Posts Tagged ‘executive power’

“Unmasking Disappointment: Series XIV”

August 31, 2026

*

“Geometric Allegory” digital painting 2023 by Ricardo Morin (American visual artist born in Venezuela–1954)

*

Scope and Use

This entry forms part of the constitutional corpus presented in the Appendix, which gathers the twenty-five constitutions of Venezuela and is arranged for consultation rather than continuous reading.  Collation proceeds by means of permanent rubric codes whose identity remains constant throughout the corpus; absent rubrics signify constitutional silence, while withdrawn rubrics are not reassigned.  Citations are anchored first in the article number and follow the CIDEP recension linked at the close of the entry.  The complete definition of the corpus, its methodology, and its citation convention appear in the Scope and Use note that heads the Constitutions of the Nineteenth Century, opening in the instalment “Unmasking Disillusion: Series XI”: https://observacionessobrelanaturalezade.com/2026/06/15/desenmascarar-la-desilusion-serie-xi/

Translation Convention

Institutional and technical names are given first in italicized Latinate Castilian and followed by their contemporary Latinate English equivalents in brackets.  All constitutional quotations appear in italic type between quotation marks and are rendered in contemporary Latinate English, faithfully preserving the substance and distinctions of the original charters.  Comparative references are restricted to 1874 against 1864 and 1881 against 1874.  The apparatus retains the classifications cont., cf., and new.

Ricardo F. Morín

August 31, 2026

Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania



* *

7).  The Constitución de 1874

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874], formally the Constitución de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Constitution of the United States of Venezuela], was decreed by the Congreso de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Congress of the United States of Venezuela] at Caracas on 23 May 1874 and ordered executed by Presidente [President] Antonio Guzmán Blanco on 27 May 1874.

DOC-PRE—Preámbulo [Preamble]

The Congress of the United States of Venezuela, under the invocation of the Supreme Author and Legislator of the Universe, and by authority of the people of Venezuela, manifested in the petitions addressed to it by the Legislatures of the twenty States composing the Venezuelan Union, requesting the reform of the Constitution of 1864 decreed by the Constituent Assembly of the States, and in conformity with its Article 122; decrees:

FND-TER—Territorio [Territory]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] declared that the Estados [States] which the Constitution of March 1864 had declared independent and united to form the Federación Venezolana [Venezuelan Federation], and which were then denominated Apure, Bolívar, Barquisimeto, Barcelona, Carabobo, Cumaná, Cojedes, Falcón, Guzmán Blanco, Guárico, Guayana, Guzmán, Maturín, Nueva Esparta, Portuguesa, Táchira, Trujillo, Yaracuy, Zamora, and Zulia, undertook to continue forming an independent and sovereign Nación [Nation] under the denomination Estados Unidos de Venezuela [United States of Venezuela] (Tít. I, Sec. I, Art. 1; cf. 1864, Tít. I, Sec. I, Art. 1:  “The Provinces of Apure, Aragua, Barcelona, Barinas, Barquisimeto, Carabobo, Caracas, Cojedes, Coro, Cumaná, Guárico, Guayana, Maracaibo, Maturín, Mérida, Margarita, Portuguesa, Táchira, Trujillo, and Yaracuy declare themselves independent States and unite to form a free and sovereign Nation under the name ‘UNITED STATES OF VENEZUELA’.”).

The limits of each Estado [State] were those which the Law of 28 April 1856 had assigned to the Provincias [Provinces], that law having fixed the last territorial division (Art. 2; cont. 1864, Tít. I, Sec. I, Art. 2).

The limits of the Estados Unidos [United States] composing the Federación Venezolana [Venezuelan Federation] were those that in 1810 corresponded to the former Capitanía General de Venezuela [Captaincy General of Venezuela] (Art. 3; cont. 1864, Tít. I, Sec. I, Art. 3).

The political entities expressed in Article 1 reserved the faculty of two or more uniting to form a single Estado [State], while always retaining the liberty to recover their character as an Estado [State]; in either case notice was given to the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive], the Congreso [Congress], and the other Estados de la Unión [States of the Union] (Art. 4; cont. 1864, Tít. I, Sec. I, Art. 4).

The Estados [States] that had exercised the faculty conferred by the preceding article retained their votes for the Presidencia de los Estados Unidos [Presidency of the United States], the appointment of Senadores [Senators], and the presentation of Vocales [Justices] for the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] (Art. 5; cont. 1864, Tít. I, Sec. I, Art. 5).

POW-LEG—Congreso [Congress]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] provided that the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] comprise two Cámaras [Chambers], one of Senadores [Senators] and the other of Diputados [Deputies] (Tít. IV, Sec. I, Art. 18; cont. 1864, Tít. IV, Sec. I, Art. 18).

The Estados [States] determined the manner of appointing Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] (Art. 19; cont. 1864, Art. 19).

Each Estado [State] appointed Diputados [Deputies] by popular election in conformity with Article 13, no. 23, at the ratio of one for every twenty-five thousand inhabitants and one additional Deputy for every excess exceeding twelve thousand, with an equal number of substitutes elected in the same manner (Tít. IV, Sec. II, Art. 20; cf. 1864, Art. 20).

The Diputados [Deputies] served for two years and were renewed in their entirety (Art. 21; cont. 1864, Art. 21).

The Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] examined the annual account presented by the Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela], passed votes of censure upon the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State], and heard accusations against the person charged with the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive], the Ministers and other national employees, and the high public functionaries of the Estados [States], in the cases stated by Article 22 (Art. 22; cf. 1864, Art. 22:  “To hear accusations against the person charged with the National Executive for treason against the Fatherland or for common offences, and against the Ministers and other national employees for infringement of the laws and for malperformance of their functions, in conformity with Article 82 of this Constitution.”).

When a Diputado [Deputy], corporation, or individual proposed an accusation, the Cámara [Chamber] appointed, by secret ballot, a commission of three Deputies; the commission delivered its opinion within the third day; and the Chamber decided by an absolute majority of the members present, the accusing Deputy abstaining from the vote (Art. 23; cont. 1864, Art. 23).

The declaration that there was ground to proceed suspended the accused by operation of law and disqualified him from exercising any public office during the trial (Art. 24; cont. 1864, Art. 24).

Each Estado [State] elected two principal Senadores [Senators] and two substitutes to fill vacancies (Tít. IV, Sec. III, Art. 25; cont. 1864, Art. 25).

To be a Senador [Senator], a person was required to be Venezuelan by birth and thirty years of age (Art. 26; cont. 1864, Art. 26).

The Senadores [Senators] served for two years (Art. 27; cf. 1864, Art. 27:  “The Senators shall remain in their offices for four years and one half shall be renewed.  When for any reason they are appointed in their entirety, one shall be elected for two years.”).

The Senado [Senate] conducted and resolved the trials initiated in the Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] (Art. 28; cont. 1864, Art. 28).

If a trial had not concluded during the sessions, the Senado [Senate] remained assembled for that purpose alone until the cause was terminated; in such a case the Senadores [Senators] received no allowances (Art. 29; cont. 1864, Art. 29).

The Legislatura [Legislature] assembled annually in the capital of the Estados Unidos [United States] on 20 February, or on the earliest possible day thereafter, without awaiting convocation; its sessions lasted seventy days and could be prolonged to ninety (Tít. IV, Sec. IV, Art. 30; cont. 1864, Art. 30).

The Cámaras [Chambers] opened their sessions with at least two thirds of their members; in the absence of that number, those present met as a preparatory commission and adopted measures to secure the attendance of the absentees (Art. 31; cont. 1864, Art. 31).

Once the sessions had opened, the Cámaras [Chambers] could continue with two thirds of those who had installed them, provided that the number did not fall below one half of the total membership appointed (Art. 32; cont. 1864, Art. 32).

The Cámaras [Chambers] functioned separately, but assembled as Congreso [Congress] when the Constitución [Constitution] or the law so determined, or when one Chamber judged it necessary; if the invited Chamber concurred, it fixed the day and hour of the meeting (Art. 33; cont. 1864, Art. 33).

The sessions were public, and secret whenever the Cámara [Chamber] so resolved (Art. 34; cont. 1864, Art. 34).

The Cámaras [Chambers] possessed the rights enumerated in Article 35 concerning their rules, discipline, internal police, correction of spectators, removal of obstacles to the exercise of their functions, execution of their exclusive resolutions, qualification of their members, and hearing of resignations (Art. 35; cont. 1864, Art. 35).

Neither Cámara [Chamber] could suspend its sessions or change its seat without the consent of the other; in case of disagreement, the Chambers assembled and the determination of the majority was executed (Art. 36; cont. 1864, Art. 36).

The exercise of any public function was incompatible, during the sessions, with the office of Senador [Senator] or Diputado [Deputy]; the law fixed their indemnities, which could not be increased during the constitutional period in which they were established (Art. 37; cont. 1864, Art. 37).

The Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] enjoyed immunity from 20 January of each year until thirty days after the sessions had ended; immunity consisted in the suspension of every proceeding, whatever its origin or nature.  When a member committed an act deserving corporal punishment, the investigation continued through the conclusion of the preliminary inquiry and remained in that state for the duration of the immunity (Art. 38; cont. 1864, Art. 38).

The Congreso [Congress] was presided over by the Presidente del Senado [President of the Senate], while the Presidente de la Cámara de Diputados [President of the Chamber of Deputies] served as Vice-President (Art. 39; cont. 1864, Art. 39).

Members of the Cámaras [Chambers] were not responsible for the opinions or speeches they delivered therein (Art. 40; cont. 1864, Art. 40).

The Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] could not accept offices or commissions from the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] until one year after the conclusion of the period for which they had been appointed; the offices of Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State], diplomatic employment, and military commands in time of war were excepted, acceptance of any such office vacating the seat occupied in the Chamber (Art. 41; cont. 1864, Art. 41).

The Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] could not enter into contracts with the Gobierno General [General Government] or prosecute the claims of others before it (Art. 42; cont. 1864, Art. 42).

The Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] possessed the attributions enumerated in Article 43, including the resolution of controversies among the Estados [States]; erection and organization of the Distrito Federal [Federal District]; organization of the Aduanas [Customs Houses], ports, posts, national codes, currency, national symbols, national employments, public debt, loans, census and statistics, Armed Force, war, treaties, public-works contracts, budgets, public prosperity, weights and measures, amnesties, territories, procedures and penalties for trials before the Senado [Senate], population basis for the Diputados [Deputies], admission of foreigners to public service, presidential elections, military retirements and pensions, responsibility of national and State employees, and military ranks or promotions (Art. 43; cf. 1864, Art. 43, no. 14:  “To prescribe the rules for the formation and replacement of the forces expressed in the preceding number”; Art. 43, no. 28:  “To enact the law governing the responsibility of all national employees.”).

In addition to the preceding enumeration, the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] could enact such laws of general character as were necessary (Art. 44; cont. 1864, Art. 44).

Laws and decrees of the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] could be initiated by members of either Cámara [Chamber], in the manner prescribed by their rules (Tít. IV, Sec. VI, Art. 45; cont. 1864, Art. 45).

Upon presentation, a bill was considered for admission; once admitted, it received three debates, with an interval of at least one day between each, under the rules established for debate (Art. 46; cont. 1864, Art. 46).

Bills approved in the Cámara [Chamber] in which they had originated passed to the other Chamber for the purposes of Article 46; if not rejected, they were returned to the Chamber of origin with the alterations they had undergone (Art. 47; cont. 1864, Art. 47).

If the Cámara [Chamber] of origin did not accept the alterations, it could insist and transmit its written reasons to the other Chamber; the Chambers could also assemble as Congreso [Congress] and constitute themselves as a general commission to seek agreement, and if none was attained, the bill became void when the Chamber of origin so decided separately (Art. 48; cont. 1864, Art. 48).

When bills passed from one Cámara [Chamber] to the other, the days upon which they had been debated were stated (Art. 49; cont. 1864, Art. 49).

A law reforming another was drafted in its entirety, and the anterior law was repealed in all its parts (Art. 50; cont. 1864, Art. 50).

Laws employed the formula “The Congress of the United States of Venezuela decrees.” (Art. 51; cf. 1864, Art. 51: the formula was “The Congress of the United States of Venezuela.  Decree.”).

Bills rejected in one Legislatura [Legislature] could not be presented anew except in another (Art. 52; cont. 1864, Art. 52).

Bills pending in a Cámara [Chamber] at the close of the sessions underwent the same three debates in succeeding Legislatures (Art. 53; cont. 1864, Art. 53).

Laws were repealed with the same formalities by which they were enacted (Art. 54; cont. 1864, Art. 54).

When the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State] had maintained before a Cámara [Chamber] that a bill was unconstitutional and it nevertheless became law, the Ejecutivo de la Unión [Executive of the Union] could submit it to the Nación [Nation], represented in the Legislaturas de los Estados [State Legislatures] (Art. 55; cont. 1864, Art. 55).

In such a case, each Estado [State] represented one vote, expressed by the majority of the members attending its Legislatura [Legislature], and transmitted the result to the Corte Federal [Federal Court] with the formula “I Confirm” or “I Object” (Art. 56; cont. 1864, Art. 56).

If a majority of the Estados [States] concurred with the Ejecutivo [Executive], the Corte [Court] ordered the law suspended and reported to the Congreso [Congress], transmitting the entire record (Art. 57; cont. 1864, Art. 57).

Laws entered into observance only after publication with the prescribed solemnity (Art. 58; cont. 1864, Art. 58).

The faculty conferred for the sanctioning of a law was not delegable (Art. 59; cont. 1864, Art. 59).

No legislative provision had retroactive effect, except in judicial procedure and when imposing a lesser penalty (Art. 60; cont. 1864, Art. 60).

ECO-HAC—Hacienda [Public Finance]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] conferred upon the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] the faculty of organizing all matters relating to the Aduanas [Customs Houses], whose revenues formed the Tesoro de la Unión [Treasury of the Union] until replaced by others (Tít. IV, Sec. V, Art. 43, no. 3; cont. 1864, Tít. IV, Sec. V, Art. 43, no. 3).

The Estados [States] having no mines in operation received from national revenues the sum of sixteen thousand venezolanos, which was fixed in the annual budget of public expenditures and delivered in anticipated quarters (Tít. II, Art. 13, no. 17; cf. 1864, Tít. II, Art. 13, no. 17:  “To reserve from national revenues, for the benefit of the States having no mines in operation, the sum of twenty thousand pesos…”).

The Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] determined all matters relating to the national debt and contracted loans upon the credit of the Nación [Nation] (Art. 43, nos. 10–11; cont. 1864, Art. 43, nos. 10–11).

The Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] annually formed the budgets of public expenditures (Art. 43, no. 18; cont. 1864, Art. 43, no. 18).

The Presidente de la Unión [President of the Union] supervised the collection of national revenues (Tít. V, Sec. II, Art. 72, no. 3; cont. 1864, Tít. V, Sec. II, Art. 72, no. 3).

The Presidente [President] appointed empleados de hacienda [Treasury employees] whose appointment was not attributed to other functionaries, Venezuelan birth being required for those offices (Art. 72, no. 10; cont. 1864, Art. 72, no. 10).

In foreign war, the Presidente [President] could demand contributions in advance or negotiate decreed loans whenever ordinary revenues were insufficient (Art. 72, no. 15.2; cont. 1864, Art. 72, no. 15.2).

Within the first five sessions of each year, the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State] presented to the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] the budget of public expenditures and the general account of the preceding year (Tít. V, Sec. III, Art. 80; cont. 1864, Tít. V, Sec. III, Art. 80).

The Congreso [Congress] could not increase the taxes burdening exports or constitute further mortgages upon them; once the existing obligations were satisfied by payment, compensation, or substitution, the exportation of national products was forever free (Tít. VII, Art. 103; cont. 1864, Tít. VII, Art. 103).

No expenditure could be made from the Tesoro Nacional [National Treasury] unless the Congreso [Congress] had expressly appropriated a sum in the annual budget; those contravening this provision were civilly responsible to the National Treasury for the sums paid.  In every expenditure from the public treasury, ordinary expenditures were preferred to extraordinary ones (Art. 108; cont. 1864, Art. 108).

Offices collecting national contributions and offices making payments remained separate; the former could make no payments other than the salaries of their own employees (Art. 109; cont. 1864, Art. 109).

When for any reason the budget corresponding to a fiscal period was not enacted, the budget of the immediately preceding period continued in force (Art. 110; cont. 1864, Art. 110).

POW-EXE—Ejecutivo [Executive]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] entrusted the general administration of the Nación [Nation] to a magistrate bearing the title Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] (Tít. V, Sec. I, Art. 61; cont. 1864, Tít. V, Sec. I, Art. 61).

To be Presidente [President], a person was required to be Venezuelan by birth and thirty years of age (Art. 62; cont. 1864, Art. 62).

The Presidente [President] was elected by the citizens of all Estados [States] through direct and public ballot, each State possessing one vote constituted by the relative majority of its electors (Arts. 63–66; cf. 1864, Arts. 63–65:  “The election of the President shall be made by the citizens of all the States through direct and secret ballot, in such a manner that each State possesses one vote, which shall be that of the relative majority of its electors.”).

Temporary absences of the Presidente [President] were supplied by one of the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State], selected by a majority vote of his colleagues.  Absolute vacancies arising from death, resignation, removal, or cessation in command upon termination of the period were supplied by the Presidente de la Alta Corte Federal [President of the High Federal Court], who was required to convoke new elections unless the vacancy occurred within the final six months of the constitutional period.  Whoever supplied the President was required to possess the constitutional qualifications for the office (Arts. 67–68; cf. 1864, Arts. 67 and 69).

The Presidente [President] served for two years, counted from 20 February.  The outgoing President, or the person replacing him in an absolute vacancy, could not be elected for either the period immediately succeeding the one then ending or the period following it; the same prohibition applied to the relatives of either within the fourth civil degree of consanguinity or affinity (Arts. 69–70; cf. 1864, Arts. 68 and 70: the presidential period was four years, and the prohibition extended only to the immediately succeeding period and did not encompass relatives).

The Constitución [Constitution] enumerated the attributions of the Presidente [President], including preservation of the Nación [Nation] from external attack; execution of the laws and decrees of the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature]; supervision of national revenues; administration of terrenos baldíos [public lands] according to law; convocation of the Legislature; appointment of diplomatic representatives and Treasury employees; direction of diplomatic negotiations and treaties; conclusion of national contracts subject to legislative approval; appointment and removal of the Ministros [Ministers]; granting of cartas de nacionalidad [letters of nationality]; issuance of patentes de navegación [navigation patents]; declaration of war following a decree of the Congreso [Congress]; exercise of the extraordinary faculties prescribed for foreign war and armed insurrection; direction of military operations; granting of pardons; defence of the Distrito Federal [Federal District]; and performance of the other functions attributed by national law (Tít. V, Sec. II, Arts. 72–73; cont. 1864, Tít. V, Sec. II, Arts. 72–73).

POW-JUD—Poder Judicial [Judicial Power]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] vested national judicial authority in the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court], whose organization, composition, and jurisdiction were regulated in Title VI (Tít. VI, Arts. 85–89; cf. 1864, Tít. VI, Arts. 85–89).

The Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] comprised five Vocales [Justices], who were required to be Venezuelan by birth or to have ten years of naturalization, and to be thirty years of age (Art. 85; cont. 1864, Art. 85).

The Legislatura [Legislature] of each Estado [State] presented candidates for the Corte [Court], and the Congreso [Congress] declared elected the candidate receiving the greatest number of votes in each of the five electoral groups established by the Constitution; ties were resolved by Congress, which also filled vacancies when the States had not transmitted their presentations (Art. 86; cf. 1864, Art. 86, which did not provide for Congress to fill such vacancies).

The law determined the respective functions of the Vocales [Justices] of the Corte [Court] and its other employees (Art. 87; cont. 1864, Art. 87).

The Vocales [Justices] and their respective substitutes served for two years; neither the principals nor the substitutes in exercise could accept offices appointed by the Ejecutivo [Executive] during that period, even after resigning their judicial office (Art. 88; cf. 1864, Art. 88:  “The Justices and their respective substitutes […] shall remain in their offices for four years…”).

The competence of the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] comprised civil and criminal causes involving diplomatic employees in the cases permitted by the law of nations; causes against the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State] and diplomatic agents; causes against high functionaries of the Estados [States] in conformity with Article 13, no. 24; civil causes in which the Nación [Nation] was defendant when so determined by law; controversies of jurisdiction among employees of different States; matters voluntarily submitted by the States; declaration of the law in force when national laws collided with one another or with State laws; controversies arising from contracts or negotiations concluded by the Presidente de la Unión [President of the Union]; prize causes; and the other attributions prescribed by law (Art. 89; cf. 1864, Art. 89, no. 5, which conditioned causes against high State functionaries upon the laws of the respective States).

POW-SUB—Gobierno subnacional [Subnational Government]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] reserved to the Estados [States] everything not expressly attributed by the Constitution to the Administración General de la Nación [General Administration of the Nation] (Tít. VII, Art. 90; cont. 1864, Tít. VII, Art. 90).

The courts of justice of the Estados [States] were declared independent; causes initiated under their own procedure and concerning matters within their exclusive competence terminated within the respective States without submission to examination by any external authority (Art. 91; cont. 1864, Art. 91).

Every act of the Congreso Nacional [National Congress] or the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] that violated the rights guaranteed to the Estados [States] by the Constitution, or attacked their independence, was to be declared void by the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] whenever requested by a majority of the State Legislatures (Art. 92; cont. 1864, Art. 92).

The Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could maintain within the Estados [States] no other resident employees exercising jurisdiction or authority than those of the States themselves, except Treasury employees and personnel assigned to national fortresses, parks established by law, naval stations, and enabled ports, whose jurisdiction was confined to their respective offices and installations (Art. 99; cont. 1864, Art. 99).

The Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could not station forces or military commanders exercising command within an Estado [State] without the permission of that State’s government (Art. 100; cont. 1864, Art. 100).

Neither the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] nor the Ejecutivos de los Estados [State Executives] could intervene by Armed Force in the domestic conflicts of a State; they were permitted only to offer their good offices toward a peaceful resolution (Art. 101; cont. 1864, Art. 101).

CON-AMD—Reforma de la Constitución [Constitutional Amendment]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] authorized the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] to reform the Constitution in whole or in part whenever requested by a majority of the Legislaturas de los Estados [State Legislatures]; no reform could extend beyond the points comprised in the State petitions (Tít. VII, Art. 122; cont. 1864, Tít. VII, Art. 122).

CIV-SUF—Sufragio [Suffrage]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] provided that Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] be elected in the manner determined by the Estados [States] (Tít. IV, Arts. 19, 25; cont. 1864, Tít. IV, Arts. 19, 25).

The Diputados [Deputies] were elected by popular vote at the ratio of one for every twenty-five thousand inhabitants and one additional Deputy for every excess exceeding twelve thousand, with an equal number of substitutes elected in the same manner (Art. 20; cf. 1864, Art. 20).

