Observations On Perception

---

APPENDIX (cont.)

CONTENT

A-2 · Government and ministries

A-3 · Armed forces

A-4 · Intelligence and security

B · Political organizations

Appendix Sources and documentary notes

Series’ Bibliography

---

Scope and chronology:

This concluding installment records the organization of public power under the constitutional frameworks of 1961 and 1999, the development of Venezuela’s military and security institutions, and political organizations from the nineteenth century through 21 October 2026.  Dates accompanying entries identify periods of activity, establishment, or reorganization.  Assessments of institutional conduct are attributed to the reports or studies from which they are drawn.

The political catalogue is selective and includes parties, electoral coalitions, and earlier personalist movements.  The numbering continues that of the Appendix.  Section A-1, “Constitutions,” is identified in the Series X appendix index and covered in the preceding constitutional installments.

---

A-2).  Branches and Departments of Government [1961–2026]

The 1961 constitutional order organized national government around legislative, executive, and judicial powers.  Article 136 of the 1999 Constitution divides Poder Público Nacional [National Public Power] into five powers:  legislative, executive, judicial, citizen, and electoral. [1] [2]

A-2.1).  Poder Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive Power]

Under the 1961 Constitution, the President served a five-year term, and immediate presidential reelection was prohibited.  The 1999 Constitution established a six-year term and initially permitted one immediate reelection.  The constitutional amendment approved by referendum in February 2009 removed the numerical restriction on reelection for the presidency and other elected offices. [1][2] [3]

The President is head of State and of the national executive, directs government action and foreign relations, and exercises supreme command of the armed forces.  The executive also includes the Executive Vice-President, ministers, and other constitutionally or legally established officials.  Article 236 assigns the appointment and removal of the Executive Vice-President and ministers to the President. [2]

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights reported a deterioration of the separation of powers and restrictions on the National Assembly’s functions.  The International Commission of Jurists documented political influence over judicial appointments and tenure. [4] [5]

Maduro took the presidential oath on 10 January 2025 following the CNE’s disputed declaration of the 2024 result. [85]  On 3 January 2026, United States forces captured Maduro and Cilia Flores and transferred them to United States custody.  Delcy Rodríguez, previously Executive Vice-President, was sworn in as acting President on 5 January. [86]

In Judgment No. 00001 of 3 January 2026, the Constitutional Chamber ordered Rodríguez to exercise the presidency in an acting capacity.  The decision invoked Articles 234 and 239 and expressly reserved the definitive classification of Maduro’s absence as temporary or absolute.  Articles 233 and 234 establish different succession procedures for those categories.  The order itself did not determine a date for a presidential election. [87] [2]

A-2.2).  Congreso de la República de Venezuela [Congress of the Republic of Venezuela; 1961–1999 framework]

The Congress comprised the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies.  The Senate incorporated territorial representation, while the Chamber of Deputies represented the population through the electoral arrangements established by the Constitution and legislation.  Congress enacted laws, considered the budget, exercised political oversight, and participated in constitutionally prescribed appointments and authorizations. [1]

The 1999 Constitution replaced Congress with a unicameral National Assembly. [2]

A-2.3).  Asamblea Nacional [National Assembly; established by the 1999 Constitution, first elected in 2000]

The National Assembly exercises legislative authority, approves the national budget, conducts political oversight, and participates in appointments assigned to it by the Constitution.  Deputies serve five-year terms.  Article 186 provides for a population-based allocation using a base of 1.1 per cent of the country’s total population, with three additional deputies per federal entity and three Indigenous deputies elected according to law and their traditions. [2]

The electoral system combines constituency and list voting.  Electoral legislation and administrative rules have governed their operation and the allocation of seats.  The European Union’s 2021 election observation report records changes in the Assembly’s composition and electoral arrangements. [6]

After the opposition won the December 2015 legislative election, Supreme Tribunal decisions restricted the Assembly’s operation.  The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights documented these restrictions and the assumption of legislative functions by the constituent body installed in 2017. [4]

The Assembly elected in 2025 comprised 285 seats.  The Inter-Parliamentary Union records 253 seats for the governing Great Patriotic Pole alliance and twenty-nine for other political organizations, with three Indigenous seats elected separately on 1 June.  Legislative voting took place on 25 May alongside regional elections.  The principal opposition platform boycotted the process, while other opposition politicians participated.  These figures record the announced allocation of seats. [88]  The new Assembly was installed on 5 January 2026. [86]

A-2.4).  Asamblea Nacional Constituyente [National Constituent Assembly; 2017–2020]

President Maduro initiated the 2017 constituent process without a prior popular referendum authorizing its convocation.  Articles 347 and 348 distinguish the people’s original constituent power from the initiative to promote a constituent assembly, which specified actors, including the President in the Council of Ministers, may exercise.  In its examination of the disputed convocation, the Venice Commission concluded that presidential initiative could not substitute for the people’s decision to convene the body. [2] [7]

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights reported that the government-aligned constituent assembly claimed authority over constituted institutions, assumed legislative functions, and removed Luisa Ortega Díaz from her office as Prosecutor General of the Republic. [4]

The constituent body concluded its activities in December 2020 without producing a new constitution.  During its operation it issued instruments denominated leyes constitucionales [constitutional laws], including the armed-forces enactment discussed in A-3.2. [8] [9]

A-2.5).  Corte Suprema de Justicia [Supreme Court of Justice; 1961–1999 framework]

The Supreme Court was the apex of the judiciary under the 1961 constitutional order.  Its responsibilities included constitutional review and the adjudication of matters assigned to it by the Constitution and legislation.  Its organization evolved during the period.  Under the 1976 Organic Law, it comprised three chambers of five magistrates each:  Political-Administrative, Civil Cassation, and Criminal Cassation.  The resulting membership was fifteen. [1] [10]

A-2.6).  Tribunal Supremo de Justicia [Supreme Tribunal of Justice; 1999–2026]

The 1999 Constitution replaced the Supreme Court with the Supreme Tribunal, organized into specialized chambers, including a Constitutional Chamber.  Its functions encompass constitutional adjudication, final judicial review within its assigned jurisdictions, and responsibilities for the administration and supervision of the judiciary.  Article 267 assigns the direction, government, and administration of the judicial branch to the Tribunal. [2]

Legislation determines the Tribunal’s membership.  It initially had twenty magistrates; the 2004 Organic Law expanded the number to thirty-two; and the 2022 reform reduced it to twenty. [11] [5]

The International Commission of Jurists’ 2021 report examined the appointment, tenure, and removal of judges and concluded that political interference compromised judicial independence. [5]

A further Organic Law reform, effective on 22 May 2026, expanded the prescribed membership to thirty-two:  seven magistrates in the Constitutional Chamber and five in each of the other five chambers.  The reform provided for appointments to the new composition. [89]

A second reform, published on 15 September 2026, established a twenty-three-member Judicial Nominations Committee comprising eleven National Assembly deputies and twelve representatives nominated by other sectors of society. [90]  Reporting on 14 October described the selection of the new Tribunal as an ongoing process.  The statutory expansion and the completion of appointments are therefore recorded separately. [91]

A-2.7).  Poder Electoral and Consejo Nacional Electoral [Electoral Power and National Electoral Council]

The name Consejo Nacional Electoral [National Electoral Council; CNE] predates the 1999 Constitution, having been adopted under the electoral reform of 1997.  The 1999 Constitution established Electoral Power as a separate national power, with the CNE as its governing body.  Its responsibilities include organizing elections and referendums, maintaining the electoral register, and regulating matters assigned to it by electoral law. [12] [2]

Article 296 provides for five principal members unaffiliated with political organizations.  Three are nominated by civil society, one by the faculties of legal and political sciences of national universities, and one by Citizen Power.  The National Assembly appoints them by a two-thirds vote for seven-year terms, subject to the constitutional arrangements governing their selection and renewal. [2]

After the presidential election of 28 July 2024, the CNE declared Maduro the winner.  The Carter Center reported that the CNE failed to publish polling-station results substantiating the announced totals and supplied no evidence supporting its claim of a cyberattack. [13]  The Center concluded that the election failed to meet international standards and could not be considered democratic. [14]

In its final report, published in February 2025, the Carter Center concluded that the available polling-station records demonstrated a clear victory for Edmundo González Urrutia in the 2024 election. [13]

On 22 August 2024 the Supreme Tribunal’s Electoral Chamber endorsed the CNE’s announced result. [92]

On 23 September 2026 Rodríguez publicly promised elections without specifying a date.  Reuters reported that opposition representatives sought changes to the judiciary and electoral authority as conditions for a competitive process. [93]

A-2.8).  Poder Ciudadano [Citizen Power; 1999–2026]

Citizen Power is exercised through the Consejo Moral Republicano [Republican Moral Council], comprising the Prosecutor General of the Republic, the Ombudsman, and the Comptroller General.  Its constituent institutions possess constitutional autonomy and perform distinct functions concerning legality, rights, and the administration of public resources. [2]

Article 279 establishes a shared appointment framework.  The Republican Moral Council convenes a nominations evaluation committee with participation from different sectors of society.  The public evaluation process produces a shortlist of three candidates for each office, submitted to the National Assembly for selection by a two-thirds vote within thirty consecutive days.  If agreement is not reached, the Constitution provides for submission of the slate to a popular vote.  If the evaluation committee is not convened, the Assembly proceeds to the appointment within the period determined by law. [2]

a).  Ministerio Público [Public Ministry; incorporated into Citizen Power in 1999].  Headed by the Fiscal General de la República [Prosecutor General of the Republic], the Public Ministry directs criminal investigations, brings public criminal actions where appropriate, and safeguards constitutional guarantees in judicial proceedings.  The institution existed before 1999; the new Constitution placed it within Citizen Power.  Article 284 provides for the Prosecutor General of the Republic’s seven-year term and appointment through the Citizen Power framework. [1] [2]

