officers were answerable in the cases determined by law and for treason against the Nación [Nation], bribery, violation of the Constitución [Constitution] or laws, and common crimes (Arts. 100–101; cf. 1891, Arts. 76–85 and 111: “The law shall create and designate such other national tribunals as may be necessary.”).

The Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] consisted of nine Vocales [Members], each with a substitute. A Vocal [Member] had to be Venezuelan by birth and at least thirty years of age. Each Asamblea Legislativa [Legislative Assembly] transmitted to Congreso [Congress] a nonaria [list of nine nominees] selected from outside its membership, from which Congreso [Congress] elected the corresponding principal Vocal [Member] and substitute; the Constitución [Constitution] regulated replacements, increases or decreases in the number of Estados [States], election every six years, and incompatibility with offices filled by executive appointment (Arts. 102–109; cf. 1891, Arts. 76–79: “The High Federal Court shall be composed of as many Members as there are States of the Federation.”).

The Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] heard accusations and proceedings against the person charged with the Presidencia [Presidency], the Consejeros [Councillors], the Ministros [Ministers], and members of both Cortes [Courts]; proceedings involving diplomatic officers and agents; civil proceedings against the Nación [Nation]; political or jurisdictional controversies among officers of different Estados [States]; conflicts of laws; the nullity of national or district acts emanating from usurped authority or from decisions obtained by force; prize causes; controversies arising from contracts concluded by the Presidente [President]; and the presidential scrutiny in the prescribed circumstances (Art. 110; cf. 1891, Art. 80: “The following matters fall within the competence of the High Federal Court:”).

The Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] was a tribunal of the Estados [States] and consisted of nine Vocales [Members] serving six-year terms. Its Vocales [Members] had to be attorneys of the República [Republic] with six years of practice, Venezuelan by birth, and over thirty years of age; each Asamblea Legislativa [Legislative Assembly] elected one principal, one substitute, and a senaria [list of six nominees] for replacements. The Corte [Court] heard proceedings against senior Estado [State] officers, the nullity of Estado [State] acts emanating from usurped authority or from decisions obtained by force, the recurso de casación [appeal in cassation], and jurisdictional disputes, and reported to Congreso [Congress] on impediments to legislative uniformity (Arts. 111–115; cf. 1891, Arts. 81–85: “The Court of Cassation referred to in paragraph 20, Article 13, of this Constitution is a Tribunal of the States; it shall be composed of as many Members as there are States of the Federation, and they shall serve four years.”).

POW-SUB—Gobierno subnacional [Subnational Government]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] declared the Estados [States] composing the Unión Venezolana [Venezuelan Union] autonomous and equal as political entities (Art. 13; cf. 1891, Art. 12: “The States composing the Venezuelan Federation reciprocally recognize their respective autonomies, declare themselves equal as political entities, and retain in full the sovereignty not expressly delegated by this Constitution.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to organize according to the principles of popular, elective, federal, representative, alternative, and responsible government (Art. 13, no. 1; cont. 1891, Art. 13, no. 1).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to recognize in their respective constitutions the autonomía [autonomy] of the Municipio [Municipality] and its independence from the political power of the Estado [State] in all matters concerning its economic and administrative order (Art. 13, no. 2; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 2: “To establish the fundamental rules of their internal order and government in complete conformity with the principles of this Constitution.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to defend themselves against all violence injuring their independence or the integrity of the Nación [Nation] (Art. 13, no. 3; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 3: “To defend themselves against all violence injuring sectional independence or the integrity of the Venezuelan Federation.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] neither to alienate any part of their territory to a foreign Power, nor implore its protection, nor establish or cultivate political relations with other nations (Art. 13, no. 4; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 4: “Neither to alienate any part of their territory to a foreign Power, nor implore its protection, nor establish or cultivate political or diplomatic relations with other nations, the latter being reserved to the Federal Power.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] neither to incorporate or ally themselves with another nation nor separate from Venezuela in diminution of its nationality or territory (Art. 13, no. 5; cont. 1891, Art. 13, no. 5).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to cede to the Nación [Nation], for the Distrito Federal [Federal District], unpopulated land not exceeding one hundred square kilometers upon which the capital city of the Unión [Union] would be built; in the interim, the Distrito Federal [Federal District] comprised the city of Caracas and its outlying parishes of El Recreo, El Valle, La Vega, Antímano, Macarao, and Macuto (Art. 13, no. 6; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 6: “To cede to the Nation the land required for the Federal District.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to cede to the Gobierno de la Nación [Government of the Nation] the territory necessary to erect forts, warehouses, shipyards, and other buildings indispensable to the Administración General [General Administration] (Art. 13, no. 7; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 7: “To cede to the Government of the Federation the territory necessary to erect forts, warehouses, shipyards, penitentiaries, and other buildings indispensable to the General Administration.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to leave to the Gobierno de la Unión [Government of the Union] the unrestricted administration of the Territorios [Territories] of Colón and Amazonas, and provided that the Territorios [Territories] of Delta and Goagira would be reincorporated into the Estados [States] to which they had belonged before their erection as Territorios [Territories] (Art. 13, no. 8; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 8: “To leave to the Government of the Federation the administration of the territories of ‘Amazonas’ and ‘Goagira’ and of the islands belonging to the Nation until it becomes expedient to elevate them to another status.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to reserve to the Poder General [General Power] all legislative and executive jurisdiction concerning maritime, coastal, and river navigation and national roads (Art. 13, no. 9; cont. 1891, Art. 13, no. 9).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] not to restrict by taxation the navigation of rivers and other navigable waters that had not required artificial canalization (Art. 13, no. 10; new).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] not to subject to contributions, before being offered for consumption, products or articles burdened by national taxes or exempted from taxation by law (Art. 13, no. 11; cont. 1891, Art. 13, no. 10).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] not to impose contributions upon livestock, goods, or merchandise of any kind in transit to another Estado [State] (Art. 13, no. 12; cont. 1891, Art. 13, no. 11).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] neither to prohibit consumption of the livestock, articles, and other products of other Estados [States] nor burden their consumption with taxes greater or lesser than those paid by their local equivalents (Art. 13, no. 13; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 12: “Neither to prohibit consumption of the products of other States nor burden foreign production with general or municipal taxes greater than those paid by locally produced goods.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] not to establish Aduanas [Customs Houses] for the collection of import duties, since only national Aduanas [Customs Houses] would exist (Art. 13, no. 14; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 13: “Not to establish maritime or inland Customs Houses for the collection of taxes, since there shall be only national Customs Houses.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to reserve to each Estado [State] the right to dispose of its natural products (Art. 13, no. 15; cont. 1891, Art. 13, no. 14).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to cede to the Gobierno de la Unión [Government of the Union] the administration of mines, saltworks, and terrenos baldíos [public lands] for the purposes expressed in the article (Art. 13, no. 16; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 15: “To cede to the Government of the Federation the administration of mines, public lands, and saltworks, so that the former may be governed by a uniform system of exploitation and the latter applied for the benefit of the peoples.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to respect the properties, parks, and castles of the Nación [Nation] (Art. 13, no. 17; cont. 1891, Art. 13, no. 16).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to comply with and ensure compliance with and execution of the Constitución y leyes de la Unión [Constitution and laws of the Union] and the decrees and orders issued by the Poderes nacionales [national Powers] in exercise of their lawful attributes and powers (Art. 13, no. 18; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 17: “To comply with and ensure compliance with and execution of the Constitution and laws of the Federation, and the decrees and orders issued by the Federal Power and the Tribunals and Courts of the Federation in exercise of their lawful attributes and powers.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to accord full faith to, and ensure compliance with and execution of, the public acts and judicial proceedings of the other Estados [States] (Art. 13, no. 19; cont. 1891, Art. 13, no. 18).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to organize their Tribunales y Juzgados [Tribunals and Courts] for the fullest administration of justice and to maintain uniform substantive civil, commercial, and criminal legislation and uniform laws of civil and criminal procedure (Art. 13, no. 20; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 19: “To organize their Tribunals and Courts for the administration of justice in the State, and to maintain for all of them uniform substantive civil and criminal legislation and uniform laws of civil and criminal procedure.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States], through the Asamblea Legislativa [Legislative Assembly], to transmit to Congreso [Congress] the corresponding list for principal and substitute Vocales [Members] of the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court], and to elect Vocales [Members] of the Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] (Art. 13, no. 21; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 20: “To present Members for the Court of Cassation and submit to the decisions of this Supreme Tribunal of the States.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to submit to the decisions of the Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] as Supremo Tribunal de los Estados [Supreme Tribunal of the States] (Art. 13, no. 22; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 20: “To present Members for the Court of Cassation and submit to the decisions of this Supreme Tribunal of the States.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to inscribe extradition as a political principle in their respective constitutions (Art. 13, no. 23; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 21: “To inscribe criminal extradition as a political principle in their respective Constitutions.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to establish direct and secret suffrage in popular elections (Art. 13, no. 24; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 22: “To establish direct and public suffrage in popular elections, render it obligatory, and secure it through the electoral census.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] did not reproduce the prohibition upon the Estados [States] assigning duties to national officers except in their capacity as citizens of the Estado [State] and insofar as those duties were compatible with national public service (cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 25: “Not to impose duties upon national officers except in their capacity as citizens of the State and insofar as those duties are not incompatible with national public service.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to establish primary instruction without charge and as obligatory, and instruction in arts and trades without charge (Art. 13, no. 25; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 23: “To establish primary education and education in arts and trades.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to reserve to the Poderes de la Unión [Powers of the Union] the authority to enact the Código de Instrucción Pública Nacional [Code of National Public Instruction] (Art. 13, no. 26; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 24: “To reserve to the powers of the Federation the laws and measures necessary for the creation, preservation, and advancement of general schools, colleges, or universities devoted to instruction in the sciences.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to furnish, without arms, the contingent proportionally incumbent upon them to compose the national public force in time of peace, as decreed annually by each Congreso Nacional [National Congress] (Art. 13, no. 27; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 26: “To furnish the contingent proportionally incumbent upon them to compose the national public force in time of peace or war.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] not to permit enlistments or levies whose object was or could be to assail liberty or independence, or disturb the public order of the Nación [Nation], other Estados [States], or another nation (Art. 13, no. 28; cont. 1891, Art. 13, no. 27).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] neither to declare nor wage war against another Estado [State] under any circumstance, and to maintain strict neutrality in all disputes arising among other Estados [States] (Art. 13, no. 29; cf. 1891, Art. 13, nos. 28–29: “To maintain strict neutrality in disputes arising in other States”; “Neither to declare nor wage war under any circumstance by one State against another.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to defer and submit to the decision of the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] every controversy arising between two or more Estados [States] when they could not by themselves and through peaceful means arrive at a settlement (Art. 13, no. 30; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 30: “To defer and submit to the decision of Congress or the High Federal Court every controversy arising between two or more States when they cannot by themselves and through peaceful means arrive at a settlement.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to recognize the competence of the Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] to hear proceedings instituted for treason against the Nación [Nation] or violation of the Constitución y leyes de la Unión [Constitution and laws of the Union] against those exercising the highest executive authority within the Estados [States] (Art. 13, no. 31; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 31: “To recognize the competence of Congress and the Court of Cassation to hear proceedings instituted for treason against the Nation or violation of the Constitution and laws of the Federation against those exercising executive authority within the States.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to receive as their own revenue the total produced in all Aduanas [Customs Houses] of the República [Republic] by the tax collected as a transit contribution and the total produced by mines, terrenos baldíos [public lands], and saltworks administered by the Poder Federal [Federal Power] (Art. 13, no. 32; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 32: “To receive as the States’ own revenue two thirds of the total produced in all Customs Houses of the Republic by the tax collected as a transit contribution, and two thirds of the revenue produced by mines, public lands, and saltworks administered by the Federal Power.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required that revenue to be distributed fortnightly among all Estados [States] of the Federación [Federation] in proportion to their respective populations (Art. 13, no. 33; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 32: “and to distribute that revenue among all States of the Federation in proportion to their respective populations.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that, if one or more of the taxes referred to in Article 13, no. 32 were abolished or reduced by law, Congreso [Congress] would establish the manner of returning to the Estados [States] the portion of revenue thereby eliminated (Art. 13, no. 34; new).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to keep away from their borders persons who sought asylum in an Estado [State] for political reasons whenever the interested Estado [State] so requested (Art. 13, no. 35; cont. 1891, Art. 13, no. 34).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] neither to coin money, nor issue paper money, nor make anything other than gold or silver coin valid for the payment of debts (Art. 13, no. 36; new).