The Constitución [Constitution] required the Estados [States] to establish in their constitutions direct, public, written, and signed suffrage for popular elections, with a registration period of thirty days and a voting period of eight days, including the final two Sundays (Tít. II, Art. 13, no. 23; cf. 1864, Tít. II, Art. 13, no. 23:  “To establish direct and secret suffrage in popular elections.”).

The Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] was elected by the citizens of all Estados [States] through direct and public ballot, each State possessing one vote constituted by the relative majority of its electors (Tít. V, Arts. 63–66; cf. 1864, Tít. V, Art. 63:  “The election of the President shall be made by the citizens of all the States through direct and secret ballot.”).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed liberty of suffrage in popular elections, without restriction other than minority below eighteen years of age (Tít. III, Art. 14, no. 11; cont. 1864, Tít. III, Art. 14, no. 11).

CIV-CIT—Ciudadanía [Citizenship]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] defined as Venezuelans all persons born in the territory of Venezuela, whatever the nationality of their parents; children of a Venezuelan father or mother born in another territory who established domicile in the country and manifested the will to be Venezuelan; foreigners who had obtained a carta de nacionalidad [letter of nationality]; and persons born in any of the Spanish American Republics or the Spanish Antilles who established residence in the territory of the Unión [Union] and desired to be Venezuelan (Tít. I, Sec. II, Art. 6; cont. 1864, Tít. I, Sec. II, Art. 6).

Venezuelans who established domicile and acquired nationality in a foreign country did not lose their character as Venezuelans (Art. 7; cont. 1864, Art. 7).

Venezuelan men above twenty-one years of age were eligible for public offices, subject to the exceptions established by the Constitución [Constitution] (Art. 8; cont. 1864, Art. 8).

All Venezuelans were bound to serve the Nación [Nation] in the manner prescribed by law, with the sacrifice of their property and life if necessary for its defence (Art. 9; cont. 1864, Art. 9).

Venezuelans present in the territory of any Estado [State] possessed therein the same rights and duties as those domiciled in that State (Art. 10; cont. 1864, Art. 10).

The law determined the rights corresponding to the condition of foreigner (Art. 11; cont. 1864, Art. 11).

RTS-GAR—Derechos [Rights]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] guaranteed Venezuelans the inviolability of life and abolished capital punishment, whatever law might establish it (Tít. III, Art. 14, no. 1; cont. 1864, Tít. III, Art. 14, no. 1).

It guaranteed property with all its rights, subject only to contributions established by the legislative authority, judicial decision, and taking for public works following indemnification and an adversarial proceeding (Art. 14, no. 2; cont. 1864, Art. 14, no. 2).

It guaranteed the inviolability and secrecy of correspondence and other papers; the inviolability of the domestic home, except to prevent the perpetration of an offence in conformity with law; liberty of thought expressed by word or through the press, without restriction; liberty of transit, domicile, departure from the Republic, and return thereto; liberty of industry; liberty of unarmed meeting and association; liberty of petition and the right to obtain a resolution; liberty of instruction; religious liberty, with public worship outside temples reserved to the Roman Catholic and Apostolic Religion; personal security; and equality before the law (Art. 14, nos. 3–15; cont. 1864, Art. 14, nos. 3–15).

Under the guarantee of personal liberty, the Constitución [Constitution] abolished forced recruitment, proscribed slavery forever, declared free the slaves who entered Venezuelan territory, and recognized the right of each person to do whatever did not prejudice another (Art. 14, no. 5; cont. 1864, Art. 14, no. 5).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that the enumeration of guarantees did not restrict the faculty of the Estados [States] to accord other guarantees to their inhabitants (Art. 15; cont. 1864, Art. 15).

The laws of the Estados [States] prescribed penalties for infringers of those guarantees and established the procedures for making them effective (Art. 16; cont. 1864, Art. 16).

Persons who issued, signed, executed, or ordered the execution of decrees, orders, or resolutions violating any guarantee accorded to Venezuelans were declared culpable and punished according to law, and any citizen was competent to accuse them (Art. 17; cont. 1864, Art. 17).

REG-MIL—La fuerza armada [The Armed Force]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] provided that the fuerza pública nacional [National Public Force] was divided into naval and land forces and composed of the Milicia Ciudadana [Citizen Militia] organized by the Estados [States] under their laws (Tít. VII, Art. 93; cont. 1864, Tít. VII, Art. 93).

The force under charge of the Unión [Union] was formed from volunteers and a proportional contingent supplied by each Estado [State], which called to service the citizens obliged to render it under its laws (Art. 94; cont. 1864, Art. 94).

In time of war, the contingent could be augmented by bodies of the Milicia Ciudadana [Citizen Militia] to the number of men required by the Gobierno Nacional [National Government] (Art. 95; cont. 1864, Art. 95).

The Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could change the commanders of the fuerza pública [Public Force] furnished by the Estados [States] in the cases and with the formalities prescribed by national military law, the States then providing replacements (Art. 96; cont. 1864, Art. 96).

Military and civil authority could never be exercised by the same person or corporation (Art. 97; cont. 1864, Art. 97).

During national and State electoral periods, the fuerza pública [Public Force] was to be disarmed in the manner prescribed by law (Art. 111; cont. 1864, Art. 111).

The fuerza armada [Armed Force] could not deliberate; it was declared passive and obedient.  No armed body could make requisitions or demand assistance of any kind except through the civil authorities and in the manner prescribed by law (Art. 116; cont. 1864, Art. 116).

REG-REL—Religión [Religion]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] invoked the Supreme Author and Legislator of the Universe in its Preámbulo [Preamble], decreed by the Congreso de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Congress of the United States of Venezuela] under the authority of the people of Venezuela (Preamble; cont. 1864, Preamble).

The Constitución [Constitution] guaranteed religious liberty, but provided that only the Roman Catholic and Apostolic Religion could exercise public worship outside temples (Tít. III, Art. 14, no. 13; cont. 1864, Tít. III, Art. 14, no. 13).

The Nación [Nation], being in possession of the right of ecclesiastical patronage, was to exercise it in the manner prescribed by law (Tít. VII, Art. 98; cont. 1864, Tít. VII, Art. 98).

REG-SLA—Esclavitud [Slavery]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] proscribed slavery forever and declared free the slaves who entered the territory of Venezuela (Tít. III, Art. 14, no. 5.2–3; cont. 1864, Tít. III, Art. 14, no. 5.2–3).

ECO-INF—Infraestructura [Infrastructure]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] empowered the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] to resolve all matters relating to the enabling and security of ports and maritime coasts; create and organize the national posts and establish charges upon the carriage of correspondence; promote measures conducive to the prosperity of the country and the advancement of the sciences and arts; fix and unify national weights and measures; and approve or reject, before execution, contracts concerning national public works concluded by the Presidente de la Unión [President of the Union] (Tít. IV, Sec. V, Art. 43, nos. 4–5, 17, 19–20; cont. 1864, Tít. IV, Sec. V, Art. 43, nos. 4–5, 17, 19–20).

The Constitución [Constitution] authorized the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] to establish temporarily, under the denomination territorios [territories], regions that were unpopulated or inhabited by uncivilized Indigenous peoples, which depended directly upon the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] (Art. 43, no. 22; cont. 1864, Art. 43, no. 22).

The Nación [Nation] and the Estados [States] were to promote immigration and the colonization of foreigners in conformity with their respective laws (Tít. VII, Art. 117; cont. 1864, Tít. VII, Art. 117).

CON-FIN—Disposiciones finales [Final Provisions]

The Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] provided that the laws and dispositions of the governments of the Estados [States] remained in force until the new State Legislatures brought them into harmony with the Constitution, which was to occur within four months (Tít. VII, Art. 121; cont. 1864, Tít. VII, Art. 121).

The Constitución [Constitution] could be reformed in whole or in part by the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] at the request of a majority of the Legislaturas de los Estados [State Legislatures], without any reform extending beyond the points comprised in those petitions (Art. 122; cont. 1864, Art. 122).

The Constitución [Constitution] entered into force upon its official publication in each Estado [State].  Public acts and official documents were to date the Federación [Federation] from 20 February 1859 and the Law from 28 March 1864 (Art. 123; cf. 1864, Art. 123).

The sole transitory provision established that the new constitutional period for the offices of the Administración General de la República [General Administration of the Republic] would begin on 20 February 1877, upon expiration of the current period, while the periods of State employees would begin when the periods then in force terminated under the respective State constitutions (Tít. VIII, Art. 124; new; cf. 1864: constitutional silence).

The Constitución [Constitution] was given and signed in the Palacio de Sesiones del Cuerpo Legislativo Federal [Palace of Sessions of the Federal Legislative Body] at Caracas on 23 May 1874 by the officers and members of the Congreso [Congress], and was ordered executed and observed in the Palacio Federal [Federal Palace] at Caracas on 27 May 1874 by Presidente [President] Antonio Guzmán Blanco and his Ministros [Ministers].

Note  

  • The original text of the Constitución de 1874 [Constitution of 1874] may be consulted in the CIDEP (Recopilación de Leyes y Decretos de Venezuela [Compilation of the Laws and Decrees of Venezuela]):  https://cidep.online/files/constituciones/1874.pdf

* *

8).  The Constitution of 1881

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881], formally the Constitución de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Constitution of the United States of Venezuela], was sanctioned by the Congreso de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Congress of the United States of Venezuela] at Caracas on 4 April 1881 and ordered executed by Presidente [President] Antonio Guzmán Blanco on 27 April 1881.  It declared as the Constitution of the United States of Venezuela the text requested by the Legislatures of the twenty States of the Federación Venezolana [Venezuelan Federation] and organized those States into nine great political entities.

DOC-PRE—Preámbulo [Preamble]

The Congress of the United States of Venezuela, having considered and scrutinized the petitions addressed by means of their Legislatures by the twenty States composing the Venezuelan Federation, requesting the reform of the Constitution of 1874, in complete conformity with the Project submitted by Congress for their consideration, and with each and every modification proposed by the Illustrious American, President of the Republic, in the Message he addressed to the State Legislatures on 15 October 1880, without essential difference upon the general points of the reform; and having present, moreover, the will expressed by the Sections concerning their own grouping, decrees:

Sole Article.  The Constitution of the United States of Venezuela requested by the Legislatures of the twenty States of the Venezuelan Federation is hereby declared, in the following terms:

CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF VENEZUELA.

FND-TER—Territorio [Territory]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] constituted as nine great political entities the twenty Estados [States] that had remained independent and united since the Constitution of 28 March 1864, preserving their union as a single free, sovereign, and independent Nación [Nation] under the denomination Estados Unidos de Venezuela [United States of Venezuela] (Art. 1; cf. 1874, Art. 1).  The territorial organization comprised the Estados [States] of Oriente, Guzmán Blanco, Carabobo, Sur de Occidente, Norte de Occidente, Los Andes, Bolívar, Zulia, and Falcón, formed by grouping the former twenty States (Art. 1; new; cf. 1874: no corresponding grouping).

The limits of the great Estados [States] continued to be determined by the territorial division established by the Law of 28 April 1856 until reformed (Art. 2; cont. 1874, Art. 2).  The exterior limits of the República [Republic] remained those that in 1810 corresponded to the former Capitanía General de Venezuela [Captaincy General of Venezuela] (Art. 3; cont. 1874, Art. 3).

The grouped Estados [States] were denominated Secciones [Sections] and declared equal among themselves.  Their constitutions were to accord with the federative principles established by the national Constitution, while sovereignty not expressly delegated continued to reside in the constituent States, subject only to the limitations arising from the compact of association (Art. 4; cf. 1874, Art. 12:  “The States forming the Venezuelan Union reciprocally recognize their autonomies, declare themselves equal as political entities, and retain in all its plenitude their sovereignty not expressly delegated by this Constitution.”).

POW-LEG—Congreso [Congress]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] retained a bicameral Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature], composed of a Cámara de Senadores [Chamber of Senators] and a Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] (Art. 18; cont. 1874, Art. 18).  The Estados [States] determined the manner of electing the Deputies, while the Senators were elected by the respective State Legislatures (Arts. 19, 25; cf. 1874, Arts. 19, 25).  Each State elected three principal Senators and an equal number of substitutes, and the senatorial period was extended from two to four years (Arts. 25–27; cf. 1874, Arts. 25–27).

Representation in the Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] was modified to one Diputado [Deputy] for every thirty-five thousand inhabitants, with one additional Deputy for every remainder not below fifteen thousand, and an equal number of substitutes (Art. 20; cf. 1874, Art. 20:  “…one for every twenty-five thousand inhabitants, and another for every excess exceeding twelve thousand.”).  The Deputies continued to be elected by direct popular vote, but their period was increased from two to four years (Arts. 20–21; cf. 1874, Arts. 20–21).

The Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] retained the faculty of examining the annual account of the Presidente [President], censuring the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State], and hearing accusations against the Ejecutivo [Executive], the Ministers, national employees, and high functionaries of the Estados [States] for the causes determined in Article 22 (Art. 22; cont. 1874, Art. 22).  The accusation procedures, declaration that there was ground to proceed, suspension of the accused, and disqualification during trial remained substantially unchanged (Arts. 23–24; cont. 1874, Arts. 23–24).

The Senado [Senate] continued to conduct and resolve trials initiated in the Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] (Art. 28; cont. 1874, Art. 28).  If a trial had not concluded during the sessions, the Senate remained assembled for that purpose alone until the cause was terminated; the 1874 provision denying allowances to the Senators in such a case no longer appeared (Art. 29; cf. 1874, Art. 29).

The Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] assembled annually in the capital on 20 February, or on the earliest possible day thereafter, without prior convocation.  The sessions were reduced from seventy to sixty days and remained prolongable to ninety, in the judgment of the majority (Art. 30; cf. 1874, Art. 30).

The quorum requirements, separate functioning of the Cámaras [Chambers], public or secret sessions, internal faculties, presidency of the Congreso [Congress], and nonresponsibility for opinions and speeches remained substantially unchanged (Arts. 31–36, 39–40; cont. 1874, Arts. 31–36, 39–40).

The Constitución [Constitution] provided that any increase in legislative indemnities would not enter into force until the succeeding period, after complete renewal of the Chambers that had sanctioned it (Art. 37; cf. 1874, Art. 37; deferred-operation rule, new).

The Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] enjoyed immunity from 20 January of each year until thirty days after the sessions ended; immunity consisted in the suspension of every civil or criminal proceeding, whatever its origin or nature (Art. 38; cf. 1874, Art. 38).

The Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] who accepted from the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] any office or commission thereby vacated their seat in the corresponding Cámara [Chamber] by operation of law (Art. 41; cf. 1874, Art. 41).

The Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] could not contract with the Gobierno General [General Government] or prosecute the claims of others before it (Art. 42; cont. 1874, Art. 42).

The Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] retained the attributions relating to controversies among the Estados [States], the Distrito Federal [Federal District], the Customs Houses, ports, posts, national codes, currency, national symbols, national offices, public debt, loans, the Armed Force, war, treaties, public works, budgets, public prosperity, weights and measures, amnesties, territories, trials before the Senado [Senate], representation in the Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies], military retirements and pensions, responsibility of public employees, and military ranks or promotions (Art. 43; cf. 1874, Art. 43).

Article 43 reduced from ten to three square miles the maximum extent of the Distrito Federal [Federal District]; replaced the formation of the census with the perfection of the census then in force; restored the reference to replacement of the Armed Force; provided that contracts concerning national public works be concluded by the Presidente [President] with the approval of the Consejo Federal [Federal Council]; suppressed the attribution to enact the law of presidential elections; and attributed to the Congreso [Congress] the election of the Federal Council and convocation of the substitutes of the Senators and Deputies elected to compose it (Art. 43, nos. 2, 12–14, 17, and 29; cf. 1874, Art. 43; Art. 43, no. 29, new; cf. 1874: constitutional silence).

The Congreso [Congress] retained the faculty of enacting necessary laws of general character, provided that they did not conflict with the Constitución [Constitution] (Art. 44; cf. 1874, Art. 44:  “In addition to the preceding enumeration, the National Legislature may enact such laws of general character as are necessary.”).

The initiative of laws and decrees remained with the members of either Cámara [Chamber], but the respective bills were required to conform to the provisions established for the Parlamento de Venezuela [Parliament of Venezuela] (Art. 45; cf. 1874, Art. 45).

Upon presentation, a bill was to be read and considered for admission; once admitted, it received three debates separated by at least one day (Art. 46; cf. 1874, Art. 46, which did not expressly require the initial reading).  If the originating Chamber did not accept alterations made by the other and no agreement was reached, the bill became void once the originating Chamber separately ratified its insistence (Art. 48; cf. 1874, Art. 48, which referred to a separate decision without expressly requiring ratification of the insistence).

The remaining rules concerning bicameral consideration, statement of the days of debate, integral redrafting of a reformed law, the legislative formula, rejected and pending bills, repeal, publication, nondelegability of the faculty to sanction laws, and the prohibition of retroactive legislation except in judicial procedure or when a lesser penalty was imposed remained substantially unchanged (Arts. 47, 49–54, 58–60; cont. 1874, Arts. 47, 49–54, 58–60).

When the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State] had maintained that a bill was unconstitutional and it had nevertheless been sanctioned as law, the Ejecutivo [Executive], with the affirmative vote of the Consejo Federal [Federal Council], suspended its execution and requested the vote of the State Legislatures.  If a majority of the Legislatures concurred with the Executive, the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] confirmed the suspension and the Executive reported to the succeeding Congreso [Congress] (Arts. 55–57; cf. 1874, Arts. 55–57).

ECO-HAC—Hacienda [Public Finance]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] retained the provision under which the revenues of the Aduanas [Customs Houses] formed the Tesoro de la Unión [Treasury of the Union] until replaced by others, and established a system for distributing certain revenues between the Federación [Federation] and the Estados [States] (Arts. 13, nos. 32–33; 43, no. 3; cf. 1874, Arts. 13, nos. 16–17; 43, no. 3).

The Estados [States] ceded to the Gobierno Federal [Federal Government] the administration of mines, terrenos baldíos [public lands], and saltworks.  Two thirds of the revenues arising from transit duties, mines, public lands, and saltworks belonged to the States and were distributed in proportion to their population; the remaining third was reserved to the Poder Federal [Federal Power] for the advancement of the country (Art. 13, nos. 15 and 32–33; cf. 1874, Art. 13, nos. 16–17).

The Congreso [Congress] continued to exercise authority over the national debt, loans, annual appropriations, administration of the Customs Houses, and organization of the Tesoro Nacional [National Treasury] (Art. 43, nos. 3, 10–11, and 18; cont. 1874, Art. 43, nos. 3, 10–11, and 18).

No expenditure could be made from the Tesoro Nacional [National Treasury] unless the Congreso [Congress] had expressly appropriated a sum in the annual budget, and those contravening the provision were civilly responsible to the National Treasury for the sums paid.  Ordinary expenditures continued to be preferred to extraordinary ones (Art. 105; cont. 1874, Art. 108).

Offices collecting national contributions and offices making payments remained separate, and the former could make no payments other than the salaries of their own employees (Art. 106; cont. 1874, Art. 109).  If the budget corresponding to a fiscal period was not enacted, the budget of the immediately preceding period continued in force (Art. 107; cont. 1874, Art. 110).

Exportation was declared free in Venezuela, and the imposition of duties burdening it was prohibited (Art. 101; cf. 1874, Art. 103).

POW-EXE—Ejecutivo [Executive]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] established a Consejo Federal [Federal Council] composed of one Senador [Senator] and one Diputado [Deputy] from each Estado [State], together with one Deputy for the Distrito Federal [Federal District], elected by the Congreso [Congress] for two-year periods (Art. 61; new).  From among its members, the Federal Council elected the Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] and the member who was to supply his temporary or absolute absences; a presidential election falling upon a person who did not belong to the Federal Council was void (Arts. 62–64; new).

The Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] and the members of the Consejo Federal [Federal Council] served for two years.  Neither the President nor the members of the Council could be reelected for the immediately succeeding period, although the Councillors resumed their legislative seats upon completion of their functions in the Council (Art. 63; cf. 1874, Arts. 69–70, which barred the outgoing President and the person replacing him in an absolute vacancy from election for either of the two succeeding periods).

The Presidente [President] appointed and removed the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State]; presided over the Gabinete [Cabinet]; received diplomatic representatives; signed official communications addressed to foreign sovereigns or presidents; ordered execution of the laws and decrees of the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature]; promulgated resolutions and decrees approved by the Consejo Federal [Federal Council]; organized the Distrito Federal [Federal District]; issued patentes de navegación [navigation patents]; reported annually to the Congreso [Congress] on the exercise of the faculties conferred by Article 66; and performed the other functions attributed by national law (Art. 65; cf. 1874, Art. 72).

With the deliberative vote of the Consejo Federal [Federal Council], the Presidente [President] preserved the Nación [Nation] from external attack; administered public lands, mines, and saltworks; convoked the Congreso [Congress]; appointed diplomatic and consular employees; directed treaty negotiations; concluded contracts of national interest; appointed and removed Treasury employees; declared war following authorization by Congress; exercised the extraordinary faculties prescribed for foreign war; restored constitutional order after an armed rebellion; intervened to terminate an armed collision between Estados [States]; directed war and organized the national force; granted pardons; and defended the Distrito Federal [Federal District] (Art. 66; cf. 1874, Art. 72).

The Presidente [President] continued to be assisted by the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State], whose number, functions, duties, and Secretarías [Departments] were determined by law (Art. 67; cont. 1874, Art. 74).  To be a Minister, a person was required to be twenty-five years of age and Venezuelan by birth or to possess five years of nationality (Art. 68; cont. 1874, Art. 75).

The Ministros [Ministers] were the natural and necessary organs of the Presidente [President].  All presidential acts were to be subscribed by them in order to be fulfilled or executed by authorities, employees, or private persons (Art. 69; cont. 1874, Art. 76).  The personal responsibility of the Ministers was not saved by an order of the President, even when received in writing (Art. 70; cont. 1874, Art. 77).

Decisions foreign to the internal administration of the Secretarías [Departments] were resolved in Consejo de Ministros [Council of Ministers], and ministerial responsibility was collective and solidary (Art. 71; cf. 1874, Art. 78:  “The decision of all matters other than the internal administration of the Departments shall be resolved in Council of Ministers; and responsibility is collective.”).

The Ministros [Ministers] were to report annually to the Cámaras [Chambers] concerning what had been accomplished or projected in their respective branches and to furnish the written or verbal information required of them.  They could reserve only that which it was not expedient to publish concerning diplomatic negotiations; the 1874 reservation relating to war no longer appeared (Art. 72; cf. 1874, Art. 79).

The Ministros [Ministers] were to present the budget of public expenditures and the general account of the preceding year, possessed the right to speak in the Cámaras [Chambers], and were obliged to appear when summoned (Arts. 73–74; cont. 1874, Arts. 80–81).

The Ministros [Ministers] answered for treason against the Fatherland, infringement of the Constitution or laws, misappropriation of public funds, expenditures exceeding appropriations, bribery or corrupt payment, and failure to execute decisions of the Consejo Federal [Federal Council] (Art. 75; cf. 1874, Art. 82; Art. 75, no. 6, new).