On 9 April 2026 the National Assembly appointed Larry Devoe as Prosecutor General of the Republic, following Tarek William Saab’s resignation in February. [94]

The Procurador General de la República [Procurator General of the Republic] represents and defends the Republic’s patrimonial interests.  Article 249 provides for presidential appointment to that office with authorization from the National Assembly. [2]

b).  Defensoría del Pueblo [Ombudsman’s Office; established by the 1999 Constitution].  The Defensor del Pueblo[Ombudsman] promotes and defends constitutional and human rights, monitors the conduct of public authorities and public services, and may undertake the actions assigned to the office by law.  The officeholder serves a seven-year term and is selected under Article 279. [2]

The Assembly appointed Eglée González Lobato as Ombudsman on 9 April 2026, following Alfredo Ruiz’s resignation in February.  EFE reported objections by civil-society organizations to the transparency and composition of the selection process for both Citizen Power appointments. [94]

c).  Contraloría General de la República[Office of the Comptroller General; incorporated into Citizen Power in 1999].  The Comptroller General supervises public revenues, expenditures, and assets and exercises fiscal control within the constitutional and statutory framework.  This institution also predates 1999.  The Constitution provides for a seven-year term and selection under Article 279.  Its audit responsibilities are distinct from the prosecution of crimes and the adjudication of criminal liability. [1] [2]

A-2.9).  Executive Ministries and Principal Administrative Portfolios [1999–2026]

Ministries formulate and implement national policy within the executive.  Article 236 authorizes the President to appoint and remove ministers and, within the legal framework, to determine the organization and competence of ministries.  The National Assembly exercises legislative oversight through its budgetary, investigative, and political-control functions. [2]

The eighteen portfolios below provide a selective functional overview.  Their names, competences, and organizational arrangements changed during the period.  The 2016 decree on the organization of the national administration supplies a documentary reference for the distribution of responsibilities, supplemented where indicated by other enactments and records. [15]

1.  Defense:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Defensa.  The ministry develops defense policy and administers military personnel, resources, procurement, and related responsibilities within the executive.  The 2020 armed-forces enactment assigns administrative responsibilities to the ministry and operational responsibilities to the Strategic Operational Command. [9]

On 18 March 2026 Rodríguez appointed Gustavo González López as Minister of Defense, replacing Vladimir Padrino López, who had held the portfolio since 2014. [95]

2.  Foreign Affairs:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para Relaciones Exteriores.  This ministry conducts diplomacy, manages diplomatic and consular services, participates in treaty negotiations, and represents the government in international organizations.  It implements presidential foreign policy within the constitutional framework, including legislative approval of international agreements where required. [15][2]

3.  Interior, Justice, and Peace:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para Relaciones Interiores, Justicia y Paz.  Its responsibilities encompass internal security, policing policy, public order, civil protection, and associated administrative matters.  Article 267 assigns judicial government and administration to the Supreme Tribunal; criminal prosecution belongs to the Public Ministry. [15] [2]

4.  Economy and Finance:  Ministerio del Poder Popular de Economía y Finanzas, under successive denominations.  The finance portfolio prepares and administers fiscal policy, coordinates budgetary and treasury matters, manages public credit, and supervises entities assigned to it by law.  Article 318 assigns monetary functions to the Central Bank of Venezuela and provides for its autonomy in the formulation and exercise of policies within its competence. [15] [2]

5.  Planning:  Ministerio del Poder Popular de Planificación, formerly associated with the designation Planificación y Desarrollo.  This portfolio coordinates national development planning, public investment priorities, institutional planning, and related statistical work. [15]

6.  Education:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Educación.  This ministry directs policy for initial, primary, and secondary education and the educational modalities assigned to it.  University education has also been administered through a separate portfolio.  A January 2024 ministerial announcement records coordination between the education and university-education ministries. [16]

7.  Health:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Salud.  The health portfolio directs public health policy, epidemiological surveillance, disease prevention, and the coordination of services and institutions assigned to it. [15]  The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights’ 2019 report documented shortages of medicines, deteriorating facilities, and barriers to healthcare. [17]

8.  Food:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Alimentación.  This ministry coordinates food supply and distribution policies and the public entities entrusted with those functions.  The administrative framework distributes related responsibilities among bodies concerned with agriculture, commerce, imports, nutrition, and social assistance. [15]

9.  Science and Technology:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para Ciencia y Tecnología, under changing organizational arrangements.  The portfolio promotes research, technological development, innovation, and cooperation among public institutions and the scientific community.  In the 2016 administrative framework, university education, science, and technology were combined in one ministry. [15]

10.  Commerce:  Domestic Commerce and Foreign Trade Portfolios.  Commercial policy has been distributed among portfolios responsible for industry and domestic commerce, foreign trade, and international investment.  The 2016 decree separately identifies the Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Industria y Comercio [Ministry of Popular Power for Industry and Commerce] and the Ministerio del Poder Popular para el Comercio Exterior e Inversión Internacional [Ministry of Popular Power for Foreign Trade and International Investment]. [15]

11.  Housing and Habitat:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para Hábitat y Vivienda.  The housing portfolio formulates policies for residential construction, housing finance, and improvements to living environments, with responsibilities involving urban development and residential services. [15]

12.  Electric Power:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Energía Eléctrica.  This ministry directs policy and planning for the electricity sector and supervises entities assigned to it.  Generation, transmission, distribution, and maintenance are carried out through operating institutions. [15]

13.  Petroleum:  Ministerio del Poder Popular de Petróleo, under successive denominations.  The petroleum portfolio formulates hydrocarbons policy, regulates activity within its competence, and oversees the State’s interests in the sector.  Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. [PDVSA] and other enterprises conduct production, refining, and commercial operations. [15]

The Organic Hydrocarbons Law was amended on 29 January 2026.  The reform introduced provisions on contracts for primary activities and revised the framework governing operations, fiscal arrangements, and ministerial authority. [96]  On 17 October Rodríguez announced an expectation of nearly US$76 billion in petroleum investment over five years, referring to new agreements, including cooperation with the United States.  This was a government forecast. [97]

14.  Agriculture and Lands:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Agricultura Productiva y Tierras.  This portfolio coordinates agricultural development, productive capacity, rural policy, and land matters assigned to it by law.  The 2016 administrative framework assigned fisheries, urban agriculture, and food distribution to separate ministerial portfolios. [15]

15.  Transport:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para el Transporte, under changing combinations with public works.  Transport responsibilities encompass infrastructure, services, regulation, and the supervision of relevant agencies and public enterprises.  The 2016 decree assigned land, water, and air transport responsibilities to the Ministry of Popular Power for Transport and Public Works. [15]

16.  Women and Gender Equality:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Mujer y la Igualdad de Género[created in 2009].  This ministry coordinates policies concerning women’s rights, equal participation, and the prevention of gender-based discrimination and violence.  Its establishment followed earlier institutional arrangements for women’s affairs. [18] [15]

17.  Communication and Information:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Comunicación y la Información.  The portfolio coordinates executive communications and the public media responsibilities assigned to it. [15]  Human Rights Watch’s report on events in 2023 documented restrictions on independent media and harassment of journalists. [19]

18.  Culture:  Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Cultura.  This ministry develops cultural policy, supports artistic activity, and oversees institutions concerned with heritage, museums, publishing, and related cultural functions.  The Constitution recognizes cultural freedom, diversity, and the rights of creators and communities. [15] [2]

---

A-3).  Fuerzas Armadas [Armed Forces]

The armed forces’ organization and duties are addressed in the constitutional provisions on national defense and security and in subsequent military legislation.  The entries below distinguish the 1961 and 1999 constitutional frameworks and later legislative changes. [1] [2]

A-3.1).  Fuerzas Armadas Nacionales [National Armed Forces; 1961–1999]

The armed forces under the 1961 constitutional framework included the Army, Navy, Aviation, and National Guard.  The National Guard, established in 1937, was already part of the military institution before the 1999 Constitution.  The 1995 Organic Law expressly identified these four components. [1] [20]

Article 132 of the 1961 Constitution defined the armed forces as an apolitical, obedient, and non-deliberative institution serving the Republic.  Its responsibilities included national defense, constitutional stability, and the protection of the democratic order. [1]

A-3.2).  Fuerza Armada Nacionaland Fuerza Armada Nacional Bolivariana [1999–2026]

Article 328 of the 1999 Constitution describes the Fuerza Armada Nacional [National Armed Force] as a professional institution without political militancy, organized to defend sovereignty and territorial integrity.  It also assigns participation in internal order and national development within the constitutional framework.  The four components named in the constitutional text are the Army, Navy, Aviation, and National Guard.  Article 330 permits active military personnel to vote but prohibits partisan political activity and candidacy for elected office while in active service. [2]

The designation Fuerza Armada Nacional Bolivariana [Bolivarian National Armed Force; FANB] was incorporated through the 2008 organic legislation. [21]

The Asamblea Nacional Constituyente issued the Ley Constitucional de la Fuerza Armada Nacional Bolivariana [Constitutional Law of the Bolivarian National Armed Force], published in Official Gazette No. 6,508 Extraordinary on 30 January 2020.  Its preamble invoked Articles 347–349 of the Constitution.  Articles 22 and 59 identify the Milicia Bolivariana [Bolivarian Militia] as a componente especial [special component].  The designation ley constitucional records the legislative form used by that constituent body, whose contested convocation is addressed in A-2.4. [9]

In her 2023 study published by Fundación Carolina, Francine Jácome documented military participation in cabinet positions, public enterprises, territorial administration, and economic activities.  She examined these roles as aspects of the militarization of government and society. [22]

The January 2026 capture of Maduro was carried out by United States forces.  The subsequent acting presidency and the March change of defense minister are recorded in A-2.1 and A-2.9. [86] [95]

A-4).  Intelligence Agencies and State Security Bodies

The institutions below perform intelligence, military counterintelligence, criminal investigation, and public-order functions.  Their organizational positions and responsibilities are described separately under their respective entries.