All matters not expressly attributed to the Administración general de la Nación [General Administration of the Nation] fell within the competence of the Estados [States] (Art. 116; cont. 1891, Art. 88).

The Constitución [Constitution] declared the Tribunales de Justicia [Tribunals of Justice] in the Estados [States] independent and provided that proceedings initiated therein would terminate within the same Estados [States], subject only to review by the Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] in the cases permitted by law (Art. 121; cont. 1891, Art. 89).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that every act of the Cámaras Legislativas [Legislative Chambers] or the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] violating the rights guaranteed to the Estados [States] or assailing their autonomía [autonomy] had to be declared void by the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court], even if the declaration of nullity was requested by only one Asamblea Legislativa estatal [State Legislative Assembly] (Art. 123; cf. 1891, Art. 90: “Every act of Congress or the National Executive that violates the rights guaranteed to the States by this Constitution or assails their independence shall be declared void by the High Court whenever a majority of the Legislatures so requests.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that the Gobierno Nacional [National Government] would have no resident officers exercising jurisdiction or authority within the Estados [States] other than the Estados [States]’ own officers, subject to the exceptions enumerated in Article 131 (Art. 131; cf. 1891, Art. 97: “The Government of the Federation shall have no resident officers exercising jurisdiction or authority within the States other than the States’ own officers.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that the Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could station neither forces nor commanders exercising command within an Estado [State] without the permission of the government of the Estado [State] in which the force was to be stationed (Art. 134; cont. 1891, Art. 98).

The Constitución [Constitution] declared that the Nación [Nation] and the Estados [States] would promote the immigration and colonization of foreigners in conformity with their respective laws (Art. 146; cont. 1891, Art. 114).

The Constitución [Constitution] required all public acts and official documents of the Nación [Nation] and the Estados [States] to cite the date of Independencia [Independence] from 5 July 1811 and that of the Federación [Federation] from 20 February 1859 (Art. 158; cf. 1891, Art. 119: “In all public acts and official documents, the date of the Federation shall be cited from 20 February 1859, and that of the Law from 28 March 1864.”).

CON-AMD—Reforma de la Constitución [Constitutional Amendment]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] permitted amendments and additions but prohibited the Congreso Nacional [National Congress] from decreeing them outside ordinary sessions or without the request of three quarters of the Asambleas Legislativas estatales [State Legislative Assemblies], likewise assembled in ordinary sessions. It also prohibited their entry into force before renewal of the Poderes Públicos de la Nación [Public Powers of the Nation] that had requested or enacted them (Art. 151; cf. 1891, Art. 118: “This Constitution may be amended by the National Legislature if the Legislatures of the States should so request; but the amendment shall never extend beyond the points upon which a majority of the States concur.”).

Amendments or additions had to proceed under the procedure established for the enactment of laws. Once adopted by the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature], the Presidente del Congreso [President of Congress] had to submit them to the Asambleas Legislativas estatales [State Legislative Assemblies] for definitive ratification (Arts. 152–153; cf. 1891, Art. 118: “but in this second case, the adopted amendment shall be submitted to the Legislatures of the States and shall be enacted as to the point or points ratified by a majority of them.”).

Congreso [Congress] could initiate amendments or additions and adopt them under the same procedure, but they were not deemed enacted without ratification by three quarters of the Asambleas Legislativas estatales [State Legislative Assemblies] (Art. 154; cf. 1891, Art. 118: “an amendment may also be made upon one or more points when two thirds of the members of the National Legislature, acting separately and according to the procedure established for the enactment of laws, so resolve.”).

Irrespective of the initiating organ, the definitive vote of the Estados [States] had to return to the Congreso Nacional [National Congress], which was charged with scrutinizing it and ordering promulgation of the enacted amendment or addition (Art. 155; new).

CIV-SUF—Sufragio [Suffrage]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] guaranteed freedom of suffrage, subject to attainment of twenty-one years of age and to interdiction declared by a final judgment of the competent Tribunales [Tribunals] (Art. 14, no. 11; cf. 1891, Art. 14, no. 11: “Freedom of suffrage in popular elections, subject to no restriction other than minority under eighteen years of age.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to establish direct and secret suffrage in popular elections (Art. 13, no. 24; cf. 1891, Art. 13, no. 22: “To establish direct and public suffrage in popular elections, render it obligatory, and secure it through the electoral census.”). Principal and substitute Diputados [Deputies] were popularly elected under that rule; the Asambleas Legislativas [Legislative Assemblies] elected the Senadores [Senators]; and the citizens of the Estados [States] and the Distrito Federal [Federal District] elected the Presidente [President] by direct and secret voting (Arts. 22, 26, and 63; cf. 1891, Arts. 20, 25, and 62: “To constitute the Chamber of Deputies, each State shall appoint by popular election, in conformity with paragraph 22 of Article 13 of this Constitution”; “To constitute this Chamber, each State, through its respective Legislature, shall elect three principal Senators”; “The Federal Council elects from among its members the President of the United States of Venezuela.”).

During electoral periods, the fuerza pública nacional o la de los Estados [national or State public force] was required to remain confined to barracks throughout the period of popular elections (Art. 140; cf. 1891, Art. 108: “During electoral periods, the national or State public force shall remain strictly confined to barracks throughout the period of popular elections.”).

CIV-CIT—Ciudadanía [Citizenship]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] distinguished Venezuelans by birth from Venezuelans by naturalization. Venezuelans by birth included persons born within the territory, irrespective of their parents’ nationality; specified children born abroad to a father or mother who was Venezuelan by birth; and legitimate children born abroad or at sea to a Venezuelan father exercising a diplomatic mission or attached to a Legación de la República [Legation of the Republic]. Venezuelans by naturalization included specified children born outside the country to naturalized Venezuelans; persons born in the Repúblicas hispanoamericanas [Spanish-American Republics] or the Antillas españolas [Spanish Antilles] who established residence and manifested their will to become Venezuelan; and foreigners who obtained a carta de naturaleza o de ciudadanía [letter of naturalization or citizenship] pursuant to law (Art. 5; cf. 1891, Art. 5: “The following are Venezuelans:”).

Male Venezuelans over twenty-one years of age were eligible for office, subject to the exceptions expressed in the Constitución [Constitution]. All Venezuelans were bound to serve the Nación [Nation] according to law, even to the sacrifice of their property and lives when necessary for its defense. In every Estado [State] and in the Distrito Federal [Federal District], they enjoyed the same rights and were subject to the same duties as native-born domiciled inhabitants (Arts. 6–8; cf. 1891, Arts. 7–9: “Male Venezuelans over twenty-one years of age are eligible for office, subject only to the exceptions contained in this Constitution.”).

Foreigners enjoyed the same civil rights as nationals and could exercise them, in substance, form, procedure, and remedies, upon the same terms. The Nación [Nation] recognized no obligations or liabilities in their favor other than those established for nationals in like cases; the Gobierno [Government] would conclude no treaties derogating from those principles, and the law would determine the rights and duties of foreigners not domiciled in the country (Arts. 9–12; cf. 1891, Arts. 10–11: “Foreigners shall enjoy the same civil rights as Venezuelans.”).

RTS-GAR—Derechos [Rights]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] guaranteed Venezuelans the effective enjoyment of the rights enumerated in Article 14 (Art. 14; cf. 1891, Art. 14: “The Nation guarantees Venezuelans:”).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed the inviolability of life and abolished capital punishment, irrespective of the law prescribing it (Art. 14, no. 1; cont. 1891, Art. 14, no. 1).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed property with all its franchises, rights, and privileges, subject only to legislatively imposed contributions and to appropriation for works of public utility after indemnification and adversarial proceedings (Art. 14, no. 2; cf. 1891, Art. 14, no. 2: “Property with all its attributes, franchises, and privileges; it shall be subject only to contributions decreed by the legislative authority, to judicial decision, and to appropriation for public works after indemnification and adversarial proceedings.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed the inviolability of correspondence and other private papers, which could be seized only by order of the competent judicial authority and with the formalities of law, while the secrecy of domestic and private matters was invariably preserved (Art. 14, no. 3; cf. 1891, Art. 14, no. 3: “The inviolability and secrecy of correspondence and other private papers.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed the inviolability of the domestic home, which could be entered only to prevent the commission of a crime and in conformity with law (Art. 14, no. 4; cont. 1891, Art. 14, no. 4).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed personal liberty, abolished forced recruitment for military service, perpetually proscribed slavery, declared free any slaves who entered Venezuelan territory, recognized the right of every person to do or perform whatever did not injure another, and provided that no person was bound to do what the law did not command or prevented from doing what it did not prohibit (Art. 14, no. 5; cf. 1891, Art. 14, no. 5: “Personal liberty, and by virtue thereof: 1. Forced recruitment for military service is abolished; 2. Slavery is perpetually proscribed; 3. Slaves who enter the territory of Venezuela are free; and 4. No person is bound to do what the law does not command or prevented from doing what it does not prohibit.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed the free expression of thought orally or through the press, preserved to the injured party, in cases of calumny or insult, recourse before the competent Tribunales de Justicia [Tribunals of Justice], and prohibited the arrest or imprisonment of the accused before the condemnatory judgment of a competent tribunal (Art. 14, no. 6; cf. 1891, Art. 14, no. 6: “Freedom of thought expressed orally or through the press, the latter without any restriction subjecting it to prior censorship. In cases of calumny, insult, or injury to a third party, the injured party retains recourse before the competent Tribunals of Justice in conformity with the general laws.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed freedom to travel without a passport, change domicile in conformity with legal formalities, leave the República [Republic], and return to it, taking one’s property abroad and bringing it back (Art. 14, no. 7; cont. 1891, Art. 14, no. 7).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed freedom of industry and, consequently, ownership of discoveries and productions, with the laws granting proprietors a temporary privilege or prescribing the manner of indemnification should they agree to publication (Art. 14, no. 8; cont. 1891, Art. 14, no. 8).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed freedom of unarmed assembly and association, publicly or privately, without any act of inspection or coercion by the authorities (Art. 14, no. 9; cont. 1891, Art. 14, no. 9).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed freedom of petition, with the right to obtain a determination from any officer, authority, or corporation; when a petition was submitted by several persons, the first five were answerable for the authenticity of the signatures and all for the truth of the facts (Art. 14, no. 10; cont. 1891, Art. 14, no. 10).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed freedom of suffrage, subject to no restriction other than minority under twenty-one years of age and interdiction declared by a final judgment of the competent Tribunales [Tribunals] (Art. 14, no. 11; cf. 1891, Art. 14, no. 11: “Freedom of suffrage in popular elections, subject to no restriction other than minority under eighteen years of age.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed freedom of instruction in its full extent and required the Poder Público [Public Power] to establish primary education and instruction in arts and trades without charge (Art. 14, no. 12; cont. 1891, Art. 14, no. 12).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed religious freedom (Art. 14, no. 13; cont. 1891, Art. 14, no. 13).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed individual security and prescribed the guarantees expressed in Article 14, no. 14, including limitations upon imprisonment for debt, quartering of military personnel, special tribunals or commissions, arrest or imprisonment, incommunicado detention, oaths or examination against oneself in criminal proceedings, criminal conviction without lawful hearing, continued imprisonment once its grounds had ceased to exist, corporal punishment exceeding ten years, deprivation of liberty for political causes, double jeopardy, torture, and infamous punishments (Art. 14, no. 14; cf. 1891, Art. 14, no. 14: “Individual security, and by virtue thereof:”).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed equality, by virtue of which all persons were to be judged under the same laws and subjected to equal duties, services, and contributions; titles of nobility, hereditary honors and distinctions, and offices whose salaries or emoluments continued beyond service were prohibited; and officers and magistrates received no form of address other than ciudadano [citizen] and usted [you] (Art. 14, no. 15; cf. 1891, Art. 14, no. 15: “Equality, by virtue of which:”).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that the preceding enumeration did not restrict the power of the Estados [States] to accord their inhabitants other rights (Art. 15; cf. 1891, Art. 15: “The present enumeration does not restrict the power of the States to accord their inhabitants other guarantees.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] declared culpable those who issued, signed, executed, or ordered the execution of decrees, orders, or resolutions violating any right guaranteed to Venezuelans; rendered them punishable according to law; authorized every ciudadano [citizen] to accuse them; and fixed a five-year limitation period for actions against them (Art. 16; cf. 1891, Art. 17: “Those who issue, sign, execute, or order the execution of decrees, orders, or resolutions that violate or infringe any of the guarantees accorded to Venezuelans are culpable and shall be punished as prescribed by law. Every citizen is competent to accuse them.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that the rights recognized and consecrated in the preceding articles would not be diminished or injured by laws regulating their exercise and that laws producing either effect would be deemed unconstitutional and without effect (Art. 17; new).