The first paragraph of Article 86 provided that the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] was exercised by the Consejo Federal [Federal Council], the Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] or the person acting in his stead, in union with the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State], who were its organs (Art. 86, para. 1; cf. 1874, Art. 83).  Its second paragraph required the President to be Venezuelan by birth (Art. 86, para. 2; cf. 1874, Art. 62, which additionally required thirty years of age).

When the Presidente [President], with approval of the Consejo Federal [Federal Council], assumed command of the Ejército [Army] or left the Distrito Federal [Federal District] upon matters of public interest, he was replaced by the Federal Council in conformity with Article 62 (Art. 87; cf. 1874, Art. 84).

POW-JUD—Poder Judicial [Judicial Power]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] retained the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court], modified its composition, and established a Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] as tribunal of the Estados [States] (Arts. 76–85; cf. 1874, Arts. 85–89; Arts. 81–85, new).

The Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] comprised one Vocal [Justice] for each Estado de la Federación [State of the Federation], and each Justice was required to be Venezuelan by birth and thirty years of age (Art. 76; cf. 1874, Art. 85:  “The High Federal Court shall be composed of five Justices…”).

The Vocales [Justices] were elected by the Congreso [Congress] from lists formed by the assembled representation of each Estado [State] (Art. 77; cf. 1874, Art. 86).  The law determined the functions of the Justices and the other employees of the High Federal Court (Art. 78; cont. 1874, Art. 87).

The Vocales [Justices] and their substitutes served for four years.  Neither the principals nor the substitutes in exercise could accept appointments from the Ejecutivo [Executive] without first resigning their judicial office, and infringement of this prohibition was punished by four years of disqualification from public office (Art. 79; cf. 1874, Art. 88).

The competence of the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] comprised civil and criminal causes involving diplomatic employees in the cases permitted by the law of nations; causes against the Ministros del Despacho [Ministers of State] and diplomatic agents; civil causes in which the Nación [Nation] was defendant when so determined by law; controversies of jurisdiction or competence among authorities of different Estados [States]; matters voluntarily submitted by the States; determination of the law in force when national laws collided with one another or with State laws; controversies arising from contracts or negotiations concluded by the Presidente [President]; prize causes; and the other attributions determined by law (Art. 80; cf. 1874, Art. 89).

The Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] was a tribunal of the Estados [States] and comprised one Vocal [Justice] for each State, with four-year periods (Art. 81; new).  To be a Justice, a person was required to be a practising lawyer with at least six years of practice, to be Venezuelan, and to be thirty years of age (Art. 82; new).

The Legislaturas de los Estados [State Legislatures] presented lists of candidates from which the Consejo Federal [Federal Council] elected the Justice corresponding to each Estado [State].  Absolute vacancies were filled by lot from the general list of unelected candidates and temporary vacancies in conformity with law (Arts. 83–84; new).

The Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation] heard criminal causes or causes of responsibility against high functionaries of the Estados [States]; the recourse of cassation in the manner prescribed by law; reported annually to the Congreso [Congress] concerning obstacles opposed to the unity of civil and criminal legislation; and resolved conflicts of jurisdiction among judicial authorities of different States and, when applicable, among those of the same State (Art. 85; new).

POW-SUB—Gobierno subnacional [Subnational Government]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] grouped the twenty Estados [States] existing under the Constitution of 1874 into nine great States formed by territorial Secciones [Sections], and declared the constituent States equal among themselves (Arts. 1, 4; cf. 1874, Arts. 1, 12).

The constitutions of the Secciones [Sections] were to accord with the federative principles established by the national Constitution.  Sovereignty not expressly delegated continued to reside in the constituent Estados [States], subject only to the limitations arising from the federal compact (Art. 4; cf. 1874, Art. 12).

Everything not expressly attributed by the Constitución [Constitution] to the Administración General de la Nación [General Administration of the Nation] belonged to the Estados [States] (Art. 88; cont. 1874, Art. 90).

The Estados [States] were to organize themselves according to the principles of popular, elective, federal, representative, alternative, and responsible government, and to establish their internal constitutional order in harmony with the national Constitution (Art. 13, nos. 1–2; cf. 1874, Art. 13, no. 1).

The Estados [States] bound themselves to preserve the independence and integrity of the Federación [Federation]; not to alienate territory or implore foreign protection; not to maintain political or diplomatic relations with foreign nations; not to establish Customs Houses or impose differential internal contributions; not to obstruct interstate commerce; and not to declare or make war among themselves (Art. 13, nos. 3–13 and 27–30; cf. 1874, Art. 13).

The Estados [States] were to cede the lands necessary for the Distrito Federal [Federal District] and other federal establishments; recognize federal jurisdiction over navigation, national roads, mines, public lands, saltworks, and insular territories; maintain uniform substantive civil and criminal legislation and uniform procedural laws; provide primary education and instruction in arts and trades; recognize the jurisdiction of the Corte de Casación [Court of Cassation]; establish criminal extradition as a constitutional principle; contribute contingents to the national Armed Force; preserve neutrality in controversies among States; and submit interstate controversies to the Congreso [Congress] or the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] (Art. 13, nos. 6–34; cf. 1874, Art. 13).

The Estados [States] ceded to the Gobierno Federal [Federal Government] the administration of mines, public lands, and saltworks.  Two thirds of the revenues arising from transit duties, mines, public lands, and saltworks were distributed among the States in proportion to their population, while the remaining third was reserved to the Poder Federal [Federal Power] for the advancement of the country (Art. 13, nos. 15 and 32–33; cf. 1874, Art. 13, nos. 16–17).

The courts of justice of the Estados [States] were declared independent, without prejudice to the recourse of cassation in the cases established by law (Art. 89; cf. 1874, Art. 91).  Acts of the Congreso [Congress] or the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] violating the constitutional rights or independence of the States were to be declared void by the Alta Corte Federal [High Federal Court] at the request of a majority of the State Legislatures (Art. 90; cont. 1874, Art. 92).

The Gobierno de la Federación [Government of the Federation] could maintain in the Estados [States] no other resident employees exercising jurisdiction or authority than those of the States themselves, except Treasury employees and personnel of the forces assigned to national fortresses, parks established by law, naval stations, and enabled ports.  Article 97 further recognized that the existing instruments of war belonged to the Gobierno Nacional [National Government] and that the States could acquire those necessary for their internal defence (Art. 97; cf. 1874, Art. 99).

CON-AMD—Reforma de la Constitución [Constitutional Amendment]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] provided that when a majority of the Legislaturas de los Estados [State Legislatures] requested constitutional reform, the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] was required to sanction it.  The reform could not comprise points other than those upon which the State petitions concurred (Art. 118; cf. 1874, Art. 122).

CIV-SUF—Sufragio [Suffrage]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] established direct and public suffrage for popular elections, grounded upon an electoral census and made obligatory.  The vote was to be cast in public session of the respective electoral board, entered in the register established by law, and signed by the voter or, if he could not sign, by another citizen at his request; without this formality no vote could be deemed validly cast (Art. 13, no. 22; cf. 1874, Art. 13, no. 23).

The Constitución [Constitution] continued to guarantee liberty of suffrage in popular elections, without restriction other than minority below eighteen years of age (Art. 14, no. 11; cont. 1874, Art. 14, no. 11).

Eligibility for public offices remained confined to Venezuelan men above twenty-one years of age, subject to the exceptions established by the Constitución [Constitution] (Art. 7; cont. 1874, Art. 8).

The Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] ceased to be elected directly by the citizens and was instead elected by the Consejo Federal [Federal Council] from among its members (Art. 62; cf. 1874, Arts. 63–66).  The Senadores [Senators] were elected by the State Legislatures, while the Diputados [Deputies] continued to be elected by direct popular vote (Arts. 19–25; cf. 1874, Arts. 19–25).

CIV-CIT—Ciudadanía [Citizenship]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] retained the constitutional definition of Venezuelan nationality.  Venezuelans were all persons born in the territory of Venezuela, whatever the nationality of their parents; children of a Venezuelan mother or father born in another territory who established domicile in the República [Republic] and manifested the will to be Venezuelan; foreigners who had obtained a carta de nacionalidad [letter of nationality]; and persons born in any of the Spanish American Republics or the Spanish Antilles who established residence in the Republic and manifested the will to be its citizens (Art. 5; cont. 1874, Art. 6).

Venezuelans who established domicile abroad and acquired a foreign nationality did not lose their character as Venezuelans (Art. 6; cont. 1874, Art. 7).

Eligibility for public offices remained confined to Venezuelan men above twenty-one years of age, subject to the exceptions established by the Constitución [Constitution] (Art. 7; cont. 1874, Art. 8).

Every Venezuelan was bound to serve the Nación [Nation], including the sacrifice of property and life when necessary for its defence (Art. 8; cont. 1874, Art. 9).

Venezuelans throughout the Federación [Federation] enjoyed the rights and immunities inherent in their condition as citizens and were subject to the same duties as persons native to and domiciled in the Estado [State] in which they resided (Art. 9; cf. 1874, Art. 10).

Foreigners enjoyed the same civil rights as Venezuelans and equal security in their persons and property.  They could employ the diplomatic channel according to public treaties and in cases permitted by law (Art. 10; new).  The law determined the rights corresponding to the condition of foreigner and distinguished between foreigners domiciled in the República [Republic] and transient foreigners (Art. 11; cf. 1874, Art. 11).

RTS-GAR—Derechos [Rights]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] retained the catalogue of constitutional guarantees established in 1874 and modified certain formulations (Arts. 14–17; cf. 1874, Arts. 14–17).

The Nación [Nation] guaranteed the inviolability of life through abolition of capital punishment; property; inviolability and secrecy of correspondence; inviolability of the domestic home; personal liberty; liberty of expression; liberty of transit; liberty of industry; liberty of meeting and association; the right of petition; liberty of suffrage; liberty of instruction; religious liberty; personal security; and equality before the law (Art. 14; cf. 1874, Art. 14).

Property was guaranteed with all its attributes, immunities, and privileges, subject only to contributions decreed by the legislative authority, judicial decision, and taking for public works following indemnification and an adversarial proceeding (Art. 14, no. 2; cf. 1874, Art. 14, no. 2:  “Property with all its rights…”).

Personal liberty comprised abolition of forced recruitment, proscription of slavery, freedom of the slaves who entered Venezuelan territory, and the rule that no person was obliged to do what the law did not command or prevented from doing what it did not prohibit (Art. 14, no. 5; cf. 1874, Art. 14, no. 5).

Liberty to express thought by word or through the press was not subject to prior censorship; actions for calumny, insult, or prejudice to a third person nevertheless remained available under the common laws (Art. 14, no. 6; cf. 1874, Art. 14, no. 6).

The authorities could exercise no act of inspection or coercion over unarmed meetings or associations (Art. 14, no. 9; cf. 1874, Art. 14, no. 9).

Religious liberty was retained without the 1874 provision reserving to the Roman Catholic and Apostolic Religion the exercise of public worship outside temples (Art. 14, no. 13; cf. 1874, Art. 14, no. 13).

Personal security comprised protection against imprisonment for debt except in cases of fraud or offence; forced quartering of troops; special tribunals; arbitrary arrest; incommunication; compulsory self-incrimination; imprisonment without legal cause; criminal punishment without prior citation and lawful hearing; corporal punishment exceeding ten years; and imprisonment for political reasons once constitutional order had been restored (Art. 14, no. 14; cf. 1874, Art. 14, no. 14).

The enumeration of guarantees did not restrict the faculty of the Estados [States] to grant other guarantees to their inhabitants (Art. 15; cont. 1874, Art. 15).  The laws of the States prescribed penalties for infringers and established procedures for making the guarantees effective (Art. 16; cont. 1874, Art. 16).  Persons who issued, signed, executed, or ordered the execution of measures violating the constitutional guarantees were responsible according to law, and every citizen was competent to accuse them (Art. 17; cont. 1874, Art. 17).

REG-MIL—La fuerza armada [The Armed Force]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] retained the organization of the fuerza pública nacional [National Public Force] into naval and land forces, composed of the Milicia Ciudadana [Citizen Militia] organized by the Estados [States] in conformity with their laws (Art. 91; cont. 1874, Art. 93).

The force under charge of the Federación [Federation] was formed by contingents contributed by the Estados [States] in proportion to their population; the 1874 reference to volunteers no longer appeared (Art. 92; cf. 1874, Art. 94).  In time of war, the contingents could be augmented by bodies of the Citizen Militia to the number required by the Gobierno Nacional [National Government] (Art. 93; cont. 1874, Art. 95).

The Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could change the commanders of State contingents in the cases and under the procedures prescribed by national military law, the Estados [States] then providing the necessary replacements (Art. 94; cont. 1874, Art. 96).  Civil and military authority could not be exercised simultaneously by the same person or corporation (Art. 95; cont. 1874, Art. 97).

The Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could not station forces or military commanders exercising command within an Estado [State] without the consent of that State’s government (Art. 98; cont. 1874, Art. 100).  Neither the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] nor the Ejecutivos de los Estados [State Executives] could intervene by Armed Force in the domestic conflicts of a State; they could only offer their good offices toward a peaceful resolution (Art. 99; cont. 1874, Art. 101).

During electoral periods, the national fuerza pública [Public Force] and that of the Estados [States] were to remain rigorously quartered while popular elections were conducted (Art. 108; cf. 1874, Art. 111:  “During the electoral periods of the Nation and the States, the Public Force shall be disarmed; and the respective laws shall determine the manner of effecting it.”).

The fuerza armada [Armed Force] could not deliberate; it was passive and obedient.  No armed body could make requisitions or demand assistance except through the civil authorities and in the manner prescribed by law (Art. 113; cont. 1874, Art. 116).

REG-REL—Religión [Religion]

The introductory text of the Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] did not reproduce the invocation of the Supreme Author and Legislator of the Universe contained in the Preámbulo [Preamble] of 1874 (cf. 1874, Preamble).

The Constitución [Constitution] retained religious liberty and eliminated the 1874 provision reserving to the Roman Catholic and Apostolic Religion the exercise of public worship outside temples (Art. 14, no. 13; cf. 1874, Art. 14, no. 13).

The Nación [Nation] continued to exercise the right of ecclesiastical patronage in the manner prescribed by law (Art. 96; cont. 1874, Art. 98).

REG-SLA—Esclavitud [Slavery]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] proscribed slavery forever and declared free the slaves who entered the territory of Venezuela (Art. 14, no. 5.2–3; cont. 1874, Art. 14, no. 5.2–3).

ECO-INF—Infraestructura [Infrastructure]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] reserved to the powers of the Federación [Federation] specified competences over national infrastructure and communications (Arts. 13, 43; cf. 1874, Art. 43).

The Estados [States] reserved to the powers of the Federación [Federation] legislative and executive jurisdiction over maritime, coastal, and river navigation and over caminos nacionales [national roads], understood as those exceeding the limits of one State and leading to the frontiers of another and to the Distrito Federal [Federal District] (Art. 13, no. 9; new).

The Estados [States] ceded to the Federación [Federation] the land necessary for the Distrito Federal [Federal District] and for the erection of fortifications, storehouses, shipyards, penitentiaries, and the other buildings indispensable to the Administración General [General Administration] (Art. 13, nos. 6–7; cf. 1874, Art. 13, no. 3).

The Congreso [Congress] retained the faculty of enabling and securing the ports and maritime coasts of the República [Republic], organizing the national posts, establishing postal charges, and approving contracts concerning national public works (Art. 43, nos. 3–5 and 17; cf. 1874, Art. 43, nos. 3–5 and 17).

The Congreso [Congress] could enact measures conducive to the prosperity of the country and the advancement of the sciences and arts (Art. 43, no. 19; cont. 1874, Art. 43, no. 19).  The Nación [Nation] and the Estados [States] were to promote immigration and the colonization of foreigners in conformity with their respective laws (Art. 114; cont. 1874, Art. 117).

CON-FIN—Disposiciones finales [Final Provisions]

The Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] entered into force upon its official promulgation in each Estado [State].  Public acts and official documents were to continue dating the Federación [Federation] from 20 February 1859 and the Law from 28 March 1864 (Art. 119; cont. 1874, Art. 123).

The newly constituted great Estados [States] were to elect Diputados Seccionales [Sectional Deputies] to compose Asambleas Constituyentes [Constituent Assemblies] charged with sanctioning local constitutions in accord with the principles of the federal Constitution and the laws applicable throughout the territory of each grouping (Art. 120; new; cf. 1874: constitutional silence).

Once the great Estados [States] had been constituted, each was to elect its Presidente [President] and the Diputados [Deputies] and Senadores [Senators] of the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature], so that the Legislature might be installed on 20 February 1882, elect the Consejo Federal [Federal Council] from its own body, and the Council elect the Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] (Art. 121; new; cf. 1874: constitutional silence).

The new constitutional period for the offices of the Administración General de la República [General Administration of the Republic] would begin on 20 February 1882, when the current period terminated (Art. 122; cf. 1874, Tít. VIII, Art. 124).

For all acts of the civil and political life of the Estados de la Federación [States of the Federation], the population basis continued to be that determined by the census approved on 6 June 1874 until reformed (Art. 123; new; cf. 1874: constitutional silence).

The Constitución [Constitution] expressly repealed the federal Constitution sanctioned in 1874 (Art. 124; new; cf. 1874: constitutional silence).

The Constitución [Constitution] was given and signed in the Palacio de las Sesiones del Cuerpo Legislativo Federal [Palace of Sessions of the Federal Legislative Body] at Caracas on 4 April 1881 by the members of the Congreso [Congress], and was ordered executed and observed on 27 April 1881 by Presidente [President] Antonio Guzmán Blanco and his Ministros [Ministers].

Note  

  • The original text of the Constitución de 1881 [Constitution of 1881] may be consulted in the CIDEP (Recopilación de Leyes y Decretos de Venezuela [Compilation of the Laws and Decrees of Venezuela]):  https://cidep.online/files/constituciones/1881.pdf

“Unmasking Disappointment: Series XIII”

August 24, 2026

*

“Geometric Allegory” digital painting 2023 by Ricardo Morin (American visual artist born in Venezuela–1954)

*

Scope and Use

This entry forms part of the constitutional corpus presented in the Appendix, comprising the twenty-five constitutions of Venezuela and organized for consultation rather than sequential reading.   Comparison proceeds by means of permanent rubric codes whose identities remain constant across the corpus; absent rubrics signify constitutional silence, while retired rubrics are not reassigned.   Citations are anchored first on the article number and follow the CIDEP recension linked at the close of the entry.   The full corpus definition, methodology, and citation convention are set forth in the Scope and Use note heading the 19th-Century Constitutions, which opens in the installment of “Unmasking Disappointment: Series XI”.

Translation Convention

Institutional and technical names are given first in italicized Latinate Castilian and followed by their contemporary Latinate English equivalents in brackets.  All constitutional quotations appear in italic type between quotation marks and are rendered in contemporary Latinate English, faithfully preserving the substance and distinctions of the original charters.  Comparative references are restricted to 1858 against 1857 and 1864 against 1858.  The apparatus retains the classifications cont., cf., and new.

Ricardo F. Morín

August 23, 2026

Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania


* *

5). The Constitution of 1858

The Constitution of 1858 (Constitución política del Estado de Venezuela [Political Constitution of the State of Venezuela]) was sanctioned by the Convención Nacional [National Convention] at Valencia on December 24, 1858, and promulgated on December 31, 1858, by the Jefe provisional del Estado [Provisional Chief of State], Julián Castro, following the March Revolution.

DOC-PRE—Preámbulo [Preamble]

(modern Latinate English translation by the author from the CIDEP recension)

“Constitution of the Republic of Venezuela under the auspices of the Supreme Legislator of the Universe.  We, the Deputies of the Provinces of Venezuela, assembled in National Convention for the purpose of forming the most perfect union, establishing justice, securing domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general happiness, and securing the precious gift of liberty for ourselves and our descendants, ordain and establish the present Constitution.”

FND-TER—Territorio [Territory]

The Constitution of 1858 declared the Nación venezolana [Venezuelan Nation] forever and irrevocably free and independent of every foreign power and provided that it was not and would never become the patrimony of any family or person (Title I, Art. 1; cont. 1857, Title I, Art. 1).

La Soberanía [Sovereignty] was vested essentially in the Nation (Art. 2; cf. 1857, Title I, Art. 2:  “Sovereignty resides in the Nation, and the Powers established by this Constitution are delegations from it for the purpose of securing order, liberty, and every right.”).

The territorio de la República [territory of the Republic] comprised all that, before the political transformation of 1810, had been denominated the Capitanía General de Venezuela [Captaincy General of Venezuela], with all its rights and appurtenances, and was divided into Provincias [Provinces], Cantones [Cantons], and Parroquias [Parishes] (Art. 3; cf. 1857, Title I, Art. 3:  “The territory of Venezuela comprises all that, before the political transformation of 1810, was denominated the Captaincy General of Venezuela and, for its better administration, shall be divided into provinces, cantons, and parishes.”).

Depopulated territories designated for colonies, together with territories occupied by Indigenous tribes, could not be separated from the provinces to which they belonged by the congresos constitucionales [constitutional congresses] and governed by special laws (Art. 4; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

No part of the national territory could pass by alienation into the dominion of another power, except through arrangements indispensable for determining the boundaries of the Republic with neighboring nations, provided that no community thereby lost its nationality (Art. 5; new; cf. 1857, Title IX, Art. 38, no. 6:  “To decree the alienation, exchange, or acquisition of territory.”).

POW-LEG—Congreso [Congress]

The Constitution of 1858 vested the Poder Legislativo [Legislative Power] in a Congreso [Congress] composed of a Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] and a Cámara del Senado [Chamber of the Senate] (Title VI, Art. 30; cont. 1857, Title V, Art. 16).

Congress assembled annually in the capital of the Republic on January 20 without need of convocation, and its sessions continued for ninety days (Art. 31; cf. 1857, Title V, Arts. 17, 19:  “Congress shall assemble annually in the capital of the Republic on February 1, or on the earliest possible date thereafter, although it has not been convoked.”  “The regular sessions shall continue for ninety days and may be extended for as many as thirty additional days when Congress considers it necessary.”).

A quorum of two-thirds of the members of each Cámara [Chamber] remained necessary to open the sessions, while their continuation required the attendance of one-half plus one of the total membership of each Chamber (Arts. 32–33; cf. 1857, Title VIII, Arts. 29–30).

The Chambers installed themselves, opened and closed their sessions on the same day, and resided in the same locality.  A transfer to another place or a suspension exceeding two days was determined by the absolute majority of Congress in joint session (Art. 34; cf. 1857, Title VIII, Art. 31).

Each Chamber adopted its own reglamento [rules], maintained order within its place of assembly, imposed the prescribed disciplinary measures, and issued its internal resolutions without the sanction of the President or the concurrence of the other Chamber (Arts. 35–37; cont. 1857, Title VIII, Art. 32).

The Chambers assembled in Congress when required by the Constitution or the law, or whenever they considered it necessary.  The Presidente del Senado [President of the Senate] presided, and the Presidente de la Cámara de Diputados [President of the Chamber of Deputies] served as Vice-President (Art. 38; cont. 1857, Title VIII, Art. 33).