The United Nations fact-finding mission’s 2022 findings documented the use of intelligence services in the repression of actual or perceived government opponents, including arbitrary detention and torture.  The mission examined institutional structures, operational practices, and chains of responsibility. [23]

A-4.1).  Organismos de Inteligencia y Contrainteligencia [Intelligence and Counterintelligence Agencies]

1.  Dirección de los Servicios de Inteligencia y Prevención [Directorate of Intelligence and Prevention Services; DISIP, 1969–2010].  Commonly associated with the later designation Dirección General Sectorial de los Servicios de Inteligencia y Prevención, DISIP served as the principal civilian intelligence and political security agency.  Its institutional history crossed the pre-1999 and Bolivarian periods.  A reorganization initiated in 2009 culminated in the formal change of name to SEBIN by Decree No. 7,453 of 1 June 2010. [24] [25]

2.  Servicio Bolivariano de Inteligencia Nacional [Bolivarian National Intelligence Service; SEBIN, 2010–2026].  SEBIN is the principal civilian intelligence service, responsible for intelligence and counterintelligence functions within its assigned remit.  Its administrative attachment has changed.  It operates within the executive security structure. [25]

The United Nations fact-finding mission documented arbitrary detention, torture, and other violations by SEBIN against perceived opponents.  Its 2022 findings linked these practices to a state plan of political repression and identified grounds for responsibility extending to senior officials. [23]

In September 2026 Acceso a la Justicia reported that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights had ordered the closure of El Helicoide in an April judgment notified to Venezuela on 10 June.  The organization stated that publicly available information was insufficient to verify compliance and distinguished reported prisoner transfers from implementation of the judgment’s reparations. [98]

3.  Dirección General de Contrainteligencia Militar [General Directorate of Military Counterintelligence; DGCIM, present designation from 2011].  DGCIM developed from earlier military intelligence structures, including the Dirección de Inteligencia Militar[DIM].  Its counterintelligence responsibilities concern threats to military security. [25]

In March 2026 Germán Gómez Lárez was appointed to head DGCIM after González López’s transfer to the Ministry of Defense. [95]

The fact-finding mission described arbitrary detention, torture, sexual violence, and other severe abuses associated with DGCIM facilities and personnel, including operations against military personnel and civilians perceived as opponents. [25]

A-4.2).  Organismos de Seguridad del Estado [State Security Bodies]

The National Guard is a military component; CICPC is an investigative police body; the National Police is a civilian police institution; and FAES was a specialized unit within the National Police.  State and municipal police form part of the wider policing system. [9] [26]

4.  Guardia Nacional and Guardia Nacional Bolivariana [National Guard and Bolivarian National Guard; 1937–2026].  Created during the presidency of Eleazar López Contreras, the National Guard combines military status with responsibilities involving internal order, border control, and support for law enforcement.  Article 329 of the 1999 Constitution assigns it a basic responsibility for operations required to maintain internal order. [27] [2]

The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights’ 2018 report documented excessive force, arbitrary detention, and ill-treatment involving the National Guard and other security bodies during demonstrations. [28]

5.  Cuerpo de Investigaciones Científicas, Penales y Criminalísticas [Scientific, Criminal, and Forensic Investigations Corps; CICPC, 2001–2026].  CICPC succeeded the Cuerpo Técnico de Policía Judicial, commonly known as the Policía Técnica Judicial [PTJ], which dated from 1958.  Its responsibilities include criminal investigation, forensic examination, and the technical collection of evidence.  In criminal proceedings, investigative work operates under the direction of the Public Ministry and within the safeguards of criminal procedure. [29] [2]

6.  Cuerpo de Policía Nacional Bolivariana [Bolivarian National Police Corps; PNB, operational from 2009].  The national police emerged from the policing reforms and organic legislation adopted during the Chávez administration.  It exercises national police functions, including crime prevention, public order, and the responsibilities assigned to it in designated areas and services.  It operates within the executive’s internal-security structure. [26]

The police-service law establishes national policy, coordination, and supervision within a system that includes national, state, and municipal police, each with assigned competences. [26]

7.  Fuerzas de Acciones Especiales[Special Action Forces; FAES, establishment variously dated to 2016 or 2017].  FAES was a specialized PNB unit associated with anti-crime operations.  Human Rights Watch’s September 2019 account dates its creation to 2017.  A June 2019 report by TalCual, republished by PROVEA, gives April 2016. [30] [31]

Human Rights Watch and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights documented killings during purported confrontations, arbitrary detentions, and other abuses involving FAES, particularly in low-income communities.  The High Commissioner’s 2019 report called for its dissolution and the investigation of its members. [30] [17]

Human Rights Watch’s World Report 2024states that FAES was dissolved in 2022 and replaced by the Dirección de Acciones Estratégicas y Tácticas [Directorate of Strategic and Tactical Actions; DAET].  Citing the United Nations fact-finding mission, it reports similar functions and methods and the placement of former FAES personnel implicated in abuses in key DAET positions. [19]

A-4.3).  Post-election Detention, Amnesty, and Judicial Proceedings [2024–2026]

The United Nations fact-finding mission’s September 2024 report recorded twenty-five deaths in the repression following the presidential election, together with arbitrary detention and violations affecting protesters and perceived opponents. [92]

In March 2025 the United Nations fact-finding mission reported that severe repression and crimes against humanity continued.  Its September assessment emphasized the absence of effective domestic accountability and the need for international action on behalf of victims. [99] [100]

The Ley de Amnistía para la Convivencia Democrática [Amnesty Law for Democratic Coexistence] entered into force on 19 February 2026.  It covers offenses associated with specified events within a period beginning on 1 January 1999, subject to its eligibility rules and exclusions.  Its application requires the procedures established in the statute. [101]

In September 2026 the United Nations fact-finding mission reported that the state’s repressive apparatus remained intact despite limited political changes. [102]  Reuters’s account of the findings noted a reduction in politically motivated detentions alongside continuing abuses, including torture and the detention of hundreds of people.  The mission characterized the changes as limited and reversible. [103]

Supreme Tribunal Resolution No. 2026-0010, dated 13 October 2026, reorganized the handling of terrorism cases, ending the nationwide jurisdiction of the specified special courts and redistributing cases within the criminal judicial system, subject to transitional exceptions.  The resolution concerns jurisdiction and case allocation; the underlying criminal provisions remain a separate matter. [104]

On 8 October 2026 the United States Department of Justice announced a superseding indictment charging Maduro and Flores with conspiracy to commit torture alongside narcotics and weapons offenses.  The prosecution alleged the use of state institutions in the abuse of detainees. [105]  Both defendants pleaded not guilty on 15 October.  Their trial was scheduled for 14 June 2027; the charges remained unadjudicated at this draft’s cutoff. [106]

---

B).  Evolution of Political Parties and Movements [1830–2026]

This section records selected nineteenth-century factions, modern parties, revolutionary movements, electoral organizations, and coalitions.  Dates identify documented origins or periods of activity, with qualifications where a movement preceded registration as a party.

Entries distinguish historical leadership and membership from the control of registered party names and electoral symbols where judicial interventions affected these arrangements.

B-1).  Early Political Traditions and Personalist Movements [1830–1935]

1.  Conservadores [Conservatives; principally the 1830s–1850s].  The conservative current developed around the governing order associated with José Antonio Páez and its commercial, landholding, and administrative supporters.  It favored political stability and established authority.  It was a historical alignment rather than a continuously registered modern party. [32]

2.  Partido Liberal and Gran Partido Liberal [Liberal Party and Great Liberal Party; from 1840].  Associated initially with Antonio Leocadio Guzmán, Tomás Lander, and the newspaper El Venezolano, liberal organization challenged the existing governing establishment.  Federalism and wider political participation became important elements of its evolving appeal. [32]

3.  Guzmancismo and Liberalismo Amarillo [Guzmán’s Political Following and Yellow Liberalism; principally from 1870].  Guzmancismo refers to Antonio Guzmán Blanco’s political following within nineteenth-century Venezuelan liberalism. [32]

4.  Crespismo [Crespo’s Political Following; especially the 1890s].  Joaquín Crespo’s supporters operated within the broader liberal tradition through personal allegiance and political patronage. [32]

5.  Gomecismo [Gómez’s Governing Network; 1908–1935].  Juan Vicente Gómez maintained power through military authority, regional relationships, administrative control, and repression.  Gomecismo describes the regime and its networks of allegiance rather than a competitive electoral party.  Opposition activity included exile organizations, student mobilization, and clandestine political groups. [33]

After Gómez’s death, Eleazar López Contreras’s administration faced opposition from emerging political organizations, student groups, and labor activists.  ORVE and the PDN formed during this period. [34] [35]

B-2).  The Formation of Modern Parties and the Democratic Transitions [1926–1958]

6.  Partido Revolucionario Venezolano [Venezuelan Revolutionary Party; PRV, founded in exile in 1926].  This organization brought together opponents of the Gómez dictatorship within an emerging revolutionary and socialist milieu. [36]

7.  Partido Comunista de Venezuela [Communist Party of Venezuela; PCV, founded in 1931].  The PCV developed as a Marxist-Leninist organization associated with labor mobilization and socialist transformation.  It experienced clandestinity, legalization, repression, and participation in both electoral and revolutionary strategies.  It was excluded from the 1958 Pacto de Puntofijo[Puntofijo Pact]. [37] [38]

The PCV’s established leadership supported Chávez and subsequently became critical of Maduro, participating in the formation of the APR in 2020.  In 2023 the Supreme Tribunal appointed an alternative leadership. [39] [19]