REG-MIL—La fuerza armada [Armed Force]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] provided that the national public force was divided into naval and land forces and consisted of milicias ciudadanas [citizen militias] organized by the Estados [States] pursuant to their laws (Art. 125; cont. 1891, Art. 91).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that the public force placed at the charge of the Poder Nacional [National Power] would consist of a contingent, proportioned to population, furnished by each Estado [State] through the call to service of citizens required to render it under their internal laws (Art. 126; cont. 1891, Art. 92).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that in case of war the contingent could be augmented by bodies of the milicia ciudadana [citizen militia] up to the number of men necessary to satisfy “the requisition of the National Government” (Art. 127; cf. 1891, Art. 93: “In case of war, the contingent may be augmented by bodies of the citizen militia up to the number of men necessary to satisfy the national requisition.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that the Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could replace the commanders of the forces furnished by the Estados [States] in the cases and with the formalities prescribed by national military law, whereupon replacements were requested from the Estados [States] (Art. 128; cont. 1891, Art. 94).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that military and civil authority could never be exercised simultaneously by the same person or corporation (Art. 129; cf. 1891, Art. 95: “Military and civil authority shall never be exercised by the same person or corporation.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that all instruments of war existing within the territory of the República [Republic] upon its promulgation belonged to the Gobierno Nacional [National Government] (Art. 132; cf. 1891, Art. 97: “All instruments of war now existing belong to the National Government …”).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that the Estados [States] had the right to acquire the armament necessary for their militias and the instruments of war necessary for their internal security, and could import them free of all import duties upon compliance in each case with the formalities of the Código Militar [Military Code] and the applicable ley de Hacienda [public-finance law] (Art. 133; cf. 1891, Art. 97: “… without this being understood to prohibit the States from acquiring those required for their internal defense.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that the Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could station neither forces nor commanders exercising command in any Estado [State], whether of the same or another Estado [State], without the permission of the government of the Estado [State] in which the force was to be stationed (Art. 134; cont. 1891, Art. 98).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that, during electoral periods, the fuerza pública nacional o la de los Estados [national or State public force] would remain confined to barracks throughout the period of popular elections (Art. 140; cf. 1891, Art. 108: “During electoral periods, the national or State public force shall remain strictly confined to barracks throughout the period of popular elections.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that the armed force could not deliberate, that it was passive and obedient, and that no armed body could make requisitions or demand aid of any kind except from the civil authorities and in the manner and form determined by law; it further provided that commanders who violated that precept would be tried and punished according to law (Art. 145; cf. 1891, Art. 113: “The armed force may not deliberate; it is passive and obedient. No armed body may make requisitions or demand aid of any kind except from the civil authorities and in the manner and form determined by law.”).

REG-REL—Religión [Religion]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] recognized the Nación [Nation]’s possession of the derecho de patronato eclesiástico [right of ecclesiastical patronage] and provided that it would exercise that right as prescribed by the governing law (Art. 130; cont. 1891, Art. 96).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed religious freedom among the rights of Venezuelans (Art. 14, no. 13; cont. 1891, Art. 14, no. 13).

CON-FIN—Disposiciones finales [Final Provisions]:

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] provided that the constitutional periods would be reckoned from 20 February 1894 (Art. 156; new).

For all acts in the civil and political life of the Estados [States], the population basis would be that determined by the latest census of the República [Republic] approved by Congreso [Congress] (Art. 157; cf. 1891, Art. 121: “For all acts in the civil and political life of the States of the Federation, their population basis is that determined by the latest census approved by the National Legislature.”).

All public acts and official documents of the Nación [Nation] and the Estados [States] were required to cite the date of Independencia [Independence] from 5 July 1811 and that of the Federación [Federation] from 20 February 1859 (Art. 158; cf. 1891, Art. 119: “in all public acts and official documents, the date of the Federation shall be cited from 20 February 1859, and that of the Law from 28 March 1864.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] would enter into force upon its promulgation in the Distrito Federal [Federal District] and in each Estado [State] of the Unión [Union] (Art. 159; cf. 1891, Art. 119: “This Constitution shall enter into force on the date of its official promulgation in each State.”).

The Asamblea Nacional Constituyente [National Constituent Assembly] would establish by special law the rules for attaining the definitive and strictly constitutional organization of the República [Republic] (Art. 160; new).

The Constitución de 1893 [Constitution of 1893] repealed the Constitución de 16 de abril de 1891 [Constitution of 16 April 1891] (Art. 161; cf. 1891, Art. 122: “The Federal Constitution of 27 April 1881 is repealed.”).

Signed by the members of the Asamblea Constituyente [Constituent Assembly] present in the capital and bearing the cúmplase [executive order of compliance] of the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive], the Constitución [Constitution] was to be promulgated immediately in the Distrito Federal [Federal District] and, upon receipt, in the Estados de la Unión [States of the Union] (Art. 162; new).

The Constitución [Constitution] was adopted in the Cámara [Chamber] of the Palacio Legislativo [Legislative Palace] at Caracas, where the Asamblea Nacional Constituyente [National Constituent Assembly] held its sessions, on 12 June 1893, the eighty-third year of Independencia [Independence] and the thirty-fifth of the Federación [Federation]. It was ordered executed and observed at the Palacio Federal [Federal Palace] in Caracas on 21 June 1893 by Presidente [President] Joaquín Crespo and countersigned by his Ministros [Ministers].

Sources of Collation:


*

“Unmasking Disappointment: Series XI”

June 15, 2026

*

“Geometric Allegory” digital painting 2023 by Ricardo Morin (American visual artist born in Venezuela–1954)

*

This series constitutes a referential corpus in the Appendix.   Its components are organized for consultation rather than sequential reading, and are presented in comparative rubrics that record institutional continuities, modifications, and reconfigurations across the constitutional texts.  

Corpus definition:   This corpus is limited to constitutions that were formally adopted and entered into force.   Constitutional projects, draft constitutions, proposed reforms that were not ratified, and other constitutional texts that did not acquire legal force are excluded.   The corpus therefore follows the constitutional order as constituted in law rather than the broader history of constitutional proposals.   The corpus functions more like an archive than an argument.   It attempts to establish a stable descriptive record of what each constitution contained and how it differed from its immediate predecessor.   The consequence is that the corpus remains open to multiple lines of inquiry without privileging any one of them.

Rubric codes:    Each rubric carries a permanent identifier in the form FAMILY-MEMBER, capitalized and hyphenated: for example POW-LEG for the legislative power, or REG-SLA for slavery.    The family prefixes group rubrics by kind:   FND (foundations of the State), CIV (civic status and participation), POW (public powers), ECO (fiscal, economic, and public works), RTS (rights and guarantees), REG (special regimes and institutions), and CON (constitutional self-regulation).   These codes denote identity, not sequence:   the order in which rubrics appear within any entry implies no precedence, and each constitution presents only the rubrics that pertain to it, in whatever arrangement best suits its text.

Append-only vocabulary:   A code, once assigned, is never reassigned or reused.    A rubric absent from a given constitution is simply omitted, signifying silence rather than oversight; a rubric that lapses from constitutional life is retired in place and marked with the span of charters to which it applied—thus REG-SLA (1811–1854) is not carried forward after abolition, and its code is never reoccupied.    Matters introduced by later charters enter as new members appended to the appropriate family.   Comparison therefore proceeds by matching codes across the twenty-five constitutions, not by position on the page.

Citation:    References are anchored first on the article number—continuous within each text and therefore collision-proof—followed by the text’s own structural division as a secondary locator, named as that charter employs it (Capítulo and Sección in the 1811 constitution; Título and Sección in 1821). Spanish citations follow the CIDEP recension linked at the close of each entry.

Terms:   “Constitution,” “charter,” and “corpus” refer throughout to the documents under study; “entry” and “installment” refer to the published pieces of this appendix.    The rubric apparatus describes the former.

Translation Convention

Institutional and technical names are given first in italicized Latinate Castilian and followed by their contemporary Latinate English equivalents in brackets.  All constitutional quotations appear in italic type between quotation marks and are rendered in contemporary Latinate English, faithfully preserving the substance and distinctions of the original charters.  Comparative references are restricted to 1830 against 1821 and 1857 against 1830.  The apparatus retains the classifications cont., cf., and new.

Ricardo F. Morín

June 7, 2026

Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania

*


*

A-1). VENEZUELAN CONSTITUTIONS 1811-1999

19th-Century Constitutions:

* *

1). The 1811 Constitution

The 1811 Constitution (Constitución Federal para los Estados de Venezuela) was adopted on December 21, 1811, by the Confederación Federal de Estados Venezolanos [the Federal Confederation of Venezuelan States], and was repealed following its collapse on July 21, 1812.   It was promulgated shortly after the declaration of Venezuelan independence [July 5, 1811] and established a federal union of autonomous states under a common national framework.

DOC-PRE—Preamble

(translated by the author in a contemporary register)

“ENACTED by the Representatives of Margarita, Mérida, Cumaná, Barinas, Barcelona, Trujillo, and Caracas, assembled in General Congress

“IN THE NAME OF ALMIGHTY GOD

“We, the People of the States of Venezuela, exercising our sovereignty and seeking to establish among ourselves the best administration of justice, to promote the general welfare, to ensure domestic tranquility, to provide for our common defense, to uphold our liberty and political independence, to preserve pure and inviolate the sacred religion of our forebears, to secure in perpetuity for our posterity the enjoyment of these blessings, and to draw ourselves together in the most steadfast union and sincere friendship, have solemnly resolved to confederate and to form and establish the following Constitution, by which these States shall be governed and administered.”