The sessions were public but could be declared secret by the respective Chamber (Art. 39; cont. 1857, Title V, Art. 18).

The Senadores y Diputados [Senators and Deputies] possessed that character by the Nation and not by the Province that appointed them (Art. 40; cf. 1857, Title VIII, Art. 35:  “The Senators and Deputies possess that character by the Nation and shall receive neither orders nor instructions from the electoral Assemblies or from any other corporation.”).

The President and Vice-President of the Republic, the Secretarios del Despacho [Secretaries of the Cabinet], the Ministers of the Supreme and Superior Courts, the Governors, and military officers in active service were ineligible for election as Senators or Deputies (Art. 41; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

The exercise of any other public function was incompatible with the office of Senator or Deputy during the sessions (Art. 42; cf. 1857, Title VIII, Art. 37).

Senators and Deputies enjoyed inmunidad [immunity] in their persons and property while attending the sessions and while traveling to and returning from Congress.  They could not consequently be sued or subjected to civil execution, arrested, or detained except for an offence punishable by death; in other cases involving a corporal or infamous penalty, the judge transmitted the preliminary record to the respective Chamber so that it could suspend the accused and place him at the disposition of the competent judge (Art. 43; cf. 1857, Title VIII, Art. 34).

Senators and Deputies incurred no responsibility for the opinions or speeches expressed in the Chambers (Art. 44; cont. 1857, Title VIII, Art. 36).

Senators and Deputies could accept appointments as Secretaries of the Cabinet, diplomatic agents, or military commanders in time of war, but acceptance vacated their legislative office (Art. 45; cf. 1857, Title VIII, Art. 37).

The offices of Senator and Deputy were freely accepted; once accepted, a resignation required admission by the respective Chamber (Art. 46; cf. 1857, Title VIII, Art. 32, no. 2).

Senators and Deputies received the indemnización [compensation] fixed by law for the days of the sessions and viático [travel allowance] for their journey to Congress and return to their homes (Art. 47; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Each Chamber judged the qualifications of its own members and heard their resignations (Art. 48; cont. 1857, Title VIII, Art. 32).

The Senado [Senate] consisted of two Senators from each Province, elected by the Legislaturas provinciales [provincial Legislatures] by an absolute majority of votes; the suplentes [alternates] were elected in the same manner (Title VII, Art. 49; cf. 1857, Title VII, Art. 25; Title VIII, Art. 35, sole paragraph).

Deputies serving in a provincial Legislature could not be appointed principal or alternate Senators for the Province in whose Legislature they served (Art. 50; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Senators served for four years and were renewed by halves every two years (Art. 51; cf. 1857, Title VII, Art. 27:  “The Senators shall serve in their offices for six years, with renewal conducted in the manner prescribed by Article 23 for the Deputies.”).

Eligibility for the Senate required citizenship in the exercise of its rights, thirty years of age, birth or domicile in the electing Province, and the real property, professional or industrial income, or salary prescribed by the Constitution (Art. 52; cf. 1857, Title VII, Art. 26).

The Senate perfected the election and heard the resignations of the members of the Supreme Court, consented or refused consent to the military promotions specified by the Constitution, and conducted and adjudicated proceedings instituted in the Chamber of Deputies (Art. 53; cf. 1857, Title VII, Art. 28).

When adjudicating constitutional causes, the Senate incorporated the Supreme Court of Justice with a deliberative vote; conviction required two-thirds of all persons charged with rendering the final judgment, and the governing procedure was determined by law (Arts. 54–56; cf. 1857, Title VII, Art. 28).

When a cause against the President or Vice-President remained unresolved at the end of the sessions, the Senate continued assembled solely for its determination (Art. 57; cf. 1857, Title VII, Art. 28).

The Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] consisted of representatives elected by direct and secret vote of the citizens of the Provinces, at the proportion of one Deputy for every twenty-five thousand inhabitants and another for an excess greater than fifteen thousand, with every Province assured at least one Deputy (Title VIII, Art. 58; cf. 1857, Title VI, Art. 21:  “The Chamber of Deputies shall be composed of members elected by the peoples in the proportion of one for every twenty-five thousand inhabitants and one more for a remainder not below fifteen thousand.  A province that does not contain twenty-five thousand inhabitants shall nevertheless appoint one Deputy.”).

Eligibility for the Chamber of Deputies required citizenship in the exercise of its rights and twenty-five years of age (Art. 59; cf. 1857, Title VI, Art. 22).

Deputies served for four years and were renewed by halves every two years (Art. 60; cf. 1857, Title VI, Art. 23:  “The Deputies shall serve in their offices for six years and shall be renewed by halves every three years.”).

The Chamber of Deputies exercised the powers prescribed by Articles 61 through 63, including examination of the annual account and the hearing of accusations in the cases determined by the Constitution (Arts. 61–63; cont. 1857, Title VI, Art. 24).

Congress exercised the powers enumerated in Article 64 (Title IX, Art. 64; cont. 1857, Title IX, Art. 38).

Congress could neither delegate its constitutional powers nor apply national funds to provincial or municipal expenditures or provincial or municipal revenues to national expenditures (Art. 65, nos. 2–3; cf. 1857, Title IX, Art. 39; Title XX, Art. 114).

Bills and legislative decrees could originate in either Chamber, except measures establishing taxes and the annual budget, which necessarily originated in the Chamber of Deputies.  Every project received three readings in each Chamber, required approval by both, was subject to presidential sanction or objection, entered into force after promulgation, and could be repealed only through the same constitutional formalities (Title X, Arts. 66–78; cont. 1857, Title X, Arts. 40–51).

The requirement that the annual budget originate in the Chamber of Deputies was newly stated (Art. 66; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

ECO-HAC—Hacienda [Public Finance]

The Constitution of 1858 entrusted Congreso [Congress] with the power to contract debts upon the credit of the State; establish general taxes, duties, and contributions; supervise the application of public revenues and require an account of them from the Executive Power; and decree annual public expenditures in view of the budgets of revenue and expenditure presented by the Secretarios del Despacho [Secretaries of the Cabinet] (Title IX, Art. 64, nos. 2, 12, 14; cf. 1857, Title IX, Art. 38, nos. 2, 3, 9:  “To contract debts upon the credit of the State.”  “To establish general taxes and contributions, supervise the application of public revenues, and require an account of them from the Executive Power.”  “To decree public expenditures in view of the budgets of revenue and expenditure presented by the Executive Power, together with an extraordinary sum for unforeseen expenditures.”).

The Constitution provided that the funds of the Tesoro Nacional [National Treasury] could not be applied to provincial or municipal expenditures, nor provincial or municipal revenues to national expenditures (Art. 65, no. 2; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

No sum could be withdrawn from the tesoro público [Public Treasury] except for purposes determined by law and in conformity with the published budgets (Title XXII, Art. 152; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 114:  “No sum shall be withdrawn from the Public Treasury unless it is included in the general budget for the fiscal year in which the expenditure is made.”).

Las rentas municipales [municipal revenues] could not be burdened by national taxes (Art. 153; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

The Presidente de la República [President of the Republic] was charged with ensuring that the collection and application of national revenues conformed to the law (Title XI, Art. 94, no. 17; cf. 1857, Title XI, Art. 53, no. 14:  “To supervise the exact administration and application of public revenues.”).

POW-EXE—Ejecutivo [Executive]

The Constitution of 1858 vested the Poder Ejecutivo [Executive Power] in a Presidente de la República [President of the Republic] (Title XI, Art. 79; cf. 1857, Title XI, Art. 52:  “The Executive Power shall be entrusted to a Magistrate denominated President of the Republic.”).

The Constitution established the offices of Vicepresidente [Vice-President] and Designado [Designate], elected in the manner prescribed by the Constitution (Art. 80; cf. 1857, Title XII, Arts. 58–64).

The President and Vice-President were elected by direct and secret vote of citizens in the exercise of their political rights (Art. 81; cf. 1857, Title XII, Art. 59:  “The President and Vice-President of the Republic shall be appointed by the provincial Assemblies composed of the electors chosen by the cantons.”).

Eligibility for the Presidency required Venezuelan nationality by birth and citizenship in the exercise of its rights (Art. 82; cf. 1857, Title XII, Art. 58, which additionally required the qualifications prescribed for a Senator).

A constitutional election required one candidate to receive an absolute majority of all votes cast.  If no candidate received that majority, Congreso [Congress] confined the election to the three candidates who had received the greatest number of votes (Art. 83; cf. 1857, Title XII, Art. 59).

Congress elected among those candidates through the successive ballots prescribed by the Constitution.  Election initially required two-thirds of the votes of the members present and, after the prescribed ballots, an absolute majority was sufficient (Art. 84; cf. 1857, Title XII, Art. 59).

The presidential election was conducted in sesión permanente [permanent session], and no member who had voted in the first ballot could withdraw without permission from Congress (Art. 85; new; cf. 1857, Title XII, Art. 59).

The President served for four years and could not be reelected until at least one constitutional period had elapsed (Art. 86; cf. 1857, Title XII, Art. 60:  “The President and Vice-President of the Republic shall serve in their functions for six years, counted from February 1 of the year in which the election has been perfected.”).

The qualifications, manner of election, and duration prescribed for the President also governed the Vice-President (Art. 87; cf. 1857, Title XII, Arts. 58–60).

Persons related to the incumbent President or Vice-President within the degrees specified by the Constitution were ineligible for election to either office (Art. 88; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

The elections of the President and Vice-President were conducted two years apart; consequently, the first Vice-President elected under the Constitution served only two years (Art. 89; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

The President ceased exercising his functions on January 20 of the year in which the constitutional period terminated, and the Vice-President assumed the Executive Power until Congress installed the President-elect (Art. 90; cf. 1857, Title XII, Art. 61).

The President could not exercise the Executive Power outside the capital except when occupation by hostile forces or another grave event rendered his presence there impossible (Art. 91; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Upon the death, resignation, removal, or incapacity of the President, the Vice-President exercised the Executive Power until the conclusion of the constitutional period (Art. 92; cf. 1857, Title XII, Arts. 63–64).

If the Vice-President exercising the Executive Power also became unavailable, the Designate replaced him until the election of a President and Vice-President.  Those elections were ordered immediately whenever at least one year remained in the constitutional period (Art. 93; cf. 1857, Title XII, Art. 64).

The President exercised the powers enumerated in Article 94, including preservation of domestic order and external security; execution of the laws and decrees of Congress; convocation of Congress; supreme command of the naval and terrestrial forces; conduct of foreign relations; appointment and removal of the Secretaries of the Cabinet and other officers; supervision of national revenues; commutation of capital punishment under the conditions prescribed by the Constitution; and the other functions assigned by the Constitution and the laws (Art. 94; cf. 1857, Title XI, Art. 53).

In cases of armed domestic commotion threatening the security of the Republic or sudden foreign invasion, Congress could confer the facultades extraordinarias [extraordinary powers] enumerated by Article 95: calling into service the portion of the Milicia Nacional [National Militia] that Congress considered necessary; demanding contributions in advance or negotiating loans when ordinary revenues were insufficient; requiring a passport for travel through or departure from the Republic; and granting general or individual pardons to persons implicated in political offences (Art. 95; cf. 1857, Title XI, Art. 54).

When Congress was not assembled, the President convoked a Consejo extraordinario [Extraordinary Council] composed of the Corte Suprema de Justicia [Supreme Court of Justice], the Vice-President, and the Secretary who presented the request, under the presidency of the President of the Supreme Court.  The Council could confer, by two-thirds of its votes, the powers specified in Article 95 (Art. 96; cf. 1857, Title XI, Art. 54, which assigned authorization during the recess to the Council of Government; Title XIV, Arts. 71–77, which regulated its composition and operation).

The powers enumerated by Article 95 could not be conferred for more than ninety days (Art. 97; cf. 1857, Title XI, Art. 54).

The Executive Power reported to Congress at its next meeting upon every act performed under those extraordinary powers (Art. 98; cf. 1857, Title XI, Art. 55).

The President could not leave the territory of the Republic during the constitutional period or for one year thereafter and could not command the naval or terrestrial forces in person (Art. 99; cf. 1857, Title XI, Art. 53, no. 15:  “To exercise supreme command of the naval and terrestrial forces and direct them in person when necessary for the defense of the Republic, with the prior concurrence of Congress or, during its recess, of the Council of Government.”).

The dispatch of matters corresponding to the Executive Power was entrusted to the number of Secretarios del Despacho [Secretaries of the Cabinet] determined by law (Title XII, Art. 100; cf. 1857, Title XIII, Art. 65, which fixed their number at four).

Eligibility as a Secretary required the same qualifications prescribed for a Deputy (Art. 101; cont. 1857, Title XIII, Art. 66).

Every presidential act, except the appointment and removal of the Secretaries, required the countersignature of the Secretary of the corresponding department and could not be obeyed without it (Art. 102; cf. 1857, Title XIII, Art. 67).

A verbal or written presidential order did not extinguish a Secretary’s responsibility (Art. 103; cont. 1857, Title XIII, Art. 68).

The Secretaries reported annually to the Chambers within fifteen days after their installation upon the condition of their respective departments (Art. 104; cont. 1857, Title XIII, Art. 69).

The Secretaries could attend the sessions of the Chambers with a right to speak but without a vote and were required to appear when called to provide information (Art. 105; cont. 1857, Title XIII, Art. 70).

POW-JUD—Poder Judicial [Judiciary]

The Constitution of 1858 vested the Poder Judicial [Judicial Power] in a Corte Suprema [Supreme Court], Cortes Superiores [Superior Courts], and the other tribunals and courts established by law (Title XIII, Art. 106; cf. 1857, Title XV, Art. 78:  “The Judicial Power is exercised by the Supreme Court of Justice, the Superior Courts, and the other tribunals and courts determined by law.”).

Criminal justice was to be administered by jurados [juries] whenever the constitutional congresses so provided (Art. 107; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

The Supreme Court was composed of no fewer than five Ministros [Ministers] (Title XIV, Art. 108; cf. 1857, Title XV, Art. 79:  “The Supreme Court of Justice shall be composed of one Presiding Minister-Judge, four Minister-Judges with the special denominations and powers assigned by law, and one Fiscal Minister.”).

Eligibility as a Minister of the Supreme Court required citizenship in the exercise of its rights, forty years of age, and either six years of service as a Magistrado de Corte Superior [Magistrate of a Superior Court] or twelve years of practice as an attorney in the Republic (Art. 109; cf. 1857, Title XV, Art. 80:  “To be a member of the Supreme Court, it is necessary: 1. To be Venezuelan by birth. 2. To have attained forty years of age. 3. To have served as a Magistrate of a Superior Court or practiced the profession of law for ten years.”).

The Ministers of the Supreme Court were elected through the nominations of the Legislaturas provinciales [provincial Legislatures] and the procedure prescribed by Articles 110 through 112 (Arts. 110–112; cf. 1857, Title XV, Art. 81:  “The members of the Supreme Court shall be proposed in lists of three to the Executive Power by Congress in joint session.”).

The Supreme Court joined the Senate in causes against the President, the Vice-President or Designate exercising the Executive Power, the Secretaries of the Cabinet, and Ministers of the Court; decreed suspension and heard ordinary criminal causes against the Vice-President when not exercising the Executive Power, the Secretaries, and its own Ministers; heard contentious matters concerning diplomatic officers, responsibility proceedings against diplomatic and consular agents and Governors, controversies arising from executive contracts or negotiations, and questions submitted by tribunals concerning the interpretation of statutes; declared the nullity of provincial legislative acts contrary to the Constitution; perfected the election of Ministers of the Superior Courts; reported to Congress upon improvements in the administration of justice; decided controversies between Provinces or between Provinces and the National Government; and exercised the other powers assigned by law (Art. 113; cf. 1857, Title XV, Art. 82:  “The Judicial Power exclusively possesses the faculty of adjudicating and applying the laws in civil and criminal matters; the Supreme Court is additionally charged, together with the powers conferred by law, with resolving judicial questions submitted to it by the Executive Power or by any other public authority or officer and reporting them to Congress at its next meeting.”).

The Ministers of the Supreme Court could not accept an office conferred by the Executive Power while serving on the Court (Art. 114; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

The Superior Courts consisted of no fewer than three Ministers (Title XV, Art. 115; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Eligibility as a Minister of a Superior Court required Venezuelan nationality in the exercise of citizenship, thirty years of age, admission to the legal profession without suspension, and either four years of service as a judge, assessor, or auditor, or six years of legal practice (Art. 116; cf. 1857, Title XV, Art. 82, which entrusted the determination of judicial qualifications to the law).

The law organized the Superior Courts and the other tribunals and courts and determined their powers and the manner in which those powers were exercised (Art. 117; cont. 1857, Title XV, Art. 82).

Judges and Magistrates could not be suspended except by a decree declaring that proceedings should be instituted, nor removed except by a final judgment (Art. 118; cont. 1857, Title XV, Art. 84).

The Ministers of the Supreme and Superior Courts served for four years, were renewed by halves every two years, and could be reelected (Art. 119; cf. 1857, Title XV, Art. 79, which prescribed a six-year term and permitted reelection for the Supreme Court).

The office of Minister of the Supreme or Superior Courts was incompatible with the exercise of any profession or public office (Art. 120; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Judicial decisions stated the grounds upon which they were founded (Art. 121; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

POW-SUB—Gobierno Subnacional [Subnational Government]

The Constitution of 1858 divided the Poder público [Public Power] into Poder Nacional [National Power] and Poder Municipal [Municipal Power] and distributed the National Power among the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches (Title III, Arts. 9–10; cf. 1857, Title II, Art. 6:  “For purposes of administration, the Public Power is divided into Legislative, Executive, Judicial, and Municipal Powers.  Each of these Powers shall exercise the functions assigned to it by the Constitution and the laws without exceeding its limits.”).

Municipal authority was exercised by the Legislaturas provinciales [provincial Legislatures] and Gobernadores [Governors], the Concejos y Jefes cantonales [Cantonal Councils and Chiefs], and the other officers and corporations established by provincial law (Title XVII, Art. 122; cf. 1857, Title XVI, Arts. 85–87).

A Legislatura provincial [provincial Legislature] was established in each Province, composed of three Deputies appointed by each Canton; a Province containing fewer than four Cantons nevertheless appointed twelve Deputies, distributed equally among them (Title XVIII, Art. 123; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

The Diputados a las Legislaturas provinciales [Deputies to the provincial Legislatures] were elected every two years by direct and secret vote of the citizens of each Canton, and persons not domiciled in the Canton remained eligible.  The suplentes [alternates] were elected in the same manner and proportion as the principal Deputies (Arts. 124–125; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

The provincial Legislatures could neither be installed nor continue their sessions with fewer than two-thirds of their total membership.  They assembled annually in the provincial capital on October 1, and each regular session continued for forty days (Arts. 126–127; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

The provincial Legislatures elected the Ministers of the Supreme Court, the Ministers of the Superior Court of their respective judicial district, and the principal and alternate Senators of the Province; organized the Cantons and Parishes; regulated appointments and instruction within the National Militia subject to national law; promoted immigration; created and suppressed Cantons and Parishes and determined their boundaries; established provincial taxes; enacted laws concerning urban, rural, and correctional police; promoted instruction, science, the arts, practical industrial education, means of communication, hospitals, charitable institutions, and internal improvements; and legislated upon every matter not reserved to the National Power (Art. 128; cf. 1857, Title XVI, Arts. 85–87; Title XVII, Arts. 88–89).

The provincial Legislatures could not impose contributions upon foreign import or export commerce, impair privileges granted by Congress or the Executive Power in conformity with the law, impose duties upon exclusively national corporations or officers, tax national property, or subject the residents or property of another Province to burdens different from those imposed upon their own residents and property (Art. 129; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

A Governor could object within five days to a decree or resolution of the provincial Legislature, which took effect notwithstanding the objection when the Legislature insisted upon it by an absolute majority.  Provincial Deputies incurred no responsibility for their speeches or opinions and enjoyed immunity to the same extent as members of Congress (Arts. 130–132; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

The executive authority of each Province was exercised by a Gobernador [Governor] (Title XIX, Art. 133; cf. 1857, Title XVII, Art. 88:  “The political administration of each province shall be entrusted to a Governor dependent upon and freely appointed by the Executive Power.”).

The superior political and administrative government and the order and security of the Province were entrusted to the Governor, to whom all employees belonging to the Province were subordinated (Art. 134; cf. 1857, Title XVII, Arts. 88–89).

Governors were agentes del Poder Nacional [agents of the National Power] and, in that capacity, executed the Constitution and laws of the Republic and the lawful orders of the Executive Power in matters within their competence (Art. 135; cf. 1857, Title XVII, Arts. 88–89).

Eligibility as a Governor required citizenship in the exercise of its rights, and Governors served for four years (Art. 136; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Governors were elected by the absolute majority of the citizens voting in the Province through direct and secret ballot.  When no candidate obtained that majority, the provincial Legislature perfected the election in the same manner in which Congress perfected the presidential election (Art. 137; cf. 1857, Title XVII, Art. 88:  “The political administration of each province shall be entrusted to a Governor dependent upon and freely appointed by the Executive Power.”).

Governors could not be reelected for the immediately succeeding period (Art. 138; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Governors convoked the provincial Legislatures extraordinarily, executed or objected to their decrees and resolutions, and exercised the other powers conferred by national or provincial law (Art. 139; cf. 1857, Title XVII, Arts. 88–89).

Temporary and absolute vacancies in the governorship were supplied by the person designated by provincial law, and the compensation of Governors was paid from provincial revenues (Arts. 140–141; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

CON-AMD—Reforma de la Constitución [Constitutional Amendment]

Any number of members could propose the amendment of one or more constitutional articles in either Chamber (Title XXIV, Art. 163; cf. 1857, Title XXII, Art. 128:  “Either Chamber may initiate constitutional amendment, but each Chamber shall declare the necessity of amendment by two-thirds of the members present.”).

Before a proposed amendment could be debated, each Chamber had to declare its necessity by the vote of two-thirds of the members present (Art. 163; cont. 1857, Title XXII, Art. 128).

Once the necessity of amendment had been declared, the Chamber in which the proposal originated drafted the corresponding project.  The project was published in the interim and debated with the same formalities as a statute by the succeeding Legislature (Art. 163; cf. 1857, Title XXII, Art. 129:  “Once both Chambers have declared the necessity of amendment, the Chamber in which it originated shall draft the corresponding project so that it may be debated and sanctioned in the same manner as statutes by the succeeding Legislature and, in the interim, published by the press.”).

The forma de Gobierno republicana, popular representativa, responsable y alternativa [republican, popular representative, responsible, and alternative form of government] could not be altered through constitutional amendment (Art. 164; cont. 1857, Title XXII, Art. 130).

CIV-SUF—Sufragio [Suffrage]

The Constitution of 1858 declared that ciudadanos [citizens] possessed the right to elect persons for the exercise of the poderes públicos [public powers] (Title IV, Art. 11; cf. 1857, Title IV, Art. 11:  “All Venezuelans enjoying the rights of citizenship may elect and be elected to public office, provided that they possess the qualifications required by the Constitution and the laws.”).