8.  Organización Venezolana [Venezuelan Organization; ORVE, 1936].  ORVE operated during the post-Gómez political opening.  Its participants included figures subsequently active in the PDN and Acción Democrática. [34]

9.  Partido Republicano Progresista [Progressive Republican Party; PRP, 1936].  The PRP emerged in the post-dictatorial opening and provided a legal political vehicle for Marxist and communist activists.  Its immediate antecedents lay in left-wing organization and opposition to dictatorship. [40]

10.  Partido Democrático Nacional [National Democratic Party; PDN, 1936–1941].  The PDN developed from efforts to coordinate democratic opposition and continued clandestinely after official recognition was denied.  It was a direct organizational antecedent of Acción Democrática.  Its work contributed to the formation of a national party structure in the late 1930s. [35] [41]

11.  Acción Democrática [Democratic Action; AD, founded in 1941].  AD developed as a mass party with a social-democratic orientation, labor and peasant constituencies, and a program of political inclusion and national development.  It participated with military officers in the overthrow of Medina Angarita in October 1945.  After 1958, it participated in national government. [41] [42]

In June 2020 the Supreme Tribunal suspended AD’s leadership and appointed an ad hocboard.  The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights recorded the intervention in its annual report. [43]

12.  Partido Democrático Venezolano [Venezuelan Democratic Party; PDV, 1943–1945].  The PDV was organized to support President Isaías Medina Angarita.  It belonged to a period of political liberalization in which party activity and public debate expanded, while presidential selection remained indirect and suffrage restricted.  Its activity ended after the military-civilian overthrow of October 1945. [44]

13.  Unión Republicana Democrática [Democratic Republican Union; URD, founded in 1945].  URD developed as a nationalist and democratic organization closely associated with Jóvito Villalba.  It opposed military rule and was one of the three signatories of the Puntofijo Pact. [42] [38]

14.  Comité de Organización Política Electoral Independiente [COPEI, founded in 1946].  Commonly identified as the Social Christian Party, COPEI developed under Rafael Caldera and other Christian-democratic leaders.  It combined a social-Christian orientation with electoral organization and participation in representative institutions.  It participated in national government after 1958.  The European Union’s 2021 election observation report records the judicial intervention affecting its leadership. [45][6]

The democratic sequence.  The military-civilian overthrow of Medina Angarita on 18 October 1945 was followed by an expansion of electoral participation.  Rómulo Betancourt headed the provisional revolutionary junta.  Rómulo Gallegos won the December 1947 election, becoming Venezuela’s first president chosen by universal, direct, and secret suffrage, and assumed office in February 1948.  A military coup removed him in November 1948.  The ensuing period of military rule ended in January 1958. [42] [46]

The Puntofijo Pact of October 1958 committed AD, COPEI, and URD to defend the electoral and constitutional order and cooperate around a common minimum program.  Betancourt won the presidential election of December 1958. [38][34]

B-3).  Party Formation and Reorganization [1960–1998]

15.  Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionaria [Revolutionary Left Movement; MIR, founded in 1960].  MIR emerged from a division within AD and became associated with the revolutionary left and armed insurgency.  Subsequent disagreements over strategy produced further divisions, while important sectors later returned to legal political activity. [47]

16.  Cruzada Cívica Nacionalista [Nationalist Civic Crusade; CCN, organized in the 1960s].  This organization represented a political current associated with former dictator Marcos Pérez Jiménez and his Nuevo Ideal Nacional [New National Ideal]. [48]

17.  Movimiento Electoral del Pueblo [People’s Electoral Movement; MEP, founded in 1967].  The MEP arose from a division in AD led by Luis Beltrán Prieto Figueroa and other figures.  It developed a left-nationalist orientation and subsequently participated in different electoral alliances, including the Bolivarian governing coalition. [49]

18.  Bandera Roja [Red Flag; BR, founded in 1970].  Bandera Roja originated in a division of the revolutionary left and initially pursued armed struggle.  It subsequently developed legal political activity and became an opponent of the Chávez and Maduro governments. [50]

19.  Movimiento al Socialismo [Movement Toward Socialism; MAS, founded in 1971].  MAS emerged from a division in the PCV.  It participated in elections and coalition politics, and later experienced divisions over support for Chávez. [51] [52]

20.  La Causa R [The Radical Cause; LCR, founded in 1971].  Associated with Alfredo Maneiro, La Causa R developed through labor and community organization, particularly in industrial Guayana.  It contested elections in the early 1990s.  PPT emerged from a division within La Causa R in 1997. [53]

21.  Liga Socialista [Socialist League; LS, 1973–2007].  The Socialist League belonged to the revolutionary left and participated in political and labor organizing.  It later supported Chávez and joined the process of integration into the PSUV in 2007. [54]

22.  Organización Renovadora Auténtica [Authentic Renewal Organization; ORA, founded in 1987].  ORA emerged with an evangelical Christian identity and participated in electoral politics. [55] [56]

23.  Convergencia [Convergence; founded in 1993].  Convergencia developed around Rafael Caldera’s presidential candidacy after his separation from COPEI.  It formed part of the broader coalition that supported his 1993 victory, commonly known as the chiripero. [57][58]

24.  Patria Para Todos [Homeland for All; PPT, founded in 1997].  PPT arose from a division in La Causa R and subsequently participated in the Bolivarian coalition.  Judicial intervention in 2020 displaced its existing leadership and affected control of the party’s electoral identity.  The party label remained in electoral use in 2024. [53] [59] [56]

25.  Movimiento V República [Fifth Republic Movement; MVR, 1997–2007].  MVR supported Hugo Chávez’s successful 1998 presidential candidacy.  It developed from the political trajectory associated with the earlier Movimiento Bolivariano Revolucionario 200[Revolutionary Bolivarian Movement 200; MBR-200].  MVR joined the PSUV in 2007. [60][61]

26.  Proyecto Venezuela [Project Venezuela; founded in 1998].  Proyecto Venezuela developed around Henrique Salas Römer’s national political project, building on his earlier regional base in Carabobo.  It supported his presidential candidacy against Chávez in 1998 and subsequently participated in opposition politics.  Its national foundation is distinct from the earlier regional organization Proyecto Carabobo. [62]

B-4).  Parties and Political Movements in the Bolivarian Period [1999–2026]

27.  Un Nuevo Tiempo [A New Era; UNT, regional origins in 1999, national organization from 2006].  UNT developed from a political base in Zulia associated with Manuel Rosales.  Its national expansion accompanied his 2006 presidential candidacy.  It subsequently participated in opposition alliances. [63]

28.  Primero Justicia [Justice First; PJ, civic origins in 1992, party organization from 2000].  Primero Justicia began as a civic association concerned with legal and institutional reform and later became an opposition party. [64]

In June 2020 the Supreme Tribunal appointed an ad hoc leadership headed by José Brito; the Court subsequently suspended that measure.  On 22 April 2024, Constitutional Chamber Judgment No. 207 again placed an ad hoc board under Brito in control of the party’s electoral label and symbols.  The established party leadership rejected the intervention.  The PJ label appeared on the 2024 presidential ballot supporting Brito, while the established leadership supported Edmundo González Urrutia. [65] [66]

29.  Alianza Bravo Pueblo [Alliance of the Brave People; ABP, founded in 2000].  Associated with Antonio Ledezma and a division from AD, ABP became part of the opposition to the Bolivarian government. [67]

30.  Por la Democracia Social [For Social Democracy; PODEMOS, founded in 2002].  PODEMOS emerged from a division in MAS.  It initially supported Chávez, later moved into opposition, and subsequently experienced judicial intervention that transferred control of the party to a different leadership. [68]

31.  Movimiento Revolucionario Tupamaro [Tupamaro Revolutionary Movement; movement origins preceding party registration in 2004].  The Tupamaro organization developed from urban revolutionary activism and later participated in electoral politics as a supporter of the Bolivarian process.  Disagreements with the government and judicial intervention in 2020 produced competing claims to its leadership and identity. [69] [70]

32.  Unidad Popular Venezolana [Venezuelan Popular Unity; UPV, founded in 2004].  Associated with Lina Ron, UPV developed as a militant supporter of Chávez and retained an identifiable electoral presence in later governing alliances.  Its party label appeared on the 2024 presidential ballot within the alliance supporting Maduro. [71] [56]

33.  Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela [United Socialist Party of Venezuela; PSUV, formation initiated in 2007].  Chávez promoted the PSUV as a unified organization for forces supporting his political project.  Its formation incorporated MVR and other organizations or sectors, while some allies retained separate identities.  The party held its founding congress in 2008. [61][72]

The PSUV headed the governing electoral alliance supporting Maduro in 2024 and occupied the first position on the presidential ballot. [66]

34.  Voluntad Popular [Popular Will; VP, movement launched in 2009, recognized as a party in 2011].  Associated with Leopoldo López and other organizers, Voluntad Popular developed around democratic participation, political change, and opposition to the governing authorities.  Its leaders and activists faced prosecution, detention, and exile.  Judicial intervention also created a competing claim to the party’s official identity. [73] [6]

35.  Movimiento Progresista de Venezuela, subsequently Movimiento por Venezuela [Progressive Movement of Venezuela, subsequently Movement for Venezuela; MPV, founded in 2012].  MPV emerged from divisions within the left and participated in opposition coordination. [74]

36.  Avanzada Progresista [Progressive Advance; AP, founded in 2012].  Associated with Henri Falcón and other leaders, AP developed as a center-left organization supporting electoral participation and political negotiation.  Its strategies sometimes differed from those of the principal opposition coalition, particularly over participation in elections whose conditions were contested. [75]

37.  Vente Venezuela [Vente Venezuela; founded in 2012].  Associated with María Corina Machado, Vente developed as a liberal political movement emphasizing individual liberties, private initiative, and democratic change.  Machado won the opposition’s 2023 primary and was excluded from the 2024 presidential ballot. [76] [13]