FND-TER—Territory

The 1811 Constitution defined Venezuela as a confederation of sovereign provinces that retained full authority over their internal government and administration, except where powers were expressly delegated to the national government (Preliminar; Bases del Pacto Federativo).  It affirmed that any territories later admitted—whether by division of existing provinces or by subsequent accession—would enter the Union on the same basis of reserved sovereignty (Preliminar; Arts. 128-32).  Congress was granted exclusive authority over:  foreign relations, common defense, trade regulation, war-making, and national taxation (Preliminar).  The charter also imposed strict limits on provincial action:  without prior congressional consent, no province could conclude special treaties or alliances, impose tonnage or custom-duties, raise or maintain armed forces in peacetime, or initiate war (Arts. 119-23).  Provincial laws had to be submitted to Congress to avoid conflicts with federal statutes, and Congress held exclusive competence to admit or separate provinces and to dispose of national territory and property (Art. 124; Arts. 128-32).  Finally, the Union guaranteed to each province a republican form of government, protection of its sovereignty, and—upon formal request—the suppression of internal violence.   And in this way, a framework was established for mutual guarantees and collective securities among the provinces (Arts. 133-4; Preliminar).

POW-LEG—Congress (Legislative)

The 1811 Constitution vested legislative authority in the General Congress of Venezuela, composed of a House of Representatives and a Senate (Art. 1, Cap. II).  Laws could originate in either chamber (Art. 21), though legislation concerning taxation could only be initiated in the House of Representatives (Art. 22).  Enactment of any law required three readings in each chamber on different days (Art. 23).  Once passed, laws were submitted to the Executive for promulgation, with procedures established for cases involving objections (Arts. 24–5).  Each chamber regulated its internal proceedings, enforced discipline, and exercised exclusive authority over its members (Arts. 18, 26–28).   

Representatives were elected every four years by a multi-tiered electoral system involving parish and chapter assemblies (Arts. 3, 6–8); senators served six-year terms and were elected by the provincial legislatures (Arts. 11–13).  The Senate judged impeachments brought by the House of Representatives (Arts. 16, 29), and both chambers held shared prerogatives concerning internal order and legislative conduct (Arts. 16, 18).   Congress convened annually in a designated capital city, with limited provisions for extending or relocating sessions (Art. 20).   Congress held legislative authority over military affairs, taxation, commerce, currency, the postal system, foreign policy, infrastructure, naturalization, bankruptcy, and the establishment of lower courts (Art. 30).  The legislative branch embodied the principle of separation of powers and functioned as part of the confederal structure based on the pact among sovereign provinces (Preliminar; Bases del Pacto Federativo).

ECO-TES—Treasury:

Article 108 of Chapter III, Section V designated provincial executive authorities to act on behalf of the Poder Ejecutivo Federal [Federal Executive] in matters not expressly delegated by the Congreso General [General Congress] to other officials in the Armada [Navy], Ejército [Army], or Tesorería Nacional [National Treasury] (Art. 108, Cap. III, Secc. V).   The Constitution contained no additional provisions concerning the structure, functions, or oversight of the Tesorería Nacional, nor did it establish a separate fiscal department.  The Tesorería Nacional was mentioned only nominally (Art. 71, Cap. II, Secc. VII).

POW-EXE—Executive:

  • Note on terminology:   in cases where the structure of executive power differs, each constitution described in this appendix uses ‘executive’ or ‘president’ according to its constitutional context.    ‘Executive’ refers to the branch of government that includes the president and the ministerial countersignatures required for the validity of executive acts.    ‘President of the republic’, or simply ‘the president’, designates the individual in whom executive power is vested.

Under the 1811 Constitution, the Ejecutivo Federal [Federal Executive] resided permanently in the capital city and was entrusted to a Three-Member Executive Council [the Poder Ejecutivo] chosen every four years (Arts. 72, 75).   Candidates had to be born on the American continent (or be Spaniards, who had been there from 1810), had to have lived in the Union during the previous decade, and had to be freeholders of property (Arts. 73, 74).   The electors met on 16 November of the electoral year, wrote three names on their ballots (at least one from another province), and forwarded the tallies to the President of the Senate (Arts. 76–79); if no slate obtained an absolute majority of electors, the Cámara de Representantes voted on the nine highest candidates, and, if no majority was reached, it fell to the Senado to elect the candidate (Arts. 81–82).   Executive acts required the countersignature of the State’s ministers—Interior and Justice, Finance, War and Navy, and Foreign Affairs—, who were appointed by the Executive and bore responsibility for official measures (Arts. 105, 107–108).   The Three-Member Executive Council—with Senate consent—oversaw the appointment of military, civil, and judicial officers; negotiated treaties; granted pardons for political offenses; convoked Congress in ordinary and extraordinary sessions; ensured the execution of laws; and presented an annual account of revenues, expenditures, and general administration (Arts. 86, 88, 92–94, 100–104).  The Three-Member Executive Council could be suspended under strict conditions.   If the Executive or any of its members was accused and convicted by the Senate of treason, corruption, or usurpation, they were to be removed from office and subjected to the penalties established in Article 58 (Arts. 89, 91, 109).

POW-JUD—Judiciary:

The 1811 Constitution vested the judicial power of the Confederation in a Supreme Court of Justice located in the capital of the Confederation, along with subordinate and lower courts created by Congress (Cap. IV, Secc. 1, Art. 110).   The Executive appointed all justices (Art. 111).   Congress set their number and required that appointees be licensed lawyers, citizens of good standing, and at least thirty years of age for the Supreme Court and twenty-five for the other courts (Art. 112).   Justices received fixed salaries that could not be reduced during their tenure (Arts. 113–114).   The Judicial Branch exercised jurisdiction over cases concerning the Constitution, treaties, diplomatic agents, maritime matters, and intergovernmental conflicts, including disputes between provinces, or between Venezuelan and foreign parties (Secc. 2, Art. 115).   The Supreme Court exercised appellate jurisdiction in most matters and original jurisdiction in cases involving ambassadors or provinces (Art. 116).    It required jury trials in ordinary criminal cases, to be held in the province of the offense or, if committed abroad, in a location designated by law (Art. 117).   The Court also examined and approved lawyers nationwide, including those credentialed abroad (Art. 118).

  • CON-AMD—Amending the Constitution:

The 1811 Constitution permitted amendments when two-thirds of both Cámaras del Congreso [Chambers of Congress] or of the Legislaturas Provinciales [Provincial Legislatures] separately proposed and reciprocally approved a reform or alteration, which would then be incorporated into the Constitution (Cap. VI, Art. 135).  The constitutional provisions remained in effect until such reciprocal approval was finalized (Art. 136).   Each province was to express its decision—whether to accept, reject, or propose modifications to the Constitution—through specially convened asambleas [assemblies], by electores de capítulo [chapter electors] appointed for that purpose, or by votantes parroquiales [parish voters] forming primary assemblies for the election of representatives (Cap. VII, Art. 137).   Once the text had been read before the provincial body and modifications adopted by majority vote, its observance was to be solemnly sworn, followed within three days by elections of national representatives conducted by the designated electors (Art. 138).  The municipalities reported the results to the respectivos gobiernos provinciales [respective provincial governments], which then transmitted them to Congress upon its assembly (Art. 139).   Provinces rejoining the Confederation were to observe the same procedures; if prevented from doing so at the time by urgent or insurmountable causes, they could fulfill the requirement later through formal petitions addressed to Congress or the Poder Ejecutivo [Executive] (Art. 140).

CIV-SUF—Suffrage:

The 1811 Constitution granted suffrage to varones libres [free-born males], who were at least 21 years old, or if younger, married, and who resided in the parroquia [parish] where they cast their vote (Cap. II, Secc. 2, Art. 26).   In provincial capitals, voters were required to hold property or assets valued at 600 pesos for an unmarried man, or 400 pesos for a married man; in smaller towns, the thresholds were 400 pesos for singles and 200 pesos for married men (Art. 26).  Alternatively, voters qualified if they held a degree in the liberal or mechanical arts or owned or leased productive land of equivalent value to those assigned for the respective cases of single or married (Art. 26).  

The Constitution disenfranchised those declared insane, deaf and dumb, publicly bankrupt, indebted to the treasury, vagrants, persons under serious criminal indictment, and married persons living apart without legal cause (Art. 27).   Parish assemblies appointed one parish elector for every 1,000 inhabitants every two years, and these assemblies were presided over by municipal authorities (Arts. 20–24, 40).   Parish electors were required to reside within the electoral district and to meet higher property qualifications, including ownership or assets valued at 6,000 pesos if unmarried or 4,000 pesos if married in Caracas, with proportionally lower requirements in other cities (Art. 28).  Public officials, who earned at least 300 pesos annually, were permitted to vote in parish assemblies, and those earning at least 1,000 pesos could vote in electoral congregations, but they were barred from legislative office, unless they resigned their posts and incomes (Art. 29).   

Municipal authorities maintained official lists of eligible voters and electors and convened election assemblies on scheduled dates.   If municipal authorities failed in convening these assemblies, the citizens gathered on the appointed day to hold elections; however, municipal authorities were prohibited from conducting any other business during these meetings (Arts. 30–38).   Public voting stood as a governing principle, while electors presided over parish assemblies and resolved any disputes concerning voter qualifications or electoral procedures, which were subject to final appeal before the provincial legislature (Arts. 41–42).

CIV-CIT—Citizenship:

The 1811 Constitution contained no discrete naturalization clause and no grant of citizenship to foreigners by term of residence.  Political membership was framed around free-born men (hombres libres) and exercised through the residence, property, and occupational qualifications of the electoral provisions (Art. 26 ff.).   

Foreigners “of any nation” were to be received in the State and to enjoy the same security of person and property as citizens, provided they respected the Catholic religion and recognized the independence and sovereignty of the constituted authorities (Art. 169)—a guarantee of civil protection, not of citizenship.   

Durational requirements appeared only as conditions of office and presupposed existing citizenship rather than conferring it:   five years’ standing as a citizen to sit in the House of Representatives (Art. 15), and ten years’ domicile for the Senate (Art. 49) and the Executive (Art. 73), the latter also requiring birth in Spanish America, with an exception for peninsular Spaniards resident in Venezuela who had sworn and supported independence (Art. 74).   A formal mechanism of naturalization (carta de naturaleza) would first appear in 1821.

RTS-GAR—Rights:

The 1811 Constitution declared that all legitimate political authority originated with the people, in whom sovereignty resided by its very nature and in its first instance (Prelim., Bases del Pacto Federativo).    It set forth a broad catalogue of individual guarantees:   every citizen had the right to liberty, equality, property, and security; deprivation of liberty or punishment had to occur strictly according to law; no one could be declared guilty except by lawful judgment; and no one could be compelled to testify against himself or his close relatives (Arts. 1, 2, 7, 8, 11).   

The Constitution protected an individual’s home from arbitrary intrusion.   Also protected was private correspondence, and private papers; it prohibited ex post facto laws, excessive bail, disproportionate penalties, confiscation, torture, and inherited civic or legal privileges—particularly aristocratic distinctions or feudal entitlements (Arts. 3, 9, 10, 13).    It also mandated that ordinary criminal trials not initiated by congressional accusation would be conducted by jury, once trial by jury had been established by law, and held in the province where the offense was committed (Art. 117).   

Citizens had the right to publish opinions, to bear arms, to move freely among the provinces, to petition the government, and to pursue any lawful occupation.   Foreigners could reside in the country and enjoy civil rights under the same conditions as citizens, provided they respected the Catholic religion and Venezuelan independence (Arts. 4, 5, 6, 12).    Property could be expropriated only by a law that declared a public necessity and provided just compensation to the owner; no tax or public contribution could be imposed without the consent of the people through their representatives (Arts. 14, 15).   Along with these guarantees, the Constitution imposed obedience to the law, service to the public and national defense, and loyalty to the Republic (Arts. 16, 17).   Any law contravening the rights set forth in the Constitution was declared “absolutely null and void” (Art. 18).

