Posts Tagged ‘Endurance’

“River Grass”

December 7, 2025

~

Ricardo Morin
Landscape II: River Grass
18” x 24”
Sepia on newsprint 
2003

Ricardo F Morin

Dec. 6, 2025

Naples. Florida

*

This diptych, “River Grass” and “Naples in the Morning,” brings together a reflection on continuity and a brief observation of everyday life.  Two scenes—one sustained, the other fleeting—register how experience, silence, and attention shape presence.  The first part, “River Grass,” does not present an argument, a confession, or a theory.  It offers an observation shaped over time by proximity rather than distance.   The focus is not on individual psychology or relational conflict, but on patterns that take form across generations and persist quietly within everyday life.

What follows avoids moral explanation and narrative resolution.   It attends instead to continuity—how restraint, generosity, and presence may be transmitted not through instruction or memory, but through posture, habit, and orientation.   The intention is to describe without adjudicating, and to clarify without assigning cause where cause cannot be cleanly isolated.   What is traced here represents one possible orientation among many, shaped by inheritance but not exhaustive of its effects—an invitation not to mistake the channel for the ocean.


Orientation of “River Grass”

What follows attends to what persists when lives are shaped by continuity rather than interruption.

Not all inheritance arrives as memory.   Some is conveyed without story, without date, without language.   It enters through atmosphere rather than narrative—through cadence, restraint, posture, and a preference for continuity over display.   In such cases, history is not recalled; it is carried.

This form of inheritance does not announce itself as trauma.   It leaves no single scene to revisit, no episode that can be isolated and explained.   Instead, it appears as a way of moving through the world:   measured, attentive, resistant to excess.   The past exerts influence not by instruction but by shaping what feels permissible, sustainable, or necessary.

Under these conditions, restraint is not experienced as loss.  It functions as orientation.  Accommodation does not signal submission but competence.   Stability reflects not the absence of desire but the quiet placement of desire among other priorities.   What is transmitted is not fear but caution—an ethic of endurance refined over time.

Because no event is foregrounded, little invites interpretation.   The absence of visible distress encourages the assumption of ease.   Life appears ordered, generous, and intact.   Yet the inheritance remains active and structures conduct without requiring acknowledgment.   It persists not as memory but as form.

Such inheritance often resists recognition precisely because it has succeeded.   The past has not repeated itself.   Continuity has been preserved.   What remains is a posture oriented toward sustaining that continuity—a vigilance so normalized that it passes as temperament rather than history.

Restraint, in this context, does not operate as inhibition or denial.   It functions as a stabilizing orientation—an internal calibration shaped over time.   Action is guided less by expression than by proportion and durability.   What governs choice is not moral judgment but coherence.

Such restraint often coexists with clarity and decisiveness.   Boundaries are maintained without conflict; decisions are made without excess emphasis.   What is avoided is not agency but surplus.   Expression is moderated not through fear of consequence, but through an internal sense of sufficiency.

Accommodation here is frequently misread.   It does not arise from compliance or uncertainty, but from an assessment of impact.   Space yielded to others reflects confidence in structure rather than retreat from position.   Presence remains intact even when it is not foregrounded.

This orientation produces a stability that can appear effortless.   Friction is minimized.   Demands are rare.   The absence of insistence is readily mistaken for ease or contentment.   Yet the restraint at work is active, not passive—and continuously shapes what is articulated, deferred, or left unspoken.

Over time, restraint becomes difficult to distinguish from identity.   It ceases to register as a choice among alternatives and hardens into posture.   The question of expression recedes, replaced by an emphasis on responsibility, proportion, and non-disruption.

Generosity shaped by inherited restraint rarely announces itself.   It does not seek recognition or reciprocation, nor does it depend on visibility for validation.   It appears instead as availability, as the quiet removal of obstacles, as the willingness to yield space without narrative or sacrifice.

In this form, giving is non-transactional.   No balance is tracked; no return anticipated.   What is offered is steadiness rather than favor.   Support unfolds without appeal, often unnoticed, absorbed into ordinary conduct.   The absence of demand is integral rather than incidental.

Because it imposes no weight, such generosity leaves little trace.   Others encounter freedom without sensing its source.   Autonomy is enabled without attribution.   The one who gives remains present yet unmarked.