Machado received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for her work on democratic rights and a peaceful democratic transition in Venezuela. [107]

38.  Movimiento Somos Venezuela [We Are Venezuela Movement; social movement established in 2017, party transformation in 2018].  Promoted by Maduro, Somos Venezuela developed in connection with social-program mobilization and the Carnet de la Patria [Homeland Card] system.  In 2018 it acquired an electoral identity through the transformation of Nuevo Camino Revolucionario [New Revolutionary Path; NCR]. [77]

39.  Cambiemos Movimiento Ciudadano [Let Us Change Citizens’ Movement; founded in 2018].  Associated with Timoteo Zambrano, Cambiemos promoted electoral participation and dialogue.  It became part of the sector of the opposition that pursued negotiations and electoral strategies outside the principal unity coalition. [78]

40.  Encuentro Ciudadano [Citizens’ Encounter; founded in 2018].  Associated with Delsa Solórzano, Encuentro Ciudadano developed as an opposition organization emphasizing democratic participation and human rights.  It participated in opposition coordination and the 2023 primary process. [79]

41.  Primero Venezuela [Venezuela First; established in 2020].  Primero Venezuela was formed by dissidents from Primero Justicia, including José Brito, and participated in the 2020 parliamentary election. [80]  Acceso a la Justicia’s 14 May 2024 account records Brito’s presidential candidacy under the Primero Venezuela label and the addition of the PJ label following the judicial intervention. [65]

42.  Fuerza Vecinal [Neighborhood Force; founded in 2021].  Fuerza Vecinal developed around municipal leaders and an emphasis on local administration and electoral participation. [81]

B-5).  Electoral Coalitions and Coordinating Platforms

43.  Mesa de la Unidad Democrática [Democratic Unity Roundtable; MUD, developed in 2008–2009].  The MUD brought together parties with different ideologies around opposition coordination, common candidacies, and electoral competition.  It helped organize major electoral campaigns, including the opposition’s parliamentary victory in 2015. [82] [6]

44.  Gran Polo Patriótico Simón Bolívar [Simón Bolívar Great Patriotic Pole; GPPSB, launched in 2011].  This alliance assembled the PSUV, allied parties, and social organizations supporting the Bolivarian government. [83] [72]

45.  Alternativa Popular Revolucionaria [Popular Revolutionary Alternative; APR, formed in 2020].  The APR brought together communist and other revolutionary-left organizations and sectors critical of Maduro’s administration.  In 2020 the Supreme Tribunal appointed alternative leaderships to PPT and Tupamaro, whose displaced leaders participated in the coalition. [39] [59] [70]

46.  Plataforma Unitaria Democrática [Democratic Unitary Platform; PUD, publicly constituted in 2021 after earlier unity initiatives].  The platform developed as a coordinating framework for opposition parties and allied sectors.  It participated in negotiations, promoted the 2023 opposition primary, and supported Edmundo González Urrutia in the 2024 presidential election after Machado’s exclusion. [84] [13]

B-6).  Electoral Labels, Organizational Continuity, and Judicial Intervention

The 2024 ballot included additional organizations alongside those described above.  El Diario’s reproduced ballot identifies Partido Verde [Green Party], Futuro Venezuela[Future Venezuela], Enamórate [Fall in Love], Partido Arepa [Arepa Party], CONDE, Unidad Visión Venezuela [Unity Vision Venezuela], and Derecha Democrática [Democratic Right]. [66]

The European Union’s 2021 election observation mission reported court interventions affecting party leaderships and control of names, symbols, and electoral nominations.  Human Rights Watch subsequently recorded the 2023 intervention in the PCV; Acceso a la Justicia documented the renewed intervention in Primero Justicia in 2024. [6] [19] [65]

### B-7).  Electoral Participation and Political Negotiations [2025–2026]

Opposition organizations pursued different strategies in the 2025 legislative election.  The PUD boycotted the process, while Henrique Capriles and other opposition figures participated.  The Inter-Parliamentary Union records eleven seats for the UNT–Unión alliance within the announced results. [88]

On 6 August 2026 Reuters reported the opening of United States-backed talks between representatives of the acting government and an opposition delegation.  Jorge Rodríguez and Dinorah Figuera headed the respective delegations.  Machado was outside that negotiating process. [108]

In October Machado called for elections by July 2027.  Her proposed timetable was distinct from an official electoral calendar. [109]  The September presidential announcement cited in A-2.7 supplied no date. [93]

---

Sources and Documentary Notes

The notes identify constitutional and legislative texts, independent institutional reports, historical scholarship, contemporary reporting, and organizational accounts. Party publications are used for origins and declared purposes; assessments of institutional conduct are attributed to the relevant reports or studies. The documentary cutoff for this working revision is 21 October 2026. Notes 1–84 retain their original numbering; subsequent notes document the expansion. English institutional names are explanatory translations.

[1] Constitution of the Republic of Venezuela (1961), especially the provisions concerning national powers, the presidency, Congress, the judiciary, and the armed forces.  CIDEP documentary edition.
https://cidep.online/files/constituciones/1961.pdf
Return to text ↑

[2] Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (1999), especially Articles 136, 186–187, 192, 225–236, 247–249, 253–279, 280–296, 318, 328–330, and 347–349.  Text hosted by the Organization of American States.
https://www.oas.org/dil/esp/constitucion_venezuela.pdf
Return to text ↑

[3] Constitution of Venezuela incorporating the 2009 amendment.  Compare Article 230 with the original text; see also Article 279.  Constitute Project.
https://constituteproject.org/constitution/Venezuela_2009?lang=es
Return to text ↑

[4] Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Democratic Institutions, the Rule of Law and Human Rights in Venezuela (country report adopted in 2017, English edition published in 2018).
https://www.oea.org/en/iachr/reports/pdfs/venezuela2018-en.pdf
Return to text ↑

[5] International Commission of Jurists, Jueces en la cuerda floja (2021):  judicial appointments, tenure, and political influence.
https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Venezuela-Judges-on-the-tightrope-Publications-Reports-Thematic-reports-2021-SPA.pdf
Return to text ↑

[6] European Union Election Observation Mission, Venezuela 2021:  Final Report.  Covers the legal framework, electoral administration, political participation, and party interventions.
https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eu_eom_ven_2021_fr_en.pdf
Return to text ↑

[7] Venice Commission, Opinion CDL-AD(2017)024 on the legal issues raised by Venezuela’s 2017 constituent process, especially paragraph 27.  Official opinion record and electoral-law reproduction.
https://www.coe.int/en/web/venice-commission/-/cdl-ad-2017-024-e
Return to text ↑

[8] Reuters, report on the closing session of Venezuela’s constituent assembly, 18 December 2020, reproduced by Infobae.  Read with the IACHR’s 2020 assessment of its failure to draft a new constitution.
https://www.infobae.com/america/agencias/2020/12/18/oficialistas-de-venezuela-cierran-criticada-asamblea-constituyente-2/
Return to text ↑

[9] Asamblea Nacional Constituyente, Ley Constitucional de la Fuerza Armada Nacional Bolivariana, Official Gazette No. 6,508 Extraordinary, 30 January 2020.  Preamble invoking Articles 347–349; Articles 22 and 59 designate the Milicia Bolivariana as a special component.  Gazette reproduction hosted by Control Ciudadano.
https://www.controlciudadano.org/web/wp-content/uploads/LOFANB-2020-GO-6.508-ExT-30.01.2020.pdf
Return to text ↑

[10] Organic Law of the Supreme Court of Justice (1976), Article 24:  three chambers with five magistrates each.  Legislative text reproduced by Justia.
https://venezuela.justia.com/estatales/miranda/leyes/ley-organica-de-la-corte-suprema-de-justicia-1976/gdoc/
Return to text ↑

[11] Carlos Lusverti, analysis of Venezuela’s 2022 Supreme Tribunal reform, Justicia en las Américas, 15 March 2022.  On the earlier expansion, see the ICJ report cited above.
https://dplfblog.com/2022/03/15/nueva-ley-y-nuevos-jueces-pero-el-mismo-control-politico-de-siempre-sobre-el-tribunal-supremo-de-venezuela/
Return to text ↑

[12] Organization of American States, electoral observation report concerning Venezuela’s 1998 elections, published in 1999.  Documents the electoral authority and the pre-1999 legal framework.
https://www.oas.org/sap/publications/1999/moe/venezuela/pbl_22_1999_spa.pdf
Return to text ↑

[13] The Carter Center, Venezuela Presidential Election 2024:  Final Report (published February 2025).  Used retrospectively for events and evidence concerning the 2024 election.
https://www.cartercenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/venezuela-final-report-2025.pdf
Return to text ↑

[14] The Carter Center, statement on Venezuela’s presidential election, 30 July 2024.  Distinct from its subsequently published final report.
https://www.cartercenter.org/news/venezuela-073024/
Return to text ↑

[15] Decree No. 2,378 on the General Organization of the National Public Administration, Official Gazette No. 6,238 Extraordinary, 13 July 2016.  Historical legislative text reproduced by Pandectas Digital; subsequent reorganizations are acknowledged in the text.
https://pandectasdigital.blogspot.com/2016/07/decreto-sobre-organizacion-general-de.html
Return to text ↑

[16] Ministry of Education, announcement of coordination between the education and university-education ministries, 16 January 2024.  Establishes their separate institutional existence during the period examined.
https://www.mppe.gob.ve/noticias/2024/01/16/articulaci%C3%B3n-acad%C3%A9mica-por-la-juventud-venezolana-mppe-y-el-mppeu-firman-resoluci%C3%B3n/
Return to text ↑

[17] United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, report A/HRC/41/18 (2019), concerning economic and social rights, security operations, and accountability.  Copy hosted by the United States Congress.
https://humanrightscommission.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/humanrightscommission.house.gov/files/documents/20190705_UNHRC_HRinVZ_A.HRC_.41.18_0.pdf
Return to text ↑