Citizenship belonged to Venezuelans over twenty years of age and to those who, without having attained that age, were or had been married (Art. 11; cf. 1857, Title IV, Art. 12:  “To enjoy the rights of citizenship, it is necessary: 1. To be Venezuelan. 2. To be married or over eighteen years of age. 3. To know how to read and write; this condition, however, shall not become obligatory until 1880.”).

The derechos de ciudadano [rights of citizenship] were suspended by mental incapacity, a final sentence imposing corporal punishment for the duration of that punishment, or judicial interdiction (Art. 12; cf. 1857, Title IV, Art. 13).

The Diputados [Deputies], President, Vice-President, Governors, and members of the provincial Legislatures were elected through direct and secret voting in the manner prescribed by the Constitution (Arts. 58, 81, 124, 137; cf. 1857, Title VI, Art. 21; Title XII, Art. 59; Title XVII, Art. 88).

The Senadores [Senators] and Ministers of the Supreme Court were elected by the provincial Legislatures (Arts. 49, 110; cf. 1857, Title VII, Art. 25; Title XV, Art. 81).

CIV-CIT—Ciudadanía [Citizenship]

The Constitution of 1858 continued to distinguish nacionalidad [nationality] from ciudadanía [citizenship] (Titles II–IV; cont. 1857, Titles III–IV).

The following were venezolanos por nacimiento [Venezuelans by birth]: all persons born in the territory of Venezuela; children of a Venezuelan father or mother born in the territory of Colombia; and children of Venezuelan parents born in any foreign country (Title II, Art. 6, no. 1; cf. 1857, Title III, Arts. 7–8).

Persons born in the other Spanish-American republics were venezolanos por adopción [Venezuelans by adoption] upon proving their origin and manifesting before the authority determined by law their will to become Venezuelan (Art. 6, no. 2; new; cf. 1857, Title III, Art. 9).

Foreigners already naturalized and those obtaining a carta de naturaleza [certificate of naturalization] in conformity with the law were venezolanos por naturalización [Venezuelans by naturalization] (Art. 6, no. 3; cont. 1857, Title III, Art. 9).

Citizenship was governed by Article 11 (Title IV, Art. 11; cf. 1857, Title IV, Art. 12:  “To enjoy the rights of citizenship, it is necessary: 1. To be Venezuelan. 2. To be married or over eighteen years of age. 3. To know how to read and write; this condition, however, shall not become obligatory until 1880.”).

RTS-GAR—Derechos Individuales [Individual Rights]

The Constitution of 1858 placed the guarantees of individual liberty under the title De los Derechos Individuales [Of Individual Rights] (Title V, Arts. 13–29; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 97:  “This Constitution guarantees Venezuelans civil liberty, individual security, property, freedom of industry, and equality before the law.”).

La esclavitud [slavery] was forever abolished in Venezuela, and every enslaved person who entered its territory was declared free (Art. 13; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 99:  “Slavery shall never be reestablished in Venezuela.”).

Every Venezuelan possessed the right to express thoughts and opinions through the press, orally, or by any other means without prior censorship, subject to the responsibility established by law when public morality or private life was injured.  Proceedings concerning the press were adjudicated by jurados [juries] (Art. 14; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 101:  “Every person possesses the liberty to publish thoughts and opinions orally, through the press, or in any other manner, without prior censorship.”).

Every Venezuelan possessed the right to associate and assemble without arms for any public or private purpose and to submit representations to the authorities (Art. 15; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Every Venezuelan possessed the right to exercise any profession or industry, except those constituting the property of another under a privilege granted in conformity with the law, those injuring public morality or the health of the population, and those obstructing the means of communication (Art. 16; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 97:  “This Constitution guarantees Venezuelans civil liberty, individual security, property, freedom of industry, and equality before the law.”).

Every Venezuelan possessed the right to travel through the territory of the Republic and to leave it without a passport, unless prohibited by a judicial authority in the cases determined by law (Art. 17; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 100:  “Venezuelans possess the liberty to settle their differences through arbitrators even after proceedings have commenced, change domicile, leave the State while taking their property with them, and return to it, provided that they observe the legal formalities, and to do everything not prohibited by law.”).

No person could be withdrawn from his jueces naturales [natural judges], subjected to extraordinary commissions or tribunals, adjudicated except under laws preceding the offence or action, or sentenced without having been heard and legally convicted (Art. 18; cf. 1857, Title XX, Arts. 102, 118:  “No person may be criminally adjudicated, much less punished, except under a law preceding the offence or action and after having been summoned, heard, and legally convicted.”  “No Venezuelan may be withdrawn without his consent from his natural judges or adjudicated by special commissions or extraordinary tribunals.”).

No Venezuelan could be imprisoned, arrested, or detained except under an order signed by the competent authority, stating its grounds and delivered in copy to the arrested person, unless he was apprehended in flagrante delicto, in which case any person could apprehend him for immediate presentation before a judge (Art. 19; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 104:  “No person may be deprived of liberty except in the cases and under the formalities prescribed by law.”).

In criminal matters, an order of imprisonment or arrest required prior información sumaria [preliminary information] demonstrating an act punishable by corporal penalty and substantiated indications that the person ordered arrested had committed it.  That person was released under bond whenever the record disclosed that such a penalty could not be imposed (Art. 20; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 107:  “In a criminal cause, after the accused has given a statement in answer to the charge, he shall be released under bond upon his request or that of his defender whenever the record discloses no ground for imposing a corporal penalty.”).

Every person imprisoned upon a criminal cause had to be informed, within three days after imprisonment, of the charges appearing from the preliminary record so that he could answer and defend himself (Art. 21; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

A carcelero o Alcaide [jailer or warden] could receive no person under arrest without the written order required by Article 19 and could prohibit communication only under a written judicial order, which could not extend beyond three days (Art. 22; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

A jailer or warden could employ no restraints other than those expressly prescribed in writing by the judge, who could authorize only those absolutely necessary to prevent escape or disorder within the prison (Art. 23; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

In a criminal cause, no person could be compelled to testify against himself, his ascendants, descendants, spouse, or relatives within the fourth civil degree of consanguinity and second degree of affinity (Art. 24; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 103:  “No Venezuelan shall give testimony under oath against himself in a criminal cause; nor shall ascendants and descendants, relatives within the fourth civil degree of consanguinity and second degree of affinity, or spouses give such testimony reciprocally against one another.”).

The hogar doméstico [domestic home] and the secrecy of letters and private papers were inviolable.  The home could not be entered, nor correspondence or papers opened or read, except by competent authority in the cases and under the requisites prescribed by law (Art. 25; cf. 1857, Title XX, Arts. 105, 112:  “The home of every Venezuelan is inviolable; entry shall occur in the cases and manner determined by law.”  “Letters and all correspondence are inviolable.  The seizure of papers shall occur in the cases and under the formalities determined by law.”).

No person could be deprived of the smallest portion of his propiedad [property], nor could it be applied to any public use, without his knowledge or that of Congress.  Whenever the common interest, legally demonstrated, so required, just compensation was always to be presupposed (Art. 26; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 108:  “Property is inviolable, and only for a legally demonstrated cause of public interest may Congress compel a Venezuelan to alienate it, after just indemnification.”).

All Venezuelans were equal before the law (Art. 27; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 97:  “This Constitution guarantees Venezuelans civil liberty, individual security, property, freedom of industry, and equality before the law.”).

The enumeration of rights did not constitute a negation of other rights belonging to individuals although not included in that Title (Art. 28; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Foreigners in Venezuela enjoyed the same individual rights and guarantees as Venezuelans and were subject, like them, to the laws and authorities of the Republic (Art. 29; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 113:  “Every foreigner, irrespective of nation, shall be admitted into Venezuela.  As he shall be subject to the same laws of the State as Venezuelans, he shall likewise enjoy in his person and property the same guarantees as they.”).

REG-MIL—La Fuerza Militar [The Military Force]

The Constitution of 1858 divided the fuerza militar [military force] into the Ejército permanente [Permanent Army], Fuerza naval [Naval Force], and Milicia Nacional [National Militia] (Title XX, Art. 142; cf. 1857, Title XVIII, Arts. 90–91:  “The legislative Chambers shall annually fix, upon proposal of the Executive Power, the permanent naval and terrestrial force.”  “The Republic shall additionally possess a national militia, whose organization and service shall be determined by law.”).

The fuerza armada [armed force] was essentially obedient and could not deliberate (Art. 143; cf. 1857, Title XVIII, Art. 92:  “The armed force is essentially obedient and cannot deliberate.”).

Members of the naval and terrestrial armed forces in active service were subject to leyes militares [military laws] (Art. 144; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 124:  “No Venezuelan shall be subject to military laws except those in active service, whether in the permanent force or the national militia, quartered and paid by the State.”).

La autoridad militar [military authority] could never be united with civil authority (Art. 145; cf. 1857, Title XVIII, Art. 93:  “Its military authority shall never be united with civil authority.”).

The National Militia was organized by law and remained under the command of the Gobernadores de las Provincias [Governors of the Provinces], who called it into service when ordered by the Executive Power under an act of Congress, the extraordinary powers conferred pursuant to Article 95, or the occurrence of sudden commotion within the Province, in the manner determined by law (Art. 146; cf. 1857, Title XVIII, Art. 95:  “The national militia shall remain under the command of the Governor of the province, who shall call it into service when ordered by the Executive Power pursuant to an act of Congress or, during its recess, of the Council of Government under Article 54, or for action within the province in case of sudden commotion and in the manner determined by its organic law.”).

REG-REL—Religión [Religion]

The Constitution of 1858 contained no provision concerning religion (cf. 1857, Title I, Art. 4:  “The State shall protect the Catholic, Apostolic, and Roman Religion, and the Government shall always sustain its Worship and Ministers in conformity with the law.”).

REG-SLA—Esclavitud [Slavery]

The Constitution of 1858 declared esclavitud [slavery] forever abolished in Venezuela and declared free every enslaved person who entered its territory (Title V, Art. 13; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 99:  “Slavery shall never be reestablished in Venezuela.”).

ECO-INF—Infraestructura [Infrastructure]

The Constitution of 1858 entrusted Congress with the organization of the servicio nacional de postas y correos [national postal service] (Title IX, Art. 64, no. 5; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Congress was empowered to promote through laws or contracts the navigation and canalization of rivers, the opening of roads, and other works of national utility (Art. 64, no. 16; cf. 1857, Title IX, Art. 38, no. 17:  “To establish rules for contracts between the State and citizens or companies, national or foreign, concerning river navigation, the opening of roads, or other objects of general utility.”).

Congress was likewise charged with promoting public education, the progress of the sciences and arts, and institutions of practical industrial instruction (Art. 64, no. 17; cf. 1857, Title IX, Art. 38, no. 11:  “To promote through laws public education, the progress of the sciences and arts, and institutions of general utility, and to grant exclusive privileges for a limited period for their encouragement and advancement.”).

The Legislaturas provinciales [provincial Legislatures] were empowered to promote instruction, the progress of the sciences and arts, institutions of practical industrial education, the opening and improvement of terrestrial and fluvial means of communication, hospitals and charitable institutions, and every matter relating to internal improvements (Art. 128, no. 10; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

CON-FIN—Disposiciones Finales [Final Provisions]

The Constitution of 1858 established the responsibility of the Presidente [President], Vicepresidente [Vice-President], and Designado [Designate] while exercising the Executive Power, together with that of the Secretarios del Despacho [Secretaries of the Cabinet] and the Ministers of the Supreme Court, in the cases prescribed by the Constitution (Title XXI, Art. 147; cf. 1857, Title XI, Art. 57:  “The President of the Republic and the Vice-President charged with the Executive Power are responsible for the crime of treason against the Republic, whether committed to subject it to a foreign power or to alter the recognized and sworn form of government, and for those crimes punished by the laws with capital punishment.  The Secretaries of the Cabinet shall be responsible for every act of the Executive Power that they authorize as its necessary organs.”).

For those purposes, traición [treason] consisted in attacking the constitutional form of government, taking arms in favor of external enemies, or forming a coalition with them or with nationals acting in favor of a foreign power (Art. 148; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

All other public employees remained responsible for their conduct in the exercise of their offices in conformity with the law (Art. 149; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 117:  “Public officers are responsible for their conduct in the performance of their duties in conformity with the law.”).

Venezuelans retained the right to terminate their differences through árbitros [arbitrators] even after judicial proceedings had commenced (Title XXII, Art. 150; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 100:  “Venezuelans possess the liberty to terminate their differences through arbitrators even after proceedings have commenced.”).

La confiscación [confiscation], toda pena cruel [every cruel punishment], and the death penalty for political offences were abolished, and the Código Criminal [Criminal Code] was required to restrict the imposition of capital punishment insofar as possible (Art. 151; cf. 1857, Title XX, Arts. 98, 109:  “Capital punishment for political offences is forever abolished.”  “Torture, confiscation of property, and every cruel or infamous punishment are prohibited.”).

No sum could be withdrawn from the Public Treasury except for purposes determined by law and in conformity with the budgets, which were necessarily published (Art. 152; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 114:  “No sum shall be withdrawn from the Public Treasury unless it is included in the general budget for the fiscal year in which the expenditure is made.”).

Municipal revenues could not be burdened by national taxes (Art. 153; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

The establishment of mayorazgos [entailed estates] and every class of vinculaciones [perpetual entailments] was prohibited (Art. 154; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 110:  “The establishment of entailed estates and every class of perpetual entailment is prohibited.”).

No public corporation or employee could exercise any function or authority not conferred by the Constitution or the law (Art. 155; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Public officers could not issue, obey, or execute orders manifestly contrary to the Constitution or the laws, orders violating their prescribed essential forms, or orders issued by manifestly incompetent authorities (Art. 156; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 119:  “No public officer shall issue, obey, or execute orders manifestly contrary to the Constitution or the laws, orders that in any manner violate the essential formalities prescribed by them, or orders issued by manifestly incompetent authorities.”).

Persons who issued, signed, executed, or ordered the execution of decrees, orders, or resolutions contrary to the Constitution and the laws guaranteeing individual rights were culpable and punishable under those laws (Art. 157; cf. 1857, Title XX, Art. 120:  “Those who issue, sign, execute, or order the execution of decrees, orders, or resolutions contrary to the Constitution and the laws guaranteeing individual rights, together with those who execute them, are culpable and shall be punished in conformity with those laws.”).

The compensation of the President, Vice-President, Senators, Deputies, and Ministers of the Supreme Court could be neither increased nor diminished during the period for which the incumbent officers had been elected (Art. 158; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

Provincial elections preceded national elections (Art. 159; new; cf. 1857: no corresponding provision).

No public employee could enter upon the exercise of an office without first taking the juramento [oath] to sustain and defend the Constitution and faithfully and exactly discharge the duties of the office (Title XXIII, Art. 160; cf. 1857, Title XXI, Art. 125:  “No employee may enter upon the exercise of his functions without first taking the oath to sustain and defend the Constitution and faithfully and exactly discharge the duties of his office.”).

The Constitution prescribed the authorities before whom the President, Vice-President, presidents of the national and provincial Chambers, presidents and members of the Supreme and Superior Courts, Secretaries of the Cabinet, Governors, and other civil and military employees took that oath (Arts. 161–162; cf. 1857, Title XXI, Arts. 126–127).

The Constitution was to be promulgated with the solemnities and formalities established by the Decree of September 24, 1830, and immediately put into execution, while every preceding law and decree remained in force insofar as it did not oppose the Constitution (Title XXV, Art. 165; cf. 1857, Transitional Provisions).

To effect the renewals prescribed by Articles 51, 60, and 119, the national Chambers at their first meeting and the Supreme and Superior Courts upon their installation determined by lot one-half of their respective members, or the greater number when the total was uneven, who would cease exercising their offices at the conclusion of the second year (Art. 165; cf. 1857, Second Transitional Provision:  “The Chambers shall be renewed in their entirety in the next elections, which shall take place in 1859.”).

The Constitution was enacted in the hall of sessions of the Convención Nacional [National Convention] at Valencia on December 24, 1858, and ordered fulfilled, published, and circulated by the Jefe provisional del Estado [Provisional Chief of State], Julián Castro, on December 31, 1858.


* *

6). The Constitution of 1864

The Constitution of 1864 (Constitución de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [Constitution of the United States of Venezuela]) was decreed by the Asamblea Constituyente [Constituent Assembly] in Caracas on March 28, 1864, and ordered published and circulated by Juan Crisóstomo Falcón at Santa Ana de Coro on April 13, 1864, with ministerial countersignature at Caracas on April 22, 1864.

DOC-PRE—Preámbulo [Preamble]

(modern Latinate English translation by the author from the CIDEP recension)

“The Constituent Assembly, invoking the Supreme Author and Legislator of the Universe and acting by the authority of the people of Venezuela, decrees:  CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF VENEZUELA.”

FND-TER—Territorio [Territory]

The Constitution of 1864 declared the provinces of Apure, Aragua, Barcelona, Barinas, Barquisimeto, Carabobo, Caracas, Cojedes, Coro, Cumaná, Guárico, Guayana, Maracaibo, Maturín, Mérida, Margarita, Portuguesa, Táchira, Trujillo, and Yaracuy to be independent Estados [States] united to form a free and sovereign Nación [Nation] under the name Estados Unidos de Venezuela [United States of Venezuela] (Title I, Sec. I, Art. 1; cf. 1858, Arts. 1–3:  “The Venezuelan Nation is forever and irrevocably free and independent of every foreign power.”  “Sovereignty resides essentially in the Nation.”  “The territory of the Republic comprises all that, before the political transformation of 1810, was denominated the Captaincy General of Venezuela, with all its rights and appurtenances.”).

The boundaries of each State were those assigned to the provinces by the law of April 28, 1856, which had established the most recent territorial division (Art. 2; cf. 1858, Art. 3:  “The territory of the Republic comprises all that, before the political transformation of 1810, was denominated the Captaincy General of Venezuela, with all its rights and appurtenances; and is divided into Provinces, Cantons, and Parishes.”).

The boundaries of the United States composing the Federación Venezolana [Venezuelan Federation] were those corresponding in 1810 to the former Capitanía General de Venezuela [Captaincy General of Venezuela] (Art. 3; cf. 1858, Art. 3:  “The territory of the Republic comprises all that, before the political transformation of 1810, was denominated the Captaincy General of Venezuela, with all its rights and appurtenances.”).

Two or more States could unite to constitute a single State while retaining the liberty to recover their separate status, with notice in either case to the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive], Congreso [Congress], and the other States of the Unión [Union] (Art. 4; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

States exercising that faculty retained their votes in the Presidencia [Presidency] election, their representation in the Senado [Senate], and their participation in the nomination of vocales [members] of the Alta Corte Federal [Federal High Court] (Art. 5; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

POW-LEG—Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature]

The Constitution of 1864 vested the Poder Legislativo Nacional [National Legislative Power] in a Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] composed of a Senado [Senate] and a Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies] (Title IV, Sec. I, Art. 18; cf. 1858, Art. 30:  “The Legislative Power is exercised by a Congress composed of two Chambers, one of Deputies and the other of Senators.”).

The respective Estados [States] determined the manner in which Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] were appointed (Art. 19; cf. 1858, Arts. 49, 58:  “The Senate shall be composed of two Senators from each Province, elected by the provincial Legislatures.”  “The Chamber of Deputies shall be composed of those elected by the citizens of the Provinces through direct and secret voting.”).

Each State elected one Deputy for every twenty-five thousand inhabitants and another for any excess greater than twelve thousand, together with an equal number of suplentes [alternates] (Art. 20; cf. 1858, Art. 58:  “one for every twenty-five thousand inhabitants, and one more for an excess of fifteen thousand.”).

Deputies served for two years and were renewed in their entirety (Art. 21; cf. 1858, Art. 60:  “The Deputies shall serve in their functions for four years and shall be renewed by halves every two years.”).

The Chamber of Deputies examined the President’s annual account, could adopt a voto de censura [vote of censure] against a Ministro del Despacho [Cabinet Minister] with the consequent vacation of his office, and heard accusations against the officer exercising the National Executive, Cabinet Ministers, and other empleados nacionales [national employees] in the cases prescribed by the Constitution (Art. 22; cf. 1858, Arts. 61–63).

An accusation presented by a Deputy, corporation, or individual was referred to a comisión [committee] of three Deputies chosen by secret ballot.  The committee reported within three days whether formación de causa [institution of proceedings] should be declared, and the Chamber decided by the absolute majority of the members present, without the vote of the accusing Deputy (Art. 23; cf. 1858, Arts. 62–63).

A declaration of ha lugar [that proceedings should be instituted] suspended the accused from office and rendered him ineligible to exercise any public office while the trial remained pending (Art. 24; cf. 1858, Art. 63).

Each State elected two Senadores principales [principal Senators] and two alternates (Art. 25; cont. 1858, Art. 49).

Eligibility for the Senate required Venezuelan nationality by birth and thirty years of age (Art. 26; cf. 1858, Art. 52).

Senators served for four years and were renewed by halves.  When the entire Senate was elected at one time, one Senator from each State was elected for two years (Art. 27; cont. 1858, Art. 51).

The Senate conducted and decided the proceedings initiated in the Chamber of Deputies (Art. 28; cont. 1858, Art. 53).

When such a proceeding had not concluded before the end of the legislative sessions, the Senate remained assembled solely for that purpose until final disposition of the causa [cause], without dietas [legislative compensation] to the Senators during that period (Art. 29; cf. 1858, Art. 57).

The National Legislature assembled annually in the capital of the United States on February 20, or on the earliest possible date thereafter, without awaiting convocation.  Its sessions continued for seventy days and could be extended to no more than ninety (Art. 30; cf. 1858, Art. 31:  “Congress shall assemble every year in the capital of the Republic on January 20, without need of convocation; and its sessions shall continue for ninety days.”).

Each Cámara [chamber] opened its sessions with at least two-thirds of its members.  In the absence of that number, the members present constituted themselves as a Comisión preparatoria [preparatory committee] and adopted measures to secure the attendance of the absentees (Art. 31; cont. 1858, Art. 32).

Once opened, the sessions could continue with two-thirds of the members who had installed the chamber, provided that their number did not fall below one-half of all appointed members (Art. 32; cf. 1858, Art. 33).

Although the chambers ordinarily acted separately, they assembled in Congreso [Congress] whenever required by the Constitution or the law, or when one chamber proposed and the other accepted a joint meeting (Art. 33; cont. 1858, Art. 38).

Sessions were public but could be declared secret by the respective chamber (Art. 34; cont. 1858, Art. 39).

Each chamber adopted its own reglamentos [rules], disciplined their violators, maintained policía [order] within its premises, corrected disorderly spectators, removed obstacles to the exercise of its functions, executed its internal resolutions, judged the qualifications of its members, and heard their resignations (Art. 35; cf. 1858, Arts. 35–37).

Neither chamber could suspend its sessions or change its place of residence without the consent of the other.  In case of disagreement, the chambers assembled jointly and the majority determined the question (Art. 36; cont. 1858, Art. 34).