REG-MIL—The Military:

The 1811 Constitution treated national defense as a civic duty (Art. 178).    Congress could raise regular forces only when necessary and could raise militias to suppress insurrections, or repel invasions (Art. 71).    Supreme command of land and naval forces was vested in the Three-Member Executive Council (Art. 86); provincial governors acted solely as administrative agents (Art. 108).    The 1811 Constitution defined a well-regulated and trained militia composed of citizens as the most secure safeguard of a free state.   During peacetime, only a limited permanent force could be maintained with prior authorization from Congress (Art. 178).    It affirmed the subordination of military authority to civil power by declaring that citizens not engaged in active service were not subject to military jurisdiction (Art. 176).   It further required civil authorization for quartering troops in private homes (Art. 177), and affirmed the right of citizens to possess lawful arms (Art. 179).   The Constitution did not provide for provincial armies and imposed no standing military obligations beyond lawful service when summoned (Art. 178).

REG-REL—Religion:

The 1811 Constitution declared the Roman Catholic Church as the sole religion of the Confederation and did not recognize any other faith (Cap. I, Art. 1).   This provision retained the exclusive public status of Catholicism already established under colonial law (Recop. Leyes de Indias, Lib. I, Tit. I, Ley 1).

REG-SLA—Slavery:

The 1811 Constitution did not abolish slavery but incorporated the prohibition of the slave trade previously decreed by the Junta Suprema de Caracas [Supreme Junta of Caracas] on 14 August 1810 (Capítulo IX, Art. 202; Gaceta de Caracas, No. 20, 21 Aug. 1810).   Prior to the promulgation of the 1821 Constitution [October 6], the Congreso de Cúcuta [Congress of Cúcuta] enacted the Ley de Libertad de los Vientres [Law of the Freedom of the Womb] on 21 July 1821, which established that children born to enslaved mothers from that date onward were to be considered free (Ley del 21 de julio de 1821 sobre la libertad de los nacidos de madres esclavas, Colección de Leyes y Decretos del Congreso de Colombia, 1821, Tomo I, pp. 31–34).    These children were required to remain in the service of the enslaver until the age of eighteen and were subject to reimbursement for maintenance costs, as determined by local juntas de manumisión [manumission boards]. These boards were authorized to register eligible births, manage emancipation funds, and supervise the process of coartación (gradual self-purchase).

CON-FIN—Final Provisions:

The 1811 Constitution directed provincial governments to establish schools and integrate indigenous peoples into civic life; it prohibited their compulsory services and recognized communal land ownership (Art. 180).   Federal officials’ salaries were to be paid from a common treasury, with no disbursements without legal authorization; direct taxes had to be proportional to population, and provinces were prohibited from granting preferential commercial advantages to their own ports (Arts. 188–189).   The Constitution designated January 1, 1811, as the commencement of the Era Colombiana [the Colombian Era], a new civic calendar marking the beginning of the independent republican order (Art. 223).

DOC-CLO—Closing Statement

(translated by the author in a contemporary register)

“Article 228.    Until a civil and criminal code is drafted—decreed by the Supreme Congress on the eighth of March last and suited to the form of Government established in Venezuela—the Code that has governed us until now remains in full force in all matters that do not directly or indirectly conflict with the provisions of this Constitution.”

“The Supreme Legislator of the Universe has seen fit to inspire in our hearts the sincerest friendship and union, both among ourselves and with the other inhabitants of the Colombian Continent who wish to join us in defending our Religion, our natural Sovereignty, and our Independence.   We, therefore, the people of Venezuela—having freely ordained the foregoing Constitution, which sets out the rules, principles, and objects of our Confederation and perpetual alliance, and invoking God Himself as witness to the sincerity of our intentions while humbly imploring His powerful assistance—do solemnly bind ourselves to observe and fulfill inviolably each and every provision it contains, so that we may forever enjoy the blessings of liberty and the imprescriptible rights that His generous beneficence has granted us, from the moment this Constitution is ratified in the manner it prescribes.”

“We further declare our intention to amend and revise these resolutions at any time, in keeping with the will of the majority of the peoples of Colombia who may choose to form a national Body for the defence and preservation of their liberty and political independence.   Any such amendments and adjustments shall be made in due course, by plurality and mutual agreement among ourselves, on all matters directly affecting the general interests of those peoples, as agreed through their lawful Representatives assembled in a General Congress of Colombia, or of any considerable part thereof, and ratified by the constituents.”

“In the meantime, each and every province that has taken part in forming this Union mutually guarantees to the others the integrity of their respective territories and essential rights, pledging their lives, their fortunes, and their honor to that end.    We entrust the inviolability and preservation of this Constitution to the fidelity of the Legislative Bodies, the Executive Powers, the Judges, and all officers of the Union and of the Provinces, and to the vigilance and virtue of the fathers of families, mothers, wives, and citizens of this State.”

“Issued at the Federal Palace of Caracas, on the twenty-first of December, in the year of Our Lord eighteen hundred and eleven, the first year of our Independence.”

*

Note:


* *

2). The 1821 Constitution

The Constitution of 1821 (the Constitution of the Republic of Colombia, commonly known as the Constitution of Cúcuta) was adopted by the General Congress of Colombia at Cúcuta on 30 August 1821, ratified that same day, and promulgated by President Simón Bolívar on 6 October 1821.    Two texts of 1819 preceded it, which this corpus does not record, as neither satisfied the requirement of entry into force:   the Constitution of Angostura [15 August 1819], enacted by the Congress of Angostura for the Republic of Venezuela, and the Fundamental Law of the Republic of Colombia [17 December 1819], which provisionally established the union of Venezuela and New Granada (present-day Colombia and Panama) and which the Constitution of Cúcuta superseded.    The new constitutional framework instituted a unified government for these two regions, with the incorporation of the territory of Quito (present-day Ecuador) envisaged though not effected until 1822.

DOC-PRE—Preamble

(translated by the author in a contemporary register)

“IN THE NAME OF GOD, AUTHOR AND LEGISLATOR OF THE UNIVERSE

“We, the Representatives of the Peoples of Colombia, assembled in General Congress, in fulfillment of the wishes of our constituents—to establish the fundamental rules of their union and to create a form of government that secures for them the blessings of liberty, security, property, and equality, insofar as this is possible for a nation just beginning its political life and still fighting for its independence—do ordain and establish the following

“CONSTITUTION”

FND-TER—Territory:

The 1821 Constitution declared that Colombia’s territory comprised the lands of the former Virreinato de la Nueva Granada (Viceroyalty of New Granada) and the Capitanía General de Venezuela (Captaincy General of Venezuela) (Art. 6) and any town liberated thereafter would enter the Republic with equal rights and representation (Art. 7).   It ordered a hierarchical division into Departments, Provinces, Cantons, and Parishes (Art. 8) and instructed Congress to create six or more Departments (Art. 150).    Each Department was led by an Intendente, the President’s “natural and immediate agent,” who was appointed for a three-year term with powers set by law (Arts. 150-2).    Every Province was placed under a Governor, subordinate to the Intendente, and held office also for three years; if the Intendente resided in a Province, he served concurrently as its Governor (Arts. 153-4).    The existing colonial-era cabildos, transitioning into municipal councils of the cantons, continued to govern local affairs, while Congress determined their number, boundaries, and functions (Art. 155).   Following the 1821 constitutional mandate, Congress’s Ley de División Territorial of October 8, 1821, divided the nation into the Departments of Venezuela (capital:   Caracas), Cundinamarca (capital:   Bogotá), and Quito (capital:   Quito).

POW-LEG—Congress (Legislative)

The 1821 Constitution enumerated twenty-six legislative powers—from annual budgets and public credit to war, peace, education, and extraordinary wartime authority (Art. 55 §§ 1–26; new).    It fixed the opening of regular sessions on 2 January for ninety days, extendable by thirty, barred adjournment or relocation without bicameral consent, and empowered the Executive to resolve venue deadlocks (Arts. 68–70; new).   Each chamber established internal rules for conducting sessions, debates, and deliberations; kept daily journals with roll-call votes upon request; and retained the power to enforce order or impose penalties for disrespect, obstruction, or threats to its proceedings or members (Arts. 56–63; new).   

Members, elected by the nation, enjoyed indemnity and personal immunity but could not hold executive, judicial, or administrative office deemed incompatible with legislative service (Arts. 64–67; new).    Legislative bills had to be read on three different days in their chamber of origin—first for introduction, second for discussion, and third for approval—unless urgency was formally declared (Arts. 41–43).    Revenue bills could only originate in the Chamber of Representatives (Art. 42).   

Once approved by both chambers, bills were submitted to the Executive, who had ten days to return objections, or two days in urgent cases; if no response was given within the deadline, or if both chambers reaffirmed the bill by a two-thirds vote, it became law without requiring Executive signature (Arts. 46–50; new).   Legislative acts were issued in duplicate, dated, accompanied by an explanation of their grounds, and archived in the chamber of origin (Arts. 51–54; new).    In election years, Congress tallied the national ballots for President, Vice-President, and departmental Senators (Art. 71; new).    The House impeached high officials (Art. 89), and the Senate tried them, with conviction requiring agreement by two-thirds of the senators present (Art. 101).    Procedural features retained from the 1811 charter included the bicameral structure, the origination of tax bills in the lower chamber, the three-reading rule, and specified voting thresholds, including two-thirds majorities for expulsion or censure (cont. 1811 Cap. II §§ 1, 4–10, 59–62).

ECO-TES—Treasury

The 1821 Constitution, consistent with the 1811 charter, did not establish a specific treasury department (continu. 1811 Art. 108).   Congress was vested with exclusive authority over the annual budget, management of national property, imposition of taxes and customs duties, and contracting of public debt (Tít. VII, Art. 55 §§ 1–4; new).   The President was required to submit annual reports to Congress detailing revenue, expenditures, and fiscal resources (Tít. IX, Art. 129).   Fiscal administration was assigned to the Secretario de Hacienda [Secretary of the Treasury], one of five ministerial offices established under the Executive (Tít. IX, Art. 136), with the President authorized to distribute functions among the secretaries in accordance with congressional law (Tít. IX, Art. 137).   The Constitution did not define mechanisms for oversight, financial jurisdiction, or audit within the treasury system.

POW-EXE—Executive

The 1821 Constitution vested executive authority in a single Presidente de la República [President of the Republic], elected for a four-year term with the possibility of one immediate re-election, assisted by a Vicepresidente [Vice President], and provisionally replaced in cases of dual vacancy by the Presidente del Senado [President of the Senate] (Arts. 105–112; continu. 1811 Arts. 62–63; cf. 1811: plural executive body).   This arrangement replaced the three-member Consejo Ejecutivo [Three-Member Executive Council] established in 1811.   

The Constitution established a Consejo de Gobierno [Council of Government] composed of the Vicepresidente, one member of the Alta Corte de Justicia [High Court of Justice], and the five Secretarios de Estado [State Ministers]; the President was required to consult this Council on matters such as declarations of war, treaties, senior appointments, emergency measures, and other issues of gravity, though he was not bound to follow its opinion.   

The Council’s deliberations were to be recorded and submitted annually to the Senate (Arts. 133–135; new; cf. 1811: no equivalent consultative body).   The President directed the general administration of the Republic and exercised extraordinary powers during foreign invasion or civil unrest, either with prior authorization from Congress or, if Congress was in recess, on his own initiative, provided he convened Congress immediately and limited his actions to what was strictly necessary (Art. 128; new; cf. 1811:    no express emergency powers clause).   