[18] Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Montevideo Consensus platform:  record concerning Venezuela’s Ministry for Women and Gender Equality and its establishment in 2009.
https://consensomontevideo.cepal.org/es/node/1244
Return to text ↑

[19] Human Rights Watch, World Report 2024, Venezuela chapter.  Documents developments during 2023, including the PCV intervention and the reorganization of FAES.
https://www.hrw.org/es/world-report/2024/country-chapters/venezuela
Return to text ↑

[20] Organic Law of the National Armed Forces (1995), especially Articles 4–7.  Historical legislative text reproduced by Venciclopedia.
https://www.venciclopedia.org/index.php/Ley_Org%C3%A1nica_de_las_Fuerzas_Armadas_1995
Return to text ↑

[21] Decree No. 6,239, Organic Law of the Bolivarian National Armed Force, Official Gazette No. 5,891 Extraordinary, 31 July 2008.  Digitized gazette held by the Library of Congress.
https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llflg/75/64/35/27/_v/e2/00/80/73/1c/75643527_ve20080731c/75643527_ve20080731c.pdf
Return to text ↑

[22] Francine Jácome, “Militarismo y militarización. El caso venezolano,” in Marcos Robledo Hoecker and Francisco J. Verdes-Montenegro (eds.), Militarización, militarismo y democracia: ¿nuevas tendencias en América Latina? (Fundación Carolina, 2023), pp. 153–169.
https://www.fundacioncarolina.es/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Militarizacion.pdf
Return to text ↑

[23] United Nations Office at Geneva, Human Rights Council discussion of the Venezuela fact-finding mission’s findings, 26 September 2022.
https://www.ungeneva.org/en/news-media/meeting-summary/2022/09/morning-human-rights-council-holds-interactive-dialogue-fact
Return to text ↑

[24] Decree No. 7,453, Official Gazette No. 39,436, 1 June 2010:  change of DISIP’s denomination to SEBIN.  Legal record maintained by Iusdata.
https://iusdata.com/denominacion-cambio-disip-por-sebin/
Return to text ↑

[25]United Nations fact-finding mission, detailed findings on crimes committed through state intelligence services, A/HRC/51/CRP.3, September 2022.  Official report collection.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/ffmv/report-ffmv-september2022
Return to text ↑

[26] Organic Law of the Police Service and the Bolivarian National Police Corps, Official Gazette No. 5,940 Extraordinary, 7 December 2009.  Legislative text reproduced by Tu Gaceta Oficial.
https://tugacetaoficial.com/leyes/ley-organica-del-servicio-de-policia-y-del-cuerpo-de-policia-nacional-gaceta-5940-2009/
Return to text ↑

[27] Héctor Bencomo Barrios, Fuerzas Armadas, Diccionario de Historia de Venezuela, Fundación Empresas Polar.  Historical development of the military components and National Guard.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/dhv/entradas/f/fuerzas-armadas/
Return to text ↑

[28] Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Venezuela report (2018), concerning violations, accountability, and the treatment of protesters.
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Countries/VE/VenezuelaReport2018_EN.pdf
Return to text ↑

[29] Keymer Ávila and colleagues, Visión panorámica del sistema policial en Venezuela (2000–2018), Acceso a la Justicia.  See the sections on CICPC, national policing, and their institutional antecedents.
https://www.accesoalajusticia.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Informe-sobre-desempe%C3%B1o-sistema-policial-venezolano-2000-2018.pdf
Return to text ↑

[30] Human Rights Watch, investigation of extrajudicial killings in low-income areas of Venezuela, 18 September 2019.
https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/09/18/venezuela-extrajudicial-killings-poor-areas
Return to text ↑

[31] TalCual, “Tres estados acumularon 50% de las 143 muertes a manos de las FAES durante mayo,” republished by PROVEA, 12 June 2019.  Gives April 2016 as the date of creation; the Human Rights Watch account cited separately gives 2017.
https://provea.org/actualidad/tres-estados-acumularon-50-de-las-143-muertes-a-manos-de-las-faes-durante-mayo/
Return to text ↑

[32] Partidos políticos, Diccionario de Historia de Venezuela, Fundación Empresas Polar.  Used for nineteenth-century party traditions and personalist alignments.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/dhv/entradas/p/partidos-politicos/
Return to text ↑

[33] Gómez, Juan Vicente, gobierno de, Diccionario de Historia de Venezuela, Fundación Empresas Polar.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/dhv/entradas/g/gomez-juan-vicente-gobierno-de/
Return to text ↑

[34] Betancourt, Rómulo, Diccionario de Historia de Venezuela, Fundación Empresas Polar.  Includes the post-Gómez organizations and the democratic transitions.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/dhv/entradas/b/betancourt-romulo/
Return to text ↑

[35] Fundación Empresas Polar, historical chronology:  organization of the National Democratic Party in 1936.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/_custom/static/cronologia_hv/zoom/s20/1936-32.html
Return to text ↑

[36] Fundación Empresas Polar, historical chronology:  formation of the Venezuelan Revolutionary Party in exile, 1926.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/_custom/static/cronologia_hv/zoom/s20/1926-7.html
Return to text ↑

[37] Wikipedia, historical reference entry for the Communist Party of Venezuela.  Founding date and organizational orientation; contemporary leadership claims are assessed separately through independent sources.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partido_Comunista_de_Venezuela
Return to text ↑

[38] Rafael Caldera documentary archive, account and documentary material concerning the Puntofijo Pact and its signatories.
https://rafaelcaldera.com/puntofijo/
Return to text ↑

[39] Popular Revolutionary Alternative founding communiqué, reproduced in August 2020.  Primary source for the coalition’s formation and declared aims.
https://www.idcommunism.com/2020/08/alternativa-popular-revolucionaria-venezuela-new-antiimperialist-and-socialist-alliance.html
Return to text ↑

[40]Wikipedia, historical reference entry for the Progressive Republican Party of Venezuela, including its establishment in 1936 and communist connections.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partido_Republicano_Progresista_(Venezuela)
Return to text ↑

[41] Acción Democrática, organizational history.  Used for the PDN antecedent and AD’s foundation in 1941; institutional assessments rely on independent reports.
https://acciondemocratica.org.ve/adport/componentes/Historia2/
Return to text ↑

[42] Junta Revolucionaria de Gobierno, Diccionario de Historia de Venezuela, Fundación Empresas Polar.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/dhv/entradas/j/junta-revolucionaria-de-gobierno/
Return to text ↑

[43] Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Annual Report 2020, Chapter IV.B, Venezuela.  Includes the political-institutional context and interventions affecting party leadership.
https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/docs/annual/2020/Chapters/IA2020cap.4b.VE-en.pdf
Return to text ↑

[44] Medina Angarita, Isaías, gobierno de, Diccionario de Historia de Venezuela, Fundación Empresas Polar.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/dhv/entradas/m/medina-angarita-isaias-gobierno-de/
Return to text ↑

[45] Fundación Empresas Polar, historical chronology:  the foundation and social-Christian orientation of COPEI in 1946.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/_custom/static/cronologia_hv/zoom/s20/1946-2.html
Return to text ↑

[46] Gallegos, Rómulo, gobierno de, Diccionario de Historia de Venezuela, Fundación Empresas Polar.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/dhv/entradas/g/gallegos-romulo-gobierno-de/
Return to text ↑

[47] Guerrillas, Diccionario de Historia de Venezuela, Fundación Empresas Polar.  Covers the revolutionary left and the development of armed insurgency.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/dhv/entradas/g/guerrillas/
Return to text ↑

[48] Wikipedia, historical reference entry for the Nationalist Civic Crusade and its association with Pérez Jiménez.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruzada_C%C3%ADvica_Nacionalista
Return to text ↑

[49] Fundación Empresas Polar, historical chronology:  foundation of the People’s Electoral Movement in 1967.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/_custom/static/cronologia_hv/zoom/s20-2/1967-46.html
Return to text ↑

[50] Wikipedia, historical reference entry for Bandera Roja:  origins in 1970, revolutionary-left background, and subsequent electoral activity.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandera_Roja_(Venezuela)
Return to text ↑

[51] Movimiento al Socialismo, programmatic document published by Nueva Sociedad (1980).  Primary source for its democratic-socialist orientation.
https://pre.nuso.org/articulo/movimiento-al-socialismo-venezuela/
Return to text ↑

[52] Scholarly study of the Movement Toward Socialism, published in 1981 and indexed by JSTOR.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3539979
Return to text ↑

[53] Understanding the Collapse of Venezuela’s Causa Radical, Journal of Politics in Latin America, vol. 6, no. 1 (2014).  Includes the party’s origins and the division that produced PPT.
https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/journals/jpla/v6i1/f_0031490_25538.pdf
Return to text ↑

[54] Wikipedia, historical reference entry for the Socialist League.  For the announced integration into the PSUV, see also the contemporary report by Agencia Bolivariana de Noticias, 21 December 2006.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_League_(Venezuela)
Return to text ↑

[55] Institute of Legal Research, study and historical tables concerning Venezuelan political parties, including ORA’s foundation in 1987.
https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/12/5544/6.pdf
Return to text ↑

[56] La República, presentation of the CNE’s 2024 presidential ballot.  Date displayed on the article:  11 May 2024; URL date segment:  2024/05/09.
https://larepublica.pe/mundo/venezuela/2024/05/09/elecciones-venezuela-2024-conoce-el-tarjeton-electoral-del-cne-que-revela-los-10-candidatos-presidenciales-235737
Return to text ↑

[57] Convergencia, organizational history and leadership record, including its establishment in June 1993.
https://partidoconvergencia.org/liderazgo/
Return to text ↑