Over time, the habit of making room for others becomes more practiced than the habit of entering it.   Attention turns outward and refines responsiveness while narrowing self-directed articulation.   What persists is not loss, but redirection.

This configuration resists conventional readings of imbalance.   No grievance emerges; no conflict announces asymmetry.   Generosity remains intact, even exemplary.   What shifts subtly is internal emphasis: presence exercised through allowance rather than assertion.

Desire, within this orientation, is neither denied nor suppressed.   It is repositioned.   Its legitimacy is not questioned, but its urgency is diminished.   What is set aside is not longing itself, but the expectation that longing must organize life.

Desire is acknowledged yet rarely centered.   Expression is permitted elsewhere more readily than inwardly claimed.   Attention gravitates toward what preserves stability rather than what intensifies experience.   Satisfaction arises from coherence rather than culmination.

This produces no vacancy.   Life remains engaged and responsive.   What diminishes is insistence.   Continuity comes to matter more than appetite; durability more than immediacy.

Because this arrangement is not framed as renunciation, it escapes notice.   No moral language surrounds it.   Nothing is named as sacrifice.   Desire persists at a distance—observed, managed, deferred without struggle.

Over time, identity becomes shaped less by pursuit than by maintenance.   Expression gives way to stewardship.   Meaning accrues not through arrival, but through the avoidance of rupture.

Patterns organized around restraint and continuity are often mistaken for moral attainment.   Composure is read as wisdom; accommodation as maturity; silence as depth.   Because no disturbance arises, the orientation escapes examination.   What functions smoothly is presumed complete.

This misreading is reinforced by social frameworks that reward stability over inquiry.   Absence of conflict is taken as evidence of balance.   Generosity without demand is praised rather than interrogated.   Its costs remain obscured precisely because they impose nothing on others.

Virtue, in this setting, becomes indistinguishable from habit.   Adaptive orientation solidifies into character, and character into expectation.   Reliability is affirmed repeatedly, deepening its hold.

The result is not deception but omission.   The steadiness is genuine.   What goes unrecognized is how fully such an arrangement organizes life around preservation rather than presence.   The question of displacement remains unasked, not refused.

Misreading occurs through success.   Relations endure.   Structures hold.   No obvious harm appears.   And so the deeper configuration—quiet, durable, historically shaped—continues beneath the language of virtue.

At a certain threshold, continuity shifts from supporting means to governing end.   Life becomes organized not around fulfillment, but around preservation.   What matters most is that nothing essential is exposed to rupture, whether through excess demand or through untested assertion.

Fulfillment is not rejected, but subordinated.   Satisfaction arises from duration rather than intensity.   Time is oriented toward extension, not culmination.   What is valued is the capacity to carry forward intact.

This proves effective.   The past does not recur.   Stability holds.   Loss is contained rather than amplified.   Inherited imperatives are honored not through recollection, but through conduct.

Yet when continuity occupies this position, the range of permissible movement narrows.   Change must justify itself in advance.   Desire must demonstrate durability before enactment.   Expression yields to maintenance.

The future is approached as responsibility rather than as open terrain.   Meaning accumulates through safeguarding what is essential rather than through the exploration of possibilities.   Success becomes synonymous with the preservation of continuity.

Presence, in its final form here, does not organize itself around position or priority.   It functions laterally and sustains structure without becoming its focus.   Life is held together through attentiveness rather than through claims to authority or justification.   The course of life proceeds without pressure to arrive at an explanation that secures its coherence.

This mode of presence resists visibility.  It does not seek recognition or assert precedence.   Its efficacy lies in what remains intact rather than in what is achieved.  Others move freely, often unaware of the support permitting such freedom.

To remain outside the center is not withdrawal.   Engagement continues—measured, responsive, intact.   What is avoided is domination, not participation.  Influence is exercised through stability rather than direction.

The image implied by the title takes form.   A river that advances without force, reshaping terrain through the sustained persistence of its course.  Motion without spectacle.  Endurance without inscription.  The course is maintained by flowing around obstruction rather than confronting it.

What remains is continuity itself—quietly sustained, seldom noticed, and difficult to name.


*

“Naples in the Morning”

I sat across from my husband at a breakfast place in Naples, Florida.  Diagonally behind him sat a young couple.  The woman was small—almost childlike in scale—next to her husband, who stood well over six feet.