The Constitution established five Secretarías de EstadoInterior, Relaciones Exteriores, Hacienda, Guerra, and Marina—whose holders served as mandatory countersignatories of presidential acts; no executive act could acquire legal force without the signature of the competent Minister (Arts. 136–138; new; cf. 1811 Arts. 91–92: no explicit requirement of countersignature).   Congress held the authority to modify the number of ministries, while the Executive assigned their functions by regulation (Art. 137; new).   

The President further commanded the armed forces, enforced laws, supervised elections, promulgated legislation, nominated diplomatic and military officials with Senate approval, and submitted annual reports to Congress on political, military, and fiscal matters (Arts. 113–117, 119–123, 129; new; cf. 1811 Arts. 64, 84, 86: powers previously distributed across other bodies).   Several of these provisions extended or reaffirmed earlier principles established in 1811, including the supremacy of civil power, administrative leadership, joint responsibility through ministerial countersignature, protection from arbitrary detention, and the lawful delegation of executive functions (Arts. 113–114, 124–127, 136–138; continu. 1811 Arts. 19–20, 64, 84, 86, 91–92).

POW-JUD—Judicial

The 1821 Constitution preserved the Alta Corte de Justicia [High Court of Justice] and fixed a minimum of five members and reaffirmed eligibility criteria of thirty years of age, active legal practice, and qualification as an elector (Arts. 140–141; continu. 1811 Arts. 110–114).   For each vacancy, the President submitted a list of three candidates; from this, the Cámara de Representantes [Chamber of Representatives] selected a shortlist, and the Senado [Senate] made the final appointment.   

During congressional recess, the Executive could provisionally fill vacancies (continu. 1811 Art. 142).   The Court retained jurisdiction over foreign relations—including embassies, consulates, diplomatic agents, and the Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores [Minister of Foreign Affairs]—as well as treaty interpretation and conflicts among higher tribunals, with further jurisdictional details to be defined by law (continu. 1811 Arts. 143–144).   Justices held offices during good conduct and received fixed, non-reducible salaries (continu. 1811 Arts. 145–146).   

The Constitution also authorized Congress to establish tribunales superiores [superior courts] throughout the Republic and to assign their jurisdictions to facilitate timely administration of justice (Art. 147; new).   Judges of these courts were to be appointed by the Executive from ternas [lists of three candidates] submitted by the High Court and received the same tenure protections as the high justices (Art. 148; new).   Tribunales inferiores [lower tribunals] remained governed by transitional legislation until Congress completed judicial reorganization (continu. 1811 Art. 149).    The Constitution also included a provision for Congress to gradually introduce trial by jury in forms and cases it deemed appropriate (Art. 175; new).

CON-AMD—Amending the Constitution

The 1821 Constitution introduced staggered renewal of the Senado [Senate] to prevent constitutional amendments by a Congress that had not undergone partial replacement (Tít. II, Secc. 7, Art. 94; new).   Senators were divided into two classes within each departamento [department], with the first class serving four years and the second serving the full eight-year term (Art. 94; new).    A lottery held during the Senate’s first session determined which senators would be subject to early replacement (Art. 94; new).   Amendments required a two-thirds vote in both the Cámara de Representantes [Chamber of Representatives] and the Senado (Tít. IV, Secc. 1, Art. 190; new).   However, no amendment could be proposed until at least half the members of both chambers were renewed through regular elections (Art. 190; new).   

The Constitution excluded from amendment the fundamental provisions defining national unity and the form of government, as established in Tít. I, Art. 1 and Tít. II, Art. 2 (Art. 190; new).   A full constitutional revision could only take place through a general convention, which could not be convened until ten years had passed or until the national territory had been completely liberated (Tít. VIII, Art. 191; new).   Existing laws remained in force insofar as they did not conflict with the Constitution or with laws enacted under its authority (Tít. VII, Art. 188; continu. 1811 Art. 108).

CIV-SUF—Suffrage

The 1821 Constitution retained the system of indirect suffrage by parroquia [parish] and electoral assemblies established in 1811 (1821 Tít. III; cont. 1811 Cap. II), but introduced a more elaborate and hierarchical electoral structure:   asambleas parroquiales [parish assemblies] convened every four years in every parish regardless of population (Art. 12; new), presided over by local judges and four reputable witnesses (Art. 13; new), and were responsible for appointing electores parroquiales [parish electors] in open sessions (Arts. 18, 24–25; new).   

Voting eligibility required Colombian nationality, either marriage or age over twenty-one, and property or occupational qualifications:    ownership of real estate worth at least 100 pesos or independent engagement in a trade, profession, or commerce (Art. 15; new).   Although the 1821 text included literacy as a condition, its enforcement lapsed unfulfilled when Gran Colombia dissolved, and a literacy qualification entered Venezuelan electoral law separately in 1840 (Ley de Reforma Electoral, Gaceta de Venezuela, 16 de mayo de 1840; sesiones del Congreso Nacional, 1840).   

Disqualifications in the 1821 charter included criminal conviction or pending criminal charges, declared insolvency by competent authority, vagrancy, or engaging in corrupt practices such as buying or selling votes (Arts. 16–17; new).   Each parish vote was recorded and sealed for transmission to cantonal councils, which compiled the tallies and declared electors by the highest number of votes or, in the case of a tie, by drawing lots (Arts. 26–28; new), then they forwarded results to the provincial capital (Art. 29; new).   

Electors were distributed among cantons based on population—one per 4,000 inhabitants plus one extra for every additional 3,000 inhabitants, with a minimum of one per canton (Art. 20; new)—and had to meet stricter criteria than parish voters:    they had to be literate, at least twenty-five years old, and either own property worth 500 pesos, earn 300 pesos annually, the profit of equivalent value, or hold a scientific degree or profession (Art. 21; new).    These electors formed the asambleas electorales provinciales [provincial electoral assemblies], which met every four years (Art. 31; new) to elect representatives, departmental senators, and the President and Vice-President (Arts. 30, 34; new).   Votes for each office were recorded in separate registers (Art. 35; new).

The results of presidential, vice-presidential, and senatorial elections were sent from parish assemblies to departmental capitals, and from there transmitted to the Senado [Senate] for final verification and proclamation (Arts. 36–38; new).    Results of elections for representatives were certified by local authorities and submitted directly to the Cámara de Representantes [Chamber of Representatives] for review (Art. 39; new).   

Citizens thus continued to vote in parish assemblies to choose parish electors, who then participated in provincial assemblies to elect members of the lower house; senators were selected by departmental assemblies from lists submitted by the provincial legislatures, and the President and Vice-President were elected by a majority of the departmental assemblies from a list of candidates proposed by Congress (Arts. 30–34; new).

CIV-CIT—Citizenship

The 1821 Constitution retained the provisions of the 1811 charter on citizenship (continu. 1811 Art. 7).   It recognized as citizens all free-born men within Colombian territory or abroad to Colombian parents (Art. 4.1; continu. 1811 Art. 7).    It also granted citizenship to foreign-born residents at the time of independence and remained loyal to the Republic (Art. 4.2; new).   It allowed naturalization by carta de naturaleza (Art. 4.3; new).    In addition, the Constitution codified civic obligations and required its obedience by citizens who had to respect authorities, to pay taxes, and—when necessary—to offer their property or lives in defense of the Republic (Art. 5; new).

RTS-GAR—Rights

The 1821 Constitution reaffirmed rights first recognized in 1811.    It upheld freedom of expression, permitted citizens to write, print, and publish their thoughts without prior censorship (Art. 156; continu. 1811 Art. 4).   It also preserved the right to petition public authorities and to seek legal remedies against violations of property, honor, or reputation (Art. 157; continu. 1811 Art. 5).   

The Constitution guaranteed the presumption of innocence and due process (Arts. 158–159; new).    In cases of in flagrante delicto, any citizen could perform the arrest, which had to be brought immediately before a judge (Art. 160; new).   Warrants had to specify the grounds for arrest, be issued by a competent authority, and be delivered in writing to the detainee (Arts. 161–162; new).   

Detainees had the right to communicate freely, unless a judge imposed a restriction of three days at a maximum; both arresting officers and jailers faced penalties for violating these safeguards (Arts. 163–164; new).    If the grounds for detention ceased, the authorities had to release the detainee or admit him to bail, and the court was required to disclose the testimony of witnesses within three days (Art. 165; new).   Criminal trials had to be conducted by established courts; the Constitution barred ex post facto laws and prohibited self-incrimination and testifying against a spouse or close relatives (Arts. 166–168; new).   It protected the inviolability of the home except by judicial order (Art. 169; new), and guaranteed the privacy of correspondence and personal papers unless otherwise provided by law (Art. 170; new).   Judicial decisions had to be reasoned and could be appealed up to three times; judges were forbidden to rule in cases involving their self-interest (Arts. 171–172; new).   

The Constitution stated that the infamy of a criminal offense could not extend to the offender’s family (Art. 173; new) and prohibited the military trial of civilians, including the militia, during peacetime (Art. 174; new).    Troops could not be quartered in private homes without consent during peacetime (Art. 176; new).   It affirmed the right to property, labor, commerce, and industry, and permitted expropriation only when justified by public necessity and then compensated accordingly (Arts. 177–179; new).    It also abolished hereditary privileges and noble titles (Arts. 179, 181–182; new).    Acceptance of foreign honors required prior congressional authorization (Art. 182; new).   Foreign residents received equal protection under the law (Art. 183; new), and the Constitution allowed foreigners, who distinguished themselves in the war of independence, to hold office, even if they did not meet the ordinary citizenship criteria (Art. 184; new).

REG-MIL—The Military

The 1821 Constitution preserved the military framework set in 1811, including congressional control over national defense, reliance on a trained militia over a standing army, civil supremacy over military authority, and presidential command subject to legislative oversight (continu. 1811 Arts. 71, 86, 108, 176–179).   It introduced a new provision authorizing the President to assume extraordinary powers during foreign invasion or domestic insurrection, either with prior congressional approval or—if Congress was in recess—on his own initiative, provided he convened the legislature immediately and limited such powers to circumstances of urgent necessity (Art. 128; new).

REG-REL—Religion

The 1821 Constitution maintained Roman Catholicism as the sole public faith and upheld the obligation of public authorities to protect it (Art. 2; continu. 1811 Art. 1).    It additionally required the respect of the citizens and resident foreigners to it (Art. 2; new).

REG-SLA—Slavery

The 1821 Constitution did not abolish slavery but retained the prohibition of the slave trade previously codified in 1811 (Tít. IX, Art. 124; continu. 1811 Cap. IX, Art. 202).   It empowered Congress to enact laws concerning the condition of enslaved persons and manumission under its general authority to legislate on all matters “conducive to the wellbeing of the general public” [todo lo que conduzca a la felicidad general] (Tít. VII, Art. 55 §26; new), without any further provision.

ECO-INF—Infrastructure

The 1821 Constitution codified the State’s responsibility to promote public education, support the advancement of science and the arts, and regulate commerce and agriculture (Tít. IX, Arts. 160–161; new).   It also required Congress and the Executive to enact laws aimed at improving national industry and general prosperity (Art. 161; new).   To support these objectives, the Executive had to submit to Congress an annual report of national income and expenditures, which served as a fiscal mechanism to finance public functions (Tít. VII, Art. 129; new).   The Constitution further mandated the publication of the national budget to ensure transparency in the administration of public funds.   These provisions replaced the more general statements on education and commerce found in the 1811 charter (1821: Tít. IX, Arts. 160–161; Tít. VII, Art. 129; new. 1811: Arts. 108, 133, 135).