[58] CIDOB, Rafael Caldera Rodríguez:  political biography, including the 1993 candidacy and supporting coalition.
https://www.cidob.org/en/lider-politico/rafael-caldera-rodriguez
Return to text ↑

[59] Supreme Tribunal, Constitutional Chamber, Judgment No. 0122 of 21 August 2020, concerning PPT.  Decision and case record reproduced by Acceso a la Justicia.
https://accesoalajusticia.org/intervencion-judicial-de-la-organizacion-con-fines-politicos-patria-para-todos-ppt/
Return to text ↑

[60] Universidad de Belgrano, study of Venezuela’s Fifth Republic Movement and the development of the Chávez political project.
https://repositorio.ub.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/123456789/185/55_rodriguez_games.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=2
Return to text ↑

[61] Margarita López Maya, El PSUV y el sistema de partidos, 20 January 2008.  Contemporary analysis of party formation and political concentration.
https://margaritalopezmaya.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/El-PSUV-y-el-sistema-de-partidos-UN-20-1-08.pdf
Return to text ↑

[62] Fundación Empresas Polar, historical chronology:  Proyecto Venezuela and the 1998 presidential election.
https://bibliofep.fundacionempresaspolar.org/_custom/static/cronologia_hv/zoom/s20-10/1998-87.html
Return to text ↑

[63] Wikipedia, historical reference entry for Un Nuevo Tiempo, distinguishing its regional origins from national expansion.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Un_Nuevo_Tiempo
Return to text ↑

[64]Primero Justicia, retrospective account distinguishing the civic association established in 1992 from party organization in 2000.
https://www.primerojusticia.org.ve/cms/index.php?Itemid=468&cid=149%3Anoticias&id=21622%3Aalejandro-vivas-primero-justicia-15-anos-resteados-con-el-cambio-para-venezuela&option=com_flexicontent&view=item
Return to text ↑

[65] Acceso a la Justicia, “La segunda intervención judicial de Primero Justicia y su impacto en las presidenciales de 2024,” 14 May 2024.  See the section “Ocultando al rival” for Brito’s candidacy under Primero Venezuela and the intervened PJ label.
https://accesoalajusticia.org/segunda-intervencion-judicial-primero-justicia-impacto-presidenciales-2024/
Return to text ↑

[66] El Diario, account and reproduction of the presidential ballot, updated 8 May 2024.  Includes the intervened Primero Justicia label supporting José Brito and the labels Futuro Venezuela and Partido Arepa.
https://eldiario.com/2024/05/08/boleta-electoral-elecciones-presidenciales-venezuela/
Return to text ↑

[67] Wikipedia, historical reference entry for Alianza Bravo Pueblo, its origins in 2000, and its connection with Antonio Ledezma.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alianza_Bravo_Pueblo
Return to text ↑

[68] Wikipedia, historical reference entry for Por la Democracia Social, including its origins in 2002 and the leadership intervention of 2012.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Por_la_Democracia_Social
Return to text ↑

[69] Wikipedia, historical reference entry for the Venezuelan Tupamaro movement, distinguishing earlier activism from legalization as a political party in 2004.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupamaro_(Venezuela)
Return to text ↑

[70] Runrun.es, report on the Tupamaro movement’s response to judicial intervention, 19 August 2020.
https://runrunes.org/noticias/419292/movimiento-tupamaro-rechazo-intervencion-del-tsj-se-ha-consumado-el-robo-del-partido/
Return to text ↑

[71] Wikipedia, historical reference entry for Venezuelan Popular Unity.  Its later electoral presence is independently documented by the 2024 ballot.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidad_Popular_Venezolana
Return to text ↑

[72]CLACSO, Venezuela chronology for 2007.  Contemporary record of political developments during the formation of the PSUV.
https://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/osal/20190429034519/Venezuela_2007.pdf
Return to text ↑

[73] Leopoldo López, organizational account of Voluntad Popular:  movement launched in December 2009 and recognition as a party in January 2011.
https://leopoldolopez.com/voluntad-popular/
Return to text ↑

[74] Wikipedia, historical reference entry for Movimiento por Venezuela, originally Movimiento Progresista de Venezuela, founded in June 2012.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movimiento_por_Venezuela
Return to text ↑

[75] Tomás Straka, Los partidos de última generación en Venezuela, PolítiKa UCAB, 4 September 2023.  Discusses established and recently formed parties.
https://politikaucab.net/2023/09/04/los-partidos-de-ultima-generacion-en-venezuela/
Return to text ↑

[76] Vente Venezuela, organizational account published 24 May 2021, identifying its foundation in 2012 and national development.
https://www.ventevenezuela.org/2021/05/24/maria-corina-machado-vente-es-una-realidad-en-toda-venezuela/
Return to text ↑

[77] El Pitazo, report on the transformation of Somos Venezuela into a political party, distinguishing the 2017 movement from its 2018 electoral registration.
https://elpitazo.net/sucesos/madurismo-se-convierte-partido-movimiento-somos-venezuela/
Return to text ↑

[78] Wikipedia, historical reference entry for Cambiemos Movimiento Ciudadano, founded in 2018 and associated with Timoteo Zambrano.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambiemos_Movimiento_Ciudadano
Return to text ↑

[79] Encuentro Ciudadano, official organizational statement identifying its foundation on 13 December 2018 and its emphasis on rights and civic freedoms.
https://encuentrociudadano.org/quienes-somos/
Return to text ↑

[80] Runrun.es, account of lesser-known parties contesting the 2021 elections, including Primero Venezuela’s origins.
https://runrun.es/noticias/453207/guachimanelectoral-los-partidos-poco-conocidos-que-van-a-las-elecciones-del-21n/
Return to text ↑

[81] Directorio Legislativo, report on Venezuela’s 2021 regional and municipal elections, published in January 2022.  Describes Fuerza Vecinal’s municipal origins and formation in 2021.
https://alertas-v3.directoriolegislativo.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Venezuela-Elecciones-regionales-y-municipales-2021-2022-1.pdf
Return to text ↑

[82] María Dubuc, account of the MUD’s 2008 agreement and 2009 reorganization, published by Primero Justicia, 22 January 2014.
https://www.primerojusticia.org.ve/cms/index.php?Itemid=499&cid=160%3Anuestros-dirigentes-opinan&id=13644%3Amaria-dubuc-un-responsabilidad-historica-la-verdadera-unidad&option=com_flexicontent&view=item
Return to text ↑

[83] PSUV, third-anniversary account of the Great Patriotic Pole’s formation on 7 October 2011, published 7 October 2014.
https://www.psuv.org.ve/temas/noticias/presidente-maduro-reconoce-lucha-gpp-a-tres-anos-su-conformacion/
Return to text ↑

[84] Crónica Uno, account of the Unitary Platform’s organizational development and appointment of Omar Barboza, 2022.  Describes the process initiated in April 2021.
https://cronica.uno/plataforma-unitaria-anuncia-refundacion-y-confirma-a-omar-barboza-como-secretario-ejecutivo/
Return to text ↑

[85] Associated Press, report on Maduro’s inauguration, 10 January 2025.
https://apnews.com/article/41df1203ab06e1ee9168622d12aac461
Return to text ↑

[86] Reuters, “Delcy Rodriguez formally sworn in as Venezuela’s interim president,” 5 January 2026.
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/delcy-rodriguez-formally-sworn-venezuelas-interim-president-2026-01-05/
Return to text ↑

[87]Supreme Tribunal, Constitutional Chamber, Judgment No. 00001, 3 January 2026, case 2026-00001.  Decision and commentary reproduced by Acceso a la Justicia.
https://accesoalajusticia.org/la-sc-ordena-que-delcy-rodriguez-presidencia-de-la-republica/
Return to text ↑

[88] Inter-Parliamentary Union, Parline, Venezuela: National Assembly election of 25 May 2025.  Seat totals reproduce the reported electoral outcome.
https://data.ipu.org/parliament/VE/VE-LC01/election/VE-LC01-E20250525/
Return to text ↑

[89] Acceso a la Justicia, record of the Supreme Tribunal Organic Law reform, Official Gazette No. 7,025 Extraordinary, 22 May 2026; published analysis, 3 June 2026.
https://accesoalajusticia.org/ley-organica-de-reforma-parcial-de-la-ley-organica-del-tribunal-supremo-de-justicia/
Return to text ↑

[90] Acceso a la Justicia, record of the Supreme Tribunal Organic Law reform, Official Gazette No. 7,074 Extraordinary, 15 September 2026; published analysis, 21 September 2026.
https://accesoalajusticia.org/ley-organica-de-reforma-parcial-de-la-lotsj/
Return to text ↑

[91] El País, report on the pending selection of Supreme Tribunal magistrates, 14 October 2026.
https://elpais.com/america/2026-10-14/un-nuevo-supremo-para-venezuela-con-prisa-y-sin-reglas-claras.html
Return to text ↑

[92] United Nations fact-finding mission, report A/HRC/57/57, 17 September 2024.  Includes the post-election institutional response and repression.
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/sessions-regular/session57/advance-versions/a-hrc-57-57-en.pdf
Return to text ↑

[93] Reuters, report on Delcy Rodríguez’s promise of elections, 23 September 2026.  The announcement supplied no election date.
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/venezuelas-rodriguez-promises-elections-2026-09-23/
Return to text ↑

[94]EFE, “El Parlamento de Venezuela designa a un nuevo fiscal general y a una defensora del pueblo,” 9 April 2026.
https://efe.com/mundo/2026-04-09/nuevo-fiscal-defensora-del-pueblo-venezuela/
Return to text ↑

[95] Reuters, “Venezuela’s acting president replaces long-time defense minister with intelligence head,” 18 March 2026.
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/venezuela-acting-president-replaces-long-time-defense-minister-2026-03-18/
Return to text ↑