The exercise of any other public function was incompatible with service as a Senator or Deputy during the legislative sessions.  The law determined their indemnizaciones [compensation], which could not be increased during the constitutional period for which it had been fixed (Art. 37; cf. 1858, Arts. 42, 46).

Senators and Deputies enjoyed inmunidad [immunity] from January 20 of each year until thirty days after the conclusion of the sessions.  That immunity suspended every proceeding against them, irrespective of its origin or nature; if a member committed an act punishable by a pena corporal [corporal penalty], the preliminary investigation could continue only until completion of the sumario [initial record] (Art. 38; cf. 1858, Art. 43).

Congress was presided over by the Presidente del Senado [President of the Senate], while the Presidente de la Cámara de Diputados [President of the Chamber of Deputies] served as Vicepresidente [Vice-President] (Art. 39; cont. 1858, Art. 38).

Members of the chambers incurred no responsibility for the opinions or speeches expressed in them (Art. 40; cont. 1858, Art. 44).

Senators and Deputies could not accept an empleo or comisión [commission] from the National Executive until one year after the conclusion of their respective terms.  Appointments as Cabinet Ministers, empleados diplomáticos [diplomatic officers], or mandos militares [military commands] in time of war were excepted, but acceptance vacated the legislative seat (Art. 41; cf. 1858, Arts. 41–42).

Senators and Deputies could neither contract with the Gobierno general [General Government] nor prosecute the claims of other persons before it (Art. 42; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The National Legislature adjudicated controversies between the States; erected and organized the Distrito Federal [Federal District]; organized Aduanas [customs], ports, postal offices, and the national currency; enacted the Códigos nacionales [national codes]; created and compensated national offices; regulated the public debt and national loans; provided for the census and national statistics; fixed the naval and terrestrial forces; declared war; approved or rejected treaties and national public-works contracts; adopted the annual budget; promoted national prosperity, science, and the arts; established weights and measures; granted amnesties; organized national territories; regulated proceedings before the Senate; enacted the presidential election law; and exercised the other powers enumerated by the Constitution (Arts. 43–44; cf. 1858, Art. 64).

Bills and decretos legislativos [legislative decrees] could originate with members of either chamber in the manner prescribed by their respective rules (Art. 45; cf. 1858, Art. 66).

Every admitted proyecto [bill] received three readings separated by at least one day (Art. 46; cont. 1858, Art. 66).

A bill approved by its Cámara de origen [chamber of origin] passed to the other chamber for the same proceedings.  If not rejected, it returned to the chamber of origin with any alterations adopted by the second chamber (Art. 47; cf. 1858, Arts. 67–68).

When the chamber of origin rejected those alterations, it could insist upon its text and transmit its reasons in writing.  The chambers could also convene jointly as a Comisión general [general committee] to seek agreement; if no agreement resulted and the chamber of origin resolved separately to terminate consideration, the bill failed (Art. 48; cf. 1858, Art. 69).

The dates of the several readings accompanied every bill transmitted from one chamber to the other (Art. 49; cont. 1858, Art. 76).

A statute amending another statute had to be redrafted in its entirety, and the former statute was repealed in all its parts (Art. 50; cont. 1858, Art. 74).

The fórmula legislativa [enactment formula] was: “El Congreso de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela. Decretan” (Art. 51; cf. 1858, Art. 75:  “The Congress of Venezuela decrees.”).

A bill rejected during one Legislature could not be introduced again until another Legislature (Art. 52; cf. 1858, Art. 70).

Bills remaining pending in either chamber at the close of the sessions were subject to three new readings in the succeeding Legislature (Art. 53; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

Statutes were repealed through the same formalities required for their enactment (Art. 54; cont. 1858, Art. 77).

When the Cabinet Ministers had maintained before a chamber that a bill was unconstitutional and the bill nevertheless became law, the Executive could submit it to the Nation as represented by the Legislaturas de los Estados [Legislatures of the States] (Art. 55; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

Each State then expressed one vote, determined by the majority of the members attending its Legislature, and transmitted the result, “Confirmo” or “Objeto”, to the Federal High Court (Art. 56; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

If a majority of the States concurred with the Executive, the Federal High Court ordered suspension of the statute and reported the proceedings to Congress (Art. 57; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

Statutes entered into operation only after publication with the prescribed solemnities (Art. 58; cont. 1858, Art. 78).

The facultad de sancionar la ley [power to enact legislation] could not be delegated (Art. 59; cont. 1858, Art. 65, no. 3).

No legislative provision had retroactive effect except in matters of judicial procedure or when it imposed a lesser penalty (Art. 60; cf. 1858, Art. 18).

ECO-HAC—Hacienda Pública [Public Finance]

The States undertook to reserve from rentas nacionales [national revenues], for the benefit of States without mines in operation, twenty thousand pesos to be included in the presupuesto anual [annual budget] and paid in anticipated quarterly installments (Title II, Art. 13, no. 17; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] organized the Aduanas [customs service], whose revenues constituted the Tesoro de la Unión [Treasury of the Union] until replaced by other sources of revenue (Title IV, Sec. V, Art. 43, no. 3; cf. 1858, Art. 64, no. 2:  “To establish taxes, duties, and contributions to meet national expenditures, supervise their application, and require an account of them from the Executive Power.”).

The Legislature determined all matters concerning the deuda nacional [national debt], contracted empréstitos [loans] upon the credit of the Nation, and annually adopted the presupuesto de gastos públicos [budget of public expenditures] (Art. 43, nos. 10, 11, 18; cf. 1858, Art. 64, nos. 12, 14).

The Presidente de la Unión [President of the Union] supervised the collection of national revenues (Title V, Art. 72, no. 3; cont. 1858, Art. 94, no. 17).

In time of foreign war, the President could demand authorized contribuciones [contributions] in advance or negotiate previously decreed loans when ordinary revenues were insufficient (Art. 72, no. 15.2; cont. 1858, Art. 95, no. 2).

Within the first five sessions of each annual Legislature, the Ministros del Despacho [Cabinet Ministers] presented the proposed budget of public expenditures and the cuenta general [general account] for the preceding year (Arts. 79–80; cf. 1858, Art. 104).

El Congreso [Congress] could neither increase the taxes imposed upon exports nor constitute additional hipotecas [encumbrances] upon them.  Once the existing obligations had been discharged by payment, compensation, or substitution, the exportation of national products became permanently free (Title VII, Art. 103; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

No expenditure could be made from the Tesoro nacional [National Treasury] unless Congress had expressly appropriated the corresponding sum in the annual budget.  Those who contravened this requirement were civilly responsible to the Treasury for the amounts disbursed, and ordinary expenditures took precedence over extraordinary expenditures in every distribution of public funds (Art. 108; cf. 1858, Art. 152:  “No sum shall be withdrawn from the Public Treasury for purposes other than those determined by law and in conformity with the budgets, which shall necessarily be published.”).

Las oficinas de recaudación [offices of collection] remained separate from las oficinas de pago [offices of payment].  Collection offices could make no payments other than the salaries of their own employees (Art. 109; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

When the budget for a período fiscal [fiscal period] was not adopted, the budget for the immediately preceding period continued in force (Art. 110; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

POW-EXE—Ejecutivo [Executive]

The Constitution of 1864 placed the Administración general de la Nación [General Administration of the Nation], insofar as it had not been assigned to another authority, under a magistrate denominated Presidente de los Estados Unidos de Venezuela [President of the United States of Venezuela] (Title V, Sec. I, Art. 61; cf. 1858, Art. 79:  “The Executive Power shall be entrusted to a magistrate denominated President of the Republic.”).

Eligibility for the Presidencia [Presidency] required Venezuelan nationality by birth and thirty years of age (Art. 62; cf. 1858, Art. 82:  “To be President of the Republic, it is necessary to be Venezuelan by birth and a citizen in the enjoyment of his rights.”).

The citizens of all the Estados [States] elected the President by votación directa y secreta [direct and secret ballot].  Each State possessed one vote, determined by the relative majority of its electors (Art. 63; cf. 1858, Art. 81:  “The President and Vice-President shall be elected by direct and secret vote of the Venezuelans who enjoy citizenship.”).

On the eighth day of the sessions of Congreso [Congress], the Cámaras [chambers] assembled to conduct the escrutinio [canvass] of the electoral returns.  If all returns had not arrived, Congress adopted measures to obtain them and could defer the canvass for as many as forty days; upon expiration of that period, the canvass proceeded with the returns received, provided that they represented no fewer than two-thirds of the States (Art. 64; cf. 1858, Art. 83).

The candidate receiving an absolute majority of the State votes was declared President.  If no candidate received that majority, Congress selected between the two candidates obtaining the greatest number of votes, with each State casting one vote determined by the absolute majority of its Senadores [Senators] and Representantes [Representatives] (Art. 65; cf. 1858, Art. 84).

No member participating in the canvass could leave the session without the consent of Congress (Art. 66; cont. 1858, Art. 85).

Two Designados [Designates], elected annually by the chambers in joint session, supplied temporary or absolute vacancies in the Presidency (Art. 67; cf. 1858, Arts. 80, 93).

The President served for four years beginning on February 20 and vacated the office on that date at the conclusion of the período constitucional [constitutional period], irrespective of whether the full term had actually been served (Art. 68; cont. 1858, Art. 86).

When a falta absoluta [absolute vacancy] occurred during the first two years of a presidential period, Congress ordered a new election for a President to serve the remainder of the period (Art. 69; cf. 1858, Art. 93).

Neither the President nor a person elected to complete the presidential period under Article 69 could be elected for the immediately succeeding period (Art. 70; cont. 1858, Art. 86).

The law determined the sueldo [compensation] of the President and of persons exercising the Presidency in his place, and that compensation could not be increased or diminished during the period in which the law was enacted (Art. 71; cf. 1858, Art. 158).

The President preserved the Nación [Nation] from every external attack (Art. 72, no. 1; cf. 1858, Art. 94, no. 1).

The President executed and secured the execution of the statutes and decrees of the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] (Art. 72, no. 2; cont. 1858, Art. 94, no. 2).

The President supervised the collection of national revenues and administered terrenos baldíos [public lands] in conformity with the law (Art. 72, nos. 3–4; cf. 1858, Art. 94, no. 17; Art. 64, no. 15).

The President convoked the National Legislature for its regular meetings and for extraordinary meetings when required by the gravity of an event (Art. 72, no. 5; cont. 1858, Art. 94, no. 3).

The President appointed agentes diplomáticos [diplomatic officers], Cónsules generales [Consuls General], and Cónsules [Consuls], with appointments to the first two categories restricted to Venezuelans by birth (Art. 72, no. 6; cf. 1858, Art. 94, no. 9).

The President directed negociaciones diplomáticas [diplomatic negotiations] and concluded tratados [treaties] with other nations, subject to submission to the National Legislature (Art. 72, no. 7; cont. 1858, Art. 94, no. 7).

The President concluded contratos de interés nacional [contracts of national interest] in conformity with the law and submitted them to the Legislature (Art. 72, no. 8; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The President appointed and removed Ministros del Despacho [Cabinet Ministers] (Art. 72, no. 9; cont. 1858, Art. 94, no. 8).

The President appointed empleados de Hacienda [Treasury employees] whose appointment had not been assigned to another officer.  Those appointments were restricted to Venezuelans by birth (Art. 72, no. 10; cf. 1858, Art. 94, no. 14).

The President removed or suspended empleados de su libre nombramiento [employees within his free appointment] and ordered proceedings against them whenever grounds existed (Art. 72, no. 11; cf. 1858, Art. 94, nos. 15–16).

The President granted cartas de nacionalidad [certificates of nationality] in conformity with the law and issued patentes de navegación [navigation licenses] to national vessels (Art. 72, nos. 12–13; cf. 1858, Art. 94, no. 13; Art. 64, no. 7).

The President declared war in the name of the República [Republic] after Congress had decreed it (Art. 72, no. 14; cont. 1858, Art. 94, no. 6).

In time of foreign war, the President could require the States to provide assistance for the national defense; demand contributions in advance or negotiate authorized loans; arrest or expel nationals of the enemy State who opposed the defense of Venezuela; suspend garantías [guarantees] incompatible with national defense except the guarantee of life; transfer the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] temporarily when grave circumstances required it; institute proceedings for traición a la Patria [treason against the Fatherland] against Venezuelans hostile to the national defense; and issue patentes de corso y represalias [letters of marque and reprisal] together with rules governing captures (Art. 72, no. 15; cf. 1858, Arts. 95–98).

In an armed insurrection against the Nation’s political institutions, the President could employ the fuerza pública [public force] and exercise the powers concerning national defense, anticipated contributions, and temporary transfer of the Executive specified by the Constitution (Art. 72, no. 16; cf. 1858, Arts. 95–98).

The President could employ the public force to terminate an armed collision between two or more States and require them to disarm and submit their controversy to the autoridades nacionales [national authorities] (Art. 72, no. 17; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The President could direct a war or command the Ejército [Army] in person in the cases prescribed by the Constitution and could leave the capital when matters of public interest required it (Art. 72, no. 18; cf. 1858, Arts. 91, 99).

The President granted indultos generales o particulares [general or individual pardons] (Art. 72, no. 19; cf. 1858, Art. 94, no. 19).

The President defended the territory assigned to the Distrito Federal [Federal District] whenever there were substantiated fears of hostile invasion (Art. 72, no. 20; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The President exercised the other functions conferred by national statutes (Art. 72, no. 21; cont. 1858, Art. 94).

Whenever the National Executive exercised any of the facultades extraordinarias [extraordinary powers] conferred by Article 72, it reported to Congress within the first eight days of its next meeting (Art. 73; cont. 1858, Art. 98).

The President was assisted by the Cabinet Ministers established by law, which also determined their functions and duties and organized the Secretarías [departments] (Art. 74; cont. 1858, Art. 100).

Eligibility as a Cabinet Minister required twenty-five years of age and either Venezuelan nationality by birth or five years of Venezuelan nationality (Art. 75; cf. 1858, Art. 101).

The Cabinet Ministers were the órganos naturales y precisos [natural and necessary organs] of the President.  Every presidential act required ministerial countersignature, without which no authority, employee, or private person could comply with or execute it (Art. 76; cf. 1858, Art. 102).

Every ministerial act had to conform to the Constitution and the laws.  A Minister’s responsibility was not extinguished by a presidential order, even when that order had been given in writing (Art. 77; cont. 1858, Art. 103).

All matters other than the internal administration of a ministry were decided in the Consejo de Ministros [Council of Ministers], whose responsibility was collective (Art. 78; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

Within the first five sessions of every annual Legislature, the Ministers reported what they had done or intended to do in their respective departments.  They also supplied the written or oral information requested by the chambers, reserving only matters whose publication was incompatible with diplomatic or military negotiations (Art. 79; cf. 1858, Arts. 104–105).

Within the same period, the Ministers presented the proposed budget of public expenditures and the general account for the preceding year (Art. 80; cont. 1858, Art. 104).

The Ministers possessed the derecho de palabra [right to speak] before the chambers and were required to appear whenever called to provide information (Art. 81; cont. 1858, Art. 105).

The Ministers were responsible for treason; violation of the Constitution or laws; malversación de los fondos públicos [misappropriation of public funds]; expenditures in excess of the budget; and soborno o cohecho [bribery or corrupt payment] in matters within their offices or in appointments to public employment (Art. 82; cf. 1858, Art. 147, no. 2).

The National Executive was exercised by the President, or by the person acting in his place, together with the Cabinet Ministers as his constitutional organs (Art. 83; cf. 1858, Arts. 79, 102).

The National Executive could not exercise its functions outside the Federal District except in the case of a temporary transfer authorized during foreign war.  When the President assumed command of the Army or left the Federal District under the authority of Article 72, he was replaced in the manner prescribed by Articles 67 and 102 (Art. 84; cf. 1858, Art. 91).

When a vacancy or absence of the President could not be supplied by the Designates, one of the Cabinet Ministers, elected by all the Ministers in public session, exercised the Presidency.  The appropriate Designate was then called, and notice was given to the States (Title VII, Art. 102; cf. 1858, Art. 93).

POW-JUD—Poder Judicial [Judiciary]

The Alta Corte Federal [Federal High Court] consisted of five vocales [members] (Title VI, Sec. I, Art. 85; cf. 1858, Art. 108:  “The Supreme Court shall be composed of no fewer than five Ministers.”).

Eligibility required Venezuelan nationality by birth or ten years of naturalization and thirty years of age (Art. 85; cf. 1858, Art. 109:  “To be a Minister of the Supreme Court, it is necessary: 1. To be a citizen in the enjoyment of his rights. 2. To have attained forty years of age. 3. To have served as a Magistrate of a Superior Court for six years, or to have practiced the profession of law in the Republic for twelve years.”).

For the appointment of its members, the Legislatura de cada Estado [Legislature of each State] presented Congress with a list containing as many candidates as there were positions to be filled.  Congress declared elected the candidate obtaining the greatest number of votes among the nominations submitted by each of the five secciones territoriales [territorial sections] established by the Constitution, with Congress resolving any tie (Art. 86; cf. 1858, Arts. 110–112).

The law determined the respective functions of the members and of the other empleados de la Alta Corte Federal [employees of the Federal High Court] (Art. 87; cf. 1858, Art. 113, which constitutionally enumerated the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court).

The vocales principales [principal members] and their suplentes [alternates], appointed through the same procedure, served for four years.  Neither a principal member nor an alternate exercising the office could accept an appointment from the Ejecutivo [Executive] during that period, even after resigning the judicial position (Art. 88; cf. 1858, Arts. 114, 119–120).

The Federal High Court heard civil or criminal proceedings against empleados diplomáticos [diplomatic employees] in the cases permitted by the Derecho Público de las Naciones [Public Law of Nations]; proceedings that the President ordered instituted against his Ministers; causas de responsabilidad [responsibility proceedings] against Cabinet Ministers and diplomatic agents; proceedings against altos funcionarios de los Estados [senior officers of the States] when state law so provided; civil actions against the Nation in the cases determined by law; controversies of jurisdicción o competencia [jurisdiction or competence] between employees of different States; matters submitted by the States; colisión de leyes [collisions of laws] among national statutes or between national and state statutes; controversies arising from contracts or negotiations concluded by the President; causas de presas [maritime prize causes]; and the other matters assigned by law (Art. 89; cf. 1858, Art. 113).

The law created and designated any additional tribunales nacionales [national tribunals] that proved necessary (Title VII, Art. 114; cf. 1858, Arts. 106, 117).

POW-SUB—Gobierno Subnacional [Subnational Government]

The Estados [States] composing the Unión venezolana [Venezuelan Union] mutually recognized their autonomía [autonomy], possessed equal political status, and retained in its plenitude every sovereign power not expressly delegated by the Constitution (Title II, Art. 12; cf. 1858, Art. 128, no. 11:  “To legislate upon all matters not reserved to the National Power.”).

The States undertook to organize themselves according to the principles of Gobierno Popular, Electivo, Federal Representativo, Alternativo y Responsable [Popular, Elective, Federal Representative, Alternative, and Responsible Government]; not to alienate territory to a foreign power or solicit foreign protection; cede the land required for the Distrito Federal [Federal District]; refrain from restricting the navigation of naturally navigable rivers and waters; refrain from imposing state contributions upon products already subject to national taxation before their offer for consumption; impose no duties upon goods in transit to another State; and impose no obligations upon empleados nacionales [national employees] except in their capacity as members of the State and insofar as those obligations remained compatible with national service (Art. 13, nos. 1–7; cf. 1858, Arts. 7–10, 128).

The States submitted controversies among themselves to Congreso [Congress], the Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive], or the Alta Corte Federal [Federal High Court]; could not declare or make war upon one another; and, in the absence of a designated árbitro [arbitrator], were subject to the authority of Congress.  They maintained strict neutrality in conflicts arising in other States and could neither join nor ally themselves with another Nation nor separate in a manner impairing the nationality or territory of Venezuela (Art. 13, nos. 8–10; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The States undertook to comply with and execute the Constitution, the leyes de la Unión [laws of the Union], and the decrees and orders issued within their jurisdiction by the National Executive and the Tribunales y Juzgados de la Unión [Tribunals and Courts of the Union]; incorporate extradición criminal [criminal extradition] as a political principle in their respective constitutions; and, at the request of an interested State, keep persons receiving asilo político [political asylum] at a distance from its frontier (Art. 13, nos. 11–13; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The States established no Aduanas [customs houses] for the collection of duties and permitted no enganches o levas [recruitment or levies] intended to attack the liberty, independence, or public order of another State or Nation (Art. 13, nos. 14–15; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

Each State retained the free administration of its productos naturales [natural products], including the independent administration of its salinas [saltworks].  The national revenues reserved twenty thousand pesos annually for States without mines in operation, and each State supplied its proportionate contingente [contingent] for the fuerza pública nacional [national public force] in peace or war (Art. 13, nos. 16–18; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The States neither prohibited the consumption of products from other States nor burdened them with impuestos diferenciales [differential taxes].  They left the territorios Amazonas y la Goajira [territories of Amazonas and La Goajira] under the free administration of the Gobierno de la Unión [Government of the Union] until those territories could assume the status of States, respected national urban properties, parks, and fortifications, maintained a common legislación sustantiva civil y criminal [substantive civil and criminal legislation], and established direct and secret suffrage in popular elections (Art. 13, nos. 19–23; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

Every matter not expressly assigned by the Constitution to the Administración General de la Nación [General Administration of the Nation] remained within the competence of the States (Title VII, Art. 90; cf. 1858, Art. 128, no. 11).

The Tribunales de justicia de los Estados [tribunals of justice of the States] were independent.  Causes commenced under state procedure and concerning matters within the exclusive competence of a State terminated within that State without examination by any external authority (Art. 91; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

Any act of Congress or the National Executive that violated the rights guaranteed to the States or impaired their independence was subject to a declaration of nullity by the Federal High Court upon petition by a majority of the Legislaturas de los Estados [Legislatures of the States] (Art. 92; cf. 1858, Art. 113, no. 8, concerning the nullity of provincial legislative acts contrary to the Constitution).

The Government of the Union could maintain no resident employees possessing jurisdiction or authority within the States other than the States’ own employees, except empleados de Hacienda [Treasury officers] and officers assigned to national fortifications, parques [arsenals], apostaderos [naval stations], and puertos habilitados [authorized ports], whose jurisdiction was confined to their respective functions and premises (Art. 99; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The Gobierno Nacional [National Government] could not station forces or military commanders in a State without the permission of that State’s Government (Art. 100; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

Neither the National Executive nor the Ejecutivos de los Estados [Executives of the States] could intervene by force of arms in the domestic conflicts of a State.  They could offer their buenos oficios [good offices] toward a pacific resolution (Art. 101; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

CON-AMD—Reforma de la Constitución [Constitutional Amendment]

The Constitution could be amended in whole or in part by the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] when a majority of the Legislaturas de los Estados [Legislatures of the States] requested amendment.  The amendment could encompass only the points specified in the requests submitted by the States (Title VII, Art. 122; cf. 1858, Arts. 163–164).