None of us had ordered yet.  She carefully arranged her silverware and napkin, aligning them with deliberate precision, almost ritualistic.   Her hair fell forward, parted to either side of her face like curtains drawn closed.  When she lifted her chin, her facial features—Asian in appearance—came briefly into view.  Despite her slightness, her posture suggested control rather than fragility.

When our glances crossed, she held my gaze longer than expected, nearly staring.  She then lowered her head, hiding again behind her hair.   Moments later, she lifted it once more and made the sign of the cross—forehead, chest, shoulder to shoulder—before turning fully back toward her husband.   No words were exchanged.

When the food arrived, she resumed the same careful demeanor.   She sliced her omelet into small, uniform squares, placed the knife down, and paused.  Each piece was lifted individually, slowly, with unbroken repetition, as if rehearsed.  The sequence carried the quality of performance.   Though she remained oriented toward her husband, her torso shifted intermittently, angling slightly in my direction.

When they finished and moved toward the register, she rose first and walked ahead, chin lowered, hair once again masking her surroundings.  He followed—tall, broad, moving through the room with visible ease.  His stride was expansive, unguarded.

They left without speaking.


“The Seventh Watch”

August 6, 2025

*


Ricardo Morin
The Seventh Watch
(Template Series, 5th panel)
Watercolor over paper
22” x 30”
2005

Introductory Note

Ricardo Morin is a writer and researcher of the history of thought as a dynamic and evolving practice—a student of unspoken gestures, a language stronger than words, especially when interlocutors no longer listen to each other. Drawing on reflections on the cycles of life and a personal experience approaching the last, he invites readers to consider how quiet vigilance and tenderness can shape a meaningful existence. The Seventh Watch emerges from decades of living attentively, offering a humble testament to dignity through perseverance and care.

71 Years

I’ve lived seventy-one years. That alone still surprises me—not because I ever expected an early end, but because each year has asked more of me than the last. There was no dramatic fall, no single crisis to point to. Just a slow, constant shaping—of the body, of temperament, of the will.

Illness didn’t come in childhood. It arrived later, in my early twenties, during a snowbound winter in Buffalo. I was just beginning to live on my own, full of ambition and unfinished dreams. The diagnosis was mononucleosis—but it wasn’t the name that mattered. It was the way it interrupted momentum, slowed my pace, and revealed something deeper: the lifelong task of learning to live within my own limits.

That was the beginning—not of a medical history, but of a different kind of vigilance. Not directed outward, but inward. A quiet realization took root: that survival, if it was to be meaningful, required not just endurance, but restraint. A way of protecting myself from myself. That discipline wasn’t harsh—it became a kind of devotion. Not to self-denial, but to finding the clarity of a peaceful mind. To living with more care than urgency.

I don’t see illness as noble, but I do see in it a mirror—not for the pain, but for the truth it reflects. What can be tended, what must be relinquished, what deserves attention. I don’t claim wisdom from illness, but I recognize what it’s taught me to let go of: illusion, pride, and the frantic chase after things that do not last—such as the accumulation of wealth or power.

I’ve come to think of it simply as endurance—the kind illness teaches when you stop resisting and begin listening. There’s an ethical arc in this awareness—not born of dogma or belief, but shaped by experience. It bends not toward triumph, but toward tenderness.

This isn’t a story of pathology. It’s a story of attention—of refining the self without hardening it. Of discovering that maturity means knowing when to persist and when to pause. That the quiet act of sustaining one’s life—daily, attentively—is its own form of courage.

I never set out to write a testament. But seventy-one years in, I see the outlines more clearly. And in that, there is dignity.

Yet, dignity is not a reward. It arrives without announcement, without ceremony. It builds slowly—through the daily rituals of rising, of choosing what to carry and what to set down. It does not shield one from sorrow, nor make suffering easier to bear. But it gives the days a certain weight.

I’ve come to cherish that weight—not as a burden, but as proof. Proof that I’ve lived through each season not untouched, but intact. And that, even now, the task is not to escape life’s demands, but to meet them with steadiness.

What I’ve learned isn’t mine alone. Anyone who lives long enough will be asked to reckon with time—not as a thief, but as a sculptor. Illness, especially, teaches us how little control we truly have—yet how much presence we’re still capable of. It humbles and joins us. Not in sameness, but in mutual recognition.