CON-FIN—Final Provisions

The 1821 Constitution was formally adopted by the General Congress of Colombia and signed by its president, vice president, and all present deputies at the Villa del Rosario de Cúcuta on 30 August 1821 (Acta de Sanción, Villa del Rosario, 30 de agosto de 1821).   And it was promulgated and executed by the Executive on October 6, 1821, bearing the signature of President Simón Bolívar and the countersignatures of the Minister of Navy and War [Secretario de Marina y Guerra], Pedro Briceño Méndez, the Minister of Finance and Foreign Affairs [Secretario de Hacienda y Relaciones Exteriores], Pedro Gual, and the Minister of Interior and Justice [Secretario de Interior y Justicia], Diego B. Urbaneja.

*

Note:


“Ritual: A Philosophy of Necessity”

September 20, 2025

Ricardo Morín
New York Series, Nº 5
54″ x 84″
Oil on canvas
1992

Preface

This essay seeks to define rituals without reliance on metaphors, abstractions, or moral judgments.   The method of this essay begins with etymology, then traces its biological foundation, and follows the extension of ritual into human conduct.   Ritual is treated as repetition with form, carried out by necessity to contain forces uncontrollable by command or intention.

The analysis will distinguish ritual from belief and superstition.    Belief attributes power beyond immediate function.   Superstition arises when belief assigns causality where none exists.    Ritual is not a belief, but only a procedure.   Its function is to regulate life through ordered repetition.

The chapters that follow address the principal domains in which ritual operates.   In sexuality, ritual prevents destabilization by giving desire a form through which it can move without collapse.   In distrust, friendship, enmity, and love, ritual contains states that resist control and makes them livable.   In governance, ritual holds ideological differences within limits that preserve continuity of community.

Ritual is necessary for existence.   It does not eliminate instinct, emotion, or conflict.   It gives them form and allows life to continue without disintegration.   This necessity is not external, but generated by life itself.   Where forces exceed control, ritual provides order.

*

Ricardo Morin. September 12, 2025, Bala Cynwyd, Pa.

I

The word ritual comes from the Latin ritus (a prescribed act performed in an ordered manner).    Its essence is repetition.   To speak of ritual is not to speak of tradition or abstraction, but of a necessity carried out for primal longing.

The biological basis of ritual is clear.   In many species, conflictive instinctive drives are contained by repeated actions which reduce uncertainty.    Birds perform dances before mating.   Wolves display submission to prevent attack.    Primates groom one another to ease tension.    These actions do not alter the external world.    They do not ensure mating, nor prevent danger, nor eliminate aggression.   They work by regulating behavior in ways preventing destabilization.    They arise from necessity:   without them, reproduction, survival, or cohesion could be placed at risk.

Human conduct extends this biological principle.    The handshake is a repeated act signaling non-aggression between strangers.   A funeral orders grief into sequence and allows the bereaved to endure loss.    A meal shared among people affirms cooperation and reduces the possibility of conflict.   Not one of these actions are effective because of a belief in causality.    They are effective because they are the product of repetition and recognition within the group.   They are necessary because without them, mistrust, grief, or rivalry would remain uncontained.

Instinct and emotion generate uncontrolled command or intention.   Repetition gives them form without elimination.    Herein lies the necessity:    life produces forces beyond control, and ritual provides their procedure without collapse.    Thus further inquiry rests here.

II

Belief begins where an act or event is taken to hold power beyond its immediate function.    To believe is to attribute meaning not evident in the act itself.   Belief provides orientation, but also creates vulnerability.

From belief grows superstition.   Superstition occurs when a gesture, a sign, or an accident is taken to determine good or bad luck.   Breaking glass is said to bring harm.   A number is said to bring luck.    The act or sign is given power it does not possess.    Superstition is belief that’s misdirected.   It relies on the conviction that external hidden forces govern external events and become accessible through signs and gestures.

Ritual does not depend on belief that an act can change fate or invoke hidden power.   Its effectiveness does not rest on what is imagined but on what is enacted.   A handshake obviates mistrust because it is repetition and recognition, not because of its magic.   A funeral allows provides ordered sequence and allows grief, but it does not alter death.   A meal shares cooperation through its mutuality, not because it calls luck.

The distinction is exact.   If ritual is the form, desire is the current that moves within it. Religious traditions have often cast desire as a deficit, a disorder, or a temptation to be repressed.   But desire is neither deficit nor disorder; it is vitality itself:   an energy that presses toward expression.   Ritual does not restrict this force; restriction belongs to fear and suffering.    Ritual contains fear and keeps excess within the limits of endurance and necessity.   Fasting, for example, does not abolish hunger but holds it in rhythm; it makes appetite a measure rather than a punishment.    By contrast, a prohibition that denies the legitimacy of desire transforms vitality into anxiety altogether.    In this way, ritual and desire are not opposed but interdependent:   the former is the channel, the latter the stream.

III

Sexual drive is pervasive in human life.    Left without form, it destabilizes both the individual and the community.    Its power lies in persistence.   Command cannot dismiss desire.   Desire presses for expression.    Every culture has developed rituals to contain and to regulate it.

Yet the grounds of sexual ritual are not repression but replication.    Nurture marks the human condition from birth:    in lactation, nurture consists in being fed, held, and sustained through another’s body.    In this original state, intimacy secures survival.    Later, desire repeats the structure.    The quest for union is both a return to that first condition of dependence and a transformation of it into adulthood.    Sexual ritual prolongs that first experience:    it carries within it the imprint of nurture.    It is not a matter of shame or judgment, but of continuity.

Courtship is the model.   Repeated gestures mark the approach to intimacy.   Ceremonies (words, gifts, dances) structure the encounter.   Desire is not eliminated, but gives form to sexuality and allows it to proceed without immediate conflict.    Marriage extends the process and establishes rules for its conduct within a recognizable frame.   Ritual transforms a disruptive force into a relation that can be carried within order.

Different cultural examples exemplify the variety of this process.    In Japan, tea ceremonies and formal visits have structured the first stages of marital negotiation.    In Victorian England, the presence of chaperones functioned as a mode of surveillance and set boundaries for courtship.   Among the Navajo in North America, the Kinaaldá ceremony marks a girl’s transition into womanhood and links individual desire and fertility with the continuation of the community.   In each case, ritual does not extinguish instinct but channels it into social life.

When desire cannot be enacted without risk, individuals turn to patterned acts that provide release without collapse.    Monastic traditions across cultures developed rituals of celibacy, which are supported by prayer, fasting, and other disciplines, containing sexual force.   In everyday life, other people turn to imagery (fantasy, dream, or artistic representation) and stage symbolically acts they long for but cannot realize.   Still others establish habits (exercise, meditation, or creative work) that redirect sexual energy into manageable outlets.   Longing, however, is not erased.   Its structure makes sure that desire moves within set limits without becoming overwhelming.

Obsession arises when desire remains unresolved and intrudes upon thought; it repeats itself without relief and it threatens stability.   Ritual is a way to contain obsession.    Through repetition, it acknowledges the force and gives it shape.    Though not eliminated, it has boundaries.

Ritual in the sphere of sexuality is not an option but a necessity.   It provides form where instinct would exceed measure.

IV

Reason alone does not govern human beings.   Emotional states persist in ways that resist control.   Distrust, friendship, enmity, and love cannot be removed by decree or maintained by thought.   Each requires ritual to provide continuity and containment.

Words alone cannot erase suspicion.    Distrust is one of the most persistent of these states. Suspicion cannot be erased by emotion.   Suspicion lingers and destabilizes interaction.   Ritual reduces its scope.   A greeting, an oath, or a contract are ceremonial acts repeated across encounters; they establish a minimum ground on which cooperation can occur.   These acts do not eliminate suspicion, but they allow engagement to proceed in spite of it.

Friendship depends on feelings, but feelings without form fade.   Ritual gives duration to friendship.    Shared meals, recurring visits, exchanges of favors, and so forth, are patterned acts that affirm a relation.   By themselves, they do not create friendship, but without them friendship weakens.   Rituals sustain that which cannot be commanded—the persistence of trust and attachment across time.

Enmity is no less powerful.    Unbounded hostility escalates until destruction follows.   Rituals channel hostility into limited form:    a duel, a contest, a formal debate—each provides a frame in which enmity can be expressed without collapse.   Even in war, treaties operate as ritual forms that restrict violence to recognizable limits.    Without them, conflict loses proportion.

Love in itself is unstable.   It begins in impulse and only lasts with repetition.   Daily gestures, renewed promises, anniversaries, and continuous acts of care provide a form to sustain it.    These rituals do not guarantee permanence, but they give a structure to love within which it can endure.    Without these rituals, love dissipates.

In all these states, ritual serves the same function.    It gives order where the force cannot be controlled directly.   It does not remove distrust, friendship, sexuality, enmity, or love.    It makes them livable.

V

Governance is the state where human forces are amplified by scale.    Distrust, enmity, and competing loyalties appear not only among individuals but among groups.    Ideological differences cannot be eliminated; they can be managed.   Ritual provides the procedure by which this is done.

One example is Parliamentary procedure.    Debate, order of speaking, and voting are repeated acts that permit conflict to be expressed without dissolution.    The forms themselves do not create agreement.   They provide limits within which disagreement can persist.

Civic ceremonies perform a related function.   Inaugurations, public oaths, and national commemorations do not change political conditions in of themselves.    Their repetition affirms the continuity of authority and gives recognition to transitions of power.   The acts are symbolic only in appearance; their real function is procedural stability.

Elections are more direct.   They do not remove ideological division.   They provide a repeated method for channeling conflict into outcomes recognizable by opposing sides.   Without elections, or when their results are not acknowledged, division tends toward rupture.

Ritual is necessity.    Governance depends on it.   Across species, ritual arises from the need to manage forces that exceed direct control.   Human conduct continues this principle.

In ancient Athens, the assembly and the use of the lot allowed opposition to be expressed without dissolving civic order.    Later, parliaments and councils provided ritual structures for negotiation between absolute monarchs and subjects.    In modern democracies, constitutions and electoral cycles maintain continuity by repeating forms that regulate the transfer of power.   When such rituals fail, the outcome is predictable.    Governance is a ritual that makes ideological differences livable.    Without ritual, politics reduces itself to domination and resistance, a cycle that cannot sustain order.


Annotated Bibliography

  • Arendt, Hannah: On Revolution. New York: Viking, 1963. (Arendt emphasizes the role of civic procedures in sustaining governance; this underlies Chapter V’s claim that ritual makes ideological difference livable.)
  • Douglas, Mary: Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge, 1966. (Douglas’s work on ritual boundaries informs Chapter IV’s discussion of distrust, enmity, and the management of instability through repeated acts.)
  • Durkheim, Émile: The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press, 1995. (Durkheim argues that ritual is the foundation of social cohesion, an idea reflected in Chapter I’s claim that rituals regulate behavior and prevent destabilization.)
  • Freud, Sigmund: Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books, 2000. (Freud’s psychoanalytic discussion of sexual drive and obsession parallels Chapter III’s treatment of private rituals and the containment of unresolved desire.)
  • Geertz, Clifford: The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973. (Geertz treats ritual as “models of” and “models for” reality; his ethnographic analysis supports the essay’s extension of ritual from sexuality to governance in Chapters IV and V.)
  • Habermas, Jürgen: Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996. (Habermas shows how ritualized procedures in discourse and law preserve governance under conflict; his thesis supports the essay’s treatment of parliamentary debate and elections.)
  • Jung, Carl Gustav: Symbols of Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1956. (Jung traces how instinctual drives, especially sexuality, become ritualized in both individual psychology and collective culture; his analysis complements Chapter III.)
  • Turner, Victor: The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine, 1969. (Turner’s analysis of liminality informs Chapter III and IV, where sexuality, friendship, and enmity are shown to require ritual frames to carry disruptive forces without collapse.)