CIV-SUF—Sufragio [Suffrage]

The Estados [States] undertook to establish sufragio directo y secreto [direct and secret suffrage] in popular elections (Title II, Art. 13, no. 23; cf. 1858, Arts. 11, 58, 81, 124, 137).

The Nación [Nation] guaranteed libertad de sufragio [liberty of suffrage] in popular elections, subject to no restriction other than minority below eighteen years of age (Title III, Art. 14, no. 11; cf. 1858, Art. 11:  “The following are citizens and therefore possess the right to elect persons for the exercise of the public powers: 1. All Venezuelans over twenty years of age. 2. Those who, without having attained that age, are or have been married.”).

The Presidente de la Unión [President of the Union] was elected by the citizens of all the States through direct and secret voting, with each State possessing one vote determined by the relative majority of its electors (Title V, Art. 63; cont. 1858, Art. 81).

The Cámaras [chambers] assembled on the eighth day of the sessions of Congreso [Congress] to conduct the escrutinio [canvass] of the presidential returns.  The canvass could be deferred for as many as forty days to obtain missing returns and thereafter proceeded if the returns received represented at least two-thirds of the States (Art. 64; cf. 1858, Art. 83).

The candidate receiving an absolute majority of the State votes was elected.  If no candidate received that majority, Congress elected between the two candidates with the greatest number of votes, with each State expressing one congressional vote in the manner prescribed by the Constitution (Art. 65; cf. 1858, Art. 84).

No member participating in the canvass could leave the session without congressional consent (Art. 66; cont. 1858, Art. 85).

The respective States determined the manner of appointing Senadores [Senators] and Diputados [Deputies] (Title IV, Sec. I, Art. 19; cf. 1858, Arts. 49, 58).

Each State elected one Deputy for every twenty-five thousand inhabitants and another for any excess greater than twelve thousand, together with an equal number of suplentes [alternates] (Art. 20; cf. 1858, Art. 58).

Each State elected two Senadores principales [principal Senators] and two alternates (Art. 25; cont. 1858, Art. 49).

CIV-CIT—Ciudadanía [Citizenship]

The Constitution of 1864 declared venezolano [Venezuelan] every person born in the territory of Venezuela, irrespective of the nationality of the parents; children of a Venezuelan father or mother born abroad who established domicilio [domicile] in the country and expressed the will to become Venezuelan; foreigners who obtained a carta de nacionalidad [certificate of nationality]; and persons born in the Spanish-American republics or the Spanish Antilles who established residence within the Unión [Union] and expressed the will to become Venezuelan (Title I, Sec. II, Art. 6; cf. 1858, Art. 6:  “The following are Venezuelans: 1. By birth, all persons born in the territory of Venezuela; the children of a Venezuelan father or mother born in the territory of Colombia; and the children of Venezuelan parents born in any foreign country. 2. By adoption, persons born in any of the other Spanish-American republics, subject only to proving their origin and manifesting before the authority determined by law their will to become Venezuelan. 3. By naturalization, foreigners already naturalized and those who obtain a certificate of naturalization in conformity with the law.”).

Venezuelans who established domicile and acquired nationality in a foreign country did not lose their Venezuelan nationality (Art. 7; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

Venezuelan males over twenty-one years of age were elegibles [eligible] for public office, subject to the exceptions established by the Constitution (Art. 8; cf. 1858, Art. 11).

Every Venezuelan was obligated to serve the Nación [Nation] in conformity with the law and to sacrifice property and life when necessary for its defense (Art. 9; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

Venezuelans present within any Estado [State] possessed the same rights and duties as persons domiciled there (Art. 10; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The law determined the rights attached to the condición de extranjero [condition of foreign nationality] (Art. 11; cf. 1858, Art. 29:  “Foreigners in Venezuela enjoy the same individual rights and guarantees as Venezuelans and are subject, like them, to the laws and authorities of the Republic.”).

RTS-GAR—Derechos y Garantías [Rights and Guarantees]

The Constitution of 1864 guaranteed Venezuelans the inviolabilidad de la vida [inviolability of life] and abolished pena capital [capital punishment] irrespective of any law purporting to establish it (Title III, Art. 14, no. 1; cf. 1858, Art. 151:  “All confiscation, every cruel punishment, and the death penalty for political offences are abolished.  The Criminal Code shall limit, insofar as possible, the imposition of capital punishment.”).

La propiedad [property] was guaranteed with all its rights and remained subject only to contribuciones [contributions] decreed by legislative authority, decisión judicial [judicial adjudication], and appropriation for public works after indemnización [indemnification] and a juicio contradictorio [adversarial proceeding] (Art. 14, no. 2; cf. 1858, Art. 26).

The correspondencia y demás papeles [correspondence and other papers] of every person were inviolable and secret (Art. 14, no. 3; cont. 1858, Art. 25).

The hogar doméstico [domestic home] could be entered only to prevent the perpetration of an offence and in conformity with the law (Art. 14, no. 4; cf. 1858, Art. 25).

The guarantee of libertad personal [personal liberty] abolished reclutamiento forzoso [compulsory military recruitment], permanently proscribed esclavitud [slavery], declared free every enslaved person who entered Venezuelan territory, and recognized the right of every person to do or execute anything that did not injure another (Art. 14, no. 5; cf. 1858, Arts. 13, 16–17).

The libertad del pensamiento [freedom of thought] could be exercised orally or through the prensa [press], which was subject to no restriction (Art. 14, no. 6; cf. 1858, Art. 14).

Every Venezuelan possessed the liberty to travel without a passport, change domicile subject to the formalities established by the Estados [States], leave and return to the República [Republic], and carry property out of or into the country (Art. 14, no. 7; cf. 1858, Art. 17).

The libertad de industria [freedom of industry] included ownership of discoveries and productions.  The laws granted their proprietors a privilegio temporal [temporary privilege] or established indemnification when an author consented to publication (Art. 14, no. 8; cf. 1858, Art. 16; Art. 64, no. 18).

Every person possessed the libertad de reunión y asociación [liberty to assemble and associate] without arms, publicly or privately, without any right of inspection by the authorities (Art. 14, no. 9; cf. 1858, Art. 15).

Every person possessed the libertad de petición [liberty to petition] and the derecho de obtener resolución [right to obtain a resolution].  A petition could be directed to any officer, authority, or corporation; when signed by several persons, the first five answered for the authenticity of the signatures and all signatories for the truth of the facts asserted (Art. 14, no. 10; cf. 1858, Art. 15).

The libertad de sufragio [liberty of suffrage] in popular elections was subject to no restriction other than minority below eighteen years of age (Art. 14, no. 11; cf. 1858, Art. 11).

The libertad de enseñanza [freedom of education] was protected in its entire extent.  The Poder público [Public Power] was obligated to establish educación primaria y de artes y oficios [primary education and instruction in arts and trades] without charge (Art. 14, no. 12; new; cf. 1858, Art. 64, no. 17, concerning the promotion of popular education and practical industrial instruction).

The libertad religiosa [religious liberty] was guaranteed, but only the Religión Católica, Apostólica y Romana [Catholic, Apostolic, and Roman Religion] could conduct public worship outside its temples (Art. 14, no. 13; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The seguridad individual [individual security] prohibited imprisonment or arrest for debts not proceeding from fraud or offence; compulsory quartering of military personnel in private homes; trial by tribunales o comisiones especiales [special tribunals or commissions] rather than the jueces naturales [natural judges] and pre-existing laws; and arrest or imprisonment without información sumaria [preliminary information] establishing an offence punishable by a corporal penalty and a written order stating its cause, except in fraganti [in flagrante delicto] (Art. 14, no. 14.1–14.4; cf. 1858, Arts. 18–20, 25).

No person could be held incomunicado [incommunicado] for any reason or pretext; compelled to take an oath or submit to interrogation against himself, his spouse, or relatives within the prescribed degrees in a criminal cause; or continued in prison after the grounds for confinement had ceased (Art. 14, no. 14.5–14.7; cf. 1858, Arts. 20, 22, 24).

No person could receive a criminal sentence without first having been heard in conformity with law; be sentenced to a pena corporal [corporal penalty] exceeding ten years; or remain deprived of liberty for political reasons after the restoration of public order (Art. 14, no. 14.8–14.10; cf. 1858, Arts. 18, 21; Art. 151).

La igualdad [equality] required every person to be judged under the same laws and subjected to the same duties, services, and contributions.  Títulos de nobleza [titles of nobility], hereditary honors or distinctions, and offices whose emoluments continued beyond actual service were prohibited, and no official form of address other than “Ciudadano” [Citizen] and “Usted” [You] could be accorded to public employees or corporations (Art. 14, no. 15; cf. 1858, Art. 27; Arts. 154, 158).

The enumeration of national guarantees did not restrict the faculty of the States to accord additional guarantees to their inhabitants (Art. 15; new; cf. 1858, Art. 28).

State laws prescribed penalties for violations of the guarantees and established the procedures necessary to make them effective (Art. 16; cf. 1858, Art. 157).

Persons who issued, signed, executed, or ordered the execution of decrees, orders, or resolutions violating any constitutional guarantee were culpable and punishable as determined by law.  Every citizen was competent to accuse them (Art. 17; cf. 1858, Art. 157).

REG-MIL—La Fuerza Armada [The Armed Forces]

Every Venezuelan was obligated to serve the Nación [Nation] in conformity with the laws and to sacrifice property and life when necessary for its defense (Title I, Sec. II, Art. 9; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The Estados [States] provided the contingents corresponding to them for the composition of the fuerza pública nacional [national public force] in peace or war (Title II, Art. 13, no. 18; cf. 1858, Art. 146).

The Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] annually fixed the fuerza armada de mar y tierra [naval and terrestrial forces] and enacted the ordenanzas del Ejército [military ordinances] (Title IV, Sec. V, Art. 43, no. 13; cont. 1858, Art. 64, no. 8).

The Legislature established the rules for the formation and replacement of those forces (Art. 43, no. 14; cf. 1858, Art. 64, no. 9).

The national public force was divided into fuerza naval y terrestre [naval and terrestrial forces] and consisted of the milicia ciudadana [citizen militia] organized by the States under their respective laws (Title VII, Art. 93; cf. 1858, Art. 142).

The force maintained by the Unión [Union] consisted of voluntarios [volunteers] and of proportionate contingents supplied by the States through the citizens called to service under state law (Art. 94; cf. 1858, Art. 146).

In time of war, the contingents could be augmented by cuerpos de la milicia ciudadana [units of the citizen militia] until the number requested by the Gobierno Nacional [National Government] had been supplied (Art. 95; cf. 1858, Art. 146).

The National Government could replace the Jefes de la fuerza pública [commanders of the public forces] supplied by the States in the cases and through the formalities prescribed by ley militar nacional [national military law], after which replacement personnel were requested from the States (Art. 96; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

La autoridad militar y la civil [military and civil authority] could never be exercised by the same person or corporation (Art. 97; cont. 1858, Art. 145).

During national and state electoral periods, the public force was disarmed in the manner prescribed by the respective laws (Art. 111; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The fuerza armada [armed force] could not deliberate and was passive and obedient.  No cuerpo armado [armed body] could make requisitions or demand assistance of any kind except through the autoridades civiles [civil authorities] and in the manner prescribed by law (Art. 116; cf. 1858, Art. 143:  “The armed force is essentially obedient and cannot deliberate.”).

REG-REL—Religión [Religion]

The Constitution guaranteed libertad religiosa [religious liberty] but reserved public worship outside the temples to the Religión Católica, Apostólica y Romana [Catholic, Apostolic, and Roman Religion] (Title III, Art. 14, no. 13; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The Nación [Nation] exercised its right of Patronato eclesiástico [ecclesiastical patronage] in the manner determined by law (Title VII, Art. 98; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

REG-SLA—Esclavitud [Slavery]

The Constitution of 1864 permanently proscribed esclavitud [slavery] and declared free every enslaved person who entered the territory of Venezuela (Title III, Art. 14, no. 5.2–5.3; cont. 1858, Art. 13).

ECO-INF—Infraestructura [Infrastructure]

The Estados [States] undertook not to restrict by taxation or otherwise the navigation of rivers and other naturally navigable waters (Title II, Art. 13, no. 4; cf. 1858, Art. 64, no. 16).

The Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] determined matters concerning the authorization and security of puertos y costas marítimas [ports and maritime coasts] (Title IV, Sec. V, Art. 43, no. 4; cf. 1858, Art. 64, no. 16).

The Legislature created and organized oficinas de correos nacionales [national postal offices] and established charges for the carriage of correspondence (Art. 43, no. 5; cont. 1858, Art. 64, no. 5).

The Legislature approved or rejected contratos sobre obras públicas nacionales [contracts for national public works] concluded by the Presidente de la Unión [President of the Union], without which approval the contracts could not be executed (Art. 43, no. 17; cf. 1858, Art. 64, no. 16:  “To promote through laws or contracts the navigation and canalization of rivers, the opening of roads, and other works, provided that they are of national utility.”).

The Legislature promoted the prosperity of the country and its advancement in the general knowledge of the sciences and arts (Art. 43, no. 19; cf. 1858, Art. 64, no. 17).

The Nación [Nation] and the States promoted inmigración y colonización de extranjeros [immigration and foreign colonization] in conformity with their respective laws (Title VII, Art. 117; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

CON-FIN—Disposiciones Finales [Final Provisions]

Every autoridad usurpada [usurped authority] was ineffective and its acts were null.  Every decision obtained through the direct or indirect coercion of the fuerza armada [armed force] or a reunión de pueblo en actitud subversiva [assembly acting in a subversive posture] was null by operation of law (Title VII, Art. 104; cf. 1858, Arts. 155–157).

Every corporación o autoridad [corporation or public authority] was prohibited from exercising any function not conferred by the Constitution or the laws (Art. 105; cont. 1858, Art. 155).

Any citizen could accuse empleados nacionales [national employees] before the Cámara de Diputados [Chamber of Deputies], their respective superiors, or the authorities designated by law (Art. 106; cf. 1858, Arts. 147–149, 157).

Los empleados de libre nombramiento del Presidente de la Unión [employees freely appointed by the President of the Union] vacated their offices at the end of each presidential period but continued to act until replaced (Art. 107; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

International tratados de comercio y amistad [treaties of commerce and friendship] were to include a clause requiring every dispute between the contracting parties to be decided without recourse to war through arbitramento [arbitration] by one or more friendly powers (Art. 112; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

No person could exercise more than one destino de nombramiento del Congreso o del Ejecutivo Nacional .  Acceptance of another such office constituted resignation from the first, and empleados amovibles [removable employees] dependent upon the National Executive vacated their offices upon accepting service as a Senador [Senator] or Diputado [Deputy] (Art. 113; cf. 1858, Arts. 41–42).

Los empleados nacionales [national employees] could not accept gifts, offices, honors, or rewards from foreign nations without the permission of the Legislatura Nacional [National Legislature] (Art. 115; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The law prescribed the manner in which national employees, upon taking possession of their offices, swore or affirmed that they would discharge their duties (Art. 118; cf. 1858, Arts. 160–162).

The Ejecutivo Nacional [National Executive] was to negotiate with the Gobiernos de América [Governments of America] concerning pactos de Alianza o de Confederación [compacts of alliance or confederation] (Art. 119; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The Derecho de Gentes [Law of Nations] formed part of the Legislación Nacional [national legislation] and applied especially in cases of guerra civil [civil war].  Civil war could consequently be terminated by treaties among the beligerantes [belligerents], who were required to respect the humanitarian practices of Christian and civilized nations (Art. 120; new; cf. 1858: no corresponding provision).

The statutes and governmental dispositions of the States remained in force until the newly elected Legislaturas [Legislatures] brought them into conformity with the Constitution, which was required within four months (Art. 121; cf. 1858, Art. 165).

The Constitution entered into force upon its official publication in each State.  From that date, actos públicos y documentos oficiales [public acts and official documents] cited the year of the Federación [Federation], calculated from February 20, 1859, together with the year of the Constitution (Art. 123; cf. 1858, Art. 165:  “The present Constitution shall be promulgated with the solemnity and formalities established by the Decree of September 24, 1830; and shall immediately be put into execution, all laws and decrees remaining in force insofar as they do not oppose it.”).

The Constitution was decreed and signed in the hall of the Asamblea Constituyente [Constituent Assembly] at Caracas on March 28, 1864; ordered published and circulated by Juan Crisóstomo Falcón at Santa Ana de Coro on April 13, 1864; and countersigned by the Ministros de Estado [Ministers of State] at Caracas on April 22, 1864.


“The Spectacle of Commemoration”

June 20, 2026

Ricardo F. Morín
Metaphors of Silent Series, Still Twenty-five: The Spectacle of Commemoration
Oil on linen & board
12″ × 15″ × 1/2″
2012

*

 

Ricardo F. Morín

November 2025

Oakland Park, Florida

 

Plans for the semiquincentennial of the American founding now include a high-speed race in the nation’s capital city, a wrestling spectacle, the construction of a triumphal arch, and large financial contributions from sponsors whose presence will become visible as part of the spectacle.  Public celebration takes shape through the very arrangement of these events.  When remembrance is organized around competition, exhibition, and the public demonstration of force, the form of commemoration begins to influence how the memory of the nation is understood.

The present moment does not arise from one figure alone, even when one figure stands at its center.  American history shows recurring periods in which expansion unsettles expectations and produces movements that promise restoration.  Similar tensions appeared before the Civil War, during segregation after Reconstruction, and again during later populist waves.  Each period translated uncertainty into calls for protection framed as defense of the nation.

The anniversary celebrations reveal more than a schedule of events.  Contests of speed, staged confrontation, and monumental display place performance at the center of remembrance.  Strength appears before an audience and gains meaning through visibility.  Victory and endurance become signs that can be witnessed and shared.  Celebration begins to resemble enactment rather than reflection.

Exceptionalism has long existed within American public life.  At times it expresses confidence in democratic possibility.  At other moments it supports claims that the nation, or a particular group within it, stands apart from ordinary limits.  When exceptionalism merges with the belief that one identity alone represents the nation’s character, disagreement begins to change form.  Debate shifts from negotiation among citizens toward contests over who speaks for the country.

Public commemorations built around competition and confrontation gradually take on the character of ritual.  The race emphasizes speed and conquest of space.  The wrestling exhibition presents struggle in visible form.  The monumental arch promises endurance beyond the present moment.  Seen together, the events place strength on display before an audience, allowing performance itself to establish recognition without argument.

Around the same moment, political leaders describe strength and force as the language understood by the world.  The statement reflects what the celebrations already display: power presented as spectacle and endurance as proof of legitimacy.  Ritual seeks permanence.  Monumental construction turns temporary display into physical presence.  Naming monuments after a living political leader departs from earlier commemorative habits that allowed time and collective judgment to determine historical recognition.

Executive decisions that advance commemorative construction place monumentality alongside celebration.  Structures, names, and ceremonies reinforce one another.  Through repetition and visibility, a leader’s presence moves from political contest into historical space.

Democratic life ordinarily accepts disagreement as part of common participation.  Citizens argue, negotiate, and change positions while they recognize one another as members of the same political community.  When rhetoric presents one movement as the true voice of the nation, disagreement begins to appear differently.  Opponents are described less as participants in debate and more as obstacles to survival.

The change becomes visible in debates over immigration.  Public discussion often reduces complex realities into a single category, merging legal processes, undocumented status, and criminal accusation into one narrative.  Distinctions that once guided policy discussion give way to simplified frames that emphasize exclusion.

Economic pressure forms part of the same landscape.  Unionized workers experience competition when employers hire cheaper labor.  These concerns arise from observable changes in employment practice.  At the same time, uneven enforcement and political framing can convert economic tension into cultural confrontation.  Under such conditions, exclusion begins to function as a sign of strength rather than as a policy choice.

Patterns that begin in policy debate extend into public celebration.  Financial patronage connects wealth to the commemorative program.  Economic power becomes linked to symbolic expression.  Participation becomes visible alignment, and spectacle reinforces authority in ways that extend beyond the commemorative stage into other arenas of governance.

Questions about election control now move beyond ordinary debate.  In the United States, counties and states traditionally administer elections under a dispersed constitutional structure.  Local officials oversee registration, voting procedures, counting, and certification.  Claims that local voting systems cannot be trusted challenge this long-standing arrangement.  A majority that asserts control over the narrative of legitimacy can extend that control toward the mechanisms that define participation itself.  When authority shifts away from local and state systems toward centralized direction, power moves with it.  The struggle turns toward who determines the rules of inclusion and exclusion within the constitutional voting system.

Trade policy and alliance relations reflect the same movement beyond domestic institutions.  Tariffs imposed through delegated executive authority shift economic relationships away from negotiated reciprocity toward unilateral assertion.  Congress retains formal authority over trade, yet statutory delegation allows the executive to act faster than legislative review.  Legal procedure remains in place, while the practical balance between branches changes through speed and concentration of decision-making.

Strain within long-standing alliances follows a similar pattern.  Partnerships built on shared limits and mutual confidence give way to expectations shaped by pressure and leverage.  External posture begins to mirror internal change and extends a preference for centralized authority into the sphere of international relations.  The external arena does not introduce a new direction;  it reveals the same logic already present domestically.

The consequence reaches beyond any single arena.  When control concentrates within domestic institutions, and external relations begin to follow the same pattern of unilateral assertion, the foundation of republican governance changes because federalism and partnership both depend upon distributed authority.  Democratic systems rely on limits that prevent any single power from defining legitimacy alone, whether within elections or in relations with other nations.  Governance may continue in form, yet the structure that once restrained power may no longer operate in the same way.  The transformation appears gradual rather than sudden and unfolds through practice rather than declaration.

American history shows that transitions toward concentrated authority do not announce themselves in advance.  Public celebration and institutional change unfold together and appear ordinary to those who witness them.  Authority gathers through accepted practices, and institutions continue to operate even as their balance shifts.  The movement toward autocracy becomes visible when concentration of power reshapes participation and limits dissent without formal rupture.  A totalitarian State does not begin with declaration;  it emerges when control over political life becomes normalized and the structures that once restrained authority cease to function as limits.


“Unmasking Disappointment: Series V”

March 25, 2026

*

“Geometric Allegory” digital painting 2023 by Ricardo Morin (American visual artist born in Venezuela–1954)

*

This installment continues Chapter XII, “The Fourth Sign,” following the initial discussion of Autocracy (§§ 1–9).    It cattends to Venezuela and examines §§ 10–25 in which the earlier framework is applied to a specific national case.    The chapter concludes in a separate installment devoted to The Asymmetry of Sanctions (§§ 26–34).

Ricardo F. Morín, December 26, 2025, Oakland Park, Florida.

Venezuela

10

To comprehend the practical implications of autocracy and its concentration of power, I defer to Rafael Arráiz Lucca’s book, Venezuela:   1830 a nuestros días:   Breve historia política [2016].    Here, Arráiz Lucca provides a comprehensive history of Venezuela from independence to today. [1]   He examines political, economic, and social changes that have shaped the nation.    He traces early struggles and the rise of caudillos, and has treated Hugo Chávez’s rise to power, his ideology, and the effects of his policies on society.   He has also examined the continuing influence of Chávez under Nicolás Maduro.    In his view, both Chávez and Maduro have exemplified regimes that have centralized power and suppressed dissent.