Endurance, I’ve found, is not passive. It’s not about waiting for pain to pass. It is active, quiet, often unseen. It means choosing how to live when choice feels narrow. It means tending to life not with haste, but with attention.

There is no finish line to this work. Just the quiet act of continuing.

So I continue—not because I must, but because life, even in its reduced dimensions, still offers room for meaning. Some days that meaning is faint. Other days it is simply the act of rising, or writing a letter, or remembering the snow. But it is there. And as long as it is, I remain.

*


“A Threshold of Silence”

February 12, 2025

~


*

Michael Basso
(June 28, 1955 – May 28, 2025)

~


*

Sometimes sudden, sometimes creeping in with the years, there comes a moment when mortality ceases to be an abstraction.     It is no longer a distant eventuality, an idea tucked away in the folds of daily existence, softened by distractions and routine.     Instead, it steps forward, undeniable and weighty, as certain as breath and just as fleeting.

Perhaps it arrives with the quiet betrayal of the body—a stiffness upon waking that does not pass, the faltering of memory, the slight hesitation before a step once taken with ease.     Or maybe it comes with loss:     a friend, a sibling, a parent, a spouse, whose absence feels like a rehearsal for one’s own.     The awareness sharpens and turns time into something both more precious and more fragile.     We begin to measure life in what remains rather than what has passed.

And yet, even with this awareness, there is resistance.     The mind flits away and grasps at plans, distractions, the comfortable illusion of continuity.     We fear death, but we also refuse to fully look at it, as if acknowledgment alone might hasten its approach.     We craft rituals around it, philosophies to explain it, but we rarely sit with it, silent and unadorned.     It is not death itself that terrifies—it is the knowing, the certainty that it will come, whether with warning or in a moment unguarded.

But what if, instead of turning away, we let the awareness settle?     Not as a burden, but as a quiet companion.     If we could bear to see loss not as a theft but as an inevitable passage, one that has always been woven into the fabric of living, then death itself might lose its urgency.     To know we are mortal is not to despair, but to understand the shape of what we are given.     The question is not whether death will come, but whether we can carry that knowledge without fear—whether we can, at last, learn to live with it.

~


*

II. The Decline: Mind and Body

The body does not falter all at once.     Its undoing is slow, measured in the smallest betrayals—steps that once felt effortless but now require consideration, a name that lingers just out of reach, the gradual dimming of senses that once shaped the world in sharp relief.     At first, these changes seem like passing inconveniences, momentary lapses rather than the steady drift toward an inescapable fate.     But the truth settles in with time:     this is not a phase, not something to be recovered from, but the quiet unraveling of what once felt permanent.

The mind, too, shows its wear.     Thought slows; memories surface in fragments, elusive and unreliable.     There is irony in the awareness that remains—sharp enough to perceive the very faculties now fading.     It is one thing to lose oneself unknowingly, another to watch the process unfold with lucid understanding.     Here lies the deepest struggle:     not merely the failing of body or mind, but the tension between resisting the inevitable and surrendering to it.

Some fight against this decline with a desperate energy and will themselves to retain what is slipping away.     They train the body, challenge the mind, cling to routines as though discipline alone can hold back time.     Others yield more readily and see in each loss a reminder that life is not meant to be held onto with clenched fists.     Acceptance, however, does not come easily—it is not passive resignation, nor is it defeat.     It is an uneasy balance between effort and surrender, between maintaining what can be kept and releasing what must go.

Suffering wears many faces.     For some, it arrives as a single, catastrophic moment—a diagnosis, an accident, an unforeseen unraveling of the body’s delicate order.     For others, it creeps in gradually, its presence felt in the weight of each passing year.     The pain may be physical, unrelenting in its demands, or it may be the subtler ache of losing one’s sense of self, of becoming unrecognizable to one’s own reflection.     Yet suffering, no matter its form, is universal.     It does not measure its presence by fairness or logic.     It simply is.

Against this backdrop, medicine intervenes—an effort to slow, to repair, to resist the natural course of deterioration.     And yet, there is a discord in this.     The body is finite, its functions destined to wane, yet we press forward with treatments, procedures, and endless prescriptions, each promising to forestall the inevitable.     The line between care and prolongation blurs.     To fight for life is instinctive, but at what point does the fight itself become suffering?