“Bound and Unbound:

August 31, 2025

The Articulation of Desire and Sin


*

Cover design by Ricardo Morín
00032
Oil On Linen
18 by 24 by 3/4 inches
2009

Author’s Note

This essay considers how cultures have spoken about desire through the language of sin, pathology, and identity. The aim is not to defend or condemn, but to observe how words have carried judgments across time and how those judgments still shape our understanding. The reflections that follow are an attempt to restore clarity, to see desire as part of life’s vitality rather than as a distortion imposed by inherited vocabularies.

Abstract

Historically, desire has been articulated through terms such as sexuality, fetishism, morality, and religion. Over time, these words shifted from description to judgment, producing a confusion between nature and culture. Evidence from animal behavior, biology, and public health demonstrates that variation in desire is neither anomaly nor pathology. By grounding ethics in dignity and consent rather than shame, desire can be recognized as a natural expression of vitality rather than a source of suspicion.

The Burden of Words

Our most familiar words already betray the history of our confusion. Sexuality, from the Latin sexus, once indicated simple biological differentiation; only in the nineteenth century did it expand into a comprehensive category, enveloping desire, identity, and conduct (Laqueur 1990). Fetishism, from the Portuguese feitiço (“charm” or “sorcery”), was first applied to African religious objects before being imported into European science, where it came to signify irrational sexual attachment (Foucault 1978). Morality, from mores (“customs”), originally described communal practices but hardened into prescriptions against desire, particularly under Christian influence. Religion, from religare (“to bind”), once meant binding communities into shared ritual but eventually came to bind individuals to guilt and suspicion about their own bodies. Here the meaning of Bound and Unbound comes into view: words that once bound desire to order and judgment now carry within them the possibility of unbinding, of returning desire to the realm of vitality rather than suspicion. Each of these terms began in description and shifted into judgment. When we use them today, we inherit their distortions.

The Articulation of Desire and Sin

Culture has long gazed upon desire not as part of life’s ordinary richness but as a threat to be monitored. Theologies cast it as sin; medical texts classified it as pathology; social codes framed it as danger (Foucault 1978). This does not clarify, it distorts. Sexuality becomes at once overexposed and diminished: in public, it is the subject of rules and prohibitions; in private, it collapses into unrealistic expectations that either inhibit expression or exaggerate it into fetish. What should be natural is turned into a negotiation with shame.

Nature provides a more honest account. Same-sex interactions have been documented in over four hundred species (Bagemihl 1999). Rams form lasting male–male bonds, often rejecting female partners. Dolphins employ genital contact across sexes to cement alliances (de Waal 2005). Swans, gulls, and penguins engage in same-sex pairings that rear offspring as successfully as heterosexual pairs (Roughgarden 2013). Among bonobos, sexual contact occurs across nearly every configuration and functions as a mechanism of peacekeeping and social cohesion (de Waal 2005). Even in insects, behaviors that humans describe as “homosexual” occur routinely as part of dominance rituals or sheer abundance of sexual drive. None of this destabilizes the species; rather, it integrates sexuality into the fabric of survival and affiliation.

Humans display similar variation. Chromosomal conditions such as Klinefelter syndrome (XXY) or Turner syndrome (XO) illustrate that biological sex is not a rigid binary but a spectrum (LeVay 2016). Hormonal influences during gestation shape attraction and behavior before culture applies its labels (Hrdy 1981). Neuroscientific studies suggest correlations between hypothalamic structures and orientation, though no single cause accounts for desire (LeVay 2016). What emerges is not a fixed order but a continuum. The insistence on strict categories—heterosexual or homosexual, normal or deviant—is not nature’s doing but culture’s imposition.

Yet culture continues to conflate desire with identity and narrows it into fixed roles. These categories can be politically useful, but they risk obscuring the fluidity of experience that biology reveals. When identity becomes prescriptive, individuals live their own vitality under suspicion, measuring themselves against cultural ideals that deny variation. The result is estrangement: desire filtered through shame.

An alternative frame already exists. The World Health Organization defines sexual health as “a state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being” that includes the possibility of safe and pleasurable experiences (WHO 2006). The World Association for Sexual Health has gone further, affirming sexual pleasure as a fundamental human right (WAS 2019). Such frameworks do not police desire; they protect individuals against coercion and exploitation. They suggest that the role of culture is not to dictate what desires are permissible but to ensure dignity and consent. Once these conditions are secured, desire resumes its natural role: a source of intimacy, bonding, creativity, and balance (Gruskin et al. 2019).

To confront nature’s complexity is to resist its reduction into morality plays of vice and virtue. Desire does not require validation from cultural obsession, nor does it deserve condemnation from inherited vocabularies of sin. It is an aspect of life, as ordinary and vital as hunger or sleep. To acknowledge it without fear is to reclaim joy. By lifting the burden of shame, we return desire to its proper place in the living order: not an aberration requiring defense, but a manifestation of vitality—one that connects us to each other and to the exuberance of nature itself.

*


Annotated Bibliography

  • Bagemihl, Bruce: Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999. (A landmark survey documenting same-sex behaviors in more than 450 species. Bagemihl’s research undermines claims that homosexuality is “unnatural” and illustrates the diversity of sexual expression across the animal kingdom. It is essential for grounding sexuality in biological rather than cultural terms.)
  • de Waal, Frans: Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are. New York: Riverhead Books, 2005. (Drawing on primate studies, de Waal emphasizes sex as a social tool among bonobos and chimpanzees, used for alliance-building and conflict resolution. His work demonstrates that sexual behavior is not confined to reproduction but serves broader social and evolutionary functions.)
  • Foucault, Michel: The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon, 1978. (In this foundational text on the cultural construction of sexuality, Foucault argues that sexuality is not a timeless natural category but a discourse shaped by power and institutions. Provides the conceptual framework for understanding how morality and pathology have distorted natural instincts.)
  • Gruskin, Sofia, et al. “Sexual Health, Sexual Rights and Sexual Pleasure.” Global Public Health, 2019, 14(10): 1361–1372. (This article situates sexual pleasure within global public health frameworks. It underscores that fulfillment and pleasure are inseparable from health and rights, reinforcing the need for ethics based on dignity rather than prohibition.)
  • Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer: The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981. (Hrdy reinterprets female primate behavior and shows active strategies in mating and alliance formation. Her work dismantles the myth of female passivity and demonstrates that sexual agency is integral to evolutionary success.)
  • Laqueur, Thomas: Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990. (Laqueur traces the cultural and historical shift from the “one-sex” model of antiquity to the modern “two-sex” binary. His work shows how scientific language helped construct cultural categories of sexuality and gender, making him central to the etymological and historical analysis of desire.
  • LeVay, Simon: Gay, Straight, and the Reason Why: The Science of Sexual Orientation. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. (LeVay synthesizes research on brain structures, genetics, and prenatal influences and argues that sexual orientation emerges from a complex interaction of biological factors. Useful for contextualizing the continuum of human desire.)
  • Roughgarden, Joan: Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People. Rev. ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013. (Roughgarden challenges traditional Darwinian views of sexual selection, highlighting diversity in gender and sexuality across species. She bridges nonhuman variation and human experience and offers a scientific argument against binary understandings of sexuality.)
  • World Health Organization (WHO): “Defining Sexual Health.” Geneva: WHO, 2006. (This report defines sexual health as a state of well-being that includes the possibility of safe and pleasurable sexual experiences, free of coercion or violence. It offers authoritative language to argue that sexual fulfillment is a health matter, not a moral one.)
  • World Association for Sexual Health (WAS): “Declaration on Sexual Pleasure.” Mexico City: WAS, 2019.(This report affirms sexual pleasure as a fundamental human right. This declaration situates pleasure within global health and rights discourse, supporting the essay’s call for ethics rooted in dignity rather than shame.)

“The Mirage of Exceptionalism”

August 19, 2025

Ricardo Morin
The Mirage of Exceptionalism
(Template Series)
1st out of six
Each 30″x 22″ = 66″h x 66″ overall
Watercolor on paper
2005

To the paradox that divides in the very act of seeking unity.

~


By Ricardo Morin
August 18, 2025, Bala Cynwyd, PA

*

Across traditions, faith has sought to articulate humanity’s highest aspirations. Scriptures, rituals, and doctrines were meant to give form to gratitude, humility, and reverence for creation. Yet time and again, these same legacies have been drawn into the service of division. The paradox lies in how beliefs that profess universal truth harden into claims of exceptional status and turn revelation into rivalry.

The Abrahamic faiths—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—rooted themselves in texts anchored in antiquity. This permanence can inspire continuity, but when transposed into political life, belief risks becoming dogma, and dogma exclusion. What began as a celebration of humanity and its creator becomes instead an engine of contention.

Exceptionalism is not confined to any single tradition. It arises wherever uniqueness is mistaken for superiority, wherever the memory of a chosen people or a sacred covenant becomes a license to deny the dignity of others. Creationism, visions of Heaven, doctrines of righteousness—all contain the seeds of inspiration, but also of antagonism when set against rival paths.

In this sense, exceptionalism is less about the divine than about the human need to define boundaries. By exalting one path as singular, communities cast shadows on others. They forget that the multiplicity of belief might reveal instead the vastness of what humanity seeks to comprehend. The question is not whether one tradition is more luminous than another, but whether clarity itself can be hoarded without dimming the shared horizon of human dignity.

The tragedy of conflating exceptionalism with uniqueness is that it mistakes a gift for a weapon. To be unique is not to be superior; to inherit a tradition is not to monopolize truth. Religions, when true to their essence, point toward a mystery larger than themselves. When they lapse into rivalry, they obscure it.

The challenge before us is whether humanity can learn to let religions serve as languages of gratitude rather than banners of conquest. If belief is to celebrate creation, it must embrace the unity of humanity rather than sabotage it. Otherwise, the promise of transcendence is reduced to a struggle for dominance, and what was meant to honor the creator becomes instead a mirror of our most destructive instincts.

*


Annotated Bibliography

  • Armstrong, Karen. The Battle for God: A History of Fundamentalism. New York: Ballantine Books, 2001. (Armstrong explores how traditions across Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have produced militant forms of fundamentalism. She shows how claims of absolute truth often distort original spiritual intent and feed conflict instead of unity.)
  • Girard, René: Violence and the Sacred. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977. (Girard argues that societies often channel violence into ritualized sacrifice. His insights illuminate how religious exceptionalism, rather than reducing violence, can redirect it toward outsiders deemed threatening to communal “uniqueness.”)
  • Küng, Hans: Christianity and the World Religions: Paths of Dialogue with Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism. New York: Doubleday, 1986. (Küng advocates for dialogue across faiths, stressing that no single religion can claim monopoly on truth. His work directly challenges exceptionalist claims and encourages the search for shared ethical ground.)
  • Said, Edward W.: Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. New York: Vintage, 1997. (Said critiques the portrayal of Islam as uniquely threatening, showing how narratives of exceptionalism become entrenched in political and cultural discourse. His analysis highlights how external perceptions reinforce divisions.)
  • Taylor, Charles: A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007. (Taylor examines how modernity has shifted the role of religion and has complicated claims of universality. He shows how belief persists in pluralist societies, while exceptionalist frameworks struggle to adapt within a diverse human landscape.)

*


Edited by Billy Bussell Thompson, August 18, 2025, NY, NY.