[96] Acceso a la Justicia, record of the Organic Hydrocarbons Law reform, Official Gazette No. 6,978 Extraordinary, 29 January 2026; published analysis, 26 February 2026.
https://accesoalajusticia.org/ley-de-reforma-de-la-ley-organica-de-hidrocarburos/
Return to text ↑

[97] Reuters, report on Rodríguez’s oil-investment forecast, 17 October 2026.  The figure is an announced expectation, not a record of completed investment.
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/venezuela-expects-nearly-76-billion-oil-investment-over-five-years-acting-2026-10-17/
Return to text ↑

[98] Acceso a la Justicia, review of compliance with the Inter-American Court’s El Helicoide judgment, 3 September 2026.
https://accesoalajusticia.org/casi-3-meses-sentencia-sobre-helicoide-que-ha-hecho-estado-venezolano-cumplirla/
Return to text ↑

[99] United Nations fact-finding mission, statement on continuing repression and crimes against humanity, 18 March 2025.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/03/venezuela-harsh-repression-and-crimes-against-humanity-ongoing-fact-finding
Return to text ↑

[100] United Nations fact-finding mission, statement on accountability and international justice, 22 September 2025.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/venezuela-only-hope-victims-find-justice-lies-international-community-says
Return to text ↑

[101] Ley de Amnistía para la Convivencia Democrática, Official Gazette No. 6,990 Extraordinary, 19 February 2026.  Legislative record and analysis by Acceso a la Justicia, 24 February 2026.
https://accesoalajusticia.org/engaceta-ley-de-amnistia/
Return to text ↑

[102] United Nations fact-finding mission, statement on continuing repression, 16 September 2026.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2026/09/venezuela-amidst-limited-political-changes-countrys-repressive-apparatus
Return to text ↑

[103] Reuters, report on the United Nations fact-finding mission’s September findings, 16 September 2026.
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/rights-abuses-persist-venezuela-despite-maduros-removal-un-experts-say-2026-09-16/
Return to text ↑

[104] Supreme Tribunal, Resolution No. 2026-0010, dated 13 October 2026, reproduced by Acceso a la Justicia on 16 October.  Reorganizes jurisdiction over terrorism cases.
https://accesoalajusticia.org/resolucion-2026-0010-mediante-la-cual-se-modifica-la-estructura-organizacional-de-los-juzgados-con-competencia-en-terrorismo/
Return to text ↑

[105] United States Department of Justice, announcement of a superseding indictment against Nicolás Maduro and Cilia Flores, 8 October 2026.  The indictment contains allegations requiring adjudication.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/nicolas-maduro-moros-and-cilia-adela-flores-de-maduro-charged-torture
Return to text ↑

[106] Reuters, report on Maduro and Flores’s not-guilty pleas and the rescheduled trial, 15 October 2026.
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/venezuelas-maduro-due-court-over-new-us-torture-charge-2026-10-15/
Return to text ↑

[107] Norwegian Nobel Committee, announcement of the Nobel Peace Prize for 2025, awarded to María Corina Machado, 10 October 2025.
https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2025/10/press-peaceprize2025.pdf
Return to text ↑

[108] Reuters, report on the opening of United States-backed talks between the acting government and an opposition delegation, 6 August 2026.
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/venezuelan-acting-government-opposition-delegation-begin-talks-2026-08-06/
Return to text ↑

[109] Reuters, report on Machado’s call for elections by July 2027, 9 October 2026, citing her Financial Times interview.
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/venezuelas-machado-calls-elections-by-july-ft-reports-2026-10-09/
Return to text ↑

---

Bibliography

Arana, Marie:   Bolívar:   American Liberator.   New York:   Simon and Schuster, 2013.

Arendt, Hannah:   The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1951.

Arendt, Hannah:   On Violence. New York:   Harcourt, Brace & World, 1969.

Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: A New Translation by Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins.  Chicago:  The University of Chicago Press, 2011.

Arráiz Lucca, Rafael:   Venezuela: 1830 a nuestros días: Breve historia política.Caracas:   Editorial Alfa, 2016.

James Baldwin’s Collected Essays:   Notes of a Native Son / Nobody Knows My Name / The Fire Next Time / No Name in the Street / The Devil Finds Work / Other Essays. Edited by Toni Morrison.   New York:   Library of America, 1998. 

Bolívar, Simón:   Discursos (Pensamiento). Spanish Edition.   Barcelona:   Linkua Ediciones, 2007. 

Chenoweth, Erica & Stephan, María J.:   Why Civil Resistance Works:   The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York:   Columbia University Press, 2011.

Cohen, Richard:   Making History:   The Storytellers who Shaped the Past. New York:   Simon and Schuster, 2022. 

Coppedge, Michael:   Democracy and Autocracy in Venezuela.   Cambridge:   Cambridge University Press.   2011.

Corrales, Javier:   “The Politics of Venezuela’s Economic Crisis.” Journal of Economic Issues, 2015, 49 (2), 341-348.

Corrales, Javier:   “The Authoritarian Resurgence: Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela,” vol. 26, no. 2. Journal of Democracy.  Washington:   Freedom House, 2021.

Corrales, Javier:   The Politics of Venezuela’s Opposition.   New York, Routledge (2015)

de la Torre, Carlos:   Hugo Chávez and the Politics of Identity:   Socialism, Bolivarianism, and Imagining the Future.   Lexington:    Rowan & Littlefield Publishers, 2017, 123.

Dahl, Robert A.:   Polyarchy:   Participation and Opposition. New Haven:   Yale University Press, 1971.

Diamond, Jared:   UPHEAVAL:   Turning Points for Nations in Crisis. New York:   Allen Lane, 2019. 

Diamond, Larry:   In Search of Democracy. London:   Routledge, 2015.

Ellner, Steve & Hellinger, Daniel: Venezuelan Politics in the Chávez Era:   Class, Polarization, and Conflict. Boulder:   Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003.

Fanon, Frantz: The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press, 1963.

Fukuyama, Francis:   Liberalism And Its Discontents. New York:   Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2022.

Gandhi, Mahatma K.: An Autobiography or The Story of My Experiments with Truth. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House, 1927.

García Márquez, Gabriel:   El general en su laberinto. New York:   Random House LLC, 1989.

Guaidó, Juan: Venezuela’s Parallel Government: A Framework for Transition. Washington:   Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2020.

Guevara, Ernesto (Che):   La guerra de guerrillas. New York:    Penguin Random House, 2024.

Harnecker, Marta:   A World to Build: New Paths toward Twenty-first-century Socialism. New York:   NYU Press, 2015.

Hillman, Richard S.:   Democracy for the Privileged:   Crisis and Transition in Venezuela. Boulder:   Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1994.

Jackson, Michael:    The Politics of Story Telling.     Variations on a Theme by Hannah Arendt.   2nd Edition.  Chicago:   The University of Chicago Press (Distributed for Museum Tusculanum Press), 2013. 

Jacobs, Norman.   The Origin of Modern Capitalism and Eastern Asia. New York:   Octagon Books, 1981. 

Levitsky, Steven & Ziblat, Daniel:    How Democracies Die.   New York:    Penguin, Random House, UK, 2018.

Lynch, John:   Simón Bolívar:   A Life.   New Haven:   Yale University Press, 2007.

Mainwaring, Scott, & Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal:    Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America.   Cambridge:    Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Martin Luther King: The Essential Box Set: The Landmark Speeches and Sermons of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.   Edited by Carson, Clayborne; Shepard, Kris; Holloran, Peter.   New York: Hachette Audio Book, 2009.

Marx, Karl:   Bolivar y Ponte.   The New American Cyclopedia, 1858.   Public Domain:  

Marx-Engels Internet Archive.   See https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1858/01/bolivar.htm

Mill, John Stuart:    On Liberty.   London: John W. Parker and Son, 1859.

Miranda, Francisco de:   The New Democracy in America:   Travels of Francisco de Miranda in the United States, 1783-84. Translated by Judson P. Wood; edited by John S. Ezell.   Norman:   University of Oklahoma Press, 1963.  

Noguera-Santaella, José: Venezuela in the Gordian Knot: Lessons for Rebuilding Democracy and Economic Prosperity.   Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2021.

Nussbaum, Martha C.: Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach.   Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Pino Iturrieta, Elías:    El Divino Bolívar.   Caracas: Editorial Alfadil, 2006, Kindle Book.

O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. C.:    Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies.   Baltimore:   Johns Hopkins University Press,1986.

Penfold, Michael & Corrales, Javier:  “Manipulating Term Limits in Latin America,” Journal of Democracy,” John Hopkins University Press, vol. 25, no.4, October 2014, 157-168.

Penfold, Michael:    “Clientelism and Populism in Chávez’s Venezuela,” Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 3, 2007, 63-84.

Piketty, Thomas:   CAPITAL IN THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer.   Cambridge:   Harvard University Press, 2014. 

Rangel, Carlos:   Del buen salvaje al buen revolucionario.   Caracas:   Monte Avila, 1976.

Rawls, J.:    A Theory of Justice.   Cambridge:   Harvard University Press,1971.

Rodríguez, F.:    “The Role of External Pressure in Venezuela’s Political Crisis,” Foreign Policy, February 28, 2019.

Schock, Kurt:    Civil Resistance Today.   New York:    Routledge, 2013.

Schedler, A.:   The Politics of Uncertainty:   Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism.   Oxford:   Oxford University Press, 2013.

Sen, Amartya:    Development as Freedom.   New York:    Knopf, 1999.

Sharp, Gene:    The Politics of Nonviolent Action.   Boston:    Porter Sargent Publishers, 1973.

Snyder, Timothy:   On Tyranny:   Twenty Lessons from the 20th Century.   New York:   Tim Duggan Books, 2017.

Zakaria, Fareed:    The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad.   New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2003.

Zúquete, José P.:    The Palgrave Handbook of Left Wing Extremism, Volume 2.    London:   Palgrave McMillan, 2023.

---