In the quiet moments, away from doctors and treatments, the question lingers:     is decline something to battle, or is there dignity in allowing nature to take its course?     And if the answer is neither absolute resistance nor passive surrender, then where, exactly, does one find the balance?

~


*

III. The Distractions That Delay Acceptance

To accept death fully would require a stillness that few can bear.     The mind, restless and cunning, finds ways to avoid such stillness, to weave a life so full of movement and intention that mortality remains a distant, theoretical concern.     And so, we fill our days with efforts to prolong them.

Longevity itself becomes a pursuit, an industry built on the promise that decline can be postponed, perhaps even avoided altogether.     Diets, regimens, supplements, and treatments—all aimed at fortifying the body against its inevitable unraveling.     Science, too, lends its hand, in offering new ways to repair, replace, and sustain.     Medicine intervenes not only to heal but to extend, technology whispers of futures in which aging is optional, and ritual grants the comfort of structure to what cannot be controlled.     Each of these offers something real—time, ease, a semblance of mastery over the body’s betrayals.     But beneath them all is the same unspoken hope:     that death, if not conquerable, might at least be postponed long enough to be forgotten.

Yet it is not only the fear of death itself that keeps us tethered to life but the weight of what remains unfinished.     The obligations we have not yet fulfilled, the words left unsaid, the people who still need us—all of these create a sense that departure is premature, that to leave now would be to abandon something essential.     Even in old age, when life has been long and full, there lingers the feeling that there is more to do, more to settle, more to understand.     The past tugs at us with its unresolved questions; the future, though narrowing, still holds the illusion of possibility.

And so, we resist stillness.     We resist the quiet where truth is most easily heard.     The mind, unoccupied, might begin to accept what the body already knows.     And so, we fill the hours, surround ourselves with routine, distraction, movement.     Even suffering, in its strange way, can serve as a tether—something to focus on, something to endure, rather than a void to surrender to.

But what if we let the distractions fall away?     If we stopped grasping for more time, more purpose, more noise?     What would remain?     The fear, yes—but also the possibility of peace.     For all our striving, death will not be bargained with. It comes when it will, unmoved by the measures taken against it.     Perhaps the final act of wisdom is not to resist, but to release—to allow the quiet to settle, to let the mind and body, at last, align in their understanding.

~


*

IV. The Weight of Suffering and Endurance

Suffering is the one certainty all sentient beings share.     It is neither rare nor exceptional; it is the undercurrent of existence, woven into the fabric of life from its first breath to its last.     And yet, for all its universality, suffering is deeply personal—felt in ways no other can fully understand, borne in ways that cannot be measured.

Pain takes many forms.     It may be the slow tightening of the body against itself, the ache of illness, the heaviness of fatigue that never fully lifts.     Or it may be the quieter pains—the loss of self as the mind falters, the loneliness of watching the world move on without you, the grief of knowing that, no matter how much one has endured, there is still more to bear.     Some suffer in the open, their pain visible and acknowledged.     Others carry it in silence, as though to admit its weight would be to surrender to it.

Yet suffering alone does not mark the end.     There is something beyond it, something deeper:     endurance.     The threshold of what one can bear is not fixed; it shifts, expands, contracts.     A pain once unthinkable becomes routine; a burden that seemed insurmountable is carried, day after day.     And yet, there is always a limit, a moment—often unspoken, often known only in the quiet of one’s own thoughts—when endurance is no longer enough.

This is the reckoning, the moment when staying alive is no longer an act of living but of mere persistence.     For some, it comes as a sudden recognition, as clear as a breaking dawn.     For others, it arrives gradually, the body whispers before the mind dares to listen.     It is not simply about pain, nor is it about age.     It is the moment when the will to remain no longer outweighs the cost of doing so.

There is no universal measure for when this moment arrives; it is known only to the one who bears it.     To endure is an instinct, a habit built into the core of existence.     But to know when endurance has reached its end—that is something else entirely.     It is not weakness, nor is it surrender.     It is a quiet knowing, a recognition that every life carries within it the right to determine when it has been enough.