11

The country’s political trajectory has been determined by its enduring history of military rule.   Since independence in 1811, twenty-five military officers have held the presidency, presided over 172 years of governance, and entrenched the military’s influence in the nation’s political fabric. [2]   The transition to representative democracy in 1961 marked a significant shift, which introduced in thirty-eight-years of civilian-led stability under the Punto Fijo Pact (see Chapter XI).   This civilian era, however, was not free from upheaval.   The 1989 Caracazo riots, coupled with the failed coup attempt by Hugo Chávez in 1992, revealed the fragility of civilian democracy and the persistent appeal of military leadership in moments of crisis. [3][4]

12

The Caracazo riots and the subsequent repression had exposed deep societal fractures that undermined confidence in civilian governance.   For many, the chaos and disillusionment restored the perception of the military as a force of order and stability, a perception grounded in the nation’s long history of caudillo leadership.   Chávez’s rise can be understood as a direct consequence of this historical legacy:   a charismatic military figure presenting himself as the answer to the failures of civilian politics.   The violent repression following the riots, coupled with the systemic inability to address the economic and social inequities they symbolized, prepared the conditions for a return to autocratic tendencies, concealed within populist rhetoric.   This marked the beginning of a new authoritarian era, shaped not only by the fractures of the present but also by legacies of the past.

13

The presidency of Hugo Chávez continued the tradition of authoritarianism that had characterized the regime of General Marcos Pérez Jiménez. [5]    As in the era of Pérez Jiménez, Chávez depended upon oil to finance his policies. [6]

14

For Hugo Chávez, “participatory democracy” directed toward empowering marginalized groups.   He created community councils and social missions, which became instruments of his political control—the so-called Bolivarian ideology.    Participation thereinwas conditioned upon loyalty to Chávez, which ultimately led to the marginalization of people opposed to his policies.   His blend of populism and authoritarianism framed dissent as being unpatriotic and thus hindered national progress.   This approach enabled him to diminish the power of law; the legislative and judicial branches of government became dependent on the executive.

15

With the endorsement of Nicolás Maduro by Hugo Chávez in 2012, the country advanced further toward authoritarianism. [7]  Opposition parties such as Vente Venezuela, Primero de Justicia, Un Nuevo Tiempo, and Voluntad Popular accused Chávez and Maduro of manipulating the Consejo Nacional Electoral[8][9][10][11][12]

16

After the death of Chávez, Maduro faced similar accusations in the 2013 and 2018 elections.   The Organization of American States, the Lima Group, the International Contact Group, and the Group of Seven concurred. [13][14][15]   Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have also questioned his legitimacy. [16][17]    One exception is  the United Nations’ Security Council debate (press release SC/13719), which urged Venezuelans to resolve their crisis internally. [18][19]

17

Following Venezuela’s 2016 suspension from Mercosur, Latin American responses varied and then changed as political administrations changed. [20][21]  Initially, Argentina favored the measures by the Organization of American States to apply diplomatic pressure on Venezuela and sought to address the political and humanitarian crises there. [22]    It also recognized Juan Guaidó as the legitimate president, though in 2019, it changed and became an advocate for mediation.   At first, Brazil recognized Guaidó and was for sanctions against the Venezuelan government, and then in 2023 requested for mediation. [23]   Between 2018–22, Colombia accused the Maduro regime of drug trafficking and of giving support to the guerrilla groups, the National Liberation Army and the Revolutionary Armed Forces; Colombia severed diplomatic relations. [24]    Later, in 2022, a new administration restored diplomatic relations and promoted non-intervention.   Chile has consistently urged sanctions against Maduro’s government, and even referred Venezuela to the International Criminal Court (ICC). [25][26]  Peru expelled Venezuela’s ambassador:   The immediate trigger for the expulsion was Venezuela’s Tribunal Supremo de Justicia’s move to dissolve the opposition-controlled Asamblea Nacional, which Peru saw as a step toward authoritarian control. [27]    As all other members of the Lima Group did, Peru regularized the status of Venezuelan migrants.   In the beginning, Mexico condemned the human rights abuses in Venezuela and called for the release of all political prisoners, but, in 2018, it adopted a non-interventional approach and in 2022 offered mediation as the only recourse. [28][29][30]

18

Ahead of the 2024 presidential election, opposition leader María Corina Machado was disqualified after having won her coalition’s primary. [31]  The Tribunal Supremo de Justicia based its decision on her alleged support of U.S. sanctions, supposed corruption, and accusations holding her responsible for losses related to the American subsidiary Citgo of the Venezuelan State-owned oil and natural gas company:   Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA).   Machado’s denial of access to the allegations against her was a blatant violation of due process.   Her disqualification left Edmundo González Urrutia as the unified opposition candidate. [32]

19

Both campaigns engaged in tactics of intimidation.   González’s coalition deployed 200,000 observers across 16,000 voting centers and Maduro’s administration intensified media censorship and repression.   After Maduro declared victory, protests resulted in extrajudicial killings, arrests, and crackdowns on independent media. [33]

20

González’s coalition collaborated with international observers, including the Organization of American States, the European Union Electoral Observation Mission, the Carter Center, and the United States Mission to the United Nations, to monitor irregularities. [34][35][36][37]   The government, however, withheld disaggregated voting data critical for audits—supposedly because the data had been hacked—and imposed travel restrictions on foreign observers. [38]    The Carter Center criticized the elections for failing to meet international standards of transparency, fairness, and impartiality. [39]

21

Maduro accused both Machado and González of having incited unrest and announced investigations into the crimes of “usurpation of functions” and “military insurrection,” each carrying thirty-year prison sentences.   On August 8, 2024, González left for Spain after the government had granted him safe passage.

22

To understand Venezuela’s political and institutional landscape, one must examine how global indices assess the state of its democracy.    The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index, the Freedom House’s Global Freedom Index, and the Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index all provide distinct metrics illuminating Venezuela’s democratic decline under Nicolás Maduro.

23

The Democracy Index ranks countries with higher scores as more democratic.    Freedom House and Transparency International diverge from this by using lower scores to indicate worse outcomes, with lower numbers signifying less freedom and higher corruption.

24

In the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index, Venezuela ranked as the least democratic country in South America in 2008; in 2022, it ranked 147th out of a total of 167 countries. [40]   Likewise, in 2023, Freedom House’s Global Freedom Index finds that Venezuela scored low both as a democracy and high corruption, while in its Corruption Perceptions Index Venezuela scored 13 out of 100 and was positioned as one of the most corrupt nations globally. [41]

25

Additionally, a report by Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index for the period from 2012 to 2023 has highlighted the severe corruption to be found in Venezuela. [42]   In its 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index, out of 180 countries, Venezuela received a score of 13 out of 100, ranking 177th.   These indicators present a clear picture of Venezuelan authoritarianism and of the deterioration of its political landscape in recent years.

~


Endnotes

§ 10

  • [1]    Rafael Arráiz Lucca, Venezuela:    1830 a nuestros días:    Breve historia política. (Caracas:    Editorial Alfa, 2016), 15-151, 212-37.

§ 11

  • [2]   José Gregorio Petit Primera, ”Presidentes de Venezuela (1811-2012).   Un análisis estadístico-descriptivo,” Revista Venezolana:   Análisis de Coyuntura (Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela, XXII-1, 2016), 47-56.
  • [3]   The Punto Fijo Pact was a political agreement signed by the three predominant political parties—Acción Democrática (AD), Comité de Organización Política Electoral Independiente (COPEI), and Unión Republicana Democrática (URD)—at the residence of Rafael Caldera (COPEI): Punto Fijo.   The pact aimed to stabilize the country after the fall of dictator Marcos Pérez Jiménez [1952-1958] by ensuring democratic alternation of power, institutional continuity, and preventing single-party rule.   While it contributed to political stability and a peaceful transition to democracy, critics argue that it also entrenched elite dominance, marginalized smaller parties, and fostered systemic corruption.    As a foundational element in Venezuela’s post-dictatorship political landscape, the agreement shaped the nation’s governance for decades.   Its legacy, however, is marked by political divisions, as the pact’s structure increasingly excluded some groups and led to dissatisfaction among factions.    This period reflects both the challenges and achievements of Venezuela’s efforts to establish a stable and inclusive democracy.
  • [4]   Rafael Arráiz Lucca, “February 4, 1992: The Day Venezuelans Learned the Name ‘Hugo Chávez,” (Caracas Chronicles, February 04, 2019). https://www.caracaschronicles.com/2019/02/04/february-4-1992-the-day-venezuelans-learned-the-name-hugo-chavez/

§ 13

  • [5]   Fredy Rincón Noriega, El Nuevo Ideal Nacional y los planes Económicos- Militares de Pérez Jiménez 1952-1957 (Caracas: Ediciones Centauro, 1981)–Kindle Edition
  • Judith Ewell, The Indictment of a Dictator: The Extradition and Trial of Marcos Perez (College Station:  A&M University Press, 1981).
  • [6]   Both leaders have employed centralized power and state control over resources, though their approaches differed.   Pérez Jiménez emphasized technocratic and infrastructural development.    His policies, as outlined in the Nuevo Ideal Nacional, focused on large-scale construction projects and urban modernization.    These initiatives promoted economic growth, but their benefit was directed towards the middle and upper classes.    Chávez, on the other hand, pursued a blend of populism and socialism aimed at redistributing oil wealth through extensive social programs for the poor.    These policies increased the State’s dependence on oil revenues and left the country vulnerable to market fluctuations.

§ 15

§ 16

  • [13]   The Lima Group, formed in August 2017, includes: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Guyana, and St. Lucia.
  • [14]   The International Contact Group (the European Union, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Uruguay) advocates for credible elections and have voiced concerns about the Consejo Nacional Electoral’s impartiality.
  • [15]   Group of Seven (G7)–Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States–has condemned electoral irregularities in Venezuela and called for independent oversight.  Allegations of voter registration manipulation by the Consejo Nacional Electoral, has heightened suspicions of vote tampering.
  • [16]    Venezuela’s Humanitarian Crisis:    Severe Medical and Food Shortages, Inadequate and Repressive Government Response, Human Rights Watch, October 24, 2016. https://www.hrw.org/report/2016/10/24/venezuelas-humanitarian-crisis/severe-medical-and-food-shortages-inadequate-and
  • [17]   “Venezuela: New research shows how calculated repression by Maduro government could constitute the crime against humanity of persecution,” Amnesty International, February 10, 2022. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/02/venezuela-calculated-repression-maduro-government/
  • [18]   Venezuelans Must Resolve Crisis Themselves, Security Council Delegates Agree while Differing over Legitimacy of Contending Parties. Briefing on Weekend Incidents Biased, Says Foreign Minister as Speakers for United States, Russian Federation Exchange Barbs,” United Nations: Meetings Coverage and Press Releases, 8472nd Meeting, SC/13719, February 26, 2019. https://press.un.org/en/2019/sc13719.doc.htm
  • [19]   In February 2019, a United Nations Security Council Report debated whether to supervise elections or mediate between Maduro’s government and the opposition. Ultimately, the Council upheld a non-interventionist approach while offering to mediate.

§ 17

§ 18

§ 19

§ 20

§ 24

§ 25


“ACTIVISM”

February 1, 2026

*

Ricardo F. Morín
Landscape II
18″ x 24″
Oil on board
2000

The word activism now functions in public language as a device for disqualification rather than description.  It appears when someone protests, reports, or questions how power is being exercised.  The word does not explain what occurred or whether rules were followed.  It assigns suspicion to the person who speaks.  Once the word enters a sentence, attention shifts from facts to motive, and inquiry is halted before it can proceed.

This linguistic use of activism depends on presenting the existing order as beyond legitimate question.  What already exists is described as normal, lawful, and necessary.  What challenges it is labeled activism.  The structure of the sentence assumes that authority does not need to justify itself, while those affected by authority do.  Language thus distributes legitimacy in advance and shields power from explanation.

Recent executive orders on immigration make this mechanism concrete and visible.  Policies once described as border enforcement have been extended deep into the interior of the country.  Federal agents now operate in cities, towns, workplaces, and private homes far from any border.  This shift is not merely about location.  It changes who is exposed to the power of the State and under what assumptions.

Interior immigration enforcement now treats distinct categories of people as interchangeable in practice.  The stated objective is to arrest people with criminal records and to take custody of those already detained.  At the same time, operations are designed to collect anyone present, nearby, or loosely associated.  Non-criminal residents are taken alongside those accused of crimes.  Long-term residents, elderly people, workers with families, and even citizens are drawn into the same encounters.  Legal distinctions remain on paper but collapse in execution.

This operational blending is presented by authorities as coherent, but its coherence is asserted rather than demonstrated.  Arresting a person convicted of a violent offense and detaining a neighbor with no criminal history are described as parts of a single mission.  The language suggests unity and purpose.  In reality, different objectives are combined for scale, not clarity.  The result is that no one can know where enforcement ends, and uncertainty itself becomes the governing condition.

Profiling supplies the practical method by which interior enforcement sustains itself.  Away from the border, agents cannot rely on crossings or documented violations.  They rely instead on appearance, accent, location, or association.  People are stopped not because of what they have done, but because of what they are assumed to be.  Citizenship, residency, and legality cease to function as reliable protections at the moment of encounter.

Community response emerges when these practices become visible in daily life.  In places such as Montana, residents have watched neighbors taken from their homes in early hours, elderly people removed while barely dressed, children detained alongside adults, and towns unsettled by large federal deployments.  In other parts of the country, citizens have died during enforcement operations.  As such events repeat, they cease to appear exceptional and begin to register as conditions people are expected to endure.

Public protest arises from this recognition of harm rather than from ideological performance.  People gather, speak, and demand answers because something familiar has been crossed.  Their response is rooted in what they have seen and experienced.  Yet this response is often dismissed as activism, a term that avoids addressing the conduct that provoked it and instead questions whether reaction itself was permissible.

The label activism redirects responsibility away from state action and toward civic response.  The word does not ask whether enforcement was lawful, proportionate, or humane.  It asks whether people should have objected.  In doing so, the conduct of authority recedes from scrutiny while dissent becomes the subject of judgment.  Accountability is reversed.

The same linguistic device is applied to journalism that documents these events.  When reporters record raids, publish testimony, or show images of arrests, the work is sometimes dismissed as activist reporting.  The accusation is not that the facts are false, but that they were assembled with improper intent.  Accuracy is displaced by suspicion, and the act of documentation itself is treated as a breach.

This pattern of language gradually alters how democracy is understood.  Democratic life depends on questioning authority, reviewing decisions, and objecting when harm occurs.  Under the grammar of activism, these actions are treated as disruptions.  Quiet acceptance is praised.  Scrutiny is framed as excess.  Stability is elevated above fairness.

The ethical consequence of this shift is the denial of ordinary civic agency.  When workers, parents, and neighbors are told that speaking up makes them activists, they are no longer addressed as reasoning citizens.  They are treated as obstacles to be managed.  Authority ceases to explain itself and instead asserts continuity as its own justification.

A narrowing definition of national belonging advances alongside this linguistic shift.  Belonging is measured by silence.  Loyalty is measured by compliance.  Difference is treated as threat.  Supremacy enters not through open declaration, but through repetition, as people are asked again and again to accept what they are no longer permitted to question.

A plural society cannot endure under a grammar that treats challenge as deviance.  Such a society does not depend on shared origin, culture, or uniform belief.  It depends on the recognition that no single group owns the meaning of the nation.  When language is used to dismiss those who expose harm or demand explanation, democracy is not defended.  It is quietly redefined against the people it exists to serve.


*

Ricardo F. Morín, February 1, 2026, Oakland Park, Florida.


“Governing by Exception: The American Executive”

November 18, 2025

*

Ricardo Morín
Untitled #3: Governing by Exception
10″x12″
Watercolor
2003

By Ricardo F. Morín

October 10, 2025

Bala Cynwyd, Pa

Power unexamined becomes its own justification—Anonymous civic maxim.

Prologue

Governance is the moral discipline of order—the effort to keep authority aligned with conscience so that power remains a function of justice, not an instrument of self-interest.  Government enacts that discipline:   necessary, fallible, and ever in danger of mistaking permanence for legitimacy.


1

Political history rarely unfolds as a straight line.  It accumulates as a palimpsest in which new regimes—imperial, republican, authoritarian, and democratic—write their doctrines over the residues of previous orders.   Institutions and laws rarely vanish; they survive as layers of precedent and practice that later governments reinterpret to serve new purposes.   The present political moment in the United States should be examined within that structure of accumulation.  What appears to be a radical break with constitutional tradition is, in fact, the latest rewriting of an existing template.   The mechanisms that once safeguarded the republic now expand the reach of executive power; these mechanisms reveal how continuity and rupture coexist in the same act.

2

During the first half year of the Trump administration’s return to office, the political system of the United States has entered a state of controlled dislocation.  Executive directives have overridden congressional appropriations, suspended statutory programs, and reorganized entire departments under provisional authority.   A government shutdown, declared an administrative necessity, has become a method for restructuring the State.   Mass dismissals, selective funding freezes, and the redefinition of agency mandates have become coordinated tools for concentrating authority in the executive branch.  These are not isolated disputes between branches of government.  These actions reveal a coherent strategy of reconfiguration, executed through administrative acts that appear lawful but are designed to disfigure the balance of powers from within.

3

The guiding principle of this transformation is the normalization of exception.   Powers that earlier generations considered temporary—emergency measures to be used only under extreme threat—have become ordinary instruments of governance.  The invocation of the Insurrection Act, intended for rebellion or lawless obstruction, now functions as justification for domestic military deployment in states governed by political opposition.  The use of this authority is framed as a response to rising crime, even when verified data show a national decline.   In this inversion of logic, the declaration of emergency precedes its necessity.   The government generates the crisis it claims to confront and allows coercive measures to appear both inevitable and legitimate. What dissolves in this process is not only institutional restraint but the moral discipline of order—the very principle that once bound authority to conscience: i.e. the active faculty of perception through which recognition becomes responsibility and seeing acquires ethical weight.

4

This redefinition of authority as authoritarianism is reinforced by judicial doctrine.   The Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Trump v. United States established that a president enjoys absolute immunity for “core official acts” and presumptive immunity for all other actions undertaken in an official capacity.  This ruling altered the meaning of accountability.  It placed the office of the president above ordinary legal scrutiny by presuming legality wherever official duty could be claimed.   The decision inverted the constitutional order that once defined the presidency as a position constrained by law.  Under this new interpretation, legality flows from function rather than from statute.   The Court did not invent executive supremacy; it legalized its evolution.   By insulating the executive office from the consequences of its acts, the judiciary, perhaps unintentionally, became an instrument of the very transformation it was designed to prevent.

5

Measured against the triad of government powers—legislative, executive, and judicial—the present equilibrium reveals a pronounced distortion.   Each branch retains its formal outline, yet its interior authority has thinned. Congress’s control of the purse has been undermined by impoundment and selective disbursement.   Administrative agencies have been hollowed out through abrupt firings and structural reorganizations.   The judiciary, bound by its own doctrines of deference and immunity, finds itself unable to intervene effectively.   What remains of institutional balance depends less on constitutional principle than on administrative inertia.  The machinery of government continues to function, but its continuity now rests on habit rather than on law.

6

This condition does not yet constitute overt dictatorship.  It represents a subtler phenomenon—a system that operates through legal forms but concentrates power in practice.   Authority remains constitutional in appearance while using those same procedures to entrench unilateral control.  The pattern can be recognized not through proclamations but through measurable actions:   decrees replacing legislation, “temporary” orders renewed without expiration, funds withheld from political adversaries, and federal troops dispatched to jurisdictions where disorder has not been empirically established.   Each measure, taken alone, seems limited and justified.   Together they form an architecture of exception—an invisible framework that reorganizes power without declaring revolution. Beneath this architecture lies the decline of the moral discipline of order, where legality endures but conscience recedes.

7

A forensic approach must therefore focus not on accusation but on diagnosis.  The purpose is to identify where practice diverges from principle, and where legal continuity conceals political mutation.  The question is not whether democracy has vanished, but how far the republic has drifted from its own operational norms.   This drift can be measured empirically through ordinary data:  the number of appropriations ignored or delayed, the duration and scope of emergency declarations, the ratio of confirmed officials to acting appointees, and the frequency with which presidential immunity is invoked to block review.   Each indicator marks a step away from the rule of shared power that defines constitutional democracy.

8

The concept of the republic, in its classical and Enlightenment sense, presupposed a balance between power and virtue:   the rule of law safeguarded by citizens free from dependence.   In contemporary practice, that idea has been reduced to a partisan label.   The republicanism that once demanded civic responsibility now coexists with mechanisms—PAC financing (Political Action Committee: An organization that raises and spends money to elect political candidates), factional loyalty, corporate influence—that transform governance into an instrument of private interest.   Thus the very word that once signified restraint now conceals its opposite:   a system where representation serves its sponsors more faithfully than its citizens.

9

History suggests that constitutional systems rarely collapse through open defiance.  They decline through adaptation.   The Roman Republic did not abolish its institutions; it gradually converted them into imperial offices.   Modern democracies follow similar paths when crisis is used to justify the consolidation of power.  Executive authority expands, legislative restraint weakens, and judicial caution hardens into complicity.  The American case fits this pattern.   The existing framework of the Constitution remains in place, yet its meaning shifts incrementally through interpretation, precedent, and administrative habit.  The transformation proceeds without formal amendment because each deviation is defended as continuity.

10

The metrics of decline are structural rather than moral.   When legality depends on will—the self-legitimating impulse of power once detached from moral accountability—and will is shielded from scrutiny, the architecture of restraint loses coherence.   Here the moral discipline of governance yields to the self-justifying logic of power.   What follows is not anarchy but organized dislocation—a condition in which institutions operate as before yet serve opposite purposes; in truth it is anarchy disguised as its own absence.   Procedures are observed; substance is inverted.   The outward appearance of democracy persists, while its inner logic is replaced by a system that governs through perpetual exception.

11

The task for observers and citizens alike is not to forecast collapse but to recognize mutation.  Political systems rarely announce their turning points; they disguise themselves as routine.  The test of civic intelligence is the capacity to detect when law becomes vocabulary, when oversight becomes performance, and when the state of exception ceases to be temporary.   The republic continues to function, but it functions under altered premises.   The preservation of legality therefore depends not only on the design of institutions but also on the vigilance of those who interpret them. Justice endures only where institutions remember that they exist to limit power, defend the vulnerable, and preserve the moral foundation from which authority derives its right to act.

12

The endurance of the republic will therefore depend not on the spectacle of its elections but on the recovery of its first obligation:   to keep authority answerable to the moral idea from which it draws its right to act.   Justice endures only where institutions remember that they exist to limit power, defend the vulnerable, and preserve the moral discipline of order through which freedom remains lawful and law remains human.   When that memory fades, what remains is administration without soul—a government still standing, but no longer governing.