And so the question lingers:     is suffering the price of life, or is there a point at which one is justified in setting the burden down?     The answer is not written in doctrine, nor in medicine, nor in the opinions of those who do not bear the weight themselves.     It is written in the individual, in the silent moment when one understands—this is enough.

~


*

V. The Unseen Threshold

Life does not depart all at once. It recedes, quietly at first, almost imperceptible in its withdrawal.     The breath grows shallower, not in gasps but in a gradual easing, as though the body has decided to take up less space in the world.     Weight diminishes, not only in flesh but in presence—the self becomes lighter, less tethered to the demands of existence.     A once-restless mind drifts, thoughts untangle, as if loosening its grip on the past, the future, even the urgency of the present.

These are not signs of failure, nor of defeat.     They are the body’s way of whispering that it is time. Time to ease away from effort, from the relentless task of sustaining itself.     Time to let go of the struggle to remain.     For all the fear that surrounds death, the body itself does not fear it.     It knows when to surrender long before the mind is ready to accept.

And so comes the moment of knowing—not a grand realization, not an epiphany, but a quiet certainty.     It is not measured in days or dictated by diagnosis.     It is something deeper, something felt.     Some fight against it and grasp at every last breath as though sheer will alone can anchor it.     Others meet it as one meets sleep—reluctant at first, then trust, then finally yield to its pull.

There is dignity in this release.     Not the dignity others impose, the kind measured in stoicism or restraint, but the simple dignity of relinquishing control.     Of allowing the body to do what it was always meant to do:     to reach its end not as a tragedy, but as a completion.     To fight against this moment is to resist the natural rhythm of life itself.     But to accept it—to welcome the stillness, to let breath slow without fear—that is its own kind of grace.

In the end, death is not something that must be conquered, nor something that must be endured beyond what one can bear.     It is simply the last threshold, unseen until it is reached, known only to the one who crosses it.     And when the time comes, there is nothing left to do but step forward—light, unburdened, and without regret.

~


*

To think of death without fear—to sit with it, unguarded, and allow it to be what it is—this is a rare and difficult peace.     For so long, the mind has recoiled from its certainty and wrapped it in distractions, explanations, and resistance.     But there comes a point when all of that falls away, when death is no longer something to be argued with or postponed, but simply recognized as the inevitable conclusion to a life that has been lived.

Fear untangles itself when death is no longer treated as an interruption, no longer seen as a theft, but rather as something as natural as breath itself.     The body, in its wisdom, has already begun to let go.     It is the mind that lingers and clings to meaning, to unfinished things, to the illusion that one more day, one more hour, might change something essential.     But in the end, no justification is needed.     One does not have to prove that it is the right time.     The right time comes, whether welcomed or not, and acceptance is simply the act of ceasing to resist.

Stillness is not the same as resignation.     Resignation carries a sense of defeat, of something being taken against one’s will.     But true stillness—true acceptance—is something else entirely.     It is an arrival, a settling into the inevitable without fear or regret.     It is the moment when the mind and body, long at odds, finally move in the same direction.     No more effort.     No more bargaining.     Only the quiet understanding that what was given has been enough.

To embrace the end is not to let go of life’s value, but to affirm it fully—by allowing it to complete itself with grace.     There is nothing left to do, no more debts to settle, no more battles to fight.     There is only the quiet, and the quiet is enough.

~


*

VII, In Closing

No life is lived in solitude, and no journey—especially the one toward acceptance—is walked alone.     Along the way, we are shaped, guided, and held by those who have touched our hearts and left their presence within us even after they are gone.     In facing mortality, we recognize not only our own, but also those who have come before us, whose lives continue to echo in memory, in love, in the quiet places where absence becomes something enduring.

Their presence lingers—not as shadows, but as light.
They have taught us, challenged us, consoled us, and, in their own ways, prepared us for the path we all must take.

Death, in its harshness, strips us bare and confronts us with what is essential.
Yet, it also unites us, for the love we have given and received does not fade with physical absence.

Our loved ones remain until the end; they sustain us through their memory and the love they have left within us.

To them, we offer our deepest gratitude.
They are not gone.
They remain, in the heart, in the soul, in the quiet acceptance of all that has been and all that will be.

*

Ricardo F. Morín Tortolero

June 11, 2025, Capitol Hill , D.C.


*